- Supports the checklist requirement to keep report-ready evidence, monitoring outputs, user feedback, compliance-function records, and non-confidential summaries.
"underlying raw data ready to be made available"
Check a designated gatekeeper's core platform services against the Digital Markets Act obligations that matter operationally: Articles 5, 6 and 7, Article 11 reporting evidence, Article 13 anti-circumvention, and Article 28 compliance governance.
Use one row per designated core platform service and obligation so legal, product, engineering, data, developer relations, advertising, and compliance-function owners can prove what changed and where the evidence lives.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
This checklist is for DMA work after an undertaking has been designated as a gatekeeper and a core platform service has been listed in the designation decision. It turns the Article 5, 6 and 7 obligations into owner, control, evidence, and review fields that can feed the Article 11 compliance report and the non-confidential summary.
Start with the Commission designation decision, not with a product roadmap label. Article 3 requires the designation decision to list the relevant core platform services, and Article 5, Article 6 and Article 7 apply with respect to each listed service.
A checklist row should be opened only when it names the designated undertaking, the listed core platform service, the obligation article and paragraph, the affected business-user or end-user group, and the system or policy owner that can change the service.
Article 5 obligations are directly framed as conduct rules. The checklist should translate each relevant paragraph into an enforceable product, commercial, advertising, payments, account, or complaint-handling control.
Do not close an Article 5 row with a policy statement alone. The row should show the user journey, contract term, system rule, monitoring metric, and exception path that make the obligation effective.
Article 6 contains obligations that often need engineering, data, ranking, default-setting, interoperability, portability, and access-control evidence. Article 7 adds a specific interoperability regime for number-independent interpersonal communications services where that service is listed in the designation decision.
For each technical access obligation, the owner field should name both the policy approver and the system team that can prove the API, interface, data export, ranking change, or default-setting change works in production.
Article 11 requires a detailed and transparent report describing the measures implemented to ensure compliance with Articles 5, 6 and 7, plus a non-confidential summary. The Commission template makes the evidence standard concrete: each obligation and each core platform service needs a standalone explanation with supporting data and internal documents.
The evidence pack should be usable by the compliance function, management body, external counsel or technical experts, and Commission reviewers without relying on undocumented project history.
A DMA checklist row should not close merely because a control exists. Article 8 requires the gatekeeper to ensure and demonstrate effective compliance, and Article 13 prohibits contractual, commercial, technical, interface-design, or other behaviour that undermines effective compliance.
Use these gates whenever a feature ships, a policy changes, an API is launched or restricted, a business-user complaint identifies friction, or a Commission request or specification process affects the row.
Sorena can help structure DMA gatekeeper questions into obligation rows, owner assignments, source citations, evidence requests, and report-ready summaries for each designated core platform service.
Ask cited questions about DMA gatekeeper obligations, core platform service scope, Article 11 evidence, and interoperability or data-access controls.
Review DMA checklist gaps, owner fields, and report evidence for designated core platform services with Sorena.
"underlying raw data ready to be made available"
"23 core platform services provided by those gatekeepers are currently designated"
"free and effective interoperability with hardware and software features"
"Article 6(7) - Interoperability with OS features"
"shall not engage in any behaviour that undermines effective compliance"