CalendarEU DMA

EU Digital Markets Act deadlines and compliance calendar

Use this DMA calendar to track the official clocks that start when a core platform service meets gatekeeper thresholds, is designated, must report compliance, or triggers merger and audit reporting.

The page focuses on source-grounded triggers: Article 3 notification and designation, the six-month obligation start, Article 11 compliance reports, Article 14 concentration notices, Article 15 profiling audits, and preparation evidence.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 9, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
6

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated May 9, 2026
Overview

The DMA calendar is trigger-based. Do not start with fixed annual dates unless a designation decision, concentration, audit, or report anniversary gives you one. Start with the Article 3 threshold assessment, then track notification, completeness, designation, the six-month obligation clock, Article 11 reporting, Article 14 concentration notices, Article 15 profiling audits, and annual report updates. Timings in this page are source-linked; verify current legal source language before implementation decisions.

Section 1

DMA calendar anchors to track

The core DMA deadline chain starts when an undertaking providing core platform services meets the Article 3(2) thresholds. The undertaking must notify the Commission without delay and in any event within 2 months after those thresholds are met.

The Commission designates an undertaking as a gatekeeper without undue delay and at the latest within 45 working days after receiving complete information. Once a core platform service is listed in the designation decision, the gatekeeper has 6 months to comply with Articles 5, 6 and 7 for that listed service.

DMA timing also includes concentration and audit duties. A gatekeeper must inform the Commission of any intended concentration that meets Article 14's scope before implementation and, within 2 months of implementing a concentration, notify additional core platform services that meet Article 3(2)(b). Within 6 months after designation, a gatekeeper must submit the Article 15 audited description of profiling techniques for consumers and then update that description and the public overview at least annually.

  • Threshold trigger: if the Article 3(2) thresholds are met, open a 2-month notification deadline and prepare the Form GD evidence pack.
  • Further-service trigger: if an already designated gatekeeper has another core platform service meeting the relevant thresholds, open a separate 2-month notification deadline for that service.
  • Completeness trigger: treat the 45-working-day Commission designation clock as running from complete information, not from a materially incomplete submission.
  • Designation trigger: when the decision lists a core platform service, open the 6-month implementation clock for Articles 5, 6 and 7.
  • Reporting trigger: every gatekeeper must provide the Article 11 compliance report and non-confidential summary within 6 months after designation and update the report at least annually.
  • Concentration trigger: if a gatekeeper plans a concentration involving core platform services or other digital-sector services, record the Article 14 notice before implementation and monitor the 2-month follow-up deadline for any newly threshold-crossing core platform services.
  • Profiling audit trigger: within 6 months after designation, calendar the Article 15 audited description of techniques for profiling of consumers and the annual update of that description and overview.
  • Status-review trigger: track Commission changes to the gatekeeper list, because the Commission publishes and updates gatekeepers and listed core platform services on an ongoing basis.
Section 2

Calendar rows for notification and designation

Use one calendar row per core platform service, including plausible alternative service delineations. The notification workstream should be complete enough for the Commission to assess thresholds, and it should preserve a clean record of estimates, assumptions, supporting documents, and any substantiated Article 3(5) arguments.

The implementing regulation matters for dates because an incomplete notification can delay the effective date of the submission. If material facts change or new information appears while the notification is under review, the undertaking must communicate it without undue delay.

  • Row title: core platform service, service delineation, and whether the undertaking is already designated for another service.
  • Clock start: date the Article 3(2) thresholds were met or date the further core platform service satisfied the relevant thresholds.
  • Deadline rule: notification without delay and in any event within 2 months after the threshold trigger.
  • Submission package: Form GD, threshold data, supporting documents, authorised signatory proof, and separate annexes for Article 3(5) substantiated arguments if used.
  • Completeness control: record Commission requests for missing information and the date complete information was received or no longer required.
  • Designation target: 45 working days from complete information for the Commission designation decision, unless the case follows another DMA procedure grounded in the regulation.
Section 3

Six-month obligation workback after designation

The designation decision is the practical hand-off from legal assessment to implementation. For each listed core platform service, create a six-month workback that maps every applicable Article 5, 6 and 7 obligation to a product owner, engineering owner, policy owner, evidence owner, and release date.

Do not treat the six-month date as only a report deadline. Article 3(10) starts the compliance clock for the listed service, and Article 8 requires the gatekeeper to ensure and demonstrate effective compliance with the obligations.

  • At designation: freeze the designation decision, listed services, applicable Article 5, 6 and 7 obligations, and any obligation-specific non-applicability rationale.
  • Before implementation: define service scope, affected user journeys, business-user flows, data flows, APIs, ranking systems, ads systems, consent prompts, and contractual terms that may need changes.
  • Design approval: approve implementation designs, security and privacy constraints, testing plans, user or business-user consultation plans, and evidence requirements.
  • Implementation record: collect dated proof of product, technical, policy, and terms changes for each obligation.
  • Effectiveness check: test using indicators appropriate to the measure, such as consent rates, choice-screen interaction, access requests, switch counts, or business-user feedback where relevant.
  • Report closeout: prepare the Article 11 report annexes and non-confidential summary so the reporting package matches the measures actually implemented by the six-month deadline.
Section 4

Article 11 reporting cadence

Article 11 creates a recurring reporting calendar. The first compliance report is due within 6 months after designation, together with a non-confidential summary. After that, the gatekeeper must update the report at least annually.

The Commission template asks gatekeepers that previously submitted a report to highlight differences from the previous report and summary, for example by submitting a redline version in addition to a clean version. This makes the annual update a change-control exercise, not just a republication task.

  • Initial due date: designation date plus 6 months for the Article 11 compliance report and non-confidential summary.
  • Annual cadence: set a report anniversary and an internal workback for evidence refresh, redline review, confidentiality review, and approval.
  • Required structure: separate and standalone annexes for each designated core platform service and each applicable Article 5, 6 and 7 obligation.
  • Compliance statement: include the undertaking's confirmation as of a specific date for each obligation and explain how the measure ensures compliance.
  • Evidence refresh: update implementation dates, technical changes, user-interface changes, market testing, consultation, feedback, indicators, and data-access procedures where they changed.
  • Format control: provide the compliance report, annexes, non-confidential summary, and underlying data in machine-readable form with searchable and recognisable text.
Section 5

Preparation tasks before the clock starts

Preparation should begin before a formal designation decision if a core platform service may meet the Article 3 thresholds. The most useful pre-clock work is not generic policy drafting; it is maintaining threshold calculations, service delineations, implementation owner maps, and evidence that can survive Form GD and Article 11 review.

For designated gatekeepers, keep a separate watchlist for new or changing core platform services. A further service that meets the thresholds starts its own Article 3 notification calendar, even if other services are already designated.

Keep a separate merger-and-audit watch as well. If a planned concentration falls within Article 14, log the pre-implementation notice and any 2-month follow-up for newly threshold-crossing services. If Article 15 applies, keep the profiling audit evidence and annual update materials ready alongside the Article 11 workstream.

  • Maintain monthly and yearly active-user calculations for each core platform service and each plausible alternative delineation.
  • Keep the financial-threshold evidence pack current for Union turnover, market capitalisation or equivalent fair market value, and Member State service presence.
  • Pre-assign owners for Form GD, Article 3(5) arguments, business-secret marking, power of attorney, technical annexes, and submission-channel logistics.
  • Create an obligation matrix for Articles 5, 6 and 7 before designation so product and engineering teams can start feasibility analysis without waiting for the final report period.
  • Store evidence in report-ready form: dated implementation records, screenshots or demos where user journeys change, API documentation, access procedures, data-retention explanations, testing methodology, feedback logs, and raw data definitions.
  • Review the Commission gatekeeper page and case list whenever a designation, amendment, or repeal is announced, then update the calendar row for the affected undertaking and core platform service.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports maintaining Form GD threshold data, plausible alternative delineations, substantiated-argument annexes, and submission evidence before notification.
"Form GD"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports checking current designation status and listed core platform services as part of calendar maintenance.
"Gatekeepers"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports the practical instruction that potential gatekeepers use Form GD and the Commission submission channels described on the DMA legislation page.
"notification form which potential gatekeepers have to use"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Commission source for the DMA legislation page, Form GD practical instructions, and links to official DMA templates including Article 11.
"The DMA contains the main rules"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports the Article 11 six-month reporting deadline and at-least-annual update requirement.
"update that report and that non-confidential summary at least annually"
Related guides

Explore more topics

DMA Anti-Circumvention Design Review for Gatekeeper Product Changes
Review DMA Article 13 anti-circumvention risks in gatekeeper product, interface, contractual, commercial, and technical changes with obligation mapping and evidence records.
DMA Article 11 Compliance Report Template FAQ
How gatekeepers should use the DMA Article 11 compliance report template to document obligation-by-obligation measures, evidence, updates, and non-confidential summaries.
DMA Article 6 Business User Data Access Guide
Grounded guide to EU Digital Markets Act Article 6 data access for business users, end users, authorised third parties, consent boundaries, and evidence handoffs.
DMA Article 6(7) and Article 7 interoperability obligations
Grounded guide to DMA interoperability duties: Article 6(7) operating-system feature access, Article 7 messaging interoperability, request handling, security conditions, and compliance evidence.
DMA Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations mapped to CPS evidence
Map EU Digital Markets Act Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations to affected core platform services, product evidence, legal owners, and Article 11 compliance-report artifacts.
DMA compliance program and monitoring for gatekeepers
Build a DMA compliance program around Article 8 effective compliance, Article 11 reporting evidence, Article 13 anti-circumvention controls, and Article 28 compliance-function governance.
DMA Core Platform Service Scoping
Scope EU Digital Markets Act core platform services by service category, designation evidence, user thresholds, and Form GD service-boundary records.
DMA core platform services FAQ
FAQ on EU Digital Markets Act core platform services: Article 2 service categories, gatekeeper designation evidence, user thresholds, service scoping, and Article 11 reporting.
DMA CPS Obligation Matrix Workflow: Articles 5, 6, 7 and Article 11 Evidence
Build a DMA core platform service obligation matrix that links each designated CPS to Articles 5, 6 and 7 duties, product owners, designation evidence, Article 11 report artifacts and review gates.
DMA designation intake workflow for gatekeeper notifications
Build a grounded DMA designation intake record covering core platform service classification, Article 3 thresholds, Form GD evidence, Commission handoff, and Article 11 readiness.
DMA enforcement, penalties, and remedies: Commission powers and evidence
EU Digital Markets Act enforcement guide covering Commission non-compliance decisions, DMA fine caps, periodic penalty payments, remedies, interim measures, commitments, and Article 11 evidence.
DMA Gatekeeper Compliance Checklist for Articles 5, 6, 7 and 11
A grounded EU Digital Markets Act checklist for designated gatekeepers: core platform service scope, Article 5/6/7 controls, Article 11 report evidence, anti-circumvention checks, and review gates.
DMA Gatekeeper Designation Guide: Article 3 thresholds, Form GD, and Article 11 readiness
A grounded EU Digital Markets Act guide for assessing Article 3 gatekeeper thresholds, scoping core platform services, preparing Form GD evidence, handling rebuttal annexes, and planning Article 11 compliance reporting.
DMA gatekeeper thresholds: what counts and when to notify
Standalone FAQ on the EU Digital Markets Act gatekeeper thresholds, Article 3 notification timing, Form GD evidence, and active user-count methodology.
DMA interoperability requests: Article 7 and Commission guidance
How EU Digital Markets Act interoperability requests work for Article 7 messaging services, Article 6(7) operating-system access, gatekeeper evidence, requester evidence, and security safeguards.
DMA penalties and fines: caps, triggers, and enforcement evidence
EU Digital Markets Act penalties guide covering Article 30 fine caps, Article 31 periodic penalty payments, non-compliance decisions, remedies, and evidence records.
DMA Product Change Review Workflow for Articles 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13
Review DMA-relevant product releases for Article 5, Article 6, Article 7, anti-circumvention, Article 11 evidence, and product-owner/legal signoff.
DMA Self-Preferencing Compliance Examples for Ranking and Display
Examples and release-review controls for DMA Article 6(5) self-preferencing checks across ranking, indexing, crawling, search results, marketplaces, app stores, feeds, and virtual assistants.
DMA vs Data Act: gatekeeper duties compared with EU data-sharing rules
Compare the EU Digital Markets Act and EU Data Act by scope, actors, data access, interoperability, reporting, evidence, and enforcement without merging distinct obligations.
DMA vs DSA: Digital Markets vs Services Act
A grounded comparison of the DMA and DSA focused on gatekeepers, core platform services, DMA obligations, Article 11 reporting, interoperability, data access, and enforcement.
DMA vs EU competition law: gatekeeper obligations, Article 11 evidence, and enforcement
Compare the EU Digital Markets Act with EU competition law: ex ante gatekeeper and core platform service duties, Articles 5 to 7, Article 11 reports, penalties, and evidence records.
DMA vs GDPR: gatekeeper data obligations compared
Compare DMA gatekeeper obligations with high-level GDPR overlap for consent, combining personal data, data access, portability, and Article 11 reporting.
EU Digital Markets Act Article 11 Evidence Calendar
Build a source-grounded DMA Article 11 compliance report calendar with evidence owners, annual update checkpoints, report sections, and review gates.
EU Digital Markets Act checklist for gatekeeper compliance
A source-grounded DMA checklist for designated gatekeepers and core platform services, covering scope, Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations, Article 11 reporting, evidence, anti-circumvention, and governance.
EU Digital Markets Act compliance: gatekeeper obligations and evidence
DMA compliance guide for designated gatekeepers: core platform service scoping, Articles 5, 6 and 7 controls, Article 11 reports, anti-circumvention checks, interoperability evidence, and enforcement risk.
EU Digital Markets Act FAQ: gatekeepers, DMA obligations, reports, and enforcement
Concise FAQ on the EU Digital Markets Act for gatekeeper designation, core platform services, Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations, Article 11 reports, interoperability, business-user data access, compliance evidence, and enforcement.
EU Digital Markets Act requirements for gatekeepers
DMA requirements for designated gatekeepers: core platform service scope, Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations, Article 11 reporting, anti-circumvention, evidence, remedies, and fines.
EU Digital Markets Act Timeline and Key Milestones: practical obligations and evidence guide
Practical EU Digital Markets Act guide to Timeline and Key Milestones: scope, owners, evidence, edge cases, checklist steps, and external source-linked citations.
EU DMA Applicability Test: gatekeeper thresholds, core platform services, and evidence
Test whether the EU Digital Markets Act may apply to a platform service using the DMA gatekeeper criteria, core platform service categories, EU user thresholds, notification steps, and evidence records.
EU DMA Article 11 Compliance Reporting Guide
Source-grounded guide to EU Digital Markets Act Article 11 compliance reports: report purpose, template evidence, non-confidential summaries, annual updates, and submission steps.
EU DMA do's and don'ts for product teams
Product release checks for designated DMA gatekeepers: Article 5, 6 and 7 obligations, anti-circumvention review, data access, interoperability, self-preferencing and Article 11 evidence.
What do DMA Articles 5, 6, and 7 require from gatekeepers?
FAQ explaining how EU Digital Markets Act Articles 5, 6, and 7 group gatekeeper obligations, what product evidence they require, and how Article 11 reporting connects.