TimelineEU DMA

EU Digital Markets Act Timeline and Key Milestones

A practical chronology that separates the DMA's fixed application dates from clocks triggered by thresholds, designation decisions, annual reporting, and service-specific Commission measures.

Use the visual timeline for the public chronology, then use this guide to decide which dates belong in your own service-level compliance calendar.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 25, 2026
Overview

There is no single DMA deadline that applies identically to every platform. Some dates are fixed in Regulation (EU) 2022/1925; others begin when an undertaking meets Article 3 thresholds, when the Commission receives complete information, or when a lists a particular . Commission specification and enforcement decisions can add dates for a named without changing the general rule for everyone else. This page keeps those categories separate.

Section 1

Fixed legal dates: adoption, entry into force, and application

The DMA was adopted on 14 September 2022 and published in the Official Journal on 12 October 2022. It entered into force on 1 November 2022, 20 days after publication. Entry into force did not mean that every substantive duty applied on that date.

Most provisions applied from 2 May 2023. The regulation separately made Article 3(6) and (7) and Articles 40 and 46 to 50 applicable from 1 November 2022, while Articles 42 and 43 applied from 25 June 2023. A roadmap should preserve those distinctions instead of describing 1 November 2022 as the start of all DMA compliance duties.

  • 14 September 2022: Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 was adopted.
  • 12 October 2022: the DMA was published in Official Journal L 265.
  • 1 November 2022: the DMA entered into force, and Article 3(6) and (7) and Articles 40 and 46 to 50 began to apply.
  • 2 May 2023: the regulation generally began to apply.
  • 25 June 2023: Articles 42 and 43 on representative actions and whistleblower protections began to apply.
Section 2

Event-driven clocks: thresholds, notification, designation, and compliance

The operational DMA calendar starts separately for each candidate . The Article 3(2) presumption requires annual Union turnover of at least EUR 7.5 billion in each of the last three financial years or average market capitalisation or equivalent fair market value of at least EUR 75 billion in the last financial year, provision of the same service in at least three Member States, at least 45 million monthly active Union end users and 10,000 yearly active Union business users in the last financial year, and those user thresholds in each of the last three financial years.

When all presumptive thresholds are met, the undertaking must notify the Commission without delay and no later than two months after the thresholds are met. A threshold-meeting undertaking can submit sufficiently substantiated rebuttal arguments. The Commission can also designate below the thresholds after an Article 17 market investigation. The 45-working-day designation clock runs after the Commission receives complete information for the standard threshold route, not automatically from a company's internal threshold calculation.

A lists the core platform services covered for that . Article 3(10) then gives the gatekeeper six months to comply with Articles 5, 6, and 7 for those listed services. Meeting a threshold is therefore not the same event as designation, and designation of one service does not make every product in the corporate group subject to every obligation.

  • Threshold event: open the Article 3 notification record and preserve the date each undertaking-level and service-level condition was met.
  • Notification: submit without delay and in any event within two months after the Article 3(2) thresholds are met.
  • Rebuttal or qualitative route: distinguish an Article 3(5) rebuttal by a threshold-meeting undertaking from an Article 3(8) below-threshold designation investigation; each follows a different evidentiary and procedural path.
  • Commission decision: track the 45-working-day target from receipt of complete information and keep later information requests with the record.
  • Designation: freeze the decision, the listed services, any specified obligations, and the service boundary used by the Commission.
  • Six-month workback: assign each applicable Article 5, 6, and 7 duty to product, engineering, policy, and evidence owners for the listed service.
Section 3

Service-specific designation history

On 6 September 2023, the Commission designated the first six gatekeepers: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, and Microsoft. Their initially listed services reached the six-month compliance point in March 2024. Later decisions added Booking and iPadOS and removed Facebook Marketplace. As of 25 July 2026, the Commission's portal lists seven gatekeepers providing 23 designated core platform services.

A designation, amendment, repeal, or non-designation affects only the undertaking and services named in that decision. For example, Apple's November 2025 notifications for Apple Ads and Apple Maps led to February 2026 decisions not to designate those services; they did not alter Apple's existing designations for other services.

  • 6 September 2023: the Commission made the first designations.
  • March 2024: the first listed services reached their initial six-month Articles 5 to 7 compliance point.
  • 29 April 2024: Apple was designated for iPadOS.
  • 13 May 2024: Booking was designated for Booking.com.
  • 23 April 2025: the Commission removed Meta's Facebook Marketplace from the designated-service list.
  • 27 November 2025: Apple notified Apple Ads and Apple Maps after reporting that they met the quantitative thresholds.
  • 5 February 2026: the Commission decided that Apple Ads and Apple Maps were not important gateways and did not designate them.
  • For current work, store the specific decision or case reference beside each -service row and reopen the row when the Commission amends its status.
Section 4

Recurring clocks after designation

The six-month implementation point also anchors recurring evidence work. Under Article 11, the must provide a detailed and transparent compliance report and a non-confidential summary within six months after designation, then update both at least annually. Article 15 separately requires an independently audited description of consumer-profiling techniques within six months after designation and an annual update.

Article 28 requires an independent compliance function. The management body must approve and review the 's compliance strategies and policies periodically and at least once a year. Coordinate this governance cycle with the reporting calendar while keeping a distinct legal record for each duty.

  • Article 11: initial compliance report and non-confidential summary within six months after designation; update at least annually.
  • Article 15: independently audited profiling description within six months after designation; update the description and public overview at least annually.
  • Article 28: management-body review of DMA compliance strategies and policies at least annually.
  • Article 4: the Commission reviews status regularly and at least every three years; that review does not suspend existing obligations.
  • Keep separate calendar rows for the report, profiling audit, management-body review, and designation-status watch even when their internal workbacks overlap.
Section 5

Commission decisions, guidance, enforcement, and the DMA review need status labels

Later public milestones have different legal effects. An investigation opens a procedure; preliminary findings state a provisional view; a final establishes the Commission's finding and may impose a fine. A consultation does not bind gatekeepers. A specification decision may set implementation steps for one named and feature set without creating a deadline for every designated service.

The Commission's March 2025 Apple interoperability decisions include staged implementation dates extending into 2027. Those dates belong in Apple's decision-specific workstream, not a universal DMA calendar. On 23 April 2025, the Commission adopted its first two final non-compliance decisions and fined Apple and Meta. On 23 July 2026, it announced final Google Search and Google Play decisions with two further fines.

required the first evaluation report by 3 May 2026 and every 3 years thereafter. The Commission issued COM(2026) 178 on 28 April 2026. It found the DMA remained fit for purpose and did not need revision at that stage. A review conclusion or proposed follow-up does not amend the regulation; a legal change still needs the applicable legislative or delegated process.

  • Label each entry as legislation, , specification decision, preliminary finding, final enforcement decision, consultation, guidance, or review report.
  • Record the named , case number, listed service, affected functionality, and legal basis for decision-specific dates.
  • Do not describe a proposal, consultation response, or review recommendation as a changed DMA obligation before the required legal act is adopted.
  • 23 April 2025: first final DMA non-compliance decisions and decision-specific fines against Apple and Meta.
  • 28 April 2026: the Commission issued its first DMA review report.
  • 23 July 2026: the Commission announced final Google Search and Google Play non-compliance decisions and decision-specific fines.
  • Keep past dates as historical evidence and maintain a separate forward-looking workback for still-open obligations.
  • Use an explicit source-check date for the current list and active Commission proceedings; status can change after this page's 25 July 2026 check.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu7 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary legal source for the DMA chronology and its notification, designation, compliance, reporting, audit, governance, enforcement, and review clocks.
  • Article 54 supplies the entry-into-force and differentiated application dates; the Official Journal text supplies the adoption and publication dates.
  • Article 3 provides the quantitative thresholds, rebuttal and qualitative-designation routes, notification, designation, service-listing, and six-month compliance sequence.
Show 4 more
  • Article 4 requires periodic review of gatekeeper status and permits confirmation, amendment, or repeal of a designation decision.
  • Articles 4, 11, 15, and 28 establish the recurring designation review, compliance reporting, profiling audit, and governance cycles.
  • Article 53 sets the statutory evaluation cadence; Articles 8, 20, and 29 distinguish specification and enforcement procedures.
  • Primary source for fixed dates and event-driven notification, designation, compliance, reporting, audit, governance, and review clocks.
"It shall apply from 2 May 2023."
More quoted passages
"within 6 months"
"review whether the gatekeepers continue to satisfy"
"at least annually"
"By 3 May 2026"
"Designation of gatekeepers"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official status page for designated gatekeepers, listed core platform services, and later designation changes.
  • Commission source for designated gatekeepers, listed core platform services, designation dates, and later changes to service status.
  • Current public status source for gatekeepers and listed core platform services.
"Core platform services"
More quoted passages
"Gatekeepers"
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Procedural source for Form GD, completeness, submissions, and DMA proceedings.
  • Procedural rules for notifications, Form GD, completeness, submissions, and rights to be heard in DMA proceedings.
"Form GD"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official template for the initial and updated compliance-report evidence structure.
  • The Commission template explains the expected per-service, per-obligation report structure and evidence refresh for later reporting cycles.
"Compliance Report"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official explanation of Apple-specific Article 6(7) specification decisions and staged implementation dates.
  • Commission explanation of the Apple Article 6(7) specification proceedings, measures, and staged decision-specific implementation dates.
"free and effective interoperability"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official material for the first Article 53 review and its legal status.
  • Commission material for the first Article 53 review, its findings, and the conclusion that the DMA did not need revision at that stage.
"review and assess the DMA"
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official 28 April 2026 report completing the first Article 53 evaluation cycle.
  • Official 28 April 2026 Article 53 report and its conclusion that the DMA remained fit for purpose and did not need revision at that stage.
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official source for the 23 July 2026 final Google Search and Google Play decisions.
  • Official source for the 23 July 2026 final Google Search and Google Play decisions and decision-specific fines.
digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Commission index for the DMA, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/814, and related procedural materials.
"The DMA contains the main rules"
Show all related guides (32)

DMA CPS Obligation Matrix Workflow: Articles 5, 6, 7 and Article 11 Evidence

Build a DMA core platform service obligation matrix that links each designated CPS to Articles 5, 6 and 7 duties, product owners, designation evidence, Article 11 report artifacts and review gates.

DMA designation intake workflow for gatekeeper notifications

Build an official source DMA designation intake record covering core platform service classification, Article 3 thresholds, Form GD evidence, Commission handoff, and Article 11 readiness.

DMA enforcement, penalties, and remedies: Commission powers and evidence

Follow DMA enforcement from investigation and preliminary findings to non-compliance decisions, fines, daily payments, interim measures, commitments, and remedies.

DMA Gatekeeper Compliance Checklist for Articles 5, 6, 7 and 11

A cited EU Digital Markets Act checklist for designated gatekeepers: core platform service scope, Article 5/6/7 controls, Article 11 report evidence, anti-circumvention checks, and review gates.

DMA Gatekeeper Designation Guide: Article 3 thresholds, Form GD, and Article 11 readiness

A cited EU Digital Markets Act guide for assessing Article 3 gatekeeper thresholds, scoping core platform services, preparing Form GD evidence, handling rebuttal annexes, and planning Article 11 compliance reporting.

DMA penalties and fines: caps, triggers, and enforcement evidence

Compare DMA Article 30 fine ceilings, the narrow 20% repeat test, 1% procedural fines, and Article 31 daily payments, with decision-specific examples.

DMA Product Change Review Workflow for Articles 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13

Review DMA-relevant product releases for Article 5, Article 6, Article 7, anti-circumvention, Article 11 evidence, and product-owner/legal signoff.

DMA Self-Preferencing Compliance Examples for Ranking and Display

Examples and release-review controls for DMA Article 6(5) self-preferencing checks across ranking, indexing, crawling, search results, marketplaces, app stores, feeds, and virtual assistants.

DMA vs Data Act: gatekeeper duties compared with EU data-sharing rules

Compare the EU Digital Markets Act and EU Data Act by scope, actors, data access, interoperability, reporting, evidence, and enforcement without merging distinct obligations.

DMA vs DSA: Digital Markets vs Services Act

Compare the EU Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act by covered services, regulated actors, core duties, reporting, dates, evidence, and enforcement.

DMA vs EU competition law: gatekeeper obligations, Article 11 evidence, and enforcement

Compare the EU Digital Markets Act with EU competition law: ex ante gatekeeper and core platform service duties, Articles 5 to 7, Article 11 reports, penalties, and evidence records.

DMA vs GDPR: gatekeeper data obligations compared

Compare DMA gatekeeper duties with GDPR rules for personal-data processing, consent, lawful basis, portability, accountability evidence, and enforcement.

EU Digital Markets Act Article 11 Evidence Calendar

Build a DMA Article 11 compliance-report calendar with the correct designation trigger, service annexes, evidence owners, annual updates, and publication gates.

EU Digital Markets Act checklist for gatekeeper compliance

A source-grounded Sorena DMA checklist for designated gatekeepers and core platform services, covering scope, Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations, Article 11 reporting, evidence, anti-circumvention, and governance.

EU Digital Markets Act compliance: gatekeeper obligations and evidence

DMA compliance guide for designated gatekeepers: core platform service scoping, Articles 5, 6 and 7 controls, Article 11 reports, anti-circumvention checks, interoperability evidence, and enforcement risk.

EU Digital Markets Act deadlines and compliance calendar

Calculate DMA notification, designation, service-compliance, Article 11 reporting, concentration-notice, and profiling-audit deadlines from the correct legal trigger.

EU Digital Markets Act FAQ: gatekeepers, DMA obligations, reports, and enforcement

Concise FAQ on the EU Digital Markets Act for gatekeeper designation, core platform services, Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations, Article 11 reports, interoperability, business-user data access, compliance evidence, and enforcement.

EU Digital Markets Act requirements for gatekeepers

DMA requirements for designated gatekeepers: core platform service scope, Articles 5, 6 and 7 obligations, Article 11 reporting, anti-circumvention, evidence, remedies, and fines.

EU DMA Applicability Test: gatekeeper thresholds, core platform services, and evidence

Test whether the EU Digital Markets Act may apply to a platform service using the DMA gatekeeper criteria, core platform service categories, EU user thresholds, notification steps, and evidence records.

EU DMA Article 11 Compliance Reporting Guide

Official source guide to EU Digital Markets Act Article 11 compliance reports: report purpose, template evidence, non-confidential summaries, annual updates, and submission steps.

EU DMA do's and don'ts for product teams

Product release checks for designated DMA gatekeepers: Article 5, 6 and 7 obligations, anti-circumvention review, data access, interoperability, self-preferencing and Article 11 evidence.

DMA Article 11 Compliance Report Template FAQ

How gatekeepers should use the DMA Article 11 compliance report template to document obligation-by-obligation measures, evidence, updates, and non-confidential summaries.

DMA core platform services FAQ

FAQ on EU Digital Markets Act core platform services: Article 2 service categories, gatekeeper designation evidence, user thresholds, service scoping, and Article 11 reporting.

DMA gatekeeper thresholds: what counts and when to notify

Standalone FAQ on the EU Digital Markets Act gatekeeper thresholds, Article 3 notification timing, Form GD evidence, and active user-count methodology.

DMA interoperability requests: Article 7 and Commission guidance

How DMA Article 7 messaging interoperability requests work, including phased functions, the three-month operational deadline, reference offers, evidence, and safeguards.

What do DMA Articles 5, 6, and 7 require from gatekeepers?

FAQ explaining how EU Digital Markets Act Articles 5, 6, and 7 group gatekeeper obligations, what product evidence they require, and how Article 11 reporting connects.