A cited field structure for assessing whether a packaging unit can support a PPWR Article 6 decision.
Use it to capture packaging category, design-for-recycling parameters, grade evidence, recycled-at-scale assumptions, and approval records before market, supplier, EPR, or claim decisions.
Use this internal template to maintain the evidence for a PPWR Article 6 decision. It is not an official Commission form and cannot produce a final grade before the applicable delegated and implementing acts supply the criteria, weighting method, recycled-at-scale thresholds, and chain-of-custody rules. Until those methods apply, treat the record as readiness evidence and record the legal exclusion check before scoring the packaging.
1
Section 1
Template header: identify the exact packaging unit
Start the assessment at packaging-unit level. Article 6 requires the manufacturer to assess on the basis of the applicable secondary acts, and Annex II grades are applied after weighing criteria per packaging unit. A product-family record is not precise enough when materials, closures, sleeves, adhesives, or residues differ.
The header should also separate the main body, integrated components, and separate components. PPWR states that integrated components are included in the assessment, integrated components that can separate through mechanical stress during transportation or sorting are assessed separately, and separate components are assessed separately.
Complete the Article 6(11) exclusion field before scoring. It covers immediate human or veterinary medicinal-product packaging; contact-sensitive medical-device and in vitro diagnostic packaging; medicinal outer packaging necessary to preserve product quality; specified contact-sensitive infant, baby-food and special-medical-purpose food packaging; dangerous-goods transport packaging under Directive 2008/68/EC; and sales packaging made from lightweight wood, cork, textile, rubber, ceramic, porcelain or wax. The last group remains subject to Article 6(8) on EPR contributions. Record the exact category and facts that meet it, rather than writing only "medical" or "wood".
For the Article 6(10) innovative-packaging route from 2030, retain the pre-market notification to the competent authority, technical details demonstrating innovation, a timeline for reaching recycled-at-scale requirements, and the end date of the derogation, which runs up to five years from the end of the calendar year of market placement. A new material or a supplier claim alone does not establish that route; if the authority rejects the innovative status, the existing design-for-recycling criteria apply.
Assessment ID, product SKU or packaging bill-of-materials reference, market, version date, and change trigger.
Applicability field covering the Article 6(11) exclusions and, where relevant, the notified innovative-packaging derogation under Article 6(10).
Packaging category selected from Annex II Table 1, including predominant material, packaging type, format, and colour where relevant.
Main packaging body, integrated components, integrated components that can separate through mechanical stress during transportation or sorting, and separate components.
Manufacturer, packaging engineering owner, product compliance owner, supplier contact, EPR owner, and final approver.
Source record for the binding PPWR article or annex, plus the technical method or guideline used for the current assessment.
Article 6 and Annex II are the binding sources for applicability exclusions, manufacturer assessment, packaging categories, packaging-unit grading, component treatment, and the innovative-packaging derogation.
The manufacturer shall assess packaging recyclability
Recommended next step
Turn PPWR recyclability into a maintained evidence record
This PPWR template helps connect Article 6, Annex II, design evidence, recycled-at-scale readiness, owners, and review gates before teams make market, supplier, EPR, or public-claim decisions.
Use the design-for-recycling block to record the facts that can affect collection, sorting, recycling yield, and secondary raw material quality. PPWR Annex II lists parameters for design-for-recycling criteria, and the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) report groups similar facts into predominant material, decoration and information, closing and opening systems, and other parameters.
Keep each field factual. Record the specification, test result, supplier declaration, or engineering judgment behind it, then state whether the evidence supports the claimed packaging category and expected grade.
Predominant material: material composition, mono-material or composite structure, colours or optical transmittance, additives or fillers, and barriers or coatings.
Decoration and information: labels, sleeves, label or sleeve coverage, inks, lacquers, varnishes, coding, and the materials or adhesives used for those features.
Closing and opening systems: closures, openings, caps, lids, liners, seals, valves, tamper-evident rings, shrink wraps, and small attached components.
Other factors: adhesives, packaging dimensions, ease of dismantling, product residues or ease of emptying, recycled content, biodegradable material content, and other integrated or separate components.
Sorting and recycling note: whether the design supports separability, sorting efficiency, recycling-process efficiency, and secondary raw material quality.
Non-binding 2024 JRC report prepared in the context of the PPWR proposal and used for technical field design; it proposes elements and parameters for assessing recyclability of packaging.
4 elements and 19 parameters
3
Section 3
Performance grade and date fields
The template should not invent a final grade method before the delegated and implementing acts fill in the detailed assessment rules. It should still capture the grade-relevant evidence that Article 6 and Annex II already identify, then mark whether the current conclusion is final, provisional, or awaiting secondary legislation.
Record dates exactly. The design-for-recycling condition applies from 1 January 2030 or 24 months after the relevant delegated acts enter into force, whichever is later. The recycled-at-scale condition applies from 1 January 2035 or five years after the relevant implementing acts enter into force, whichever is later. From 1 January 2038, packaging within Article 6's scope must reach grade A or B, subject to Article 6(10).
The Commission's June 2026 guidance says the general Article 6(1) recyclable-packaging rule applies from 12 August 2026, but manufacturers do not need to perform the PPWR conformity assessment under Article 38 and Annex VII until the Article 6(4) delegated act enters into force. Until the design-for-recycling condition applies, the guidance directs manufacturers to the previous Packaging Waste Directive requirements and related harmonised standards. Record this as Commission interpretation, not as a replacement for Article 6 or the future secondary acts.
Current design-for-recycling (DfR) result: grade A, B, C, below grade C, not yet assessed, or awaiting applicable delegated acts.
DfR percentage evidence where available: grade A is at least 95%, grade B is at least 80%, grade C is at least 70%, and below 70% is technically non-recyclable under Annex II.
Recycled-at-scale (RaS) status: not yet applicable, evidence requested, data received from downstream operators, grade A RaS, grade B RaS, grade C RaS, or not recycled at scale.
Date basis: the applicable delegated-act entry-into-force date plus 24 months, the applicable implementing-act entry-into-force date plus five years, and the fixed 1 January 2038 grade A or B restriction.
Decision status: approved for use, approved with monitoring, redesign required, supplier evidence required, legal review required, or blocked from claim or market decision.
Article 6 and Annex II are the binding sources for assessment timing, grade bands, manufacturer duties, delegated and implementing acts, and market-placement restrictions.
Packaging recyclability shall be expressed in the recyclability performance grades A, B or C
Non-binding Commission guidance distinguishing the Article 6(1) application date, the later design-for-recycling method, and when the PPWR recyclability conformity assessment begins.
4
Section 4
Recycled-at-scale and chain-of-custody fields
Keep the recycled-at-scale block separate from design for recycling. A design assessment does not prove that the packaging is recycled in practice. Article 6 requires an implementing methodology based on quantities placed on the market and quantities recycled, plus a chain-of-custody mechanism.
Until the implementing acts are in force, label this evidence as a readiness record. Do not present downstream data as a final PPWR recycled-at-scale determination unless the applicable Article 6 methodology and thresholds are available.
Downstream evidence owner and data source for collection, sorting, recycling, and installed infrastructure.
Technical documentation showing quantities of collected packaging waste sent to sorting and recycling facilities, where available.
Verification status showing whether the manufacturer can obtain data from downstream operators.
Packaging category and Union and Member State geographic data used for recycled-at-scale evidence, kept separate from supplier-specific design claims.
Open dependency on Article 6 implementing acts for the recycled-at-scale methodology, thresholds, and chain-of-custody mechanism.
Article 6 and Annex II explain why recycled-at-scale evidence is separate from design-for-recycling evidence and require a methodology, quantity data, thresholds, downstream verification, and a chain-of-custody mechanism.
a design for recycling assessment has been carried out does not, in itself, ensure that packaging is recycled in practice
5
Section 5
Review gates before using the assessment
Use review gates before the assessment reaches packaging artwork, supplier onboarding, EPR fee-modulation inputs, customer statements, or public sustainability content. The record should show what was assessed, what was assumed, which secondary act is still pending, and who approved the internal decision.
Keep the record traceable to the packaging unit, Article 6 and Annex II, the technical parameter evidence, the grade status, recycled-at-scale readiness, and the next review trigger.
Stop if the packaging category, components, or material specification is missing or inconsistent across the bill of materials and supplier evidence.
Stop if the grade conclusion depends on a delegated or implementing act that has not been identified in the record.
Stop if a below-grade-C, not-assessed, or not-recycled-at-scale result is being converted into a public recyclable claim.
Stop if integrated or separate components are omitted from the assessment.
Review after material, label, closure, coating, adhesive, supplier, market, or sorting-and-recycling evidence changes.
Non-binding Commission interpretation for the Article 6 application sequence and conformity-assessment transition.
Non-binding Commission guidance distinguishing the Article 6(1) application date, the later design-for-recycling method, and when the PPWR recyclability conformity assessment begins.
Non-binding 2024 European Commission Joint Research Centre report prepared in the context of the PPWR proposal and used to structure design-for-recycling assessment fields around elements and parameters.
Non-binding 2024 JRC report prepared in the context of the PPWR proposal and used for technical field design; it proposes elements and parameters for assessing recyclability of packaging.
Article 6 and Annex II are the binding sources for applicability exclusions, manufacturer assessment, packaging categories, packaging-unit grading, component treatment, and the innovative-packaging derogation.
Article 6 and Annex II are the binding sources for assessment timing, grade bands, manufacturer duties, delegated and implementing acts, and market-placement restrictions.
"The manufacturer shall assess packaging recyclability"
More quoted passages
"Packaging recyclability shall be expressed in the recyclability performance grades A, B or C"
Article 6 and Annex II explain why recycled-at-scale evidence is separate from design-for-recycling evidence and require a methodology, quantity data, thresholds, downstream verification, and a chain-of-custody mechanism.
"a design for recycling assessment has been carried out does not, in itself, ensure that packaging is recycled in practice"