EU TaxonomyTemplates

EU Taxonomy (Article 8) Templates

Templates that make reporting repeatable.

Use these to standardize activity mapping, evidence packs, and KPI computations.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
Feb 21, 2026
Updated
Feb 21, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
2

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published Feb 21, 2026
Updated Feb 21, 2026
Overview

Taxonomy work scales only when it's templated. Use the templates below to build a controlled activity register, evidence packs tied to technical screening criteria, and a KPI workbook with reconciliations and change control.

Section 1

Activity mapping register (the backbone of classification)

This register connects finance and operations. Treat it as a controlled dataset: versioned, owner-assigned, and mapped to accounts and reporting perimeter.

Recommended columns:

  • Activity ID (stable identifier)
  • Entity / subsidiary, site / asset, geography
  • Taxonomy activity name and delegated act reference (version)
  • Boundary statement (included/excluded, time period)
  • Revenue/CapEx/OpEx mapping (accounts/projects/cost categories)
  • Eligibility status + rationale
  • Alignment status + evidence pack link
Section 2

Eligibility + alignment register (keep claims precise)

Eligibility and alignment must be separate fields. This register is what drives aligned KPI numerators.

Recommended fields:

  • Eligible? (Y/N) + rationale and boundary note
  • Aligned? (Y/N) + decision date + reviewer
  • Criteria mapping file link (substantial contribution + DNSH + safeguards)
  • Minimum safeguards coverage statement (perimeter coverage)
  • Re-assessment trigger (delegated act change / asset change / methodology change)
Section 3

Criteria mapping template (criterion-by-criterion evidence)

This is the single most important template for auditability. It turns a claim into a reproducible set of checks with evidence pointers.

Recommended rows/fields:

  • Criterion ID / text (substantial contribution and DNSH criteria)
  • Pass/Fail/Not applicable (with rationale if N/A)
  • Metric/value and measurement method
  • Evidence artifact link (assessment/permit/monitoring/source data)
  • Owner and timestamp
  • Notes (assumptions, estimates, limitations)
Recommended next step

Keep EU Taxonomy (Article 8) Templates in one governed evidence system

SSOT can take EU Taxonomy (Article 8) Templates from reusing this material inside a governed evidence system to a reusable workflow inside Sorena. Teams working on EU Taxonomy (Article 8) can keep owners, evidence, and next steps aligned without copying this guide into separate documents.

Section 4

DNSH register and minimum safeguards evidence register

DNSH and safeguards are often the hardest to keep consistent across entities. Use registers that are linked to activity IDs and to KPI numerator components.

Recommended fields:

  • Activity ID link + objective(s) claimed
  • DNSH criteria status and evidence pointers
  • Safeguards baseline: due diligence processes, grievance mechanism, remediation tracking
  • Coverage statement: which entities/suppliers are covered by safeguards checks
  • Refresh cadence and last review date
Section 5

Delegated acts tracker and KPI workbook structure

These templates keep reporting consistent when the legal layer changes. Track acts by application date and link them to your activity register and KPI workbook change log.

Recommended KPI workbook tabs:

  • Delegated acts tracker (act -> change summary -> application date -> impacted activities)
  • Inputs (source system extracts and mapping rules)
  • Activity-level calculations (numerators/denominators by activity ID)
  • Aggregations (entity and group totals) + reconciliations
  • Methodology notes + estimates/proxies policy + change log
  • Disclosure tables output (ready for reporting templates)
Primary sources

References and citations

Related guides

Explore more topics

EU Taxonomy Applicability Test (Article 8): In-Scope Entities, Activities, and Disclosures
A practical EU Taxonomy applicability test for Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and Article 8 disclosures: determine whether your entity must disclose.
EU Taxonomy Checklist (Article 8): Audit-Ready Eligibility, Alignment, KPIs, Evidence Packs
An audit-ready EU Taxonomy checklist for Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and Article 8 disclosures: scope/perimeter, activity mapping.
EU Taxonomy Compliance Program (Article 8): Implementation Playbook for KPIs and Evidence
A practical EU Taxonomy compliance program playbook for Regulation (EU) 2020/852: set governance, build an activity mapping register.
EU Taxonomy Deadlines and Disclosure Calendar: Article 8 Reporting Dates, 2026 Simplification, GAR
A practical EU Taxonomy calendar covering Regulation (EU) 2020/852, the Article 8 disclosure timetable, the 2023 and 2024 reporting phases.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker: 2021/2139, 2021/2178, 2022/1214, 2023/2485, 2023/2486, 2026/73
Track the full EU Taxonomy delegated-act stack, including the climate, environmental, disclosure, and 2026 simplification acts.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards: Evidence, OECD, UNGP, ILO, SFDR Link
A practical guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards.
EU Taxonomy Enforcement, Measures, Penalties and Fines (Articles 5-7)
How EU Taxonomy enforcement works in practice: competent authorities monitor compliance for disclosures under Articles 5 to 7.
EU Taxonomy FAQ: Article 8, Eligibility vs Alignment, GAR, Minimum Safeguards, 2026 Simplification
A grounded EU Taxonomy FAQ covering Article 8 scope, eligibility vs alignment, turnover CapEx OpEx KPIs, GAR, minimum safeguards, the 2025 Commission Notice.
EU Taxonomy KPIs and Disclosure Workflow: Turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR, Article 8
Build an EU Taxonomy disclosure workflow that can survive review.
EU Taxonomy Requirements (2020/852): Eligibility, Alignment, DNSH, Minimum Safeguards, Article 8 KPIs
A practical requirements breakdown for Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (EU Taxonomy): what environmentally sustainable means.
EU Taxonomy Scope and Reporting Entities: Who Must Disclose Under Article 8
Understand EU Taxonomy scope and reporting entities under Article 8.
EU Taxonomy Technical Screening Criteria: Documentation, Evidence Packs, and Audit Trail
How to document EU Taxonomy alignment against technical screening criteria: build a criteria-by-criteria mapping.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: How Article 8 Taxonomy Disclosures Fit Into CSRD Reporting
Compare EU Taxonomy and CSRD the practical way. Learn how Article 8 Taxonomy disclosures fit inside the broader CSRD reporting system.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: How Taxonomy Data Flows Into GAR, Product Disclosures, and Investor Requests
Understand the practical relationship between EU Taxonomy and SFDR.
Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment (EU Taxonomy): What You Can Claim, What You Must Prove
A high-signal explainer of EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: eligibility means the activity is covered/listed.