TaxonomyTemplatesEU

EU Taxonomy Article 8 Disclosure templates

Field-level templates for preparing EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures, from activity mapping through KPI calculation, financial undertaking inputs, and publication review.

Use them to connect finance, sustainability, legal, and assurance teams around the exact annex route, source evidence, and public disclosure record.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 27, 2026
Sections
6

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
11

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated May 27, 2026
Overview

EU Taxonomy templates should do more than collect percentages. The Disclosures Delegated Act specifies which information, methodology, annexes, and tabular templates apply under Article 8. A useful internal template therefore starts with the reporting entity type, maps activities to delegated-act descriptions, separates eligibility from alignment, records turnover, CapEx, OpEx or financial-undertaking KPI inputs, and keeps the evidence behind each public number reviewable.

Section 1

Template selector for Article 8 reporters

Start with a template selector before anyone builds a workbook. Article 8 applies to undertakings covered by the relevant sustainability reporting provisions, while the Disclosures Delegated Act separates the presentation route by undertaking type.

Non-financial undertakings disclose the information specified in Annex I and present it using the Annex II templates. Asset managers use Annexes III and XI and the Annex IV template; credit institutions use Annexes V and XI and the Annex VI template; investment firms use Annexes VII and XI and the Annex VIII template; insurance and reinsurance undertakings use Annexes IX and XI and the Annex X templates.

  • Selector fields: legal entity; consolidation level; reporting period; undertaking type; applicable Article 19a or 29a status; mixed-group note.
  • Annex fields: required methodology annex; required presentation template; qualitative disclosure annex; owner for each annex route.
  • Scope fields: in-scope activities, assets, exposures, products, or services; excluded exposure categories; voluntary disclosure items kept separate from mandatory KPIs.
  • Control fields: source regulation version checked; Commission notice or FAQ used; calculation owner; disclosure approver; assurance or review status.
Section 2

Activity mapping and eligibility template

Create one activity record before calculating any KPI numerator. The Disclosures Delegated Act defines a Taxonomy-eligible activity as an activity described in the delegated acts, irrespective of whether it meets the technical screening criteria. That means the template should first prove the activity is described in an applicable delegated act, then separately assess alignment.

The Commission FAQ warns that value-chain assumptions can be wrong: a supplier to a Taxonomy-eligible activity is not automatically Taxonomy-eligible for turnover reporting, and purchasing the output of a Taxonomy-eligible activity is not automatically eligible unless it fits the relevant CapEx or OpEx category.

  • Activity fields: activity name; business unit; revenue stream, asset, process, exposure, or product boundary; geography; reporting period.
  • Delegated-act mapping fields: environmental objective; activity section; activity description text; enabling, transitional, or adaptation label where relevant.
  • Eligibility decision fields: eligible, non-eligible, or not assessed; reason; source URL; reviewer; unresolved interpretation question.
  • Boundary fields: own activity versus supplier activity; turnover, CapEx, OpEx, asset, exposure, or underwriting relevance; consolidation treatment.
  • Output fields: activity ID used in KPI workbook; eligible amount source; non-eligible amount source; link to alignment evidence pack.
Section 3

Non-financial KPI workbook template

For non-financial undertakings, the workbook should keep three controlled calculation tabs: turnover, CapEx, and OpEx. Article 8(2) names those KPIs, and Annex I of the Disclosures Delegated Act sets their methodology and accompanying disclosure requirements.

Do not let the Annex II table be the only working file. The table is the presentation layer; the working template should retain line-item source data, numerator decisions, denominator references, environmental-objective breakdowns, double-counting checks, and contextual notes.

  • Turnover tab: net turnover denominator; product or service revenue numerator; activity ID; alignment status; environmental objective; accounting source.
  • CapEx tab: additions to qualifying tangible and intangible assets; category (a), (b), or (c) basis; CapEx plan reference; management-body approval where relevant.
  • OpEx tab: direct non-capitalised cost category; denominator basis; numerator basis; materiality note if the OpEx KPI is not material to the business model.
  • Alignment columns: substantial contribution criterion, DNSH evidence, minimum safeguards review, technical screening source, and reviewer sign-off.
  • Publication columns: Annex II row or column reference; prior-period comparative value; currency; contextual explanation; voluntary disclosure flag.
Section 4

Alignment evidence pack template

Eligibility is not enough for an aligned KPI. The Taxonomy Regulation requires an environmentally sustainable activity to contribute substantially to one or more environmental objectives, do no significant harm to the other objectives, comply with minimum safeguards, and satisfy technical screening criteria.

Use a separate evidence pack for each aligned activity or financed activity. The pack should be narrow enough for review: it should show the exact criterion, evidence item, source system, date, reviewer, and open issue rather than a broad sustainability narrative.

  • Substantial contribution fields: objective; technical screening criterion; measurement, threshold, or qualitative condition; evidence ID; responsible owner.
  • DNSH fields: each relevant environmental objective; applicable appendix or criterion; evidence item; exception or unresolved gap; reviewer conclusion.
  • Minimum safeguards fields: OECD Guidelines, UN Guiding Principles, ILO fundamental principles and rights at work, and International Bill of Human Rights review references.
  • Evidence fields: document title; source system; period covered; public or confidential status; version date; data owner; assurance status.
  • Decision fields: aligned, eligible but not aligned, or not supportable; rationale; reviewer; approval date; next review trigger.
Recommended next step

Turn EU Taxonomy templates into a reviewable disclosure file

Use this EU Taxonomy guide to connect Article 8 annex selection, KPI workbooks, activity evidence, financial undertaking inputs, and publication review before disclosures are finalized.

Section 5

Financial undertaking KPI input template

Financial undertaking templates need counterparty and exposure controls that are not visible in the final percentage alone. Credit institution GAR, asset manager investment KPIs, investment firm KPIs, and insurance or reinsurance KPIs depend on the undertaking type, applicable annex, exposure category, counterparty KPI, and exclusions.

Article 7 of the Disclosures Delegated Act excludes central government, central bank, and supranational issuer exposures from both the numerator and denominator of financial-undertaking KPIs. It excludes derivatives from the numerator and excludes exposures to undertakings not obliged to publish non-financial information under Articles 19a or 29a from the numerator.

  • Exposure fields: portfolio, instrument, gross carrying amount or relevant value, stock or flow basis, counterparty, geography, and disclosure reference date.
  • Counterparty fields: undertaking type; turnover KPI; CapEx KPI; GAR or other applicable KPI; source publication; reporting period; data quality limitation.
  • Known-use fields: financed activity; use-of-proceeds evidence; aligned amount; environmental objective; double-counting adjustment.
  • Exclusion fields: central government, central bank, supranational issuer, derivative, non-reporting undertaking, trading book, or other annex-specific treatment.
  • Template fields: Annex IV, VI, VIII, X, or XI destination; turnover-based value; CapEx-based value; qualitative disclosure note.
Section 6

Publication and review checklist template

The final checklist should compare the public Article 8 disclosure against the calculation workbooks, annex templates, and evidence packs. Article 8 of the Disclosures Delegated Act requires accompanying disclosures to appear in the same parts of the non-financial statement as the KPIs or through cross-references to those parts.

The checklist should also prevent stale or overstated voluntary material. Commission FAQ guidance says voluntary information should not contradict or misrepresent mandatory disclosures, should not be more prominent than mandatory disclosures, and should explain its basis and methods.

  • Confirm that each published KPI ties to a controlled workbook value and applicable annex template.
  • Check that accompanying disclosures, methodology notes, prior-period values, and currency are present where required.
  • Review voluntary Article 8 information for clear labeling, method explanation, and lower prominence than mandatory disclosures.
  • Verify that every public source URL is external, HTTPS, current for the claim, and not a local file path or internal research filename.
  • Keep an approval record with calculation owner, data owner, template owner, legal or reporting reviewer, publication approver, and next review trigger.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Defines Taxonomy-eligible economic activity and sets the Article 8 disclosure mechanics for eligible and aligned activities.
"taxonomy-eligible economic activity"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Primary Taxonomy Regulation source for Article 8 disclosure duties and the framework for environmentally sustainable economic activities.
"how and to what extent"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Grounds the alignment conditions, including substantial contribution, DNSH, technical screening criteria, and minimum safeguards.
"minimum safeguards"
Related guides

Explore more topics

DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including SVHCs, CLP hazard classes, the 0.1% w/w threshold, suitable alternatives, and controlled conditions evidence.
EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?
source-linked FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims.
EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain
A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and source-linked review records.
EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment
Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow
source-linked workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities
Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ
source-linked FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain.
EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist
Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement.
EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs
Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.
EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar
source-linked EU Taxonomy calendar for Article 8 reporting phases, environmental objective application dates, delegated-act updates, and evidence review gates.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker
Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.
EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check
FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker
Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards: Article 3 alignment gates, Article 17 significant harm, Article 18 safeguards, evidence records, and KPI controls.
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals checks, including SVHC thresholds, alternatives, controlled conditions, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained
Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.
EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?
Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.
EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8
EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ
FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures.
EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs
source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, including GAR, asset manager KPIs, investment firm KPIs, insurance KPIs, exclusions, and reporting evidence.
EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions
source-linked workflow for preparing EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio (GAR) KPI disclosures under Article 8 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence
FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx
Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.
EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk
Understand where EU Taxonomy penalty exposure starts: Article 22 measures and penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures, with practical evidence controls.
EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment
A source-linked EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ
Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison
Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with CSRD sustainability reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits using official EU Taxonomy sources.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence
Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits.