- Practical interpretive guidance for taxonomy reporting.
References and citations
- KPI templates, calculation rules, and phase-in requirements.
- Core framework, alignment conditions, and objectives.
A checklist that maps work to owners and evidence.
Use this to build a repeatable taxonomy reporting process - not a one-time spreadsheet.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
Taxonomy reporting breaks when it's treated as a one-off narrative. Use this checklist as an operating system: clear scope decisions, activity mapping to accounts, alignment evidence packs, KPI workbook controls, and a cadence that survives supplier changes, reorganizations, and delegated act updates.
Scope and perimeter decisions prevent 80% of later KPI disputes. Define who must disclose, which templates apply, and which entities and activities are in the reporting boundary.
Output: a scope memo and a perimeter register that ties to consolidation reporting.
Taxonomy is activity-based. Build a controlled register that maps revenue/CapEx/OpEx lines to taxonomy activities and records boundaries and assumptions.
Output: a versioned activity register with account mappings and evidence pointers.
Eligibility is a coverage check. Alignment is a compliance claim. Treat them as separate fields in your register with separate evidence expectations.
Output: eligibility status per activity, plus alignment pass/fail per criterion with evidence pointers.
Alignment evidence is not one PDF. It is a criteria mapping file plus evidence artifacts attached to each criterion, including DNSH and safeguards.
Output: activity-level evidence packs with traceability and owners.
KPI quality is reproducibility. Use a controlled workbook, reconciliations to audited numbers, and a documented estimates policy.
Output: a KPI workbook you can re-run with the same inputs and get the same outputs.
Assurance teams usually challenge boundaries, traceability, and evidence - not the math. Design the process so those questions are answerable quickly.
Output: a sign-off pack and a repeatable annual schedule.
ESG Compliance can take EU Taxonomy (Article 8) Checklist from turning this checklist into an operational workflow to a reusable workflow inside Sorena. Teams working on EU Taxonomy (Article 8) can keep owners, evidence, and next steps aligned without copying this guide into separate documents.
Start from EU Taxonomy (Article 8) Checklist and manage cross team sustainability work, reporting, and evidence from one workflow.
Review your current process, evidence gaps, and next steps for EU Taxonomy (Article 8) Checklist.