TaxonomyArticle 8 scopeEU

EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and reporting entities

This page helps classify the reporting entity before choosing EU Taxonomy KPIs, templates, or evidence owners.

The scope test starts with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and the Disclosures Delegated Act, not with a generic sustainability-reporting label.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Sections
6

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
12

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

EU Taxonomy reporting starts with the undertaking's obligation to publish sustainability information under Article 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 then assigns the KPI method and templates for non-financial undertakings, asset managers, credit institutions, investment firms, and insurance or reinsurance undertakings. Scope, consolidation, and any 2026 simplification option must be settled before activity mapping begins.

Section 1

Start with the Article 8 reporting trigger

The first question is whether the undertaking must publish sustainability information under Article 19a or Article 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU for the reporting year. of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 attaches the Taxonomy disclosure obligation to that reporting population. Determine that Accounting Directive status under the rules applicable to the undertaking; the Taxonomy Regulation does not create a separate size test.

For an in-scope undertaking, the disclosure must explain how and to what extent its activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. The delegated act then defines the content, presentation, and methodology for the specific undertaking type.

  • Record whether the assessment is for an individual non-financial statement or a consolidated non-financial statement.
  • Keep the Article 19a or Article 29a basis in the scope memo; it is the legal gateway for reporting.
  • Do not treat voluntary Taxonomy information as mandatory disclosure unless the entity is actually in that reporting population.
Section 2

Classify the undertaking before choosing KPIs

The delegated act uses different disclosure routes for different reporting entities. A non-financial undertaking reports the information specified in Annex I and presents it using Annex II templates. Financial undertakings follow entity-specific annexes instead.

The distinction matters because turnover, CapEx, and OpEx are the statutory KPIs for non-financial undertakings, while financial undertakings use KPIs designed for financing, investment, asset-management, investment-service, and insurance activities.

  • Non-financial undertaking: disclose information under Annex I and Annex II.
  • Asset manager: use Annexes III and XI, presented through Annex IV.
  • Credit institution: use Annexes V and XI, presented through Annex VI; the green asset ratio () is the central banking KPI.
  • Investment firm: use Annexes VII and XI, presented through Annex VIII.
  • Insurance or reinsurance undertaking: use Annexes IX and XI, presented through Annex X.
Section 3

Set the consolidation boundary before collecting data

An undertaking reporting under Article 19a prepares Taxonomy information for its individual reporting boundary. A parent reporting under Article 29a includes the group subsidiaries in consolidated Taxonomy disclosures, including subsidiaries that use a group-reporting exemption or are not individually subject to Articles 19a or 29a.

Mixed groups need more than a single parent label. Current Commission guidance says a reporting parent with financial and non-financial business segments should report the relevant consolidated KPIs for each financial segment and consolidated turnover and CapEx KPIs for non-financial activities, using the prescribed weighting approach. Record the prudential consolidation used for regulated financial activities and the Accounting Directive group boundary used for consolidated sustainability reporting.

  • Document the parent entity and whether the report is individual or consolidated.
  • Identify mixed financial and non-financial lines before assigning templates.
  • Reconcile the Taxonomy boundary to the Accounting Directive group boundary and document any prudential consolidation used for financial business segments.
  • Keep voluntary supplemental disclosures separate from mandatory disclosures and explain their basis.
Section 4

Separate scope from eligibility and alignment

Being in scope does not mean that an activity is Taxonomy-eligible or Taxonomy-aligned. The delegated act defines a Taxonomy-eligible economic activity as one described in the delegated acts adopted under the environmental-objective provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, regardless of whether that activity meets the technical screening criteria.

That definition keeps the workflow in order: first confirm the reporting entity and undertaking type, then map activities to delegated acts, then test alignment criteria and calculate the applicable KPIs.

  • Scope decision: is this undertaking required to disclose under ?
  • Entity decision: is it non-financial, an asset manager, a credit institution, an investment firm, or an insurance or reinsurance undertaking?
  • Eligibility decision: is the economic activity described in the relevant delegated act?
  • Alignment decision: does the activity meet the Taxonomy Regulation Article 3 conditions and related technical criteria?
Section 5

Apply the 2026 simplification rules to the correct reporting year

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73 applies from 1 January 2026. For a financial year starting during 2025, an undertaking may instead use the Taxonomy rules as they stood on 31 December 2025. The scope memo should record which rule set was chosen because the amended act changes materiality options, templates, and financial-undertaking denominators.

The amendment lets non-financial undertakings omit eligibility and alignment assessment for activities whose cumulative turnover or CapEx is below 10% of the corresponding KPI denominator, with separate reporting as non-material. It also gives financial undertakings that make no Taxonomy association claim a temporary standardized-statement route until 31 December 2027. Neither option removes the underlying (1) disclosure duty.

  • Record the financial year start date and whether the amended or 31 December 2025 rule set is used for a 2025 financial year.
  • If a non-financial undertaking uses a 10% assessment threshold, calculate it separately for turnover, CapEx, and, where relevant, OpEx, and report omitted amounts as non-material.
  • If a financial undertaking uses the temporary no-claim route, reproduce the standardized statement required by Article 7(9) of the amended delegated act and do not present Taxonomy association claims.
  • Do not confuse an assessment omission, a temporary reporting route, or an OpEx materiality option with being outside scope.
Section 6

Keep an evidence file for the reporting boundary

A useful scope file should let a reviewer trace the reporting obligation from the undertaking to the applicable template. It should not be a generic EU Taxonomy policy note.

For each reporting cycle, keep the legal scope basis, undertaking type, consolidation conclusion, selected annexes, timing assumption, and any voluntary-disclosure explanation together with the financial-reporting sign-off.

  • Article 19a or Article 29a conclusion and the source used for it.
  • Entity classification: non-financial undertaking or named financial-undertaking category.
  • Consolidation basis and parent-entity classification for group reporting.
  • Applicable annexes and templates.
  • KPI start date used for the reporting year, including any transition-period treatment.
  • Separate rationale for voluntary Taxonomy information, if included.
Recommended next step

Turn the Article 8 scope test into an evidence file

This EU Taxonomy scope guide helps connect the reporting entity, undertaking type, applicable annexes, and evidence owners before KPI work begins.

Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • The Disclosures Delegated Act specifies the content, presentation, and methodology for Article 8 disclosures.
"undertakings subject to Articles 19a or 29a"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Article 10 sets transition timing for non-financial undertakings, financial undertakings, and selected credit-institution KPIs; Article 8 requires accompanying disclosures to appear with the KPIs or through cross-references.
"Entry into force and application"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Articles 1 and 4 introduce assessment materiality options, the temporary financial-undertaking no-claim route through 31 December 2027, application from 1 January 2026, and the option to use the rules in force on 31 December 2025 for financial years starting in 2025.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Current Commission interpretation of the Article 8 Disclosures Delegated Act as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/73.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Article 8 links Taxonomy disclosures to undertakings required to publish non-financial information under Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU.
"shall include in its non-financial statement"
Related guides

Explore more topics

DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ
Practical FAQ on the current EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including listed substances, the 0.1% w/w SVHC threshold, alternatives, and controlled conditions.
EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims.
EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain
A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and cited-source review records.
EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment
Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates
Cited EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow
cited workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain.
EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist
Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement.
EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs
Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.
EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar
EU Taxonomy calendar covering Article 8 reporting phases, 2026 disclosure changes, environmental objective dates, and evidence review gates.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker
Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.
EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check
FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker
Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards guide covering Article 3 alignment, Article 17 harm tests, Article 18 procedures, evidence, and KPI controls.
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
Current EU Taxonomy Appendix C chemicals guide covering the 2026 replacement criteria, listed substances, legal exemptions, the SVHC threshold, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained
Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.
EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?
Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.
EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8
EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ
FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures.
EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs
EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPI guide covering GAR, sector KPIs, 2026 denominator rules, materiality options, exclusions, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions
Prepare EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio stock and flow disclosures with current rules for covered assets, exclusions, materiality, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy gas and nuclear activities: when can they align?
Explain how the EU Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act treats specified gas and nuclear activities, alignment criteria, DNSH evidence, and separate disclosures.
EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence
FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx
Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.
EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk
EU Taxonomy Article 22 explains who sets penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures and how to research the applicable national rule.
EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment
A cited EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ
Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison
Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with current Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence
Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits.