- Grounds KPI templates, financial-undertaking methodologies, common exclusions, reporting-period rules, and contextual disclosures.
"provide in the non-financial statement the key performance indicators"
Decide whether an undertaking must report under Article 8, whether an activity is Taxonomy-eligible, and what evidence is needed before calling it Taxonomy-aligned.
The test separates legal reporting scope from activity mapping, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI workpapers.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
An EU Taxonomy applicability decision should not start with a generic sustainability label. Start with the reporting undertaking and the economic activity, then test Article 8 reporting scope, whether the activity is described in the delegated acts, and whether the evidence supports Taxonomy alignment under Article 3.
The Taxonomy Regulation links undertaking-level disclosure to entities that publish non-financial information under Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU. For those undertakings, Article 8 requires information on how and to what extent activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities.
Do not treat every company, asset, supplier, or project as an Article 8 reporter. First record the reporting entity, whether the test is for a non-financial or financial undertaking, and which disclosure template or KPI family applies under the Disclosures Delegated Act.
Use the applicability result to separate Article 8 scope, eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI workpapers before publishing Taxonomy claims.
Eligibility is an activity-mapping question. Under the Disclosures Delegated Act, a Taxonomy-eligible economic activity is one described in delegated acts adopted under the environmental-objective articles, whether or not it meets the technical screening criteria.
Alignment is a higher test. Under Article 3 of the Taxonomy Regulation, the activity must substantially contribute to at least one environmental objective, do no significant harm to the others, meet minimum safeguards, and comply with applicable technical screening criteria.
The alignment file should read like a chain of proof. For each activity, cite the delegated-act criteria used for substantial contribution, then record the DNSH checks for the other environmental objectives and the minimum-safeguards assessment.
DNSH is not a generic statement. Article 17 lists significant-harm concepts across climate mitigation, climate adaptation, water and marine resources, circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and biodiversity and ecosystems. Commission guidance on the Climate Delegated Act also warns that technical screening criteria can be reviewed and updated over time.
The applicability test should end in a reportable data decision, not only a legal memo. For non-financial undertakings, Article 8 and the Disclosures Delegated Act require the proportions of turnover, CapEx, and OpEx associated with environmentally sustainable activities, with the delegated templates and contextual information.
For financial undertakings, the KPI package depends on the undertaking type. The Disclosures Delegated Act sets separate disclosure rules for asset managers, credit institutions, investment firms, and insurance or reinsurance undertakings, and it contains common rules such as exclusions for central governments, central banks, supranational issuers, derivatives, and certain non-reporting undertakings in financial KPI calculations.
A useful applicability record should let a reviewer move from the published KPI or claim back to the legal source, activity classification, screening evidence, data extract, and approval decision. That is especially important when a public statement says an activity is Taxonomy-aligned rather than merely eligible.
Keep advisory material labeled correctly. Commission notices can help interpret and implement the delegated acts, while Platform reports and Technical Expert Group materials are useful context but should not be presented as binding law.
"provide in the non-financial statement the key performance indicators"
"do not extend in any way the rights and obligations"
"Only the Court of Justice of the European Union"
"cornerstone of the EU's sustainable finance framework"
"Due diligence processes are at the heart of MS"
"does not significantly harm any of the environmental objectives"