EU TaxonomyArticle 8 KPIsFinancial undertakings

EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs

This guide helps separate the Green Asset Ratio from the other Article 8 KPIs that apply to asset managers, investment firms, and insurance or reinsurance undertakings.

The page is based on the Disclosures Delegated Act and Commission Article 8 guidance, with attention to scope, exclusions, templates, and evidence.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Sections
7

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
9

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

The EU Taxonomy Disclosures Delegated Act sets Article 8 KPIs for credit institutions, asset managers, investment firms, and insurance or reinsurance undertakings. is the main KPI for credit institutions, not a whole-bank sustainability score. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 changed the templates, denominator rules, materiality options, and application dates from 1 January 2026, and it created a conditional financial-undertaking opt-out through 31 December 2027.

Section 1

Which financial undertakings have Article 8 KPI rules?

The Disclosures Delegated Act defines a as an undertaking subject to the Article 19a or 29a Accounting Directive sustainability reporting obligations that is an asset manager, credit institution, investment firm, insurance undertaking, or reinsurance undertaking.

Article 8(2) names turnover, CapEx, and OpEx KPIs for non-financial undertakings, while the delegated act provides separate KPIs and calculation methods for financial undertakings. A bank, asset manager, investment firm, insurer, or reinsurer should identify its undertaking type before choosing a template or formula.

  • Asset managers disclose the KPI specified in Annexes III and XI, using the Annex IV template.
  • Credit institutions disclose the information specified in Annexes V and XI, using the Annex VI template.
  • Investment firms disclose the information specified in Annexes VII and XI, using the Annex VIII template.
  • Insurance and reinsurance undertakings disclose the information specified in Annexes IX and XI, using the Annex X templates.
  • Entities that provide financial services but do not meet the delegated-act definition of may need to report as non-financial undertakings; the Commission notice says they may voluntarily disclose relevant financial-undertaking KPIs where appropriate.
Section 2

What does the Green Asset Ratio measure for credit institutions?

The delegated act describes the as the main KPI for credit institutions. At a high level, the numerator is the covered-asset amount financing or invested in Taxonomy-aligned activities, after the required activity or counterparty KPI weighting; the denominator is the covered on-balance-sheet asset population after the Article 7 exclusions. The ratio reflects lending and investment business such as loans, advances, debt securities, and equity holdings.

For on-balance-sheet exposures, Annex V says the covers specified accounting categories of financial assets, including loans and advances, debt securities, equity holdings, investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, certain non-trading fair-value assets, and repossessed real estate collateral. The GAR is disclosed with stock and flow information, environmental-objective breakdowns, and relevant enabling or transitional activity breakdowns.

  • L&A covers loans and advances to non-financial undertakings, with separate treatment for and unknown use of proceeds.
  • DS covers debt securities to non-financial undertakings, including use-of-proceeds securities and general-purpose debt securities.
  • EH covers equity holdings in non-financial undertakings, weighted by the investee's turnover and CapEx Taxonomy KPIs.
  • Credit institutions also disclose for financial-undertaking exposures, retail real estate and car-loan exposures, public housing or other specialised public-authority lending where relevant, and repossessed real estate collateral.
  • Annex V also requires total , combining the relevant exposure-based KPI numerators over total covered on-balance-sheet assets after the applicable Article 7 and Annex V exclusions.
Section 3

How do turnover-based and CapEx-based financial undertaking KPIs work?

KPI calculations depend heavily on counterparty and investee disclosures. The Article 8 rules require separate turnover-based and CapEx-based calculations where general-purpose exposures are weighted by an issuer or counterparty Taxonomy KPI.

For known-use-of-proceeds exposures that finance specific identified Taxonomy-aligned activities, include only the amount supported by activity or asset evidence under the applicable method. For general-purpose exposures, use the counterparty KPI and basis required for the reporting undertaking. Keep turnover-based and CapEx-based results separate.

  • : retain project, bond, loan, or activity evidence showing which Taxonomy-aligned activity is financed.
  • Unknown use of proceeds: retain the issuer or counterparty KPI used for weighting, including whether it is turnover-based or CapEx-based.
  • Counterparty exposures require the counterparty's applicable Article 8 KPI, not a generic sustainability label.
  • Avoid double counting where the delegated act requires discounting or allocation to the most relevant environmental objective.
  • Document the reporting year, disclosure reference date, stock or flow basis, turnover-based or CapEx-based weighting, gross carrying amount, and data-source limitation for each KPI input.
Section 4

Which exposures are excluded or limited in financial undertaking KPIs?

The amended Article 7 exclusions affect how and other financial-undertaking KPIs should be read. Exposures to central governments, central banks, and supranational issuers remain outside numerator and denominator calculations. From 1 January 2026, derivatives, cash and cash equivalents, on-demand interbank loans, goodwill, commodities, and other asset categories not covered by Article 7(6) are also excluded from the denominator.

Exposures to undertakings outside Articles 19a and 29a, and outside groups caught by those provisions, are generally excluded from the denominator. The amended rule has specific treatment for qualifying special-purpose vehicles and permits voluntary inclusion where the counterparty reports the prescribed KPIs voluntarily or where use of proceeds is known. These coverage rules mean is not a measure of every asset on the balance sheet.

  • Do not present as a whole-bank sustainability score; it is a defined Article 8 ratio with numerator, denominator, and coverage constraints.
  • Do not include central government, central bank, or supranational issuer exposures in KPI numerator or denominator unless a future rule changes that treatment.
  • Exclude derivatives, cash and cash equivalents, on-demand interbank loans, goodwill, commodities, and other uncovered asset categories from the denominator under amended Article 7(2).
  • Exclude exposures to non-reporting undertakings from the denominator unless the group, SPV, voluntary-reporting, or known-use-of-proceeds rule permits inclusion.
  • For a voluntarily included counterparty, retain the counterparty KPI or known-use-of-proceeds evidence that supports both denominator and numerator treatment.
Section 5

When can materiality relief or the temporary opt-out be used?

Regulation (EU) 2026/73 lets each financial-undertaking type omit assessment of specified known-use-of-proceeds assets, exposures, revenue, premiums, or other KPI inputs when the cumulative omitted amount is below 10% of the relevant defined denominator. The exact denominator differs by undertaking and KPI. Omitted amounts are not erased: they must be reported separately as non-material.

Until 31 December 2027, a may opt out of most detailed Article 8 rules only if it makes no claim under Articles 3 and 9 of the Taxonomy Regulation that its activities are associated with environmentally sustainable activities. It must place the prescribed statement in its management report. The opt-out is a temporary reporting option and does not determine alignment.

  • Apply the 10% test to the denominator named for the specific undertaking and KPI; do not use 10% of total assets by default.
  • Keep non-material assets, exposures, revenue, premiums, or other inputs visible in the amended template and contextual information.
  • For a credit institution, also test whether the separate 10% net-turnover rule permits omission of Annex V KPIs.
  • Before using the opt-out, review all management-report, website, fund, product, and investor language for a Taxonomy-association claim.
  • Retain the prescribed statement, approval, reporting period, and reason for using the opt-out.
Section 6

When do financial undertaking KPI disclosures apply?

The Article 8 transition matters because KPI data depends on information from counterparties and investees. The delegated act limited 2022 reporting to specified elements and qualitative information, with remaining provisions applying from 1 January 2023 for non-financial undertakings and from 1 January 2024 for financial undertakings.

Credit institutions have an additional staged item. The original delegated-act transition placed trading-book and commission-and-fee KPIs for commercial services other than financing in 2026, but Regulation (EU) 2026/73 deferred those sections to 1 January 2028.

For a financial year beginning in 2025, a reporting undertaking may instead use the rules applicable on 31 December 2025. Commission Notice C/2026/2558 says the chosen rule set must be applied in full and identified in contextual information; selected elements of the old and amended rules should not be combined.

  • 2022: large undertakings reported Taxonomy-eligible and non-eligible proportions and qualitative information under the transition rules.
  • 2023: non- Taxonomy KPI provisions applied, giving financial undertakings more counterparty KPI data for their own calculations.
  • 2024: financial undertakings started reporting KPIs, including for credit institutions, under Article 10(5).
  • 2028: credit institution trading-book KPIs and fees-and-commissions KPIs for non-financing commercial services start after the deferral in Regulation (EU) 2026/73.
  • For local content and controls, keep the reporting period and disclosure reference date visible so users do not confuse eligibility-only transition disclosures with alignment KPIs.
Section 7

What qualitative evidence should accompany GAR and financial undertaking KPIs?

Annex XI requires quantitative KPIs to be accompanied by qualitative information for asset managers, credit institutions, investment firms, and insurance or reinsurance undertakings. That qualitative layer is not optional page decoration; it explains scope, data sources, data limitations, changes over time, strategy links, product design, and engagement with clients and counterparties.

The evidence file for or another financial-undertaking KPI should connect each number to its source population, exclusions, counterparty KPI inputs, known-use-of-proceeds evidence, method, and approval trail. Reassess after a counterparty restatement, changed use of proceeds, exposure disposal or acquisition, reporting-scope change, delegated-act amendment, or methodology correction. This record shows whether a ratio moved because financed activities, counterparty data, methodology, or coverage changed.

  • List the assets, exposures, activities, and undertaking types covered by the KPI.
  • Identify excluded exposure categories and show where they appear in complementary disclosures.
  • Record the data source for every counterparty or investee KPI used in weighting.
  • Separate business changes from data or methodology changes when explaining KPI movement over time.
  • Tie Article 8 disclosures to business strategy, product design processes, and client or counterparty engagement where Annex XI requires it.
Recommended next step

Turn GAR and Article 8 KPI rules into an evidence workflow

This EU Taxonomy guide helps map the applicable financial undertaking KPI, source data, exclusions, calculation basis, qualitative disclosure, and review trail before reporting.

Primary sources

References and citations

Related guides

Explore more topics

DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ
Practical FAQ on the current EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including listed substances, the 0.1% w/w SVHC threshold, alternatives, and controlled conditions.
EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims.
EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain
A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and cited-source review records.
EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment
Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates
Cited EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow
cited workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities
Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain.
EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist
Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement.
EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs
Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.
EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar
EU Taxonomy calendar covering Article 8 reporting phases, 2026 disclosure changes, environmental objective dates, and evidence review gates.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker
Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.
EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check
FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker
Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards guide covering Article 3 alignment, Article 17 harm tests, Article 18 procedures, evidence, and KPI controls.
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
Current EU Taxonomy Appendix C chemicals guide covering the 2026 replacement criteria, listed substances, legal exemptions, the SVHC threshold, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained
Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.
EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?
Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.
EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8
EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ
FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures.
EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions
Prepare EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio stock and flow disclosures with current rules for covered assets, exclusions, materiality, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy gas and nuclear activities: when can they align?
Explain how the EU Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act treats specified gas and nuclear activities, alignment criteria, DNSH evidence, and separate disclosures.
EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence
FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx
Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.
EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk
EU Taxonomy Article 22 explains who sets penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures and how to research the applicable national rule.
EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment
A cited EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ
Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison
Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with current Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence
Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits.