We use privacy-by-default, cookieless analytics.

Optional analytics cookies are used only if you accept them.

Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

TaxonomyCapEx evidenceEU

EU Taxonomy Regulation CapEx Plan Evidence

Document when planned capital expenditure can sit in the EU Taxonomy CapEx KPI numerator before the expanded or upgraded activity is complete.

This page helps collect the management approval, activity mapping, timing, expenditure, and contextual disclosures required by the Article 8 framework.

Back to main artifactReview sources
Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
4

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

A is the evidence route for capital expenditure used to expand Taxonomy-aligned activities or make Taxonomy-eligible activities Taxonomy-aligned. Keep the affected activity, management-body approval, measures, timing, expected expenditure, and technical-screening-criteria link in one controlled file. For reporting under the rules applying from 1 January 2026, record any permitted CapEx assessment omission before applying this checklist.

Section 1

When does a CapEx plan matter for the Article 8 CapEx KPI?

Start with the numerator. Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 allows numerator treatment for capital expenditure related to Taxonomy-aligned assets or processes, for a qualifying CapEx plan, and for certain purchases of Taxonomy-aligned output or individual measures implemented and operational within 18 months.

A CapEx plan is relevant when spending happens before the expansion or upgrade is complete and the undertaking wants to count that spending as Taxonomy-aligned in the period incurred. If the expanded activity becomes operational in the same financial period as all related CapEx is incurred, the Commission Notice explains that a CapEx plan may not be needed for that expansion route.

  • Confirm the undertaking is reporting the Article 8 turnover, CapEx, and OpEx KPIs as a non-financial undertaking.
  • Identify whether the CapEx relates to an already Taxonomy-aligned activity, a CapEx plan, or an individual measure route.
  • Use the CapEx plan route only for expanding Taxonomy-aligned activities or upgrading or commencing Taxonomy-eligible activities so they become Taxonomy-aligned.
  • If the undertaking uses the amended 10% CapEx assessment threshold, retain the threshold calculation and report the omitted CapEx separately as non-material rather than placing it in an eligibility or alignment category.
  • Keep the activity-level mapping clear enough to avoid counting the same CapEx across several economic activities or environmental objectives.
Sources for this answer
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178
Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 defines the CapEx KPI numerator and the CapEx plan route for non-financial undertakings.
Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures
FAQ 26 explains when an expansion uses the CapEx plan route rather than same-period aligned CapEx treatment.
Commission Article 8 FAQ on eligible activities and assets
Commission FAQ confirms that Article 8 reporting covers turnover, CapEx, and OpEx proportions for non-financial undertakings.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73
Article 1 adds the option to omit assessment of activities whose cumulative CapEx is below 10% of the CapEx KPI denominator and requires separate reporting as non-material CapEx.
Section 2

What must the CapEx plan itself prove?

The plan must aim to expand Taxonomy-aligned activities or upgrade Taxonomy-eligible activities so they become Taxonomy-aligned within five years. A longer period is possible only when objectively justified by the specific features of the economic activity and upgrade, and the delegated act caps that period at 10 years.

Evidence should therefore be activity-specific. A board slide that says the company is investing in transition will not be enough unless it identifies the economic activities, planned measures, timing, expected capital expenditure, and the that the activity is expected to meet.

  • Record the economic activity and environmental objective for each CapEx plan.
  • Keep the management-body approval or delegated approval record that starts the five-to-ten-year clock.
  • List the planned measures needed for technical-screening-criteria compliance, including expenditures and significant interim milestones.
  • Exclude spend that does not help the activity meet the relevant criteria, such as facility improvements with no environmental-performance bearing.
  • Add an objective justification inside the plan and contextual information when the expected alignment period exceeds five years.
Sources for this answer
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178
Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 sets the five-year condition, management-body approval requirement, update rule, and maximum 10-year justified period.
Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures
FAQ 24 says the CapEx-plan time period starts from management-body approval or delegated approval; FAQ 26 explains the precision expected in the plan.
Section 3

Which disclosure evidence should be retained?

Annex I Section 1.2.3.2 requires contextual information about the , including a quantitative breakdown at economic-activity aggregated level and a qualitative explanation of key changes during the reporting period.

For each CapEx plan, retain the five required disclosure fields: environmental objectives pursued, economic activities concerned, research and innovation activities where relevant, the period in which each activity is expected to be expanded or become aligned, and the total capital expense expected during the reporting period and over the plan period.

  • numerator workbook with line-item references to the non-financial statements.
  • Activity-level schedule showing which CapEx items fall under Section 1.1.2.2 points (a), (b), or (c).
  • CapEx plan register with objectives, activities, R&D or innovation items where relevant, timing, and expected capital expense.
  • evidence for the activity expected to become aligned.
  • Double-counting check across turnover, CapEx, OpEx, economic activities, and environmental objectives.
  • Contextual explanation for material changes, restatements, or changes in calculation approach.
Sources for this answer
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178
Annex I Section 1.2.3.2 lists the contextual information and key information required for each CapEx plan.
Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures
FAQ 27 says CapEx values under Section 1.1.2.2 points (a), (b), and (c) should be presented at activity level.
Recommended next step

Turn CapEx plan rules into an evidence workflow

This EU Taxonomy guide helps connect CapEx plan approval, activity mapping, KPI calculations, and contextual disclosure evidence before publication.

Research workflow
Open Research Copilot

Answer EU Taxonomy implementation questions with cited source material.

Explore next step
Talk to Sorena
Discuss EU Taxonomy implementation

Review CapEx plan scope, source evidence, and next implementation steps with Sorena.

Explore next step
Section 4

What changes during implementation or amended criteria?

The evidence file should not freeze after approval. Non-financial undertakings must disclose material changes in implementation of CapEx plans, the reasons for those changes, the impact on the potential for activities to become Taxonomy-aligned, and any restatement of CapEx or OpEx KPIs for past reporting years covered by the plan.

If relevant are amended before completion, Annex I requires the undertaking either to update the plan within two years so the activities are aligned with the amended criteria at completion, or to restate the numerator. Updating the plan restarts the plan period.

  • Trigger a review when for the activity change.
  • Record whether the plan was updated within the two-year window or whether the numerator was restated.
  • Explain how implementation changes affect expected alignment timing.
  • Keep restated comparative figures where a calculation change or plan change affects prior KPI disclosures.
  • After completion, verify that the expanded or upgraded activity meets the relevant .
Sources for this answer
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178
Annex I sets the update-or-restate rule when technical screening criteria change and requires disclosure of material changes to CapEx plan implementation.
Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures
FAQ 26 confirms that after completion, the expanded activity still needs to meet the relevant technical screening criteria.
Section 5

Common evidence mistakes to remove before publication

Most weak CapEx-plan files fail because they mix eligible, aligned, future-alignment, and individual-measure spending without explaining which Section 1.1.2.2 route is being used. That makes the reported hard to trace from source rule to accounting amount to economic activity.

A defensible file is narrow: it shows the Article 8 reporting scope, the accounting basis for CapEx, the activity-level allocation, the approval date, the plan period, the planned measures, and the contextual disclosure text that will be published.

  • Do not count a broad transition budget as a CapEx plan unless it identifies the Taxonomy activity, measures, expenditure, timing, and milestones.
  • Do not use CapEx-plan treatment for spend that is unrelated to meeting the .
  • Do not describe the plan as already aligned if the evidence only supports eligibility or future expected alignment.
  • Do not omit management-body or delegated approval evidence; the Commission Notice ties the plan clock to that approval.
  • Do not publish activity-level CapEx values without explaining the related points (a), (b), and (c) treatment and avoiding double counting.
Sources for this answer
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178
Binding disclosure rules for CapEx KPI methodology, CapEx plan conditions, contextual information, and restatement triggers.
Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures
Commission interpretation explaining timing, precision, activity-level presentation, and multi-period expansion treatment for CapEx plans.
Commission Article 8 FAQ on eligible activities and assets
Article 8 FAQ sources support the broader reporting context for turnover, CapEx, and OpEx ratios.
Primary sources

References and citations

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Binding disclosure rules for CapEx KPI methodology, CapEx plan conditions, contextual information, and restatement triggers.
"previously published KPI related to capital expenditure shall be restated"
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Article 1 adds the option to omit assessment of activities whose cumulative CapEx is below 10% of the CapEx KPI denominator and requires separate reporting as non-material CapEx.
Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Commission interpretation explaining timing, precision, activity-level presentation, and multi-period expansion treatment for CapEx plans.
"expenditures related to those measures and their timing"
Related guides

Explore more topics

DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ
Practical FAQ on the current EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including listed substances, the 0.1% w/w SVHC threshold, alternatives, and controlled conditions.
EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims.
EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain
A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and cited-source review records.
EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment
Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates
Cited EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow
cited workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities
Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain.
EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement.
EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs
Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.
EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar
EU Taxonomy calendar covering Article 8 reporting phases, 2026 disclosure changes, environmental objective dates, and evidence review gates.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker
Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.
EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check
FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker
Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards guide covering Article 3 alignment, Article 17 harm tests, Article 18 procedures, evidence, and KPI controls.
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
Current EU Taxonomy Appendix C chemicals guide covering the 2026 replacement criteria, listed substances, legal exemptions, the SVHC threshold, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained
Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.
EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?
Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.
EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8
EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ
FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures.
EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs
EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPI guide covering GAR, sector KPIs, 2026 denominator rules, materiality options, exclusions, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions
Prepare EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio stock and flow disclosures with current rules for covered assets, exclusions, materiality, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy gas and nuclear activities: when can they align?
Explain how the EU Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act treats specified gas and nuclear activities, alignment criteria, DNSH evidence, and separate disclosures.
EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence
FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx
Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.
EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk
EU Taxonomy Article 22 explains who sets penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures and how to research the applicable national rule.
EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment
A cited EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ
Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison
Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with current Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence
Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits.