TaxonomyGAR workflowEU

EU Taxonomy Regulation GAR KPI Workflow

A practical workflow for credit institutions preparing Green Asset Ratio (GAR) disclosures under Article 8 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.

Use it to move from exposure inventory to Annex VI templates, with cited checks for coverage, exclusions, counterparty KPIs, use-of-proceeds evidence, stock, and flow.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Sections
4

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
6

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

The is the main on-balance-sheet EU Taxonomy KPI for credit institutions. Prepare it by fixing the reporting perimeter, classifying covered and excluded assets under the current delegated act, separating known-use-of-proceeds evidence from weighting, and calculating . The rules applying from 1 January 2026 also change denominator exclusions and permit defined materiality and temporary no-claim options.

Section 1

Set the GAR scope before collecting exposure data

Start with the legal reporting perimeter. Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 requires in-scope undertakings to disclose how and to what extent their activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. For credit institutions, the Disclosures Delegated Act specifies the GAR methodology in Annex V and the tabular presentation in Annex VI.

The delegated act describes GAR as the proportion of a credit institution's assets financing and invested in Taxonomy-aligned economic activities relative to total covered assets. Begin by identifying the credit institution, prudential consolidation basis, reporting year, applicable rule set, and Annex VI templates. For a financial year starting in 2025, the institution may use the rules in force on 31 December 2025 instead of the amendments applying from 1 January 2026. Commission Notice C/2026/2558 says that choice applies to the complete rule set and must be identified in contextual information.

  • Confirm that the entity is a credit institution and that Article 8 reporting is being prepared under the Disclosures Delegated Act.
  • Use prudential consolidation and the balance sheet scope required for the GAR exposure types in Annex V.
  • Map the required Annex VI outputs before calculations: summary KPIs, covered assets, sector information, GAR KPI stock, GAR KPI flow, and, when applicable, later fees-and-commissions and trading-book templates.
  • Separate GAR work from non-financial undertaking turnover, CapEx, and OpEx KPI workflows; those non-financial KPIs feed some counterparty weightings but are not the bank's own GAR.
Section 2

Classify covered assets, exclusions, and counterparty data

Build the exposure inventory around Annex V categories rather than a generic loan list. GAR covers on-balance-sheet financial assets such as loans and advances, debt securities, equity holdings, and repossessed collateral. Under the rules applying from 1 January 2026, derivatives, cash and cash equivalents, on-demand interbank loans, goodwill, commodities, and other assets outside Article 7(6) are excluded from financial-undertaking KPI denominators.

For exposures to undertakings, the workflow should capture whether the counterparty publishes Article 8 KPIs and which KPI must be applied. For non-financial undertakings, the delegated act uses their turnover and CapEx Taxonomy KPIs in several weighting steps. For financial undertaking counterparties, the bank should use the relevant under the delegated act, such as a counterparty credit institution's total GAR.

  • Tag each exposure by Annex V type: loans and advances, debt securities, equity holdings, repossessed real estate collateral, retail mortgage or renovation loans, car loans, local-government housing finance, or other specialised lending.
  • Record denominator exclusions separately, including exposures to central governments, central banks, and supranational issuers and, under the amended rules, exposures to undertakings outside Articles 19a or 29a that do not belong to a group covered by those provisions.
  • Apply the amended exceptions carefully: qualifying SPV exposures remain in scope; voluntarily reporting counterparties and known-use-of-proceeds exposures to otherwise excluded undertakings may be included under Article 7(3), with the prescribed numerator treatment.
  • If known-use on-balance-sheet assets omitted from assessment are cumulatively below 10% of all known-use assets in the GAR denominator, calculate the threshold separately for and report the omitted assets as non-material.
  • Store the counterparty's latest available Article 8 KPI source, reporting period, KPI type, and whether the exposure uses a turnover-based or CapEx-based weighting.
  • For Annex VI sector information, assign the counterparty's main NACE activity; if a holding company, special purpose vehicle, or multi-entity exposure is involved, document the principal activity used for the template row.
Section 3

Separate use-of-proceeds evidence from counterparty KPI weighting

Keep two GAR evidence paths distinct. Where use of proceeds is known, connect the exposure amount to the financed Taxonomy-aligned activity and the applicable technical screening criteria. Where use of proceeds is unknown, apply the issuer or weighting required by Annex V rather than treating the full exposure as aligned.

The Annex VI guidance also makes the 'of which Use of Proceeds' column a separate information view. It is used for exposures where proceeds are known and included in the GAR up to the amount financing Taxonomy-aligned activities; it does not simply add together with the 'of which transitional' and 'of which enabling' views.

  • For known-use-of-proceeds loans and debt securities, retain the financing purpose, funded activity, financed amount, screening-criteria evidence, and any amount excluded from the aligned numerator.
  • For specialised lending, document the use-of-proceeds assessment under the Annex V GAR loans-and-advances component rather than treating specialised lending as project finance only.
  • For general-purpose lending or securities without known use of proceeds, apply the relevant and keep the published counterparty disclosure as evidence.
  • Keep separate tags for use-of-proceeds, transitional activity, enabling activity, environmental objective, stock, and flow so Annex VI 'of which' columns can be populated without double counting.
Recommended next step

Turn GAR rules into a reviewable evidence workflow

This GAR workflow helps connect Article 8 source requirements, exposure data, counterparty KPIs, Annex VI template rows, and reviewer-ready evidence before publication.

Section 4

Calculate stock, flow, and qualitative support for review

The calculation workstream should produce outputs that can be traced back to gross carrying amounts and Annex VI rows. For flow in template 4, Commission Notice C/2024/6691 explains that credit institutions should use newly incurred exposures during the year prior to the disclosure reference date and should not calculate flow as the difference between exposure at T and exposure at T-1.

Before publication, the review pack should include the quantitative templates and the qualitative information required by Annex XI. That support should explain the scope of assets and activities, data sources and limitations, evolution of Taxonomy-aligned economic activities, and how Taxonomy compliance is reflected in business strategy, product design, and client or counterparty engagement.

  • Reconcile each template line to gross carrying amount, exposure type, source, use-of-proceeds evidence, and exclusion reason.
  • Calculate separately; for flow, use newly incurred loans and advances, debt securities, equity instruments, and repossessed collateral during the year prior to the disclosure reference date.
  • Document turnover-based and CapEx-based outputs separately where Annex V requires both versions.
  • Add qualitative notes on data limitations, excluded assets, counterparty data gaps, and methodology choices before sign-off.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • The amended Annex VI flow template includes newly incurred repossessed collateral alongside loans and advances, debt securities, and equity instruments.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Clarifies early Article 8 eligible-activity and eligible-asset reporting, including template use and the relationship between eligible activities and KPI denominators.
"eligible activities do not equal to the denominator"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Current Commission interpretation of financial-undertaking reporting under the amended Disclosures Delegated Act.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Grounds the Article 8 obligation to disclose how and to what extent activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities.
"information on how and to what extent the undertaking’s activities are associated"
Related guides

Explore more topics

DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ
Practical FAQ on the current EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including listed substances, the 0.1% w/w SVHC threshold, alternatives, and controlled conditions.
EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims.
EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain
A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and cited-source review records.
EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment
Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates
Cited EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow
cited workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities
Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ
cited FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain.
EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist
Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI
Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement.
EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs
Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.
EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar
EU Taxonomy calendar covering Article 8 reporting phases, 2026 disclosure changes, environmental objective dates, and evidence review gates.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker
Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.
EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check
FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker
Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards guide covering Article 3 alignment, Article 17 harm tests, Article 18 procedures, evidence, and KPI controls.
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
Current EU Taxonomy Appendix C chemicals guide covering the 2026 replacement criteria, listed substances, legal exemptions, the SVHC threshold, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained
Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.
EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?
Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.
EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8
EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ
FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures.
EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs
EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPI guide covering GAR, sector KPIs, 2026 denominator rules, materiality options, exclusions, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy gas and nuclear activities: when can they align?
Explain how the EU Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act treats specified gas and nuclear activities, alignment criteria, DNSH evidence, and separate disclosures.
EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence
FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx
Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.
EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk
EU Taxonomy Article 22 explains who sets penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures and how to research the applicable national rule.
EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment
A cited EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ
Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison
Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with current Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence
Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits.