FAQ HubTaxonomyEU

EU Taxonomy FAQ eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8 reporting

Direct answers for teams deciding whether an economic activity is Taxonomy-eligible, what is needed for alignment, and what evidence supports Article 8 disclosures.

Use the linked FAQ modules to separate delegated-act activity mapping, technical screening criteria, do-no-significant-harm checks, Article 18 minimum safeguards, and KPI reporting.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 27, 2026
FAQ modules
12

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
9

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated May 27, 2026
Overview

The EU Taxonomy is the EU classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activities. This FAQ hub is for legal, finance, sustainability, product, and portfolio teams that need a practical path from an activity description to eligibility, alignment, evidence, and Article 8 disclosure decisions without treating the Taxonomy as a generic ESG label.

Browse sub-FAQs

Choose the question set you need

These focused FAQ modules break this artifact into narrower answer sets so teams can move straight to the right source-backed guidance.

Browse all FAQ items49
Focused FAQ modules
12
Showing 12 of 12
FAQ module

DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ

Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including SVHCs, CLP hazard classes, the 0.1% w/w threshold, suitable alternatives, and controlled conditions evidence.

3 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?

source-linked FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain

A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and source-linked review records.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ

source-linked FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review

Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI

Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement.

5 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check

FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?

Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ

FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence

FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.

5 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx

Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.

4 items
FAQ module

EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ

Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.

4 items
Question 1

What should an EU Taxonomy FAQ answer first?

Start with the economic activity, not the company or product brand. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 classifies whether an economic activity can qualify as environmentally sustainable. A useful FAQ answer should therefore identify the activity, the relevant environmental objective, the delegated-act criteria that cover it, and the evidence needed to show whether the activity is only eligible or also aligned.

For alignment, Article 3 requires more than being listed in a delegated act. The activity must contribute substantially to at least one environmental objective, do no significant harm to the other objectives, comply with Article 18 minimum safeguards, and meet the relevant technical screening criteria.

  • Identify the economic activity and the delegated act that contains its activity description.
  • Separate eligibility from alignment before calculating any public KPI.
  • Record the substantial-contribution criteria, DNSH criteria, and minimum-safeguards evidence separately.
  • Tie the conclusion to an Article 8 reporting output, such as non-financial undertaking turnover, CapEx, or OpEx KPIs, or the relevant financial-undertaking KPI.
Question 2

How should teams organize eligibility, alignment, DNSH, and minimum-safeguards evidence?

Use a four-part evidence file. First, keep the activity-mapping record that explains why the revenue, expenditure, asset, exposure, or project matches a Taxonomy activity description. Second, keep the technical screening criteria record for substantial contribution. Third, keep the do-no-significant-harm record for the other environmental objectives. Fourth, keep the minimum safeguards record for the undertaking carrying out the activity.

The six environmental objectives are climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. Minimum safeguards under Article 18 are procedures aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, including ILO fundamental principles and rights at work and the International Bill of Human Rights.

  • Activity map: delegated-act activity name, activity boundary, business unit, data owner, and included revenue or expenditure lines.
  • Substantial contribution: criterion-by-criterion test, measurement basis, assumptions, source systems, and reviewer sign-off.
  • DNSH: objective-by-objective harm check using the criteria that apply to the activity and delegated act.
  • Minimum safeguards: due-diligence procedures, human-rights and labour-rights controls, escalation records, and unresolved cases that may affect the alignment conclusion.
Recommended next step

Turn EU Taxonomy answers into reportable evidence

Use this EU Taxonomy FAQ hub to connect activity mapping, technical screening criteria, DNSH checks, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI evidence before reporting or publishing sustainability claims.

Question 3

Which EU Taxonomy FAQ sources should be treated as authoritative?

Use the Taxonomy Regulation for the legal framework, the relevant delegated acts for activity-level criteria, and Commission notices or FAQ publications for interpretation. The Commission's EU Taxonomy FAQ publication dated 29 November 2024 provides technical clarifications on the Taxonomy Climate and Environmental Delegated Acts, generic DNSH criteria, and related reporting obligations.

For reporting questions, use the Article 8 Disclosures Delegated Act and the Commission notices on Article 8 before relying on summaries. Non-financial undertakings disclose the proportion of turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure associated with environmentally sustainable activities. Financial undertakings use the KPI structure in the Disclosures Delegated Act, including the Green Asset Ratio where relevant.

  • Legal framework: Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
  • Activity criteria: the climate, complementary climate, environmental, and amending delegated acts that cover the activity.
  • Reporting mechanics: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 and Commission Article 8 notices.
  • Interpretive support: Commission notices, Commission FAQ publications, the EU Taxonomy Navigator, and Platform reports where their non-binding status is clear.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Delegated act source for climate mitigation and climate adaptation activity criteria, including technical screening and DNSH criteria for covered activities.
"technical screening criteria"
finance.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Commission overview describing the EU Taxonomy as a sustainable-finance classification and market-transparency tool, with links to legislation, delegated acts, guidance, and tools.
"EU taxonomy for sustainable activities"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Primary legal source for the Taxonomy framework, environmental objectives, Article 3 alignment conditions, Article 8 disclosures, and Article 18 minimum safeguards.
"criteria for environmentally sustainable economic activities"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Primary source for the six environmental objectives, do-no-significant-harm structure, and Article 18 minimum-safeguards requirement.
"six environmental objectives"
Related guides

Explore more topics

EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment
Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates
source-linked EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow
source-linked workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks.
EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities
Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.
EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist
Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs
Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.
EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar
source-linked EU Taxonomy calendar for Article 8 reporting phases, environmental objective application dates, delegated-act updates, and evidence review gates.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker
Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.
EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker
Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards: Article 3 alignment gates, Article 17 significant harm, Article 18 safeguards, evidence records, and KPI controls.
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals checks, including SVHC thresholds, alternatives, controlled conditions, and evidence records.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained
Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.
EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs
source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, including GAR, asset manager KPIs, investment firm KPIs, insurance KPIs, exclusions, and reporting evidence.
EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions
source-linked workflow for preparing EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio (GAR) KPI disclosures under Article 8 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk
Understand where EU Taxonomy penalty exposure starts: Article 22 measures and penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures, with practical evidence controls.
EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment
A source-linked EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison
Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with CSRD sustainability reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits using official EU Taxonomy sources.
EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence
Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits.