EU Taxonomy FAQ eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8 reporting
Direct answers for teams deciding whether an economic activity is Taxonomy-eligible, what is needed for alignment, and what evidence supports Article 8 disclosures.
Use the linked FAQ answers to separate delegated-act activity mapping, technical screening criteria, do no significant harm (DNSH) checks, Article 18 minimum safeguards, and key performance indicator (KPI) reporting.
The is the EU classification system for environmentally sustainable economic activities. This FAQ hub is for legal, finance, sustainability, product, and portfolio teams that need a practical path from an activity description to eligibility, alignment, evidence, and Article 8 disclosure decisions without treating the Taxonomy as a generic ESG label.
Browse sub-FAQs
Choose the question set you need
These focused FAQ modules break this artifact into narrower answer sets so teams can move straight to the right source-backed guidance.
Start with the economic activity, not the company or product brand. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 classifies whether an economic activity can qualify as environmentally sustainable. Identify the activity, the relevant environmental objective, the delegated-act criteria that cover it, and the evidence needed to show whether the activity is eligible or also aligned.
For alignment, Article 3 requires more than being listed in a delegated act. The activity must contribute substantially to at least one environmental objective, do no significant harm to the other objectives, comply with Article 18 minimum safeguards, and meet the relevant technical screening criteria.
Identify the economic activity and the delegated act that contains its activity description.
Separate eligibility from alignment before calculating any public KPI.
Record the substantial-contribution criteria, DNSH criteria, and minimum-safeguards evidence separately.
Tie the conclusion to an Article 8 reporting output, such as non-financial undertaking turnover, CapEx, or OpEx KPIs, or the relevant financial-undertaking KPI.
Commission overview describing the EU Taxonomy as a sustainable-finance classification and market-transparency tool, with links to legislation, delegated acts, guidance, and tools.
Official Commission notice used for FAQ interpretation questions, including links between the Taxonomy Regulation, financial product disclosures, and minimum safeguards.
interpretation and implementation
2
Question 2
How should teams organize eligibility, alignment, DNSH, and minimum-safeguards evidence?
Use a four-part evidence file. First, keep the activity-mapping record that explains why the revenue, expenditure, asset, exposure, or project matches a Taxonomy activity description. Second, keep the technical screening criteria record for substantial contribution. Third, keep the do-no-significant-harm record for the other environmental objectives. Fourth, keep the minimum safeguards record for the undertaking carrying out the activity.
The six environmental objectives are climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources, transition to a circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. Minimum safeguards under Article 18 are procedures aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, including ILO fundamental principles and rights at work and the International Bill of Human Rights.
Activity map: delegated-act activity name, activity boundary, business unit, data owner, and included revenue or expenditure lines.
DNSH: objective-by-objective harm check using the criteria that apply to the activity and delegated act.
Minimum safeguards: due-diligence procedures, human-rights and labour-rights controls, escalation records, and unresolved cases that may affect the alignment conclusion.
Delegated act source for climate mitigation and climate adaptation activity criteria, including technical screening and DNSH criteria for covered activities.
Which EU Taxonomy FAQ sources should be treated as authoritative?
Use the Taxonomy Regulation for the legal framework, the relevant delegated acts for activity-level criteria, and Commission notices or FAQ publications for interpretation. The Commission's FAQ publication dated 29 November 2024 provides technical clarifications on the Taxonomy Climate and Environmental Delegated Acts, generic DNSH criteria, and related reporting obligations.
For reporting questions, use the Article 8 Disclosures Delegated Act and its current amendments before relying on summaries. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 applies from 1 January 2026, while allowing undertakings to use the rules applicable on 31 December 2025 for a financial year starting during 2025. Non-financial undertakings use turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure KPIs; financial undertakings use the category-specific KPI structure, including the Green Asset Ratio where relevant.
Legal framework: Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
Activity criteria: the climate, complementary climate, environmental, and amending delegated acts that cover the activity.
Commission publication page for the 29 November 2024 FAQ clarifications on delegated-act technical screening criteria, generic DNSH criteria, and related reporting obligations.
Binding amendment applying from 1 January 2026, with a transition option for financial years starting in 2025, that changes Article 8 templates, materiality assessment, financial KPIs, and specified DNSH criteria.
It shall apply from 1 January 2026
4
Question 4
Questions and answers
Are gas and nuclear activities automatically Taxonomy-aligned?
No. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 covers only the specified gas and nuclear activities and does not align them automatically. The operator must match the exact activity description and satisfy its substantial-contribution threshold, every applicable DNSH condition, Article 18 minimum safeguards, and the other technical screening criteria for the reporting period. Article 8 also requires separate information for the covered gas and nuclear activities.
What is the difference between Taxonomy eligibility and Taxonomy alignment?
Taxonomy eligibility means an economic activity is described in a delegated act, whether or not it meets the criteria. Taxonomy alignment means that eligible activity also meets all Article 3 conditions: substantial contribution to at least one objective, DNSH for the other objectives, Article 18 minimum safeguards, and the applicable technical screening criteria. An eligible activity with a failed or unproven condition remains eligible but must not enter an aligned KPI numerator.
What should teams report first under Article 8?
Start by confirming whether the undertaking must publish sustainability information under Article 19a or 29a of the Accounting Directive for that reporting year. Then classify the reporter and map its activities or exposures as eligible or non-eligible. Test eligible activities for alignment before calculating the applicable KPI: turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx), and operating expenditure (OpEx) for a non-financial undertaking, or the category-specific KPI for an asset manager, credit institution, investment firm, insurer, or reinsurer.
What evidence should be kept for an alignment decision?
Keep an activity-level file that identifies the reporting entity, activity boundary, environmental objective, delegated-act section and version, substantial-contribution calculation, every applicable DNSH check, and the dated minimum-safeguards conclusion. Add source data, assumptions, evidence owners, reviewer approval, the reporting period, and the bridge to the Article 8 KPI line. A reviewer should be able to reproduce the classification and see why any failed or unresolved gate kept the amount out of the aligned numerator.
Did Regulation (EU) 2026/73 remove reporting?
No. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 applies from 1 January 2026 and simplifies Article 8 reporting rather than repealing it; an undertaking may instead use the rules in force on 31 December 2025 for a financial year that started during 2025. The amendment introduced KPI-specific non-materiality options, generally based on cumulative 10% tests whose denominator depends on the KPI, and requires unassessed amounts to be reported separately. It also gives a qualifying financial undertaking a temporary opt-out through 31 December 2027 only if it makes no Taxonomy-association claim and includes the prescribed management-report statement.
Which six environmental objectives does the use?
Article 9 lists six objectives: climate change mitigation; climate change adaptation; sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; transition to a circular economy; pollution prevention and control; and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. Climate criteria applied from 1 January 2022, and the Regulation's provisions for the other four objectives applied from 1 January 2023. For alignment, an activity must contribute substantially to at least one objective and satisfy the applicable DNSH criteria for the others.
Does being outside mandatory Article 8 reporting make an activity Taxonomy-aligned?
No. Article 8 reporting scope and activity alignment are separate questions. An undertaking outside the Article 19a or 29a reporting scope may have no mandatory Article 8 disclosure for the tested year, but any voluntary, contractual, financing, SFDR, or product claim that an activity is Taxonomy-aligned still needs the Article 3 evidence. Outside reporting scope is not an alignment conclusion.
What should teams do when evidence is missing?
If activity mapping establishes eligibility but alignment evidence is missing, record the activity as eligible but not demonstrated as aligned and keep it out of the aligned KPI numerator. If eligibility itself is unresolved, record that uncertainty internally rather than assuming eligibility. Name the missing criterion or mapping evidence, data owner, requested evidence, reviewer, and due date. Reassess when the evidence arrives or when the activity facts, delegated-act criteria, supplier data, reporting boundary, or minimum-safeguards findings change.
Delegated act source for climate change mitigation and adaptation technical screening criteria and DNSH criteria for covered activities.
Delegated act source for climate mitigation and climate adaptation activity criteria, including technical screening and DNSH criteria for covered activities.
Current binding amendment for Article 8 simplification, KPI-specific non-materiality options, temporary financial-undertaking relief, revised templates, and amended DNSH criteria from 1 January 2026.
Binding amendment applying from 1 January 2026, with a transition option for financial years starting in 2025, that changes Article 8 templates, materiality assessment, financial KPIs, and specified DNSH criteria.
Official Commission notice used for interpretive FAQ questions on reporting Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned economic activities and assets under the Disclosures Delegated Act.
Commission notice source for interpretive questions on Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned activity reporting under the Disclosures Delegated Act.
"Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned"
More quoted passages
"reporting of Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned"
Commission overview page for the EU Taxonomy, including links to legislation, delegated acts, Commission notices, FAQ material, and the Taxonomy Navigator.
Commission overview describing the EU Taxonomy as a sustainable-finance classification and market-transparency tool, with links to legislation, delegated acts, guidance, and tools.
Commission FAQ publication page dated 29 November 2024 for technical clarifications on delegated-act criteria, generic DNSH criteria, and related reporting obligations.
Commission publication page for the 29 November 2024 FAQ clarifications on delegated-act technical screening criteria, generic DNSH criteria, and related reporting obligations.
Official Commission notice used for FAQ interpretation questions, including links between the Taxonomy Regulation, financial product disclosures, and minimum safeguards.