- Requires non-financial undertaking disclosures to use the delegated-act templates and explain how turnover, CapEx, and OpEx were determined and allocated.
"determined and allocated to the numerator"
Build a cited evidence file for EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures.
This guide focuses on what to document before calling an economic activity Taxonomy-aligned, and where unsupported or activity-specific claims should stay out of public reporting.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
EU Taxonomy screening starts with the exact economic activity and the delegated-act version that applies to the reporting year. Eligibility means the activity is described in a delegated act. Alignment requires all Article 3 conditions: substantial contribution, no significant harm to the other environmental objectives, minimum safeguards, and compliance with the applicable . Failure to support one required criterion prevents an aligned claim.
Eligibility is a classification step: identify whether the activity is described in the Taxonomy delegated acts. The Article 8 Disclosures Delegated Act defines a Taxonomy-eligible economic activity as one described in delegated acts, regardless of whether it meets any or all of the .
Alignment is a stricter conclusion. The Taxonomy Regulation requires an aligned activity to contribute substantially to at least one environmental objective, avoid significant harm to the other objectives, meet minimum safeguards, and comply with the Commission's .
For each eligible activity, the evidence file should quote or reference the exact substantial-contribution criteria and each criterion that applies to the activity. The Taxonomy Regulation says should identify relevant contributions, specify minimum requirements to avoid significant harm, be quantitative with thresholds where possible and otherwise qualitative, and facilitate verification of compliance.
The Commission notice narrows what checking compliance means in practice: collect and assess relevant information to determine whether the activity fulfils the conditions in the . Where a criterion is not relevant to the specific activity, the disclosure should explain why the element is not involved rather than silently omitting it.
A substantial-contribution result is not enough for alignment. Article 3 requires and minimum safeguards alongside , and the Commission notice states that all substantial-contribution criteria, DNSH criteria, and minimum safeguards must be met for an activity to be considered Taxonomy-aligned.
Minimum safeguards documentation should point to procedures that align the undertaking's activity with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, including the ILO fundamental principles and rights identified in Article 18.
Article 8 requires undertakings in scope to disclose how and to what extent their activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. For non-financial undertakings, the Regulation identifies the proportions of turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure linked to qualifying activities.
The Disclosures Delegated Act turns that into a documentation task: non-financial undertakings disclose the specified information in tabular form using templates, calculate turnover, CapEx, and OpEx KPIs, explain how amounts were determined and allocated, and avoid double counting across activities and objectives.
This EU Taxonomy guide helps map each activity to its delegated-act criteria, DNSH checks, minimum safeguards, KPI calculations, and evidence gaps before publishing alignment claims.
Screening criteria are not static. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 amended parts of the Climate and Environmental Delegated Acts, including pollution-prevention criteria, and applies from 1 January 2026. An undertaking with a financial year starting in 2025 may instead use the delegated acts as they stood on 31 December 2025.
Carry the delegated-act version, reporting-year choice, assessment date, and reason each prior evidence item remains valid. Test every applicable criterion in the chosen version: failure to demonstrate even one required criterion means the activity cannot be reported as Taxonomy-aligned.
"determined and allocated to the numerator"
"could become stricter over time"
"regularly review the technical screening criteria"
"meet minimum safeguards"