EU TaxonomyFree Resource

EU Taxonomy Timeline, Eligibility and Article 8 Guide

The EU Taxonomy classifies economic activities, not whole companies. Start by checking whether the undertaking must publish sustainability information under Article 19a or 29a of the Accounting Directive and therefore reports under Taxonomy Regulation . Then separate activity eligibility from alignment and disclosure.

By Sorena AIOfficial sourcesNo signup required
Quick scan
Taxonomy
Eligible
Covered by a Taxonomy delegated-act activity description.
Aligned
An meets substantial-contribution criteria, every applicable technical screening criterion, , and .
Disclosed
Mapped to the current template or KPI family, including where applicable and any separately reported non-material activity.

Use the visual timeline for legal changes, then follow the grouped guides from reporting scope to activity evidence and KPIs. Climate criteria applied from 1 January 2022; the Taxonomy Regulation's provisions for the other four objectives applied from 1 January 2023, and the Environmental Delegated Act criteria applied from January 2024. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 applies from 1 January 2026, subject to its 2025-financial-year option. Do not implement the March 2026 draft screening-criteria revisions unless an adopted act is published and applicable.

Key dates
6
Objectives
DNSH
No harm
GAR
Finance KPI
Art. 8
Disclosure
What you can decide faster
Eligibility
Match each revenue, expenditure, asset, exposure, or project to a delegated-act activity description. If no description fits, record it as non-eligible rather than choosing the nearest label.
Alignment
Check substantial contribution, every applicable criterion, , and the technical screening criteria separately. An unresolved or failed gate keeps the activity out of an aligned numerator.
Disclosure
Identify whether the reporter is a non-financial undertaking or a financial undertaking, then use its KPI family, 2026 materiality options, denominator exclusions, templates, and contextual notes.
Eligibility first
DNSH evidence
Article 8 KPIs
Publication details
Editorial metadata for this artifact
Author
Sorena AI
Published
Feb 21, 2026
Updated
Jul 16, 2026

An is only covered by a delegated-act description. Calling it aligned requires substantial contribution to at least one of six objectives, no significant harm to the others, , and every applicable technical screening criterion. A company can therefore report a mix of non-eligible, eligible but not aligned, and aligned activities. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 applies from 1 January 2026, subject to its option to use the rules in force on 31 December 2025 for a financial year that started during 2025.

Taxonomy Timeline

Key dates for delegated acts and disclosures

Track the core Regulation, Taxonomy delegated acts, disclosure rules, Commission notices, and amendments that change activity coverage or reporting evidence. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 applies from 1 January 2026, while the March 2026 climate and environmental screening-criteria revisions remain draft initiatives pending adoption and Official Journal publication.

Loading timeline...
Recommended reading path

Choose the next EU Taxonomy decision

New to the Taxonomy? Start with reporting scope and the difference between eligibility and alignment. If those decisions are documented, jump to criteria evidence, KPIs, change monitoring, or a comparison guide.

1

Start here: scope and classification

Identify the reporting undertaking and its KPI family, then learn why a covered economic activity is eligible but not necessarily aligned.

2

Eligibility, alignment, and criteria

Map the activity to an adopted delegated act and test substantial contribution, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and every applicable technical screening criterion.

EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow
Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.
Read guide
EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment
Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.
Read guide
EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs
Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.
Read guide
EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide
How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.
Read guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards guide covering Article 3 alignment, Article 17 harm tests, Article 18 procedures, evidence, and KPI controls.
Read guide
EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide
Current EU Taxonomy Appendix C chemicals guide covering the 2026 replacement criteria, listed substances, legal exemptions, the SVHC threshold, and evidence records.
Read guide
EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence
Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.
Read guide
3

Implementation and evidence

Turn the criteria decision into owned records, calculation controls, CapEx-plan evidence, review gates, and defensible public wording.

4

Article 8 disclosures and KPIs

Select the correct non-financial or financial-undertaking methodology and keep turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR, numerator, denominator, and qualitative disclosures traceable.

5

Dates, delegated acts, and change control

Use binding application dates for reporting, distinguish adopted amendments from proposals and guidance, and reassess affected activities and templates before publication.

6

Compare frameworks or answer a focused question

Understand how Taxonomy calculations interact with CSRD and SFDR without treating one framework as proof of compliance with another, or go directly to a focused FAQ.

Next step

Turn EU Taxonomy planning into an ESG delivery workflow

This overview is the shared starting point for Taxonomy work, then route live execution into ESG Compliance and source-specific research questions into Research Copilot.

What this unlocks
  • Route each activity through eligibility, alignment, , minimum-safeguards, and disclosure checks.
  • Use ESG Compliance to assign activity owners, evidence owners, reviewer roles, and reporting tasks.
  • Use Research Copilot when a delegated act, Commission notice, or activity boundary needs cited interpretation.
  • Keep Taxonomy conclusions, source links, assumptions, and approval history together before reporting.
EU Taxonomy artifact preview
Share it internally
Download the timeline export to align legal, product, engineering, and commercial teams on milestones and deadlines.