FAQTaxonomyEU

EU Taxonomy Regulation Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ

Article 8 uses different key performance indicator (KPI) models for banks, asset managers, investment firms, insurers, and non-financial undertakings. Financial undertakings need the category-specific KPIs in the Disclosures Delegated Act.

This FAQ helps separate the credit institution GAR from other KPIs and to check timing, numerator exclusions, and required qualitative disclosures.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

This FAQ explains how KPIs work under EU Taxonomy Article 8 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178. It focuses on the (GAR), why the non-financial turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx), and operating expenditure (OpEx) KPIs do not transfer directly to financial activities, and what disclosures need to accompany the numbers.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

Which financial KPIs apply under EU Taxonomy Article 8?

Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 requires undertakings that must publish non-financial information under Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU to disclose how and to what extent their activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. Article 8 names turnover, CapEx, and OpEx for non-financial undertakings, then requires a delegated act to specify the content, presentation, and methodology, including the specificities of financial undertakings.

The Disclosures Delegated Act explains why the non-financial turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure KPIs are not appropriate for lending, investment, and insurance activities. It therefore sets separate KPI frameworks for asset managers, credit institutions, investment firms, and insurance and reinsurance undertakings.

  • Start by classifying the reporting entity: asset manager, credit institution, investment firm, insurance or reinsurance undertaking, or non-.
  • Use Annexes III and XI for asset managers, Annexes V and XI for credit institutions, Annexes VII and XI for investment firms, and Annexes IX and XI for insurance and reinsurance undertakings.
  • Do not describe GAR as the universal Taxonomy KPI for every entity; in the delegated act, GAR is the main credit institution KPI and related GAR-style ratios are adapted for other activities.
Question 2

What does the Green Asset Ratio measure for credit institutions?

For credit institutions subject to Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, the Disclosures Delegated Act identifies the as the main KPI. It shows the proportion of covered on-balance-sheet exposures related to activities compared with the covered assets in the applicable denominator.

The delegated act links the GAR to the institution's main lending and investment business, including loans, advances, debt securities, and equity holdings. For credit exposures to financial undertakings, the numerator is based on counterparties' KPIs calculated under the same delegated regulation; for credit institutions as counterparties, that means using the counterparty's total GAR.

  • Separate credit institution GAR from non- turnover, CapEx, and OpEx KPIs.
  • Keep the denominator and numerator logic traceable to the relevant GAR template and exposure type.
  • For use-of-proceeds instruments, keep issuer or counterparty information showing which economic activity or project is financed.
  • Avoid double counting where the same specialised lending exposure or bond could relate to more than one environmental objective.
Question 3

Which timing rules and exclusions matter most for GAR and financial KPIs?

The Disclosures Delegated Act phased in reporting. Non- KPIs applied from 1 January 2023, while financial undertaking KPIs applied from 1 January 2024. Regulation (EU) 2026/73 later deferred credit institution KPIs for the trading book and for commission and fee income from commercial services and activities other than financing to 1 January 2028.

For a financial year beginning in 2025, an undertaking may use either the amended rules or the rules applicable on 31 December 2025. Commission Notice C/2026/2558 explains that an undertaking choosing the earlier rules must apply that rule set in full and identify the rule set in its contextual information; it should not combine selected parts of the two versions.

Regulation (EU) 2026/73 also changes the denominator. Derivatives, cash and cash equivalents, on-demand interbank loans, goodwill, commodities, and other asset categories outside Article 7(6) are excluded from financial-undertaking KPI denominators. Exposures to undertakings outside Articles 19a and 29a reporting are generally excluded from both numerator and denominator, subject to the act's rules for voluntarily reported counterparty KPIs and known use-of-proceeds financing. Central governments, central banks, and supranational issuers remain excluded from numerator and denominator.

The 2026 act adds KPI-specific 10% non-materiality options. For the credit institution GAR, on-balance-sheet assets with known use of proceeds may be left unassessed where their cumulative value is below 10% of all such assets included in the GAR denominator; they must be reported separately as non-material. Until 31 December 2027, a that makes no Taxonomy association claim can instead use the prescribed management-report statement route, subject to Article 7(9).

  • Check the reporting year before comparing GAR data across institutions or periods.
  • Do not mix the 2022-2023 transitional disclosures with the full financial undertaking KPI regime from 2024.
  • Track denominator exclusions, non-assessed non-material exposures, and voluntarily included exposures as different categories.
  • If relying on the route through 31 December 2027, use the prescribed wording and do not make a Taxonomy association claim.
  • When an exposure is not financing a specific identified activity, use the issuer or counterparty KPI weighting approach required by the delegated act rather than treating the whole exposure as aligned.
Question 4

What evidence should accompany financial undertaking KPI disclosures?

The KPI number is not enough on its own. Annex XI requires qualitative disclosures to support the quantitative KPIs and market understanding of them.

Useful evidence should therefore explain what assets and activities the KPI covers, which data sources were used, what limitations exist, how economic activities evolved over time from the second year of implementation, and how the undertaking treats Taxonomy compliance in business strategy, product design, and engagement with clients and counterparties.

  • Keep a mapping from each KPI line item to the relevant annex, template, exposure type, data source, and limitation.
  • Record the rationale for excluding central government, central bank, supranational, derivative, and non-reporting counterparty exposures where relevant.
  • Reconcile excluded denominator items, non-assessed non-material items, voluntarily included exposures, and assessed covered assets without combining those categories.
  • For credit institutions, retain qualitative support for trading portfolio alignment where quantitative trading exposure information is not required.
  • For public explanations, state whether a figure is turnover-based, CapEx-based, exposure-based, revenue-based, investment-based, or underwriting-related.
Recommended next step

Turn EU Taxonomy guidance into an evidence workflow

Connect each financial KPI to the reporting-period rules, exposure categories, counterparty data, exclusions, and qualitative explanation before publication.

Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu5 citations
Referenced sections
  • Specifies financial undertaking KPIs, GAR methodology, timing, exclusions, templates, and qualitative disclosures.
  • Specifies the Article 8 KPI frameworks for financial undertakings and explains why separate financial KPIs are needed.
  • Defines GAR for credit institutions and the exposure categories used in GAR calculations.
Show 2 more
  • Grounds financial undertaking KPI timing, exclusions, and use of counterparty KPI weighting.
  • Annex XI requires qualitative information to accompany financial undertaking quantitative KPIs.
"the green asset ratio (GAR), which shows the proportion of exposures related to Taxonomy-aligned activities"
More quoted passages
"provide specific key performance indicators and calculation methodologies"
"from 1 January 2024 for financial undertakings"
"contextual information in support of the quantitative indicators including the scope of assets and activities"
eur-lex.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Current binding amendment for financial-KPI materiality, denominator scope, voluntary counterparty treatment, the temporary no-claim statement route, revised templates, and 2028 deferrals.
  • Binding amendment for the 1 January 2028 deferral, revised financial-KPI denominator exclusions, KPI-specific 10% non-materiality options, and temporary Article 7(9) statement route.
  • Current binding source for the categories that must be separated in financial-undertaking templates, including non-material activities and exposures.
"Until 31 December 2027"
More quoted passages
"1 January 2028"
"Non-assessed exposures considered non-material"
eur-lex.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Provides official interpretation and implementation guidance for Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned reporting.
  • Provides official Article 8 implementation guidance for Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned reporting by undertakings.
  • Supports Article 8 implementation guidance on Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned reporting.
"reporting of Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned economic activities and assets"
More quoted passages
"interpretation and implementation of certain legal provisions of the Disclosures Delegated Act"
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Clarifies implementation of Article 8 eligible-activity and eligible-asset reporting under the Disclosures Delegated Act.
  • Clarifies implementation of the Disclosures Delegated Act, including that eligible activities are not the same thing as KPI denominators.
"eligible activities do not equal to the denominator of the taxonomy alignment KPI"
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official 2026 guidance on applying the complete pre-amendment or amended rule set for financial year 2025 and on the temporary Article 7(9) no-claim option.
  • Explains the financial-year 2025 transition: an undertaking may choose the amended rules or the rules applicable on 31 December 2025, but must apply the selected rule set in full and identify it in contextual information.
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Article 8 establishes the Taxonomy disclosure obligation and mandates delegated rules for content, presentation, and methodology.
  • Grounds the Article 8 disclosure obligation and the delegated-act mandate for financial and non-financial undertaking methodologies.
"information on how and to what extent the undertaking’s activities are associated"
Show all related guides (37)

EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check

FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records.

EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?

Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards.

EU Taxonomy gas and nuclear activities: when can they align?

Explain how the EU Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act treats specified gas and nuclear activities, alignment criteria, DNSH evidence, and separate disclosures.

EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence

FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes.

EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx

Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks.

EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ

Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence.

EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow

Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting.

EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment

Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence.

EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates

Cited EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks.

EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow

Prepare EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures: calculate turnover, capital and operating expenditure ratios, collect bank inputs, and review templates before publication.

EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities

Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary.

EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow

Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls.

EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist

Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act.

EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs

Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures.

EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar

EU Taxonomy calendar covering Article 8 reporting phases, 2026 disclosure changes, environmental objective dates, and evidence review gates.

EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker

Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update.

EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker

Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up.

EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide

EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards guide covering Article 3 alignment, Article 17 harm tests, Article 18 procedures, evidence, and KPI controls.

EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide

Current EU Taxonomy Appendix C chemicals guide covering the 2026 replacement criteria, listed substances, legal exemptions, the candidate-list substance threshold, and evidence records.

EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment

Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability.

EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained

Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards.

EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8

EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records.

EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs

EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPI guide covering GAR, sector KPIs, 2026 denominator rules, materiality options, exclusions, and evidence.

EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions

Prepare EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio stock and flow disclosures with current rules for covered assets, exclusions, materiality, and evidence.

EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence

Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment.

EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk

EU Taxonomy Article 22 explains who sets penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures and how to research the applicable national rule.

EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment

A cited EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures.

EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs

Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep.

EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide

How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence.

EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison

Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with current Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits.

EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence

Compare EU Taxonomy activity tests and Article 8 KPIs with SFDR entity and product disclosures, evidence, publication channels, and limits on data reuse.