EU AI ActCalendar

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Deadlines and calendar

Use the legal dates to plan real work, not to build a passive timeline.

Each milestone below includes the practical deliverables that should be complete by that date.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
Mar 4, 2026
Updated
Mar 4, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
4

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published Mar 4, 2026
Updated Mar 4, 2026
Overview

The AI Act is phased. If your program treats 2 August 2026 as the only relevant date, you will miss early obligations and transition rules that already shape what teams should be doing. This calendar translates Article 113 and Article 111 into a delivery sequence.

Section 1

1 August 2024: entry into force

The Regulation entered into force on 1 August 2024. This was the correct point to launch inventory, role mapping, budget planning, and portfolio triage. Teams that waited for later dates often lost a year of preparation time.

Program level work should already have started here even if the main body of obligations applied later.

  • Create the AI system and model inventory.
  • Set the owner model and approval forum.
  • Identify likely Article 5, Annex III, and GPAI exposure.
  • Build the evidence repository and template set.
Section 2

2 February 2025: prohibitions and general provisions apply

From 2 February 2025, the general provisions and the prohibited practices framework apply. This is also the point at which Article 4 AI literacy becomes a live obligation. Release controls should therefore be active before this date, not after it.

If your program cannot show Article 5 screening and role based AI literacy from this date forward, it will look immature even if later controls are strong.

  • Article 5 screening gate live in product and model review.
  • AI literacy content assigned by role and retained as evidence.
  • Escalation owners named for high impact or ambiguous use cases.
  • Board or executive reporting established for material findings.
Section 3

2 August 2025: GPAI rules, governance, and penalties provisions become active

Chapter V obligations for providers of general purpose AI models apply from 2 August 2025. Governance provisions, notified body and authority setup, and penalties provisions also begin around this phase. For GPAI providers, this is the date by which Article 53 obligations become operational, even though Commission enforcement powers on fines start later.

Providers of models that meet the systemic risk threshold need notification readiness without delay and in any event within two weeks after the threshold is met or known to be met.

  • GPAI technical documentation and downstream documentation workflow live.
  • Copyright policy and training content summary process live.
  • Systemic risk threshold monitoring and notification process live.
  • Supplier contract refresh completed for downstream integrators.
Section 4

2 August 2026: main application date

This is the main application date for most of the Regulation. By this point, high risk system controls, transparency components, deployer operating procedures, and authority ready evidence should all be functioning.

Commission enforcement powers for GPAI providers also start from this date. If a GPAI provider is not compliant on 2 August 2026, the first year of grace on enforcement is over.

  • High risk Articles 9 to 15 controls evidenced.
  • FRIA process active for the deployers that must perform it.
  • Article 50 disclosures and machine readable marking in production.
  • Incident, complaint, and corrective action workflows tested.
Section 5

2 August 2027 and 31 December 2030: transition deadlines

Article 111 creates later deadlines for specific legacy cases. Providers of GPAI models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 must comply by 2 August 2027. Article 6(1) obligations tied to certain product safety routes also apply from 2 August 2027. Large scale IT systems listed in Annex X and certain public authority deployments have longer transition periods, with some compliance reaching 31 December 2030.

These later dates are not excuses to delay current portfolio review. They are tracking duties for transitional cases that should already be named and monitored.

  • Register every legacy GPAI model and assign a 2027 remediation plan.
  • Track public authority high risk systems that must comply by 2 August 2030.
  • Track Annex X large scale IT systems with the 31 December 2030 date.
  • Reassess any pre 2026 high risk system once significant design changes occur.
Recommended next step

Turn EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Deadlines and calendar into an operational assessment

Assessment Autopilot can take EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Deadlines and calendar from planning deadlines, owners, and milestones from this page to a reusable workflow inside Sorena. Teams working on EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) can keep owners, evidence, and next steps aligned without copying this guide into separate documents.

Primary sources

References and citations

Related guides

Explore more topics

EU AI Act Applicability and Roles | Provider, Deployer, Importer Guide
Determine whether the EU AI Act applies, when output used in the Union brings a system into scope, and how to assign provider, deployer, importer.
EU AI Act Applicability Test | Scope, Role, and Obligation Routing
Run a practical EU AI Act applicability test that checks scope, exclusions, operator role, prohibited practices, high risk status, transparency triggers.
EU AI Act Checklist | Practical Compliance Checklist by Obligation
Use a detailed EU AI Act checklist covering inventory, role mapping, Article 5 screening, high risk controls, Article 50 disclosures, GPAI evidence, logging.
EU AI Act Compliance Program | Build an Operational AI Act Program
Build an EU AI Act compliance program that covers inventory, governance, AI literacy, prohibited practice gates, high risk controls, Article 50 product work.
EU AI Act FAQ | Dates, High Risk, GPAI, Transparency, and Penalties
Get grounded answers to common EU AI Act questions on application dates, high risk status, provider versus deployer roles, transparency.
EU AI Act GPAI and Foundation Model Obligations | Chapter V Guide
Understand EU AI Act obligations for general purpose AI model providers, including Article 53 documentation, copyright policy.
EU AI Act High Risk AI Use Cases by Industry | Annex III and Product Routes
See how EU AI Act high risk status appears across biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment, essential services, law enforcement, migration.
EU AI Act High Risk Requirements Checklist | Articles 9 to 15 and Beyond
Use a detailed high risk AI checklist covering Article 9 risk management, Article 10 data governance, Annex IV technical documentation, logging, instructions.
EU AI Act Penalties and Fines | Article 99 and GPAI Fine Exposure
Understand EU AI Act penalty tiers, including Article 5 fines up to EUR 35,000,000 or 7 percent.
EU AI Act Prohibited AI Practices | Article 5 Screening Guide
Screen AI systems against EU AI Act Article 5 prohibited practices, including manipulative and deceptive techniques, exploitation of vulnerabilities.
EU AI Act Requirements | Prohibited, High Risk, Transparency, and GPAI
Get a grounded overview of EU AI Act requirements across Article 5 prohibited practices, Article 6 and Annex III high risk systems.
EU AI Act Timeline and Phasing Roadmap | Practical Implementation Roadmap
Follow a practical EU AI Act roadmap that aligns workstreams to the phased application dates for prohibited practices, AI literacy, GPAI obligations.
EU AI Act Transparency, Labeling, and User Disclosures | Article 50 Guide
Implement EU AI Act Article 50 transparency duties for direct interaction notices, machine readable marking of synthetic outputs, deepfake disclosures.
EU AI Act vs ISO 42001 | What ISO 42001 Covers and What It Does Not
Compare the EU AI Act with ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Learn where ISO 42001 helps with AI policy, roles, risk assessment, impact assessment, documented information.
EU AI Act vs NIST AI RMF | How to Use AI RMF Without Missing AI Act Duties
Compare the EU AI Act with NIST AI RMF 1.0. Learn how the voluntary NIST AI RMF functions Govern, Map, Measure.