- Supports the use of the EUDR information system for due diligence statement operation.
"information system"
Map EUDR scope, due diligence, DDS filing, records, and simplified regimes before relevant products are placed on, made available on, or exported from the EU market.
This page focuses on what operators, downstream operators, and traders need to prove, collect, file, keep, and pass along under the Regulation.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
EUDR compliance starts with three linked questions: is the commodity or derived product in Annex I, what role is the business playing in the transaction, and can the business prove the product is deforestation-free, legally produced, and covered by the required due diligence statement or simplified declaration before the market activity happens.
The core EUDR gate applies to relevant commodities and relevant products. They cannot be placed on the EU market, made available on the EU market, or exported unless they are deforestation-free, produced in accordance with relevant legislation of the country of production, and covered by the required due diligence statement or simplified declaration.
Start every requirements review by matching the product to Annex I and assigning the transaction role. An operator places relevant products on the market or exports them. A downstream operator places on the market or exports relevant products made using products already covered by a due diligence statement or simplified declaration. A trader makes relevant products available on the market and is not an operator or downstream operator.
Use this EUDR requirements guide to connect product scope, role classification, supplier evidence, risk decisions, DDS filing, and retention controls before products move.
Operators must exercise due diligence before placing relevant products on the market or exporting them. The due diligence system has three required parts: information collection under Article 9, risk assessment under Article 10, and risk mitigation under Article 11 when the risk is not negligible.
A due diligence workflow should stop a transaction unless the evidence file supports Article 3 compliance and the risk assessment shows no or only negligible risk. When the review does not reach that result, mitigation has to happen before the product is placed on the market or exported.
Article 9 information is the evidence base for the whole EUDR decision. It should connect the relevant product to the supplier, the commodity origin, the production plot or establishment, and the documents showing deforestation-free and legal production.
For normal operator due diligence, geolocation is a required information category. For micro or small primary operators covered by the simplified declaration regime, the grounded EUDR extracts state that Article 9(1)(d) geolocation may be replaced by the postal address of the plots of land or the establishment.
An operator must not place a relevant product on the market or export it without prior submission of a due diligence statement when that route applies. If due diligence concludes compliance, the operator makes the statement available through the Article 33 information system and assumes responsibility for Article 3 compliance.
Operators can mandate an authorised representative to submit the due diligence statement or simplified declaration, but the operator retains responsibility. After filing, the operator should pass the due diligence statement reference number, or the simplified declaration identifier where that regime applies, to downstream operators and traders.
Downstream operators and traders are not just passive recipients of upstream EUDR work. They may place, make available, or export relevant products only if they possess the required Article 5 information, including supplier details and, where the supplier is an operator, the due diligence statement reference number or simplified declaration identifier.
The grounded EUDR extracts also require non-SME downstream operators and non-SME traders to register in the Article 33 information system before the relevant activity. If new information indicates risk of non-compliance, downstream operators and traders must inform competent authorities and downstream recipients; non-SME actors have additional pre-activity verification limits when they receive information indicating non-compliance.
Country benchmarking affects how much due diligence work is required, but it does not remove the need to prove the route used. All countries start at standard risk under the grounded EUDR material, and the Commission benchmarking list classifies countries or parts of countries as low or high risk by implementing acts.
When relevant products are produced in low-risk countries or parts of countries, operators are not required to fulfil Articles 10 and 11 if they have assessed supply-chain complexity and risks of circumvention or mixing, ascertained low-risk production, and can provide documentation on request showing negligible circumvention or mixing risk.
EUDR records need to show both the legal route and the factual trail. Operators keep due diligence statement records for five years. Downstream operators and traders keep Article 5 information for at least five years and provide it to competent authorities on request.
A practical evidence file should let a reviewer move from the Annex I product decision to the role classification, supplier data, geolocation or permitted address data, legal-production evidence, risk assessment, mitigation, DDS or declaration filing, and downstream communications.
"information system"
"five years"
"deforestation-free products"