EUDRDDS filingEU

EU Deforestation Regulation Due Diligence Statement Filing Workflow

A practical workflow for filing an EUDR only after scope, due diligence, risk, and role prerequisites are in place.

The main obligations apply from 30 December 2026; the later 30 June 2027 date applies only to the micro and small group specified in Article 38(3).

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

Under Regulation (EU) 2023/1115, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the operator files the before placing an in-scope relevant product on the EU market or exporting it, and only after due diligence supports no or negligible risk. Downstream operators and traders do not file a second statement for products already covered upstream; Article 5 requires them to hold the prescribed supply-chain information and apply the new-information and substantiated-concern duties that match their status. A qualifying micro or small primary operator uses the one-time simplified declaration under Article 4a instead of an ordinary DDS.

Section 1

DDS filing prerequisites

Start with the release event and the actor. An operator placing an Annex I relevant product on the EU market or exporting it uses the Article 4 DDS route. A downstream operator or trader follows Article 5 without submitting another DDS. A qualifying micro or small primary operator uses Article 4a. An may submit for an operator under mandate, but the operator retains responsibility.

A standard operator filing should not be prepared until the due diligence file supports the Article 3 conditions: the relevant product is deforestation-free, produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production, and covered by a or simplified declaration as applicable.

  • Procurement confirms commodity and product scope, supplier identity, country of production, and supply-chain boundaries.
  • Sustainability or compliance collects Article 9 information and evidence, including geolocation or permitted replacement information where the simplified primary-operator route applies.
  • Risk review confirms the applicable no-or-negligible-risk basis: an Article 10 risk assessment and any required mitigation, or the Article 13 simplified-due-diligence checks.
  • Legal or trade compliance confirms the actor role and whether the Article 4 route, Article 4a simplified declaration route, or downstream Article 5 information route applies.
Recommended next step

Turn EUDR filing into a controlled release workflow

Connect EUDR scope checks, due diligence evidence, Article 33 filing, reference-number handoff, and five-year records before relevant products are placed, made available, or exported.

Section 2

Filing in the Article 33 information system

Once due diligence concludes no or only negligible risk, the operator makes the available to competent authorities through the Article 33 information system. The filing owner should be the operator or an acting under mandate; using a representative does not move responsibility for EUDR compliance away from the operator.

Build the submission from Annex II, not from a generic internal checklist. The DDS contains the operator's name and address and, for products entering or leaving the market, Economic Operators Registration and Identification (EORI) number; the Harmonised System (HS) customs classification code and product description, trade name and scientific name where applicable; quantity in the prescribed unit; country of production; geolocation for all plots or establishments; and the required operator declaration. The Information System assigns the filing identifiers used for later handoff.

For a micro or small primary operator that qualifies under Article 2, the filing event is a one-time simplified declaration containing the Annex III information. The operator may update that declaration after a major change to the information supplied. Keep this route separate from an ordinary DDS because its eligibility test, information fields, and declaration identifier differ.

  • Create a controlled filing record before submission: product line, commodity, supplier, production origin, due diligence file owner, risk conclusion, filing route, and approver.
  • Reconcile the final Annex II product description, HS code, quantity and unit, production country, geolocation coverage, and EORI field where applicable against the evidence file.
  • Submit the only after the release approver confirms that the due diligence file supports no or negligible risk.
  • For authorised-representative filing, keep the mandate and the operator responsibility statement with the DDS record.
  • For simplified declarations, record the declaration identifier and the basis for treating the filer as a micro or small primary operator.
Section 3

Reference numbers, identifiers, and trade release

After filing, the DDS reference number or simplified declaration identifier becomes the operational handoff item. Article 4 requires operators to communicate the relevant reference number or declaration identifier to downstream operators and traders. The system also assigns a verification number for access control; do not publish or pass it as though it were the Article 4 supply-chain reference.

For import, export, and order-release controls, do not let the commercial shipment record stand alone. Link the shipment, purchase order, sales order, or export release to the relevant DDS reference number or declaration identifier so downstream recipients and trade-compliance reviewers can verify that the filing prerequisite was met before the product is placed, made available, or exported.

  • Trade compliance stores the DDS reference number or declaration identifier with the shipment or release record.
  • Procurement and supplier management pass received reference numbers into downstream product records instead of keeping them only in email threads.
  • Sales or distribution teams pass the official reference number or declaration identifier when acting as an operator supplying downstream operators or traders. Further downstream, distinguish any voluntary reference-sharing control from the Article 5 requirement to collect references only when the supplier is an operator.
  • If a non-SME downstream operator or non-SME trader receives a substantiated concern, pause further release until Article 5 verification demonstrates no or negligible risk. Apply the separate Article 5 notification duties when any downstream operator or trader obtains relevant new information after placement or availability.
Section 4

Roles and recordkeeping

The filing workflow needs separate owners for the evidence file, risk conclusion, information-system submission, and downstream handoff. That separation matters because the person submitting the statement may not be the person who collected supplier evidence or approved the no-or-negligible-risk conclusion.

Keep the record, the supporting due diligence evidence, and the downstream handoff log together for the retention period. Operators keep a record of due diligence statements for five years; downstream operators and traders keep required supply-chain information for at least five years and provide it to competent authorities on request.

  • Operator: owns the due diligence result, filing decision, responsibility for Article 3 compliance, and five-year DDS record.
  • : may submit the DDS or simplified declaration under mandate, while the operator retains compliance responsibility.
  • Non-SME downstream operator or non-SME trader: registers in the Article 33 information system before placing, making available, or exporting relevant products.
  • Downstream operator or trader: keeps supplier details, received DDS reference numbers or declaration identifiers, and downstream recipient information for at least five years.
Section 5

When the DDS file should stop before submission

The filing owner should stop the DDS submission if the product scope is not tied to Annex I, if the due diligence file does not demonstrate no or negligible risk, if required geolocation or permitted replacement information is missing, or if the filer cannot identify the responsible operator or .

If information in a draft does not match the evidence, stop before submission. If information changes after submission, use the Information System's amendment or withdrawal function only when the applicable rule and filing status permit it; preserve the prior record and reason. Separately, new non-compliance information can trigger Article 4 or 5 notification duties to competent authorities and affected supply-chain recipients.

  • Where Article 10 applies, stop before filing when the risk assessment has not reached no or negligible risk.
  • For a non-SME downstream operator or non-SME trader with substantiated concerns, stop before release until Article 5 verification demonstrates no or negligible risk.
  • After market placement, an operator receiving information indicating non-compliance risk must immediately notify the relevant competent authorities and downstream recipients under Article 4(5). Downstream operators and traders apply their separate Article 5 notification duties.
  • Do not replace the Article 33 filing record with an internal memo, purchase-order note, or supplier attestation.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu6 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary source for the DDS prerequisite, Annex II fields, Article 33 submission, reference-number handoff, simplified declarations, authorised representatives, application dates, and recordkeeping.
  • Articles 3 to 6 and 38 support the product conditions, actor-specific filing routes, authorised-representative rule, and application dates.
  • Articles 4, 4a, 6, and Annexes II and III support the filing step, mandatory data, no-or-negligible-risk precondition, authorised-representative submission, and simplified declaration route.
Show 3 more
  • Articles 4 and 5 distinguish the operator's reference-number handoff from the information held by downstream operators and traders.
  • Articles 4 to 6 support the role split, registration rule, authorised-representative mandate, five-year DDS retention, and at-least-five-year Article 5 retention.
  • Articles 4, 5, 10, and 11 support the stop point, mitigation before placement or export, and notification duties when new risk information appears.
eur-lex.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Current Information System amendment covering DDS administration, simplified declarations, and grouped records.
  • Current amendment to the Information System rules, including simplified declarations, updates after major changes, and grouped DDS or declaration identifiers.
  • Sets current Information System rules relevant to amending or withdrawing a submitted record, rejecting a record, and simplified declarations.
environment.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • European Commission overview used for the current application-date framing.
  • Commission overview supporting the 30 December 2026 and 30 June 2027 application dates used in release planning.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Amending act that introduced the current simplified-declaration and downstream-actor framework.
Show all related guides (32)

EUDR deadlines and compliance calendar

EUDR calendar covering application dates, the current country-risk act, the information system, timber transition rules, and preparation tasks by actor.

EUDR deadlines, phasing, and first actions

EUDR readiness guide covering the correct application cohort, role-specific first actions, geolocation evidence, due diligence statements, and country risk.

EUDR Due Diligence Statement Evidence: DDS records, geolocation, and supplier proof

Build an EUDR evidence file for due diligence statements: Article 9 information, geolocation records, supplier proof, risk assessment, mitigation, reference numbers, and retention.

EUDR Due Diligence Statement Template

Prepare the mandatory EUDR Annex II due diligence statement fields and the internal evidence log that supports the operator's no-or-negligible-risk conclusion.

EUDR Geolocation Data Requirements: plots, suppliers, and DDS evidence

How to collect, check, and use EUDR geolocation evidence for relevant commodities and products, Article 9 information, risk assessment, supplier records, and due diligence statements.

EUDR Geolocation Evidence and Annex I Commodity Lookup

Build an EUDR evidence file that links Annex I commodity scope, supplier and trader records, geolocation evidence, product lots, risk assessment, and due diligence statement support.

EUDR Geolocation Traceability Systems: records, DDS handoffs, and supplier evidence

How to structure EUDR traceability records for geolocation, supplier evidence, product lots, risk assessment inputs, and due diligence statement handoffs.

EUDR in-scope commodities and products

How to check EUDR scope for the seven commodities, Annex I relevant products, operator and trader roles, and the evidence needed to support a scope decision.

EUDR penalties and enforcement: checks and sanctions

EUDR enforcement guide covering risk-based checks, no-warning inspections, interim measures, corrective action, penalties, and records by actor.

EUDR penalties and fines: what Article 25 requires

EUDR penalty guide explaining Article 25 fines, the 4% turnover rule, confiscation, temporary restrictions, corrective action, and national-law limits.

EUDR requirements for operators, traders, and DDS filing

EUDR requirements based on official sources: scope, due diligence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, DDS filing, records, and simplified regimes.

EUDR risk assessment and mitigation under Articles 10 and 11

How to run an EUDR Article 10 risk assessment, decide when risk is not negligible, apply Article 11 mitigation, and keep release evidence before placing products on the EU market or exporting.

EUDR Supplier Onboarding Template

A practical EUDR supplier onboarding template for Annex I product scope, supplier roles, geolocation evidence, risk inputs, mitigation records, DDS references, and five-year records.

EUDR vs CSDDD: product due diligence vs corporate due diligence

Compare EUDR product-level market controls with the current CSDDD company-scope thresholds, human-rights and environmental due diligence, application dates, evidence, and enforcement.

EUDR Annex I product lookup: how to check scope

How to check whether a product is in EUDR Annex I, connect it to a covered commodity, and keep supplier and trade evidence without relying on unsupported code lists.

EUDR country benchmarking FAQ: low, standard, and high risk

What EUDR country benchmarking means, how low-risk production affects simplified due diligence, and what operators still need to collect.

EUDR customs and import release FAQ

How to prepare EUDR due diligence statement references, information-system handoffs, importer checks, and release evidence before customs or export clearance.

EUDR DDS Reference Numbers: What to Record and Pass Down

FAQ on EU Deforestation Regulation DDS reference numbers, including operator submissions, downstream handoffs, Article 33 information-system context, and evidence records.

EUDR geolocation plots and polygons FAQ

How EUDR teams should collect, link, and use plot-level geolocation evidence for due diligence statements, suppliers, consignments, and risk assessment.

EUDR information system filing: DDS references and handoffs

FAQ guidance on EUDR information system filing, due diligence statement submission, declaration identifiers, downstream handoffs, representatives, and evidence retention.

EUDR non-negligible risk: what stops product release?

FAQ on how EUDR Articles 10 and 11 handle non-negligible risk, when operators should stop placement or export, and what evidence belongs in the file.

EUDR operator, trader, and downstream roles FAQ

Classify EUDR operators, downstream operators, and traders by product and transaction, then identify the due diligence, information, registration, and recordkeeping duties for each role.

EUDR simplified due diligence: low-risk country evidence FAQ

When EUDR Article 13 simplified due diligence applies, what operators must still collect and submit, how mixing or circumvention defeats it, and which low-risk list controls.

EUDR SME timing: which dates apply to micro, small, and medium businesses?

EUDR timing by role and size: the 30 December 2026 main date, the narrow 30 June 2027 operator exception, its timber exclusion, and the evidence needed to use it.

EUDR Supplier Evidence FAQ

What supplier evidence to collect for EUDR Article 9 information, geolocation, risk assessment, due diligence statements, and downstream recordkeeping.

How is the EU Deforestation Regulation enforced?

EUDR FAQ on competent authority checks, evidence requests, due diligence records, corrective action and penalties for non-compliance.