FAQEUDREU

EU Deforestation Regulation simplified due diligence FAQ

EUDR simplified due diligence can remove Article 10 risk assessment and Article 11 mitigation only for production in countries or parts classified as low risk, and only when the operator can support the low-risk assumption.

Article 9 information collection, due diligence statement responsibility, monitoring of risk-status changes, and evidence records still matter.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 9, 2026
Questions
4

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
2

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated May 9, 2026
Overview

Under the EU Deforestation Regulation, simplified due diligence is a narrow Article 13 route for relevant products produced in countries or parts classified as low risk under Article 29. It does not remove the need to prove the product is in scope, deforestation-free, legally produced, and covered by the required EUDR statement or declaration.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

What does EUDR simplified due diligence change?

Simplified due diligence changes only part of the EUDR due diligence system. Where relevant products are produced in a country or part classified as low risk under the Article 29 benchmarking system, operators are not required to carry out Article 10 risk assessment or Article 11 risk mitigation for that low-risk production, provided the Article 13 conditions are met.

The operator still needs to know the product, commodity, production origin, supplier chain, and EUDR role well enough to justify the simplified treatment. A low-risk benchmark is not a blanket exemption from Article 3, Article 4, Article 8, Article 9, or due diligence statement responsibility.

  • Use simplified due diligence only for production in a country or part that the Commission has classified as low risk under Article 29.
  • Keep Article 9 information and evidence; simplified due diligence does not erase the information-collection step.
  • Do not use the simplified route if supply-chain complexity, circumvention risk, or mixing with unknown or higher-risk origin cannot be shown to be negligible.
Citations
Consolidated Regulation (EU) 2023/1115

Supports the Article 13 rule that low-risk-country production can remove Articles 10 and 11 only when the operator satisfies the simplified due diligence conditions.

Question 2

What information must still be collected?

Article 13 simplified due diligence does not supersede Article 9. Operators still collect and keep the information and evidence needed to show the relevant product is deforestation-free, produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production, and traceable to the production origin required by the Regulation.

For downstream operators and traders, the record set also needs to preserve the Article 5 supply-chain information they must possess and keep, including supplier details and the due diligence statement reference number or simplified declaration identifier where the supplier is an operator.

  • Product and commodity scope: relevant product, relevant commodity, quantity, and market or export activity.
  • Origin evidence: production country or part, and geolocation or permitted establishment information required for the product and actor.
  • Legality and deforestation-free evidence: documentation showing production met EUDR Article 3 conditions.
  • Supply-chain records: supplier and downstream recipient details, plus EUDR statement reference numbers or declaration identifiers when required.
Citations
Question 3

When is simplified due diligence unavailable?

Simplified due diligence is unavailable when the product is not produced in a country or part classified as low risk, when the operator cannot ascertain that production occurred in the low-risk area, or when the supply chain creates more than negligible risk of circumvention or mixing with products of unknown, standard-risk, or high-risk origin.

In those cases, the operator should treat the product under the ordinary due diligence route: collect Article 9 information, perform Article 10 risk assessment, and apply Article 11 risk mitigation before placing the product on the EU market or exporting it.

  • Origin cannot be tied to the low-risk country or part used for the simplified due diligence claim.
  • Supplier records do not prove that relevant products were not mixed with material from other origins.
  • Supply-chain complexity leaves a non-negligible risk of circumvention or mixing.
  • The country or part is standard risk or high risk under the current Article 29 benchmark.
Citations
Question 4

How should teams monitor changes and keep evidence?

Because simplified due diligence depends on the Article 29 benchmark and on the facts of the supply chain, teams should review the simplification before each sourcing route, supplier change, origin change, or benchmark-status change. The record should show the current country-risk basis and the product-specific facts that support it.

Keep evidence in a form that can be produced to competent authorities on request. For operators, that means Article 9 information, the due diligence statement record, and the Article 13 documentation showing negligible circumvention or mixing risk. For downstream operators and traders, keep the Article 5 supply-chain information for the required retention period.

  • Save the benchmark source checked, the date checked, and the country or part used for the low-risk assessment.
  • Keep the product-origin file that links the shipment, batch, plot, establishment, or supplier record to the low-risk area.
  • Keep the circumvention and mixing assessment, including any controls used to prevent substitution or commingling.
  • Escalate to ordinary due diligence when monitoring shows the benchmark, origin, supplier, or mixing facts no longer support Article 13.
Citations
Recommended next step

Build an EUDR simplified due diligence evidence file

Use this FAQ to structure the Article 9 information, Article 13 low-risk justification, and monitoring records behind an EUDR simplified due diligence position.

Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports the Article 29 benchmarking dependency that teams must monitor before relying on simplified due diligence.
"publish the list of low and high risk countries or parts thereof"
environment.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports the practical point that the Commission country-risk system is the external benchmark for simplified due diligence eligibility.
"classifies countries according to their risk"
Related guides

Explore more topics

EU Deforestation Regulation FAQ
Concise EU Deforestation Regulation answers on scope, covered commodities, operator and trader roles, due diligence statements, geolocation, low-risk countries, customs release, SME timing, enforcement, and records.
EUDR Annex I product lookup: how to check scope
How to check whether a product is in EUDR Annex I, connect it to a covered commodity, and keep supplier and trade evidence without relying on unsupported code lists.
EUDR Applicability Test: Products, EU Market Activity, and Actor Roles
Test whether the EU Deforestation Regulation applies by checking Annex I product scope, EU market placement or export, operator/trader status, downstream role, SME status, and simplified due diligence conditions.
EUDR compliance checklist for products, suppliers, and DDS filing
A practical EU Deforestation Regulation checklist covering product scope, supplier evidence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, due diligence statements, recordkeeping, and customs readiness.
EUDR compliance obligations for operators and traders
Source-grounded EUDR compliance guide covering operator and trader duties, Article 9 information, Article 10 risk assessment, Article 11 mitigation, due diligence statements, records, and authority-readiness.
EUDR country benchmarking and simplified due diligence
How EUDR country-risk benchmarking affects low-risk simplified due diligence, full due diligence, information collection, risk monitoring, and evidence records.
EUDR country benchmarking FAQ: low, standard, and high risk
What EUDR country benchmarking means, how low-risk production affects simplified due diligence, and what operators still need to collect.
EUDR country benchmarking triage workflow
Route EUDR consignments and suppliers after country benchmarking: low-risk simplification checks, standard or high-risk due diligence, monitoring triggers, and evidence records.
EUDR customs and import release FAQ
How to prepare EUDR due diligence statement references, information-system handoffs, importer checks, and release evidence before customs or export clearance.
EUDR DDS Reference Numbers: What to Record and Pass Down
FAQ on EU Deforestation Regulation DDS reference numbers, including operator submissions, downstream handoffs, Article 33 information-system context, and evidence records.
EUDR deadlines and compliance calendar
A grounded EUDR calendar covering application dates, benchmarking milestones, the due diligence statement system, and preparation tasks for operators and traders.
EUDR deadlines, phasing, and first actions
Source-grounded EUDR readiness guide covering application dates, operator and trader first actions, geolocation evidence, due diligence statements, the information system, and country benchmarking.
EUDR Due Diligence Statement Evidence: DDS records, geolocation, and supplier proof
Build an EUDR evidence file for due diligence statements: Article 9 information, geolocation records, supplier proof, risk assessment, mitigation, reference numbers, and retention.
EUDR due diligence statement filing workflow
A grounded workflow for filing EUDR due diligence statements: prerequisites, Article 33 information-system use, reference numbers, role handoffs, and records.
EUDR Due Diligence Statement Template
A source-grounded EUDR due diligence statement template covering operator data, product scope, geolocation evidence, risk conclusion, reference numbers, and attachment records.
EUDR Geolocation Data Requirements: plots, suppliers, and DDS evidence
How to collect, check, and use EUDR geolocation evidence for relevant commodities and products, Article 9 information, risk assessment, supplier records, and due diligence statements.
EUDR Geolocation Evidence and Annex I Commodity Lookup
Build an EUDR evidence file that links Annex I commodity scope, supplier and trader records, geolocation evidence, product lots, risk assessment, and due diligence statement support.
EUDR geolocation plots and polygons FAQ
How EUDR teams should collect, link, and use plot-level geolocation evidence for due diligence statements, suppliers, consignments, and risk assessment.
EUDR Geolocation Traceability Systems: records, DDS handoffs, and supplier evidence
How to structure EUDR traceability records for geolocation, supplier evidence, product lots, risk assessment inputs, and due diligence statement handoffs.
EUDR in-scope commodities and products
How to check EUDR scope for the seven commodities, Annex I relevant products, operator and trader roles, and the evidence needed to support a scope decision.
EUDR information system filing: DDS references and handoffs
FAQ guidance on EUDR information system filing, due diligence statement submission, declaration identifiers, downstream handoffs, representatives, and evidence retention.
EUDR non-negligible risk: what stops product release?
FAQ on how EUDR Articles 10 and 11 handle non-negligible risk, when operators should stop placement or export, and what evidence belongs in the file.
EUDR operator, trader, and downstream roles FAQ
How to classify EUDR operators, downstream operators, and traders, including market-placement triggers, DDS reference handoffs, non-SME duties, and evidence records.
EUDR Penalties and Enforcement: Checks, Corrective Action, and Sanctions
Grounded guide to EUDR enforcement: competent authority checks, interim measures, corrective action, EU penalty categories, and records to keep ready.
EUDR Penalties, Fines, and Enforcement Consequences
Grounded guide to EUDR enforcement exposure: Member State penalties, competent authority checks, corrective measures, product holds, and evidence records without invented national fine tables.
EUDR requirements for operators, traders, and DDS filing
Source-grounded guide to EU Deforestation Regulation requirements: scope, due diligence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, DDS filing, records, and simplified regimes.
EUDR risk assessment and mitigation under Articles 10 and 11
How to run an EUDR Article 10 risk assessment, decide when risk is not negligible, apply Article 11 mitigation, and keep release evidence before placing products on the EU market or exporting.
EUDR SME timing: which dates apply to micro, small, and medium businesses?
FAQ on EUDR SME timing, including the 30 December 2026 main application date, the 30 June 2027 later date for certain micro and small undertakings, and first evidence records to prepare.
EUDR Supplier Evidence FAQ
What supplier evidence to collect for EUDR Article 9 information, geolocation, risk assessment, due diligence statements, and downstream recordkeeping.
EUDR Supplier Onboarding Template
A practical EUDR supplier onboarding template for Annex I product scope, supplier roles, geolocation evidence, risk inputs, mitigation records, DDS references, and five-year records.
EUDR vs CSDDD: product due diligence vs corporate due diligence
Compare EUDR product-level deforestation controls with high-level corporate due-diligence workstreams, focusing on scope, actors, due diligence statements, geolocation, country benchmarking, and evidence.
How is the EU Deforestation Regulation enforced?
EUDR FAQ on competent authority checks, evidence requests, due diligence records, and grounded non-compliance consequences.