FAQEUDREU

EU Deforestation Regulation simplified due diligence FAQ

EUDR Article 13 removes the Article 10 risk assessment and Article 11 mitigation steps only after the operator confirms low-risk production and negligible circumvention or mixing risk.

The operator must still collect Article 9 information and, unless the separate Article 4a regime applies, submit a due diligence statement before placing or exporting.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 25, 2026
Questions
4

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
2

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 25, 2026
Overview

Use EUDR only when every relevant commodity and product in the assessed supply chain was produced in a country or part classified as low risk under Article 29 and the operator documents negligible risk of or mixing. Article 13 then removes the Article 10 risk assessment and Article 11 mitigation steps. It does not remove Article 9 information collection, the Article 3 compliance conditions, or the operator's responsibility for the product.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

What does EUDR simplified due diligence change?

Article 13 changes two steps in the operator's due diligence process. The operator may omit Article 10 risk assessment and Article 11 risk mitigation only after assessing supply-chain complexity, risk, and the risk of mixing with products of unknown origin or origin in standard- or high-risk countries or parts. The operator must ascertain that all relevant commodities and products were produced in a or part.

The controlling country list is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093, as updated if the Commission later revises it. Sweden is a on the current list; the United States and China are also listed low risk. Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Myanmar, and the Russian Federation are high risk. Unlisted countries, including Brazil, Indonesia, and Malaysia, remain standard risk. A low-risk classification concerns the Article 3(a) deforestation-free condition and does not itself prove legality under Article 3(b) or satisfy product-level traceability.

Article 13 and the Article 4a regime for a serve different purposes. Article 13 determines whether Articles 10 and 11 can be omitted. Article 4a generally requires a micro or small primary operator to submit a one-time simplified declaration; where all Annex III information is available in another system or database under Union or Member State law, the Member State instead makes that information available in the Article 33 system. An operator using Article 13 still submits a due diligence statement unless it separately qualifies for Article 4a.

  • Check the current Article 29 implementing act for every country or part of production; supplier location, shipment origin, or customs origin alone does not establish where the commodity was produced.
  • Assess every relevant input in the chain. Article 13 requires all relevant commodities and relevant products covered by the assessment to have low-risk production.
  • Keep Article 9 information and the Article 13 assessment; low-risk status does not remove information collection or the Article 3 conditions.
  • Use ordinary due diligence if or mixing risk is more than negligible or if any relevant origin is unknown, standard risk, or high risk.
Citations
Question 2

What information must still be collected?

Article 13 does not supersede Article 9. The operator still collects and keeps the relevant product description, quantity, country of production, production date or time range, supplier and customer details, and the required geolocation of all plots of land or cattle establishments. It also needs adequately conclusive and verifiable information showing that the product is deforestation-free and was produced in accordance with the relevant legislation of the country of production.

Before placing or exporting, the operator must also satisfy Article 4. Unless it separately qualifies as a under Article 4a, it submits a due diligence statement through the Article 33 information system. Submitting the statement does not shift responsibility to a supplier, authorised representative, or authority.

Downstream operators and traders do not use Article 13 to replace their Article 5 duties. They must hold the specified supplier and business-recipient information before their transaction, including statement reference numbers or declaration identifiers when their supplier is an operator, and retain it for at least five years.

  • Scope and quantity: Annex I product and commodity, product description, trade name where applicable, quantity, and intended placing or export.
  • Production: country and, where relevant, part of country; production date or time range; and geolocation of every plot or cattle establishment, subject to the separate Article 4a postal-address option.
  • Compliance evidence: adequately conclusive and verifiable information that the product is deforestation-free and legally produced.
  • Parties: required supplier and customer names, addresses, and email addresses, with supporting transaction links.
  • Submission: due diligence statement and reference number, or the Article 4a declaration identifier when that separate regime applies.
Citations
Question 3

When is simplified due diligence unavailable?

is unavailable if any relevant commodity or product in the assessed chain was not produced in a or part, the operator cannot establish production there, or the documented risk of or mixing is more than negligible. A low-risk supplier address, warehouse, port, processing country, or invoicing country cannot cure missing production evidence.

Article 13 also has a live reversion trigger. If relevant information, including a substantiated concern, points to non-compliance or , the operator must perform Articles 10 and 11 and immediately communicate the information to the competent authority.

When Article 13 is unavailable, use the ordinary route: collect Article 9 information, perform the Article 10 risk assessment, and, if the risk is not negligible, adopt adequate and proportionate Article 11 mitigation. The operator cannot place or export until the assessment shows no or only a negligible risk.

  • One relevant input has unknown, standard-risk, or high-risk production origin.
  • Plot, establishment, batch, or transformation records do not connect the product to the claimed low-risk production area.
  • Segregation and mass-balance records do not reduce substitution or mixing risk to a negligible level.
  • The current Article 29 implementing act no longer classifies the production country or part as low risk.
Citations
Consolidated Regulation (EU) 2023/1115

Article 13 requires low-risk production for all relevant inputs and documentation showing negligible circumvention or mixing risk; Articles 10 and 11 control when that condition is not met.

Question 4

How should teams monitor changes and keep evidence?

Recheck Article 13 whenever the Commission updates the country list or the product's origin, supplier chain, processing route, or mixing controls change. The record should identify the version of the implementing act used and connect each relevant input to the low-risk production area.

Keep the complete due diligence documentation for at least five years. That file should contain Article 9 information, the Article 13 complexity and or mixing assessment, supporting segregation and traceability evidence, the statement record or applicable declaration identifier, and any later review. The operator must be able to provide the Article 13 documentation to the competent authority on request.

  • Save the applicable Article 29 implementing act, review date, and country or part used for each production origin.
  • Keep the product-origin file that links the shipment, batch, plot, establishment, or supplier record to the low-risk area.
  • Keep the supply-chain complexity, , substitution, and mixing assessment, including the evidence for any segregation control.
  • Move the affected product to ordinary due diligence when the benchmark, origin, supplier chain, or mixing facts no longer support Article 13.
Citations
Recommended next step

Build an EUDR simplified due diligence evidence file

Record the Article 9 information, every low-risk production origin, and the evidence that circumvention or mixing risk is negligible before omitting Articles 10 and 11.

Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Articles 4, 12, 13, and 29 support five-year records, production and mixing evidence, and continued reliance on the current country classification.
Related guides

Explore more topics

EU Deforestation Regulation FAQ
Concise EU Deforestation Regulation answers on scope, covered commodities, operator and trader roles, due diligence statements, geolocation, low-risk countries, customs release, SME timing, enforcement, and records.
EUDR Annex I product lookup: how to check scope
How to check whether a product is in EUDR Annex I, connect it to a covered commodity, and keep supplier and trade evidence without relying on unsupported code lists.
EUDR Applicability Test: Products, EU Market Activity, and Actor Roles
Test whether the EU Deforestation Regulation applies by checking Annex I product scope, EU market placement or export, operator/trader status, downstream role, SME status, and simplified due diligence conditions.
EUDR compliance checklist for products, suppliers, and DDS filing
A practical EU Deforestation Regulation checklist covering product scope, supplier evidence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, due diligence statements, recordkeeping, and customs readiness.
EUDR compliance obligations for operators and traders
Official source EUDR compliance guide covering operator and trader duties, Article 9 information, Article 10 risk assessment, Article 11 mitigation, due diligence statements, records, and authority-readiness.
EUDR country benchmarking and simplified due diligence
How EUDR country-risk benchmarking affects low-risk simplified due diligence, full due diligence, information collection, risk monitoring, and evidence records.
EUDR country benchmarking FAQ: low, standard, and high risk
What EUDR country benchmarking means, how low-risk production affects simplified due diligence, and what operators still need to collect.
EUDR country benchmarking triage workflow
Use the official EUDR country list to route each production origin through low-risk simplified due diligence or full due diligence, with evidence and review triggers.
EUDR customs and import release FAQ
How to prepare EUDR due diligence statement references, information-system handoffs, importer checks, and release evidence before customs or export clearance.
EUDR DDS Reference Numbers: What to Record and Pass Down
FAQ on EU Deforestation Regulation DDS reference numbers, including operator submissions, downstream handoffs, Article 33 information-system context, and evidence records.
EUDR deadlines and compliance calendar
EUDR calendar covering application dates, the current country-risk act, the information system, timber transition rules, and preparation tasks by actor.
EUDR deadlines, phasing, and first actions
EUDR readiness guide covering the correct application cohort, role-specific first actions, geolocation evidence, due diligence statements, and country risk.
EUDR Due Diligence Statement Evidence: DDS records, geolocation, and supplier proof
Build an EUDR evidence file for due diligence statements: Article 9 information, geolocation records, supplier proof, risk assessment, mitigation, reference numbers, and retention.
EUDR due diligence statement filing workflow
File an EUDR due diligence statement with the correct Annex II data, operator approval, Information System handoff, reference number, and retained evidence.
EUDR Due Diligence Statement Template
Prepare the mandatory EUDR Annex II due diligence statement fields and the internal evidence log that supports the operator's no-or-negligible-risk conclusion.
EUDR Geolocation Data Requirements: plots, suppliers, and DDS evidence
How to collect, check, and use EUDR geolocation evidence for relevant commodities and products, Article 9 information, risk assessment, supplier records, and due diligence statements.
EUDR Geolocation Evidence and Annex I Commodity Lookup
Build an EUDR evidence file that links Annex I commodity scope, supplier and trader records, geolocation evidence, product lots, risk assessment, and due diligence statement support.
EUDR geolocation plots and polygons FAQ
How EUDR teams should collect, link, and use plot-level geolocation evidence for due diligence statements, suppliers, consignments, and risk assessment.
EUDR Geolocation Traceability Systems: records, DDS handoffs, and supplier evidence
How to structure EUDR traceability records for geolocation, supplier evidence, product lots, risk assessment inputs, and due diligence statement handoffs.
EUDR in-scope commodities and products
How to check EUDR scope for the seven commodities, Annex I relevant products, operator and trader roles, and the evidence needed to support a scope decision.
EUDR information system filing: DDS references and handoffs
FAQ guidance on EUDR information system filing, due diligence statement submission, declaration identifiers, downstream handoffs, representatives, and evidence retention.
EUDR non-negligible risk: what stops product release?
FAQ on how EUDR Articles 10 and 11 handle non-negligible risk, when operators should stop placement or export, and what evidence belongs in the file.
EUDR operator, trader, and downstream roles FAQ
Classify EUDR operators, downstream operators, and traders by product and transaction, then identify the due diligence, information, registration, and recordkeeping duties for each role.
EUDR penalties and enforcement: checks and sanctions
EUDR enforcement guide covering risk-based checks, no-warning inspections, interim measures, corrective action, penalties, and records by actor.
EUDR penalties and fines: what Article 25 requires
EUDR penalty guide explaining Article 25 fines, the 4% turnover rule, confiscation, temporary restrictions, corrective action, and national-law limits.
EUDR requirements for operators, traders, and DDS filing
Official source guide to EU Deforestation Regulation requirements: scope, due diligence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, DDS filing, records, and simplified regimes.
EUDR risk assessment and mitigation under Articles 10 and 11
How to run an EUDR Article 10 risk assessment, decide when risk is not negligible, apply Article 11 mitigation, and keep release evidence before placing products on the EU market or exporting.
EUDR SME timing: which dates apply to micro, small, and medium businesses?
EUDR timing by role and size: the 30 December 2026 main date, the narrow 30 June 2027 operator exception, its timber exclusion, and the evidence needed to use it.
EUDR Supplier Evidence FAQ
What supplier evidence to collect for EUDR Article 9 information, geolocation, risk assessment, due diligence statements, and downstream recordkeeping.
EUDR Supplier Onboarding Template
A practical EUDR supplier onboarding template for Annex I product scope, supplier roles, geolocation evidence, risk inputs, mitigation records, DDS references, and five-year records.
EUDR vs CSDDD: product due diligence vs corporate due diligence
Compare EUDR product-level market controls with the current CSDDD company-scope thresholds, human-rights and environmental due diligence, application dates, evidence, and enforcement.
How is the EU Deforestation Regulation enforced?
EUDR FAQ on competent authority checks, evidence requests, due diligence records, and official source non-compliance consequences.