- Supports the operational need to control due diligence statement submission through the EUDR information system.
"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3084 (EUDR information system)"
Build EUDR compliance around the legal sequence: product scope, actor role, Article 9 information, Article 10 risk assessment, Article 11 mitigation where needed, and a due diligence statement before EU market placement or export.
This page focuses on what operators, downstream operators, and traders need to evidence so a relevant product file can withstand independent review or competent-authority questions.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
The EU Deforestation Regulation makes compliance a product-and-supply-chain control, not a generic sustainability policy. For each relevant commodity or Annex I product, teams need to show that the product is deforestation-free, produced in accordance with relevant legislation of the country of production, and covered by the required due diligence statement or simplified declaration before the regulated EU activity occurs.
The first compliance file should identify the exact relevant commodity or Annex I product, the EU activity, and the actor role. Operators place relevant products on the market or export them. Traders make relevant products available on the market and are not operators or downstream operators. Downstream operators and traders have their own information, registration, notification, and recordkeeping duties where Article 5 applies.
Do not file a due diligence statement from a generic supplier questionnaire alone. The file should connect the product to the covered commodity, country of production, supplier chain, plot or establishment information, and the internal owner who can stop placement, availability, or export if the EUDR evidence is incomplete.
Operators need a due diligence system that runs before placing a relevant product on the market or exporting it. The system should combine Article 9 information collection, Article 10 risk assessment, and Article 11 risk mitigation where the risk is not negligible. If the due diligence conclusion is no or only negligible risk, the operator makes the due diligence statement available through the Article 33 information system and assumes responsibility for Article 3 compliance.
The practical compliance owner is usually split across sourcing, sustainability, trade compliance, and legal. Sourcing obtains supplier and plot-level inputs; sustainability checks deforestation-free and legality evidence; trade compliance controls release and statement references; legal handles substantiated concerns, non-negligible-risk decisions, and competent-authority correspondence.
Use this guide to connect product scope, supplier evidence, Article 9 information, Article 10 risk assessment, Article 11 mitigation, and due diligence statement records before covered products move.
Downstream operators and traders should treat supplier references as controlled compliance data. Article 5 grounding requires them to possess specified supply-chain information, including supplier details and due diligence statement reference numbers or declaration identifiers where the supplier is an operator, and to keep the information for at least five years.
Non-SME downstream operators and non-SME traders have additional Article 5 controls. They register in the Article 33 information system before the relevant activity, and if they obtain information indicating non-compliance or a substantiated concern before placement, availability, or export, they verify due diligence and do not proceed unless verification demonstrates no or negligible risk.
Article 9 information is the foundation for the rest of the EUDR compliance file. A useful record is structured enough for a reviewer to connect product, supplier, country of production, plot or establishment, legality evidence, and deforestation-free evidence without hunting through email attachments.
Where simplified treatment is available for micro or small primary operators, do not erase the compliance trail. The file should still show why the simplified declaration route applies, what declaration identifier was assigned, and what production-location substitute information is being used where the grounding allows it.
A compliant EUDR risk assessment should explain why the product is no or negligible risk, not simply state that a supplier is approved. The record should evaluate production location, commodity and product characteristics, supplier reliability, supply-chain complexity, mixing or circumvention risks, and any substantiated concerns.
If risk is not negligible, Article 11 mitigation happens before the product is placed on the market or exported. The release decision should show which mitigation actions were required, who approved the result, and why the remaining risk is no or negligible. If the conclusion cannot be supported, the product should not proceed under that compliance file.
The due diligence statement is the controlled output of the EUDR file. Operators should not let commercial teams, brokers, or automated trade systems submit statements until the Article 9 file, Article 10 assessment, Article 11 mitigation where needed, and release approval are complete.
Enforcement-readiness means the evidence can be produced quickly, not that it sits somewhere in procurement. Keep a single file index for each DDS reference or declaration identifier, with the product, supplier, origin, Article 9 evidence, risk conclusion, mitigation record, authority communications, downstream reference communications, and retention owner.
"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3084 (EUDR information system)"
"2026-12-30: Main EUDR application date."
"Operators are not required to fulfil Articles 10 and 11 if they have assessed supply chain complexity and risks of circumvention or mixing and have ascertained low risk production."
"Downstream operators and traders collect and keep supply chain information including supplier details and due diligence statement reference numbers or declaration identifiers."
"Article 9 includes collecting and keeping information and evidence including geolocation of plots of land or establishments, and documentation demonstrating deforestation-free and legal production."
"Operators do not place on the market or export unless the risk assessment reveals no or only a negligible risk of non-compliance."
"Relevant commodities and relevant products must not be placed or made available on the market or exported unless they are deforestation-free, produced in accordance with relevant legislation, and covered by a due diligence statement or simplified declaration."
"Due diligence includes information collection (Article 9), risk assessment (Article 10), and risk mitigation (Article 11)."
"Operators keep a record of due diligence statements for five years."
"For micro or small primary operators, the Article 9(1)(d) geolocation may be replaced by postal address of plots of land or the establishment."