FAQEUDREU

EU Deforestation Regulation Country benchmarking under the EUDR

Country benchmarking is the EUDR system for classifying countries or parts of countries as low, standard, or high risk.

The classification can change the due diligence steps for low-risk production, but it does not remove the need to prove the product is in scope, traceable, deforestation-free, legally produced, and covered by the required statement or declaration.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 25, 2026
Questions
4

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
5

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 25, 2026
Overview

EUDR classifies countries or parts of countries as low, standard, or high risk. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093 contains the official low- and high-risk lists; countries not listed in either category remain standard risk. The tier affects due diligence and authority checking, but it does not decide whether a specific product complies or replace Article 9 information collection.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

What is country benchmarking under the EU Deforestation Regulation?

is the Article 29 system that assigns countries, or parts of countries, to a low, standard, or high risk category for EUDR purposes. The category is about the country-of-production risk context; it does not decide by itself whether a shipment, product line, supplier, or plot complies with the Regulation.

Use the benchmark as one input in the EUDR due diligence file. The starting question remains whether the product is a relevant commodity or relevant product under Annex I and whether it can meet the Article 3 conditions: deforestation-free, produced in accordance with relevant legislation of the , and covered by the required due diligence statement or simplified declaration.

  • Low risk: may support for products produced in that country or part of a country, if the operator also checks supply-chain complexity and circumvention or mixing risk.
  • Standard risk: does not create the low-risk simplification; ordinary information collection, risk assessment, and risk mitigation logic remains relevant.
  • High risk: should be treated as a stronger risk signal in the operator's assessment and controls, not as a reason to skip product-level evidence.
Citations
Recommended next step

Turn EUDR country risk into evidence

Use Sorena to connect country-risk classifications, production-origin records, supplier evidence, and due diligence statement references before relying on simplified due diligence.

Question 2

How does low-risk benchmarking affect simplified due diligence?

For relevant products produced in a country, or part of a country, classified as low risk under Article 29, Article 13 can relieve operators from the Article 10 risk assessment and Article 11 risk mitigation steps. That relief is conditional: the operator must still assess supply-chain complexity and the risk of circumvention or mixing with products from other origins, and must be able to show documentation demonstrating negligible risk.

Low-risk status therefore narrows the due diligence work only after the operator has confirmed the production origin and checked for mixing or circumvention. It should not be used as a blanket rule for every supplier invoice, warehouse lot, or product batch connected to the country.

  • Confirm the relevant product was produced in the low-risk country or part of a country, not merely shipped from it.
  • Check whether the supply chain mixes origins, commodities, plots, establishments, or batches in a way that could undermine the low-risk conclusion.
  • Keep documentation that explains why the operator treated the risk of circumvention or mixing as negligible.
Citations
Question 3

What must still be collected even when production is low risk?

Low-risk benchmarking does not remove Article 9 information collection. Operators still need information and evidence for the relevant product, including production origin, geolocation of plots or establishments where required, and documentation showing the product is deforestation-free and produced in accordance with relevant legislation of the .

The operator also still needs the required EUDR submission route. The Regulation describes due diligence statements through the Article 33 information system, and simplified declarations for micro or small primary operators where the amended Regulation allows them. Downstream operators and traders still need the required supply-chain information, including due diligence statement reference numbers or declaration identifiers when those apply.

  • Product and commodity identity, including whether the product is listed in Annex I.
  • Country or part of , backed by production-origin evidence rather than shipping-origin assumptions.
  • Geolocation or permitted substitute information where the Regulation allows it for a specific actor.
  • Documentation showing deforestation-free status and production in accordance with relevant legislation in the .
  • Due diligence statement reference numbers, declaration identifiers, supplier details, and downstream recipient details where the actor's role requires them.
Citations
Question 4

Should an EUDR FAQ name low-risk and high-risk countries?

Use Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093 for the current low- and high-risk lists. Its Annex lists, for example, Germany, the United States, China, and Ghana as low risk; Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Myanmar, and the Russian Federation are the high-risk countries. Brazil is not on either list and therefore remains standard risk under Article 1(2). These are classifications under that act, not permanent labels.

Because the Commission may review and update the list when new evidence warrants it, record the act and date checked rather than copying an unversioned country tier into a supplier record.

Match the benchmark to the country or part of country where the commodity was produced, not the supplier's address, exporter location, or port of shipment. Then document the product origin and any mixing or circumvention risk before relying on low-risk .

  • Name a country only when the official source being cited contains that classification.
  • Record whether the classification applies to the whole country or only to a part of it.
  • Separate production origin from supplier location, exporter location, and port of shipment.
  • Refresh benchmark evidence before relying on low-risk for a new product, supplier, or origin path.
Citations
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports the point that benchmarking applies to countries or parts of countries and should be tied to the official Article 29 classification being relied on.
"countries or parts thereof"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Original EUDR legal text for scope, Article 3 market-access conditions, and the benchmarking structure.
"Regulation (EU) 2023/1115"
Related guides

Explore more topics

EU Deforestation Regulation FAQ
Concise EU Deforestation Regulation answers on scope, covered commodities, operator and trader roles, due diligence statements, geolocation, low-risk countries, customs release, SME timing, enforcement, and records.
EUDR Annex I product lookup: how to check scope
How to check whether a product is in EUDR Annex I, connect it to a covered commodity, and keep supplier and trade evidence without relying on unsupported code lists.
EUDR Applicability Test: Products, EU Market Activity, and Actor Roles
Test whether the EU Deforestation Regulation applies by checking Annex I product scope, EU market placement or export, operator/trader status, downstream role, SME status, and simplified due diligence conditions.
EUDR compliance checklist for products, suppliers, and DDS filing
A practical EU Deforestation Regulation checklist covering product scope, supplier evidence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, due diligence statements, recordkeeping, and customs readiness.
EUDR compliance obligations for operators and traders
Official source EUDR compliance guide covering operator and trader duties, Article 9 information, Article 10 risk assessment, Article 11 mitigation, due diligence statements, records, and authority-readiness.
EUDR country benchmarking and simplified due diligence
How EUDR country-risk benchmarking affects low-risk simplified due diligence, full due diligence, information collection, risk monitoring, and evidence records.
EUDR country benchmarking triage workflow
Use the official EUDR country list to route each production origin through low-risk simplified due diligence or full due diligence, with evidence and review triggers.
EUDR customs and import release FAQ
How to prepare EUDR due diligence statement references, information-system handoffs, importer checks, and release evidence before customs or export clearance.
EUDR DDS Reference Numbers: What to Record and Pass Down
FAQ on EU Deforestation Regulation DDS reference numbers, including operator submissions, downstream handoffs, Article 33 information-system context, and evidence records.
EUDR deadlines and compliance calendar
EUDR calendar covering application dates, the current country-risk act, the information system, timber transition rules, and preparation tasks by actor.
EUDR deadlines, phasing, and first actions
EUDR readiness guide covering the correct application cohort, role-specific first actions, geolocation evidence, due diligence statements, and country risk.
EUDR Due Diligence Statement Evidence: DDS records, geolocation, and supplier proof
Build an EUDR evidence file for due diligence statements: Article 9 information, geolocation records, supplier proof, risk assessment, mitigation, reference numbers, and retention.
EUDR due diligence statement filing workflow
File an EUDR due diligence statement with the correct Annex II data, operator approval, Information System handoff, reference number, and retained evidence.
EUDR Due Diligence Statement Template
Prepare the mandatory EUDR Annex II due diligence statement fields and the internal evidence log that supports the operator's no-or-negligible-risk conclusion.
EUDR Geolocation Data Requirements: plots, suppliers, and DDS evidence
How to collect, check, and use EUDR geolocation evidence for relevant commodities and products, Article 9 information, risk assessment, supplier records, and due diligence statements.
EUDR Geolocation Evidence and Annex I Commodity Lookup
Build an EUDR evidence file that links Annex I commodity scope, supplier and trader records, geolocation evidence, product lots, risk assessment, and due diligence statement support.
EUDR geolocation plots and polygons FAQ
How EUDR teams should collect, link, and use plot-level geolocation evidence for due diligence statements, suppliers, consignments, and risk assessment.
EUDR Geolocation Traceability Systems: records, DDS handoffs, and supplier evidence
How to structure EUDR traceability records for geolocation, supplier evidence, product lots, risk assessment inputs, and due diligence statement handoffs.
EUDR in-scope commodities and products
How to check EUDR scope for the seven commodities, Annex I relevant products, operator and trader roles, and the evidence needed to support a scope decision.
EUDR information system filing: DDS references and handoffs
FAQ guidance on EUDR information system filing, due diligence statement submission, declaration identifiers, downstream handoffs, representatives, and evidence retention.
EUDR non-negligible risk: what stops product release?
FAQ on how EUDR Articles 10 and 11 handle non-negligible risk, when operators should stop placement or export, and what evidence belongs in the file.
EUDR operator, trader, and downstream roles FAQ
Classify EUDR operators, downstream operators, and traders by product and transaction, then identify the due diligence, information, registration, and recordkeeping duties for each role.
EUDR penalties and enforcement: checks and sanctions
EUDR enforcement guide covering risk-based checks, no-warning inspections, interim measures, corrective action, penalties, and records by actor.
EUDR penalties and fines: what Article 25 requires
EUDR penalty guide explaining Article 25 fines, the 4% turnover rule, confiscation, temporary restrictions, corrective action, and national-law limits.
EUDR requirements for operators, traders, and DDS filing
Official source guide to EU Deforestation Regulation requirements: scope, due diligence, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, DDS filing, records, and simplified regimes.
EUDR risk assessment and mitigation under Articles 10 and 11
How to run an EUDR Article 10 risk assessment, decide when risk is not negligible, apply Article 11 mitigation, and keep release evidence before placing products on the EU market or exporting.
EUDR simplified due diligence: low-risk country evidence FAQ
When EUDR Article 13 simplified due diligence applies, what operators must still collect and submit, how mixing or circumvention defeats it, and which low-risk list controls.
EUDR SME timing: which dates apply to micro, small, and medium businesses?
EUDR timing by role and size: the 30 December 2026 main date, the narrow 30 June 2027 operator exception, its timber exclusion, and the evidence needed to use it.
EUDR Supplier Evidence FAQ
What supplier evidence to collect for EUDR Article 9 information, geolocation, risk assessment, due diligence statements, and downstream recordkeeping.
EUDR Supplier Onboarding Template
A practical EUDR supplier onboarding template for Annex I product scope, supplier roles, geolocation evidence, risk inputs, mitigation records, DDS references, and five-year records.
EUDR vs CSDDD: product due diligence vs corporate due diligence
Compare EUDR product-level market controls with the current CSDDD company-scope thresholds, human-rights and environmental due diligence, application dates, evidence, and enforcement.
How is the EU Deforestation Regulation enforced?
EUDR FAQ on competent authority checks, evidence requests, due diligence records, and official source non-compliance consequences.