CSDDDArticle 2 scopeEU

CSDDD Article 2 Scope Thresholds and In-Scope Groups

Use this page to test whether an EU or non-EU company, ultimate parent group, franchise network, or licensing model falls within the CSDDD scope thresholds.

It focuses on the legal triggers in Article 2, the two-consecutive-financial-years rule, adopted 2025 timing changes, and the evidence records a scope file should keep.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 9, 2026
Sections
6

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
4

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated May 9, 2026
Overview

Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2024/1760 brings a company into CSDDD scope through four practical routes: an EU company size-and-turnover route, a non-EU Union-turnover route, an ultimate-parent group route, and a franchise or licensing route. The test is not a one-page revenue estimate; it needs legal-entity status, employee counts, worldwide or Union turnover, group consolidation data, royalty records, and proof that the thresholds were met for the required financial years.

Section 1

Article 2 scope routes at a glance

For EU companies formed under Member State law, the general Article 2(1)(a) route applies when the company had more than 1,000 employees on average and net worldwide turnover of more than EUR 450 million in the last financial year for which annual financial statements have been or should have been adopted.

For non-EU companies, Article 2(2)(a) does not use an employee threshold. The trigger is net turnover of more than EUR 450 million generated in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year.

  • EU individual-company route: more than 1,000 average employees plus more than EUR 450 million net worldwide turnover.
  • Non-EU individual-company route: more than EUR 450 million net turnover generated in the Union, with no Article 2 employee threshold.
  • EU group route: an ultimate parent that does not itself meet the EU thresholds can still be in scope if its group reaches them on a consolidated basis.
  • Non-EU group route: an ultimate parent can be in scope where its group reaches more than EUR 450 million Union turnover on a consolidated basis.
  • Franchise and licensing route: separate royalty and turnover thresholds can bring EU or non-EU companies, or their ultimate-parent groups, into scope.
Recommended next step

Build a CSDDD scope evidence file

Turn Article 2 thresholds, group structure, Union turnover, franchise or licensing royalties, and timing assumptions into a reviewable CSDDD scope record.

Section 2

EU company and ultimate-parent group thresholds

Start with each EU legal entity, then test the group. A Member State company is in scope under Article 2(1)(a) if it passes both the employee and net worldwide turnover thresholds. If it does not, Article 2(1)(b) can still pull in the ultimate parent when the group reaches those thresholds in the last financial year for which consolidated annual financial statements have been or should have been adopted.

Employee counts should be recorded on a full-time-equivalent basis for part-time employees. Temporary agency workers and other workers in non-standard employment are included where they meet the worker-status criteria referenced in the Directive.

  • Record the EU company legal name, Member State of formation, registered office, and annual financial statement period.
  • Calculate average employees and keep the full-time-equivalent method used for part-time employees.
  • Record net worldwide turnover for the company, then repeat the test on consolidated group figures if the company is an ultimate parent or part of a parent-led group.
  • If the parent is mainly a holding company and does not make management, operational, or financial decisions for the group, document whether the Article 2(3) designated-subsidiary exemption route is relevant.
  • Keep the authority application or decision if an ultimate parent seeks the Article 2(3) exemption; the parent remains jointly liable with the designated subsidiary for failures by that subsidiary.
Section 3

Non-EU Union turnover and authorised-representative evidence

For third-country companies, the core scope test is Union turnover, not global headcount. Article 2(2)(a) covers a non-EU company that generated more than EUR 450 million net turnover in the Union in the financial year preceding the last financial year. Article 2(2)(b) applies the same Union-turnover test on a consolidated group basis for ultimate parent companies.

Once a non-EU company is within Article 2(2), Article 23 requires an authorised representative established or domiciled in a Member State where the company operates, and the authorised representative or company must notify supervisory authorities that the company is in scope.

  • Keep a Union turnover schedule by Member State for the financial year preceding the last financial year.
  • Identify whether the non-EU company has an EU branch; if not, record the Member State where it generated most Union turnover for supervisory-authority routing.
  • For group assessments, keep consolidated Union turnover and the ownership/control basis for treating the company as the ultimate parent.
  • Retain authorised-representative name, address, email, telephone number, acceptance confirmation, and authority notification records.
  • Do not apply an employee threshold to the non-EU Article 2(2)(a) or 2(2)(b) route unless a separate national-law question requires it.
Section 4

Franchise and licensing route

Article 2(1)(c) and 2(2)(c) create a separate route for companies, or ultimate parent groups, that enter into franchising or licensing agreements in the Union with independent third-party companies. The route is limited to agreements that ensure a common identity, a common business concept, and uniform business methods.

For EU companies or groups, the royalty threshold is more than EUR 22.5 million and the supporting turnover threshold is more than EUR 80 million net worldwide turnover. For non-EU companies or groups, the same EUR 22.5 million royalty threshold and EUR 80 million turnover threshold are measured in the Union.

  • List franchise and licensing agreements in the Union and identify independent third-party counterparties.
  • Document whether the agreements ensure common identity, common business concept, and uniform business methods.
  • For EU companies or groups, keep royalty totals over EUR 22.5 million and net worldwide turnover over EUR 80 million for the relevant financial year.
  • For non-EU companies or groups, keep Union royalty totals over EUR 22.5 million and Union net turnover over EUR 80 million for the relevant financial year.
  • Separate brand-only licensing from arrangements that actually impose the common identity, business concept, and business-method features required by Article 2.
Section 5

Two-consecutive-financial-years rule and current timing

Article 2(5) says the Directive applies only if the Article 2(1) or 2(2) conditions are met in two consecutive financial years. It also says the Directive ceases to apply where those conditions cease to be met for each of the last two relevant financial years. A scope file should therefore show both the trigger year and the second consecutive year, not only the most recent turnover estimate.

Directive (EU) 2025/794 amended Article 37 timing. Member States must adopt and publish CSDDD transposition measures by 26 July 2026. The first active application date in the amended text is 26 July 2027 for EU and non-EU companies in Article 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b), 2(2)(a), and 2(2)(b) that meet the higher EUR 900 million wave thresholds; all other Article 2 companies, including the franchise and licensing route, follow from 26 July 2029, with Article 16 communication measures from financial years starting on or after 1 January 2030.

  • Keep two consecutive financial years of employee, worldwide turnover, Union turnover, consolidated group, royalty, and agreement evidence as relevant to the route.
  • Record when the company first fulfilled the Article 2 criteria and when it would cease to be covered if thresholds are not met for two relevant financial years.
  • Do not use the original 2024 first-wave 26 July 2027 date as current timing without noting that Article 37 was amended by Directive (EU) 2025/794.
  • For timing checks, separate Article 2 scope from Article 37 application waves; being in scope and having national measures apply are related but distinct questions.
  • For Article 16 communication timing, keep the applicable financial-year start date with the scope route instead of mixing it into the Article 2 threshold calculation.
Section 6

Evidence records for a defensible CSDDD scope file

A useful scope file should let legal, finance, sustainability, and group reporting teams reproduce the Article 2 conclusion without relying on memory. The record should show the legal route tested, the financial statements used, the calculation periods, the threshold result, and any supervisory-authority or authorised-representative follow-up.

The evidence standard is different for each route. EU company files need employee and worldwide turnover evidence; non-EU files need Union turnover and authorised-representative evidence; group files need consolidation and parent-control evidence; franchise or licensing files need agreement features, royalty totals, and turnover totals.

  • Scope route field: Article 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b), 2(1)(c), 2(2)(a), 2(2)(b), or 2(2)(c).
  • Entity data: legal entity name, formation jurisdiction, registered office or branch status, ultimate-parent status, and group perimeter.
  • Financial data: annual financial statement period, consolidated statement period, net worldwide turnover, Union turnover, and royalty totals with currency and source system.
  • Employee data: average employee count, full-time-equivalent conversion for part-time employees, and treatment of temporary agency or non-standard workers.
  • Governance data: preparer, reviewer, approval date, source citation, open assumptions, authorised-representative notifications, and any competent-authority exemption application or decision.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Official CSDDD text for EU and non-EU company scope thresholds, ultimate-parent group tests, franchise and licensing thresholds, employee calculation, and the two-consecutive-financial-years rule.
"This Directive shall apply to companies"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Adopted amending directive that postponed the CSDDD transposition deadline and first application wave; cited here only for current timing, not as proposal-stage law.
"Member States shall adopt and publish, by 26 July 2026"
commission.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Commission overview confirming the CSDDD entered into force on 25 July 2024 and summarising covered EU and non-EU company cohorts.
"companies in scope identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts"
Related guides

Explore more topics

CSDDD adverse impact prioritisation workflow
A CSDDD workflow for identifying actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts, ranking severity and likelihood, and documenting prevention, mitigation, remediation, and stakeholder evidence.
CSDDD Applicability Test: EU and Non-EU Company Scope
Test whether Directive (EU) 2024/1760 may apply to an EU or non-EU company using grounded CSDDD employee, turnover, group, franchise, royalty, exclusion, and phase-in checks.
CSDDD chain of activities and supplier due diligence
Explain CSDDD chain-of-activities scope, upstream and downstream boundaries, subsidiaries, direct and indirect business partners, supplier risk segmentation, and evidence.
CSDDD Chain of Activities Boundaries
Define CSDDD upstream and downstream chain of activities boundaries for subsidiaries, direct and indirect business partners, distribution, transport, storage, and records.
CSDDD chain of activities boundaries: upstream and downstream FAQ
FAQ on how the CSDDD defines chain of activities boundaries for subsidiaries, direct and indirect business partners, upstream activities, downstream logistics, and evidence.
CSDDD civil liability under Article 29: what companies should check
FAQ on CSDDD Article 29 civil liability: liability conditions, protected legal interests, causation, compensation, limitation periods, and evidence disclosure.
CSDDD Climate Transition Plan Requirements
Article 22 CSDDD guidance for climate transition plans: business model alignment, targets, actions, funding, governance, and 12-month progress updates.
CSDDD complaints and notifications FAQ
FAQ on Article 14 CSDDD complaint and notification mechanisms, who may complain, follow-up rights, confidentiality, retaliation, and evidence.
CSDDD compliance duties and evidence guide
A grounded CSDDD compliance guide covering due diligence policy, adverse impact identification, prevention, corrective action, complaints, monitoring, reporting, climate plans, and supervisory evidence.
CSDDD contractual assurances FAQ for Articles 10 and 11
How CSDDD Articles 10 and 11 use contractual assurances with business partners, verification, SME support, action plans, and suspension or termination escalation.
CSDDD deadlines and compliance calendar after Directive (EU) 2025/794
Current CSDDD calendar for transposition, application phases, Article 16 reporting exceptions, Commission guidance dates, and practical compliance evidence.
CSDDD due diligence checklist
A grounded CSDDD checklist for scope, due diligence policy, chain-of-activities risk mapping, impact prioritisation, action plans, complaints, monitoring, communication, climate planning, and evidence.
CSDDD Due Diligence Steps Playbook for Articles 5 and 7-16
A grounded playbook for the CSDDD due diligence sequence: policy integration, impact assessment, prioritisation, prevention, correction, remediation, stakeholder engagement, complaints, monitoring, communication, and evidence.
CSDDD FAQ: scope, dates, duties, liability, and evidence
Practical answers on CSDDD scope, current application dates, chain of activities, due diligence duties, complaints, remediation, civil liability, climate plans, and evidence.
CSDDD franchising and licensing scope FAQ
FAQ on when franchise or licensing networks can fall within Article 2 of the EU CSDDD, including royalties, turnover, EU and non-EU treatment, and evidence.
CSDDD grievance and remediation workflow guide
Build a CSDDD grievance, notification, stakeholder engagement, and remediation workflow around Articles 12, 13, and 14 of Directive (EU) 2024/1760.
CSDDD Liability and Penalties: enforcement, fines, and civil claims
A grounded guide to CSDDD supervisory enforcement, penalty mechanics, civil liability, compensation limits, evidence records, and national transposition caveats.
CSDDD non-EU turnover threshold FAQ
How non-EU companies should assess CSDDD scope using EU-generated turnover, group thresholds, authorised representative records, and competent authority evidence.
CSDDD Non-EU Turnover Thresholds and Scope Waves
Article 2 and Article 37 CSDDD scope guide for non-EU Union turnover, group routes, franchise and licensing routes, and current application dates after Directive (EU) 2025/794.
CSDDD Omnibus timing changes after Directive (EU) 2025/794
FAQ answer on current CSDDD Article 37 dates after Directive (EU) 2025/794 and how to separate adopted timing changes from proposal-stage Omnibus simplification.
CSDDD penalties and fines under Article 27
How CSDDD Article 27 sets penalty rules, turnover-based fine caps, public decision publication, supervisory authority powers, and national transposition caveats.
CSDDD prevention vs mitigation: potential and actual adverse impacts
CSDDD FAQ on when to prevent or mitigate potential adverse impacts, when to end or minimise actual adverse impacts, and what evidence records to keep.
CSDDD remediation FAQ: when companies must remedy adverse impacts
FAQ on CSDDD remediation: when Article 12 requires remedy, how complaints and stakeholder engagement affect the response, and what evidence to keep.
CSDDD Remediation Plan Template: Article 12, 13 and 14 evidence
A CSDDD remediation plan template for actual adverse impacts, complaint inputs, stakeholder engagement, action records, and monitoring evidence.
CSDDD requirements: scope, due diligence, climate plan, and evidence
A grounded map of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive requirements across scope, due diligence policy, impact assessment, complaints, remediation, monitoring, communication, and climate transition planning.
CSDDD risk prioritisation FAQ: severity, likelihood, and evidence
How to prioritise CSDDD adverse impacts when teams cannot address everything at once, using severity, likelihood, stakeholder evidence, and a reviewable rationale.
CSDDD scope waves: current Article 37 dates and thresholds
FAQ on the current CSDDD phase-in after Directive (EU) 2025/794: 26 July 2028, 26 July 2029, Article 2 scope thresholds, and evidence to retain.
CSDDD Supplier Contract Clause Review Workflow
Review supplier contract clauses against CSDDD Articles 10 and 11: contractual assurances, verification, SME fairness, support, action plans, and escalation evidence.
CSDDD Supplier Contract Clauses: Articles 10 and 11 Evidence
How to use CSDDD supplier contract clauses without treating clauses as a substitute for due diligence: contractual assurances, verification, SME support, action plans, limits, and evidence.
CSDDD supplier human rights impact scoring template
A CSDDD supplier impact scoring template for Article 8 identification, Article 9 prioritisation, severity, likelihood, stakeholder input, chain-of-activities boundaries, and evidence records.
CSDDD transition plans FAQ: Article 22 climate plan requirements
FAQ on CSDDD Article 22 climate transition plans: targets, decarbonisation levers, investment and funding, governance, CSRD overlap, and evidence records.
CSDDD vs CSRD: Due Diligence and Reporting Compared
Compare CSDDD due diligence duties with CSRD sustainability reporting, including scope, timing, Article 16 reporting, evidence overlap, assurance, and enforcement.
CSDDD vs German LkSG Comparison
Compare the EU CSDDD with Germany's LkSG without mixing directive duties, national-law duties, chain boundaries, complaints, reporting, and enforcement routes.
CSDDD vs OECD Guidelines
Compare the binding EU CSDDD with the OECD Guidelines for responsible business conduct across scope, due diligence duties, business relationships, remediation, and evidence.
How CSDDD overlaps with OECD, UNGP, and ILO standards
FAQ on how OECD responsible business conduct guidance, the UN Guiding Principles, and ILO labour standards inform CSDDD due diligence without being the same legal instrument.