CSDDDBoundary mapEU

CSDDD Chain of activities boundaries

Draw the CSDDD boundary between own operations, subsidiaries, upstream business partners, and limited downstream product activities.

Use the boundary record to decide which entities, activities, partners, and evidence records belong in the due diligence file.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 9, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
2

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated May 9, 2026
Overview

Under the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, the chain of activities is not the same as the whole value chain. It covers a company's own operations and subsidiaries through the due diligence duties, then defines which business-partner activities count upstream and which downstream product activities count only when they are carried out for or on behalf of the company.

Recommended next step

Turn the boundary map into evidence

Use Sorena to keep CSDDD chain-of-activities classifications tied to the source rule, partner record, contract evidence, and monitoring review.

Section 2

Separate upstream from downstream

Upstream coverage is broad. It includes activities of upstream business partners related to production of goods or provision of services by the company, including design, extraction, sourcing, manufacture, transport, storage, supply of raw materials, products or product parts, and development of the product or service.

Downstream coverage is narrower. It covers activities of downstream business partners related to distribution, transport, and storage of the company's product only where those partners carry out those activities for the company or on behalf of the company. The directive does not make ordinary customer use, product disposal, or unrelated downstream services part of this definition.

  • Include upstream design, extraction, sourcing, manufacture, transport, storage, raw-material supply, product-part supply, and product or service development.
  • Include downstream distribution, transport, and storage only for company products and only when performed for or on behalf of the company.
  • Exclude product disposal from the CSDDD chain-of-activities definition unless another law or internal commitment creates a separate obligation.
  • Exclude downstream services of the company from the chain-of-activities definition; for regulated financial undertakings, downstream partners receiving services and products are not included.
Section 3

Record subsidiaries and group-level support separately

A parent company may fulfil certain CSDDD obligations on behalf of in-scope subsidiaries where the conditions in Article 6 are met, but that does not erase the subsidiary from the boundary map. The subsidiary and parent must provide each other necessary information, the subsidiary must integrate due diligence into its policies and risk management systems, and the subsidiary remains subject to supervisory powers and civil liability.

For boundary evidence, keep one record for the group-level allocation and another record for each subsidiary's operational perimeter. This avoids the common mistake of treating a group policy as proof that subsidiary-specific operations, partners, and impacts have been mapped.

  • Name each in-scope subsidiary and its operational perimeter, including products, services, sites, and business-partner categories.
  • Identify which obligations the parent performs and which obligations the subsidiary continues to perform directly.
  • Keep the information-sharing record that shows how the parent and subsidiary exchange documents needed for due diligence.
  • Track subsidiary-specific direct and indirect business partners when they relate to that subsidiary's chain of activities.
Section 4

Use direct and indirect partner labels for controls

The direct or indirect label matters because CSDDD uses it in the control design. Prevention and corrective measures can include contractual assurances from direct business partners, cascading assurances to partners where their activities are part of the chain of activities, and, where impacts cannot otherwise be addressed, assurances from indirect business partners.

Do not classify every lower-tier supplier as out of reach. Article 8 requires mapping business partners where related to the chain of activities and directs companies to request information, where reasonable, from business partners at the levels where adverse impacts are most likely to occur.

  • For each direct partner, store the agreement, covered activities, product or service link, assurance clause, verification route, and SME support decision where relevant.
  • For each indirect partner that is material to a likely or severe impact, store the activity performed, how it was identified, the information source, and any assurance or engagement route.
  • When information can come from different chain levels, document why the request went to the partner level where the adverse impact is most likely to occur.
  • If an activity is outside the chain of activities, record the exclusion reason rather than leaving the partner unclassified.
Section 5

Keep evidence that proves the boundary

A defensible boundary file should let a reviewer reproduce the classification. It should show the product or service, the entity, the partner relationship, the activity performed, the upstream or downstream side, the inclusion or exclusion rule, the source citation, and the owner who approved the decision.

The record should also connect to due diligence monitoring. Article 15 requires periodic assessments of the company's own operations and measures, those of subsidiaries, and, where related to the chain of activities, those of business partners. Boundary records should therefore be reviewed after significant changes and against regular monitoring outputs.

  • Boundary register: entity, subsidiary, product or service, activity, upstream or downstream side, direct or indirect partner status, and inclusion outcome.
  • Downstream limit evidence: distribution, transport, or storage contract showing whether the partner acts for or on behalf of the company.
  • Exclusion log: product disposal, customer use, export-controlled downstream activity after authorisation, downstream services, or regulated-financial downstream recipient exclusions, with the cited rule.
  • Information record: data requested, partner level contacted, reason for that level, response received, and gaps still being pursued.
  • Review record: significant-change trigger, at-least-annual monitoring result, owner approval, and changes made to the due diligence policy or controls.
Primary sources

References and citations

data.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • The summary notes regular monitoring and a five-year documentation retention expectation for due diligence compliance.
"keeping all documentation"
Related guides

Explore more topics

CSDDD adverse impact prioritisation workflow
A CSDDD workflow for identifying actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts, ranking severity and likelihood, and documenting prevention, mitigation, remediation, and stakeholder evidence.
CSDDD Applicability Test: EU and Non-EU Company Scope
Test whether Directive (EU) 2024/1760 may apply to an EU or non-EU company using grounded CSDDD employee, turnover, group, franchise, royalty, exclusion, and phase-in checks.
CSDDD chain of activities and supplier due diligence
Explain CSDDD chain-of-activities scope, upstream and downstream boundaries, subsidiaries, direct and indirect business partners, supplier risk segmentation, and evidence.
CSDDD chain of activities boundaries: upstream and downstream FAQ
FAQ on how the CSDDD defines chain of activities boundaries for subsidiaries, direct and indirect business partners, upstream activities, downstream logistics, and evidence.
CSDDD civil liability under Article 29: what companies should check
FAQ on CSDDD Article 29 civil liability: liability conditions, protected legal interests, causation, compensation, limitation periods, and evidence disclosure.
CSDDD Climate Transition Plan Requirements
Article 22 CSDDD guidance for climate transition plans: business model alignment, targets, actions, funding, governance, and 12-month progress updates.
CSDDD complaints and notifications FAQ
FAQ on Article 14 CSDDD complaint and notification mechanisms, who may complain, follow-up rights, confidentiality, retaliation, and evidence.
CSDDD compliance duties and evidence guide
A grounded CSDDD compliance guide covering due diligence policy, adverse impact identification, prevention, corrective action, complaints, monitoring, reporting, climate plans, and supervisory evidence.
CSDDD contractual assurances FAQ for Articles 10 and 11
How CSDDD Articles 10 and 11 use contractual assurances with business partners, verification, SME support, action plans, and suspension or termination escalation.
CSDDD deadlines and compliance calendar after Directive (EU) 2025/794
Current CSDDD calendar for transposition, application phases, Article 16 reporting exceptions, Commission guidance dates, and practical compliance evidence.
CSDDD due diligence checklist
A grounded CSDDD checklist for scope, due diligence policy, chain-of-activities risk mapping, impact prioritisation, action plans, complaints, monitoring, communication, climate planning, and evidence.
CSDDD Due Diligence Steps Playbook for Articles 5 and 7-16
A grounded playbook for the CSDDD due diligence sequence: policy integration, impact assessment, prioritisation, prevention, correction, remediation, stakeholder engagement, complaints, monitoring, communication, and evidence.
CSDDD FAQ: scope, dates, duties, liability, and evidence
Practical answers on CSDDD scope, current application dates, chain of activities, due diligence duties, complaints, remediation, civil liability, climate plans, and evidence.
CSDDD franchising and licensing scope FAQ
FAQ on when franchise or licensing networks can fall within Article 2 of the EU CSDDD, including royalties, turnover, EU and non-EU treatment, and evidence.
CSDDD grievance and remediation workflow guide
Build a CSDDD grievance, notification, stakeholder engagement, and remediation workflow around Articles 12, 13, and 14 of Directive (EU) 2024/1760.
CSDDD Liability and Penalties: enforcement, fines, and civil claims
A grounded guide to CSDDD supervisory enforcement, penalty mechanics, civil liability, compensation limits, evidence records, and national transposition caveats.
CSDDD non-EU turnover threshold FAQ
How non-EU companies should assess CSDDD scope using EU-generated turnover, group thresholds, authorised representative records, and competent authority evidence.
CSDDD Non-EU Turnover Thresholds and Scope Waves
Article 2 and Article 37 CSDDD scope guide for non-EU Union turnover, group routes, franchise and licensing routes, and current application dates after Directive (EU) 2025/794.
CSDDD Omnibus timing changes after Directive (EU) 2025/794
FAQ answer on current CSDDD Article 37 dates after Directive (EU) 2025/794 and how to separate adopted timing changes from proposal-stage Omnibus simplification.
CSDDD penalties and fines under Article 27
How CSDDD Article 27 sets penalty rules, turnover-based fine caps, public decision publication, supervisory authority powers, and national transposition caveats.
CSDDD prevention vs mitigation: potential and actual adverse impacts
CSDDD FAQ on when to prevent or mitigate potential adverse impacts, when to end or minimise actual adverse impacts, and what evidence records to keep.
CSDDD remediation FAQ: when companies must remedy adverse impacts
FAQ on CSDDD remediation: when Article 12 requires remedy, how complaints and stakeholder engagement affect the response, and what evidence to keep.
CSDDD Remediation Plan Template: Article 12, 13 and 14 evidence
A CSDDD remediation plan template for actual adverse impacts, complaint inputs, stakeholder engagement, action records, and monitoring evidence.
CSDDD requirements: scope, due diligence, climate plan, and evidence
A grounded map of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive requirements across scope, due diligence policy, impact assessment, complaints, remediation, monitoring, communication, and climate transition planning.
CSDDD risk prioritisation FAQ: severity, likelihood, and evidence
How to prioritise CSDDD adverse impacts when teams cannot address everything at once, using severity, likelihood, stakeholder evidence, and a reviewable rationale.
CSDDD Scope Thresholds: EU, Non-EU, Group and Franchise Routes
Article 2 CSDDD scope thresholds for EU companies, non-EU Union turnover, ultimate-parent groups, franchise and licensing routes, consecutive-year tests, and evidence records.
CSDDD scope waves: current Article 37 dates and thresholds
FAQ on the current CSDDD phase-in after Directive (EU) 2025/794: 26 July 2028, 26 July 2029, Article 2 scope thresholds, and evidence to retain.
CSDDD Supplier Contract Clause Review Workflow
Review supplier contract clauses against CSDDD Articles 10 and 11: contractual assurances, verification, SME fairness, support, action plans, and escalation evidence.
CSDDD Supplier Contract Clauses: Articles 10 and 11 Evidence
How to use CSDDD supplier contract clauses without treating clauses as a substitute for due diligence: contractual assurances, verification, SME support, action plans, limits, and evidence.
CSDDD supplier human rights impact scoring template
A CSDDD supplier impact scoring template for Article 8 identification, Article 9 prioritisation, severity, likelihood, stakeholder input, chain-of-activities boundaries, and evidence records.
CSDDD transition plans FAQ: Article 22 climate plan requirements
FAQ on CSDDD Article 22 climate transition plans: targets, decarbonisation levers, investment and funding, governance, CSRD overlap, and evidence records.
CSDDD vs CSRD: Due Diligence and Reporting Compared
Compare CSDDD due diligence duties with CSRD sustainability reporting, including scope, timing, Article 16 reporting, evidence overlap, assurance, and enforcement.
CSDDD vs German LkSG Comparison
Compare the EU CSDDD with Germany's LkSG without mixing directive duties, national-law duties, chain boundaries, complaints, reporting, and enforcement routes.
CSDDD vs OECD Guidelines
Compare the binding EU CSDDD with the OECD Guidelines for responsible business conduct across scope, due diligence duties, business relationships, remediation, and evidence.
How CSDDD overlaps with OECD, UNGP, and ILO standards
FAQ on how OECD responsible business conduct guidance, the UN Guiding Principles, and ILO labour standards inform CSDDD due diligence without being the same legal instrument.