Ofcom can assess a concern, compel information, investigate a suspected breach, issue provisional findings, and reach a final confirmation decision after representations.
The provider should preserve source records, control every notice deadline, verify each submitted fact, and track remediation separately from its response to the alleged breach.
Ofcom enforcement under the Online Safety Act is not a single-step fine process. Ofcom can use supervision and information powers before or during an investigation, give the recipient an opportunity to respond to provisional findings, and issue a that requires remedial steps, a penalty, or both. Court approval is required for business disruption measures.
1
Section 1
How does Ofcom enforce the Online Safety Act?
Ofcom may receive a complaint, identify a concern through supervision or an enforcement programme, or use its information powers to test compliance. It first assesses the issue and may seek voluntary compliance, provide remediation time, gather more information, open a formal investigation, or take no further action. Not every concern reaches a formal breach decision.
If Ofcom opens an investigation, it normally tells the subject the scope and legal provisions under review and may issue information notices, require interviews, appoint a skilled person, or use other statutory powers. The subject must continue meeting the underlying Online Safety Act duties while the investigation runs.
Where Ofcom considers there are reasonable grounds to believe an enforceable requirement has been breached, it may issue a . A final breach finding is made through a after the recipient has had an opportunity to make representations.
Ofcom enforces provider duties, can require information, investigate suspected failures, issue confirmation and penalty decisions, and seek court orders that restrict access or business support in serious cases. The maximum financial penalty is generally the greater of £18 million or 10% of qualifying worldwide revenue, subject to the statutory route and calculation rules.
Readiness starts before an investigation: keep current scope and assessment records, the measures adopted under each duty, code or alternative-measure reasoning, terms enforcement, complaints data, testing, governance approvals, and change history. A notice-response procedure should authenticate the notice, preserve records, assign legal and factual owners, validate data, meet the stated deadline, and retain submission evidence.
Identify the Ofcom stage: initial assessment, supervision or remediation, formal investigation, provisional notice, or .
Confirm the exact statutory duty and service under review rather than responding at company level only.
Calendar every notice-specific deadline and preserve the material used to prepare the response.
Continue remediation without presenting corrective work as proof that no past breach occurred.
Record whether the requirement is a provider duty, an information requirement, an interview or inspection obligation, or a remedial step in a decision.
Identify the legal entity, regulated service or service part, UK user group, system, and period covered by the investigation.
Map each requested fact to its source record, factual owner, legal reviewer, submission approver, and any known limitation.
Escalate questions about statutory exemptions, overseas providers, related entities, controlling individuals, criminal offences, or court orders for case-specific advice.
What evidence should a provider prepare for Ofcom?
Give legal or regulatory affairs one response record for the matter, supported by the product or operations owner who controls the relevant service. Record the exact obligation, service, period, Ofcom stage, response deadline, preservation scope, factual position, and remediation decision.
The evidence depends on the issue. It may include service-scope decisions, risk-assessment records, underlying data, moderation and recommender-system documentation, age-assurance testing, complaints and reporting records, terms of service, governance approvals, implementation logs, and communications with Ofcom. Preserve source data and explain limitations rather than reconstructing a cleaner record after the event.
Name a response lead, factual owner, legal reviewer, and person authorised to approve submissions.
Preserve relevant documents, messages, datasets, code or configuration history, and decision records.
Trace every submitted fact to a source and state any known gap, estimate, or qualification.
Keep remediation tickets and completion evidence separate from representations about whether a breach occurred.
What can happen at the end of an Ofcom investigation?
After investigating, Ofcom may close the case without a provisional notice, issue a , or use another compliance route. A provisional notice states the obligations and period in question, Ofcom's reasons, and any proposed penalty or remedial steps. The recipient can make representations before a separate final decision maker reaches a final outcome.
Ofcom may then close the case, issue a further provisional notice where the legal conditions are met, settle the case, or issue a . A confirmation decision may find a breach, require specified steps, and impose a financial penalty. Closure after remediation does not necessarily mean Ofcom found that no breach occurred; the published case statement and decision explain the outcome.
Read the provisional notice, evidence package, and response instructions together.
Distinguish provisional findings from a final .
Track required remedial steps and financial penalties as separate obligations.
Do not describe a closed investigation as exoneration unless Ofcom's published decision supports that conclusion.
Treat an Ofcom or enforcement notice as a controlled regulatory response. Confirm the legal entity and service, record when and how the notice was received, identify every request and definition, preserve relevant material, and assign owners for collection, verification, legal review, approval, and submission.
Information must be complete, accurate in all material respects, and provided in the required form and by the stated deadline. If a request is unclear or the provider needs more time, use Ofcom's stated contact route promptly. Do not assume that a discussion changes the deadline unless Ofcom confirms that change.
The response record should also capture service scope, affected user groups, the relevant risk assessment, code or alternative-measure reasoning, child-access status, mitigation owner, and Ofcom correspondence.
The output depends on the notice: it may be a verified information return, representations on provisional findings, a remedial plan, evidence that required steps are complete, or a combination of those records.
Break the notice into numbered requests and map each one to a data owner, reviewer, source, and completion status.
Record searches performed, systems checked, assumptions, exclusions, and quality-control steps.
Escalate missing data, inconsistent records, possible inaccuracies, and deadline risk as soon as they are identified.
Retain the final submission, proof of delivery, follow-up questions, remedial commitments, and evidence that each commitment was completed.
Record the Ofcom stage and legal power at intake so the team does not answer an as though it were a provisional breach finding.
Map every answer to a request number, source, owner, reviewer, approval, and submission status.
Check related assessment, complaints, age-assurance, terms-enforcement, and transparency records for consistency before approval.
Update the response procedure when Ofcom changes its enforcement or information-gathering guidance, or when a completed matter exposes a repeatable evidence gap.
Binding source for Ofcom's information powers, enforceable requirements, investigation notices, confirmation decisions, penalties, and business disruption measures.
Official explanatory notes supporting the maximum-penalty statement for regulated services.
"Paragraph 4(1) of Schedule 13 says that the maximum penalty that OFCOM can impose on the provider of a regulated service is the greater of £18 million and 10% of the person’s "qualifying worldwide revenue" for the person’s most recent complete accounting period."
Official government correspondence urging timely implementation and effective enforcement of the Act.
"However, it is imperative that the Act is now implemented in its entirety as quickly as possible, with a long-term plan for effective enforcement across all aspects of the Act and with services of all sizes."