First test whether and access controls prevent normal child access. If children can access the service or part, assess actual child use and whether it is likely to attract significant numbers of children.
A stated minimum age does not settle the test if children can still access the service. Assess each materially different part and retain the evidence.
A under sections 35 to 37 decides whether a Part 3 user-to-user or search service, or a materially different part of it, is likely to be accessed by under-18s. Existing services had to complete the first assessment by 16 April 2025. If the answer is yes, the provider must complete the applicable children's risk assessment and follow the child-safety duty route. If the answer is no, keep the evidence and repeat the assessment within 12 months or sooner when a statutory or Ofcom trigger applies.
1
Section 1
How should a children's access assessment work under the UK Online Safety Act?
The duty applies to the provider of every regulated with links to the United Kingdom, including a provider established elsewhere. Confirm that the product is a regulated user-to-user service, search service, or combined service and test the Schedule 1 exemptions before applying the access assessment. Category status does not decide whether this gateway duty applies.
Stage 1 asks whether means children are not normally able to access the service or part. If not, Stage 2 applies the : children are likely to access the service when a significant number of children use it, or the service is of a kind likely to attract a significant number of child users. Significant is contextual and does not require children to form a majority of users.
Use evidence about actual and expected access: reliable age data, registration and usage data, audience research, app-store and marketing choices, content and feature appeal, complaints, support contacts, search queries, school or parent reports, and evidence of circumvention. Do not rely on terms that set a minimum age when the access control is not effective.
A provider can end the assessment at Stage 1 only when the resulting access control is highly effective so that children are not normally able to access the service. A minimum-age term, self-declaration, or weak gate is not enough. Analyse logged-out views, embedded content, alternate clients, account sharing, recovery paths, and each separable service part.
If children are likely to access the service or a part of it, record that result and open the applicable children's risk assessment and safety duties.
Ofcom's quick guide describes a three-month children's risk-assessment period after launch. Its detailed Children's Risk Assessment Guidance, paragraph 2.21, measures that period from the positive children's access-assessment conclusion, including for a new service.
Record both dates, plan to the earlier deadline where they differ, and seek Ofcom clarification before relying on the later one.
Complete a new risk assessment before making a significant change. If children are not likely to access the service, keep the Stage 1 or Stage 2 evidence and the events that trigger a fresh assessment.
Scope decision: identify the provider, service type, UK links, exemptions, and every materially different service part before recording the access result.
Outcome: , not likely to be accessed by children because Stage 1 establishes that children cannot normally access the service or Stage 2 establishes that the is not met, or insufficient evidence pending a stated protective interim position.
Evidence: service map, child-user data, attraction analysis, access-control tests, bypass tests, assumptions, data gaps, reviewer, and approval.
Part-by-part result: explain why materially different public, logged-in, search, messaging, or content areas share or do not share the same conclusion.
Review trigger: new feature, audience or marketing change, evidence of child use, control bypass, method change, Ofcom update, or reason to suspect the assessment is inaccurate.
Supports the two-stage process, 16 April 2025 first-assessment deadline, highly effective age-assurance branch, next steps, and 12-month reassessment rule.
Published 24 April 2025. Measures three months from a children's access assessment concluding that the new or reassessed service is likely to be accessed by children.
Quick guide updated 1 April 2026 gives the launch-based summary; compare detailed guidance paragraph 2.21.
2
Section 2
What should the assessment record contain?
Record the provider, service and part assessed, user and feature map, assessment date, actual child-use evidence, attraction evidence, stated age, access-control design and test, circumvention evidence, data limitations, result, reviewer, approval, linked children's risk-assessment action, and review triggers.
Separate actual-use evidence from evidence that the service is likely to attract children.
State the measurement period, age-data quality, sample coverage, and users or access paths the data does not cover.
Record each materially different service part and the reason it shares or does not share the overall conclusion.
If evidence is insufficient, record an interim protective position and the work needed to resolve the gap.
Template field support for Children's Access Assessment.
The Online Safety Act 2023 (the Act) is a new set of laws that protects children and adults online.
3
Section 3
When should the access assessment be reviewed?
Review the assessment when there is reason to suspect it is no longer accurate and after changes that could affect child use or access prevention. Relevant events include new content or social functions, marketing or audience changes, logged-out access, a new market, an age-assurance change, bypass evidence, complaints, or a material change in child-user data.
Treat the Act as the binding source for who must assess, the likely-access test, and the reassessment triggers. Ofcom's guidance explains the regulator's two-stage method and evidence expectations; it does not replace the statutory test. Record which conclusion comes from the Act, which method comes from guidance, and any judgment the provider made where the evidence was incomplete.
Re-run access-control and circumvention tests across web, app, embedded, recovery, and alternate-client routes.
Compare observed child use with the forecast and explain material differences.
Open or update the children's risk assessment when the result changes to likely accessed.
Keep the prior version, new evidence, changed conclusion, approval, and effective date.
The Online Safety Act 2023 (the Act) is a new set of laws that protects children and adults online.
4
Section 4
Which sources control the assessment, and what should happen next?
Sections 35 to 37 of the Online Safety Act control the scope, test, timing, and reassessment duties. Ofcom's guidance explains the operating sequence and evidence expectations. UK Government and ICO material provides policy and data-protection context but does not replace the Act or Ofcom's statutory guidance.
This page gives a general decision method, not a service-specific legal conclusion. Confirm the provider, UK links, exemptions, service parts, current Ofcom publications, and the deployed age-assurance evidence before relying on a negative assessment. Keep the source version and review date with the assessment record.
Binding law: Online Safety Act sections 35 to 37 set the assessment duty, likely-access test, timing framework, and reassessment events.
Regulator guidance: Ofcom explains the two-stage method, evidence expectations, highly effective age-assurance branch, and operational deadlines.
Related law: UK data-protection duties continue to apply when age assurance or child-user analysis processes personal data.
Next action: approve a part-by-part result, preserve the evidence, and open the children's risk assessment immediately for every part .
Supports the two-stage process, 16 April 2025 first-assessment deadline, highly effective age-assurance branch, next steps, and 12-month reassessment rule.
Official regulator guidance for the two-stage assessment, evidence, deadlines, reassessment, and next steps.
Published 24 April 2025. Measures three months from a children's access assessment concluding that the new or reassessed service is likely to be accessed by children.