A service is in Part 3 scope only if it is a user-to-user service or search service, has links with the United Kingdom, falls outside the applicable Schedule 1 exemptions, and is not described in Schedule 2.
Run the test feature by feature. A product may contain regulated, exempt, and out-of-scope functions, and provider pornographic content is covered separately under Part 5.
Use four checks to decide whether a function is part of a : identify the internet-service functionality, decide whether it is user-to-user or search, apply the UK-link test, and then apply the and Schedule 2 exclusion. If Part 3 applies, the provider has illegal-content, assessment, reporting, complaints, record-keeping, and other duties according to the service type and facts. Categorisation and likely child access are later tests; they do not decide basic Part 3 scope.
1
Section 1
What should the UK Online Safety Act Applicability Test decide?
A is an internet service through which content generated, uploaded, or shared by one user may be encountered by another user. A is an internet service that is, or includes, a search engine. Apply these definitions to actual functions such as posts, comments, reviews, file sharing, group spaces, marketplaces, messaging, and public search rather than relying on the product label.
The service must also have links with the United Kingdom. Section 4 provides three routes: a significant number of UK users; the United Kingdom as a target market; or UK access combined with reasonable grounds to believe that user-generated or search content presents a material risk of significant harm to individuals in the United Kingdom. A provider can be in scope even when it is established outside the United Kingdom.
Finally, apply the , the Schedule 2 exclusion for specified user-to-user or search services that include regulated , and any function-specific disapplication. Schedule 1 descriptions include certain email, SMS or MMS, one-to-one live aural communication, limited-functionality, internal business, public-body, and education or childcare services, but each exemption has conditions and some have exceptions. Record the exact paragraph and facts instead of treating a product name or sector as automatically exempt.
Part 5 uses a separate test for a service that publishes or displays and has . Do not force that service into the Part 3 user-to-user or search analysis when the relevant content is published by the provider.
Map each content flow: who creates or uploads the content, who can encounter it, and whether a search engine produces results from more than one website or database.
Record the UK-link route and evidence, including UK user data, UK-facing marketing or commercial design, and any material-risk analysis.
Test every claimed Schedule 1 exemption and any Schedule 2 exclusion against its full conditions and exceptions; an exempt or excluded function does not necessarily remove the rest of a from scope.
State the result separately for the user-to-user part, public search engine, and any provider-pornography part.
Record one of four outcomes for each assessed function: Part 3 regulated , Part 3 regulated , exempt, excluded or disapplied Part 3 functionality, or outside Part 3 because a required element is absent. Assess separately under Part 5. A single product can produce more than one outcome.
For example, a marketplace may have regulated user reviews and messages, an exempt internal staff area, and a provider-operated product search that does not meet the public search-service definition. A foreign discussion forum can still be in scope through UK users or a UK target market. These are examples only; the service facts and statutory conditions control.
If Part 3 applies, open the illegal-content risk assessment and children's access assessment immediately and assign owners for reporting, complaints, terms, and records.
If Part 5 applies, document the provider-content boundary and highly effective age-assurance work separately.
If an exemption or exclusion applies, cite the exact Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 provision, preserve evidence for every condition, and identify any function left in scope.
If the function is outside scope, record which required element is absent and the product change that would require a new test.
Who should own the UK Online Safety Act applicability test, and what evidence should prove the decision?
A product owner should supply the functional facts; legal or regulatory counsel should review the statutory classification; data and commercial owners should support the UK-link analysis. The provider remains responsible for the service-level conclusion.
The scope record should identify the service, provider entity, functions assessed, users who can create and encounter content, search sources, , each Schedule 1 exemption and Schedule 2 exclusion considered, the conclusion for each service part, and the facts that would trigger reassessment.
Name the provider entity and one accountable scope owner; a vendor or moderator does not replace the provider's statutory role.
Keep current user journeys, permissions, screenshots, architecture notes, user metrics, target-market evidence, and the exemption analysis with the decision.
List assumptions that could change the outcome, such as whether a message can be forwarded, whether comments are limited to provider content, or whether search spans multiple sites.
Repeat the test when functionality, audience, UK availability, ownership, or content flows materially change.
Which edge cases should teams check before relying on a UK Online Safety Act applicability test decision?
Scope can attach to only part of a product. Internal search over one provider's own content is not automatically a regulated public search engine, while user comments or reviews may create user-to-user functionality even when the main product is publishing or commerce.
Do not use company size, revenue, or formal categorisation as the basic applicability test. Small services can be in Part 3 scope, and the core illegal-content and children-access assessment duties apply before the Category 1, 2A, or 2B analysis.
Check mixed products separately: a can contain both a regulated user-to-user part and a regulated public search engine.
Treat comments, reactions, reviews, and direct messages as fact-sensitive; Schedule 1's limited-functionality rules are narrower than a general low-risk exemption.
Do not count provider-generated content as user-generated merely because a user prompted or selected it without checking the Act's detailed rules.
Escalate borderline facts and preserve the alternative analysis; this page cannot determine scope without the service's actual content and access design.
How should teams implement the applicability decision?
Write the result as a service-scope memo, not a single yes-or-no field. It should show the analysis for each service part and explain why each Schedule 1 exemption and Schedule 2 exclusion does or does not apply.
If Part 3 applies, the immediate next steps are an illegal-content risk assessment and record, the related safety and reporting controls, and a children's access assessment. If Part 5 applies, run the provider-pornography age-assurance analysis separately.
Approve the scope memo with dated evidence and an owner for every follow-on duty.
Record a review trigger for new content-sharing, messaging, search, recommender, age-gating, or UK-launch functionality.
Use the regulated-service-scope guide for the detailed exemption analysis and the categorisation guide only after Part 3 scope is established.
Keep unresolved legal interpretations visible; an operational checklist must not turn an uncertain service fact into a definitive legal conclusion.
Turn UK Online Safety Act Applicability Test into assigned work
This UK Online Safety Act guide helps turn Applicability Test into owners, evidence requests, review checkpoints, and reusable operating records in Sorena.