What moderation outcomes does the Act require?
For illegal content, user-to-user services need proportionate systems and processes designed to prevent users encountering , mitigate identified risks, minimise how long priority illegal content remains, and swiftly take down illegal content when the provider becomes aware of it. Search services must minimise the risk of users encountering priority illegal content and known illegal content in or via search results.
Services likely to be accessed by children have additional duties for content harmful to children. The exact moderation design depends on the service, assessed risks, applicable duties, and Ofcom codes. Measures can include detection, triage, human review, removal, visibility reduction, recommendation controls, account action, user support, and escalation, but each measure must be justified and tested in context.
- Map each content class and risk to a detection route, decision rule, response target, reviewer, escalation path, and user-facing outcome.
- Test automated systems for accuracy and bias, and give reviewers enough context and authority to correct errors.
- Keep urgent routes for child sexual abuse material, terrorism content, imminent danger, and other cases requiring specialist handling or reporting.
Explains current illegal-content safety duties and relevant code measures.
Sets the user-to-user illegal-content safety duties.
Sets the search-service illegal-content safety duties.