- Official amendment adding DEHP, BBP, DBP, and DIBP to RoHS Annex II and setting application timing.
"amending Annex II to Directive 2011/65/EU"
RoHS treats spare parts as part of the substance-restriction system: EEE placed on the market, including cables and spare parts for repair, reuse, updating functionality, or upgrading capacity, must meet Annex II limits unless a specific Article 4 carve-out applies.
Use this page to decide whether a service part, repair part, reused recovered part, cable, or sub-assembly can rely on a RoHS date-based rule, and what evidence to keep.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
For EU RoHS spare parts, the useful compliance question is specific: what original EEE is being repaired, reused, updated, or upgraded; when was that EEE placed on the market; which restricted substance is involved; and is the item a new spare part, a reused recovered spare part, a cable, a sub-assembly, or finished EEE in its own right?
Article 4(1) requires Member States to ensure that EEE placed on the market, including cables and spare parts for repair, reuse, updating functionalities, or upgrading capacity, does not contain RoHS Annex II substances above the maximum concentration values tolerated by weight in homogeneous materials.
That means a spare-part review cannot stop at a supplier certificate or a broad claim that the part is for service. The record should classify the item, identify the finished EEE it supports, map the relevant Article 4 date rule, and show whether the homogeneous materials meet the Annex II limits or fall under a precise carve-out.
Article 4(4) creates date-based carve-outs for cables and spare parts used to repair, reuse, update functionalities, or upgrade capacity of certain older EEE. The current consolidated directive includes dates for EEE placed on the market before 1 July 2006, medical devices before 22 July 2014, in vitro diagnostic medical devices before 22 July 2016, monitoring and control instruments before 22 July 2014, industrial monitoring and control instruments before 22 July 2017, and other formerly out-of-scope EEE placed on the market before 22 July 2019.
The same paragraph also covers EEE that benefited from an exemption and was placed on the market before that exemption expired, but only as far as that specific exemption is concerned. This should be documented at the exact Annex entry and application level, not as a generic spare-parts permission.
Article 4(5) is narrower than ordinary repair-spare logic. It applies to reused spare parts only where reuse takes place in auditable closed-loop business-to-business return systems and the reuse of spare parts is notified to the consumer.
The cutoff dates depend on the source EEE and the new EEE in which the recovered part is used: parts recovered from EEE placed before 1 July 2006 and used before 1 July 2016; medical devices or monitoring and control instruments placed before 22 July 2014 and used before 22 July 2024; in vitro diagnostic medical devices placed before 22 July 2016 and used before 22 July 2026; industrial monitoring and control instruments placed before 22 July 2017 and used before 22 July 2027; and other formerly out-of-scope EEE placed before 22 July 2019 and used before 22 July 2029.
Turn spare-part identity, target equipment, source equipment, market-placement dates, substance limits, exemptions, closed-loop reuse evidence, and CE records into one reviewable RoHS decision.
The four phthalates added to RoHS Annex II have an additional spare-part rule. The consolidated Annex II says the DEHP, BBP, DBP, and DIBP restriction does not apply to cables or spare parts used for repair, reuse, updating functionalities, or upgrading capacity of EEE placed on the market before 22 July 2019, and of medical devices and monitoring and control instruments placed on the market before 22 July 2021.
CE marking and declaration decisions should be kept separate from the substance decision. Article 15 requires CE marking on finished EEE or its data plate, or on packaging and accompanying documents where marking the EEE is not possible or warranted. If a service item is itself finished EEE sold independently, assess the full manufacturer, importer, distributor, EU declaration, CE marking, and technical-documentation duties instead of treating it only as a spare part.
A good spare-part file lets a reviewer reproduce the conclusion without asking the service team for history. It should show the part identity, target EEE, source EEE where relevant, dates, substance or exemption basis, and the reason the item is handled as a spare part rather than as finished EEE.
For release and support teams, the most useful output is a short dated decision record attached to the BOM, service-part master data, supplier declaration, test rationale, closed-loop tracking record where relevant, exemption register, and technical documentation or CE records where the item is finished EEE.
"amending Annex II to Directive 2011/65/EU"
"technical documentation required for assessing materials"
"conditions for the exemption of reused spare parts"
"DEHP, BBP, DBP and DIBP"
"including cables and spare parts for its repair"
"Paragraph 1 shall not apply to cables or spare parts"
"auditable closed-loop business-to-business return systems"
"provide it with all the information and documentation necessary"
"The CE marking shall be affixed visibly"
"including cables and spare parts for its repair"