FAQEU

RED FAQ Radio Modules

RF modules and components with embedded RF modules can themselves be under Directive 2014/53/EU when placed on the EU market before integration.

For the , module certificates and test reports are supporting evidence. They do not replace the final-product RED assessment, , declaration, instructions, and responsibility record.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

Assess radio-module products in two layers. First, decide whether the or RF component placed on the EU market is in its own right. Second, assess the final placed on the EU market. The final-product manufacturer may reuse module assessments, but remains responsible for the conformity of the whole radio equipment and must show that the module is used within the assessed antenna, software, enclosure, power, installation, spectrum, EMC, safety, and intended-use conditions.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

5 of 5 questions
Question 1

Are RF modules covered by the Radio Equipment Directive?

Yes. The Commission RED Guide treats RF modules and components with an embedded as where they meet the RED definition and are placed on the EU market before integration into another product. The guide also treats an integrated circuit as radio equipment when it has the capacity to receive or transmit radio signals and is intended to be integrated into another product as a standalone radio function. This is Commission guidance on applying the Article 2 definition, not a separate certification category in the Directive.

Integration can create further obligations. The guide says its component analysis is without prejudice to new obligations that may arise when radio components are integrated into another product.

  • Identify whether the item being bought, sold, or imported is an , a component with an embedded RF module, an integrated circuit with radio transmit or receive capability, or a finished .
  • For a module placed on the EU market before integration, keep the module's RED conformity evidence and integration instructions, tied to its hardware, firmware, antenna, power, and operating limits.
  • For the , run a final-product assessment instead of relying only on the module label, supplier declaration, or certificate.

Can a host manufacturer rely on a certified radio module without further RED work?

No. Module evidence is useful input, but the final placed on the EU market still needs its own RED assessment. The manufacturer may use assessments already performed for components or parts, while remaining responsible for the conformity of the whole product; the RED Guide states that reused component assessments may not be sufficient to demonstrate conformity of the whole radio equipment.

What should the module supplier provide?

For a radio module placed on the EU market before integration, keep the supplier's RED evidence, declaration information, test evidence, and instructions. The Commission guide says the module manufacturer should assess risks identifiable at the stage of placing the module on the EU market and provide instructions which, if followed, will ensure that the module remains compliant.

Question 2

How should the host product be assessed?

Start with the final product and intended market placement. If the is because it intentionally emits or receives radio waves for radio communication or radiodetermination, map the final product to the applicable Article 3 requirements, not just to the module test report.

Article 17 requires to take into account all intended operating conditions. For Article 3(1)(a), the assessment also takes reasonably foreseeable conditions of use into account. The RED Guide adds that where can take different configurations, the conformity assessment should confirm compliance in all possible configurations.

  • Confirm the exact host model, hardware revision, firmware version, radio modes, intended use, accessories, and EU market placement role.
  • Check whether the host changes the module's assessed conditions: antenna type or placement, enclosure, shielding, cables, power supply, ports, firmware settings, duty cycle, operating modes, installation position, user configuration, or intended environment.
  • Map Article 3(1)(a) safety and health, Article 3(1)(b) EMC, Article 3(2) efficient spectrum use, and any applicable Article 3(3) requirement to final-product evidence.
  • Use module reports only for the requirements, configurations, and conditions they actually cover; supplier branding such as pre-certified or RED-approved does not transfer final-product responsibility.
Recommended next step

Review the host product before relying on module evidence

Map the RF module and final host product separately, then check that module evidence, antenna and software assumptions, Article 3 coverage, instructions, DoC wording, and technical documentation support the exact configuration placed on the EU market.

Question 3

What module and host evidence belongs in the technical documentation?

The should let a reviewer connect the module evidence to the exact final . Annex V requires a general product description, relevant photos or illustrations, marking and internal layout, software or firmware versions affecting compliance, user information, installation instructions, drawings, standards or other technical specifications, the EU declaration, and test or examination results where applicable.

When the host manufacturer reuses assessments performed for components or parts, the RED Guide says those assessments should be included in the . The record should also explain why the host configuration stays inside the module supplier's conditions, or what added analysis or testing covers deviations.

  • Keep module DoC or supplier declaration information, module test reports, module installation instructions, approved antenna conditions, radio parameters, firmware assumptions, and limitations.
  • Keep host evidence for antenna location, enclosure, shielding, cable routing, power supply, ports, accessories, software settings, labels, packaging, instructions, and intended operating configurations.
  • List harmonised standards applied in full or in part; where harmonised standards are not applied or are only partly applied, describe the solutions used to meet Article 3.
  • If Annex III EU-type examination is used, include the EU-type examination certificate and annexes from the notified body.
Question 4

What should instructions and the EU declaration say for a module-based product?

Instructions matter because they define how the is intended to be used. Article 10(8) requires instructions and safety information in a language easily understood by consumers and other end-users as determined by the Member State concerned. For intentional transmitters, the instructions also need frequency bands and maximum transmitted radio-frequency power information.

For accessories, components, and software that allow the to operate as intended, the RED Guide focuses on items that influence conformity and are intended to be installed or changed by the user without the manufacturer's control. If the equipment is delivered without an antenna, the guide says the technical features of the antenna that may be used with the radio equipment should be provided to the user and mentioned in the DoC where needed.

  • State allowed antennas, antenna characteristics, installation limits, separation or mounting assumptions, power supply limits, firmware or software constraints, and supported radio modes where those facts affect compliance.
  • Do not leave module integration conditions only in supplier files; carry the relevant conditions into host instructions, , and release checks.
  • Keep the DoC designation aligned with the product, module configuration, accessories, components, and software that allow the to operate as intended.
  • If restrictions on putting into service or authorisation requirements apply, keep packaging and instruction evidence aligned with Article 10(10) analysis.
Question 5

When should a radio-module assessment be reopened?

Reopen the assessment when the product facts no longer match the evidence. A module test report or certificate is strongest when the host uses the same radio configuration, antenna conditions, software assumptions, installation limits, and intended environment that were assessed.

A change does not automatically mean the product fails, but it does need a documented review. The record should decide whether existing module and host evidence remains sufficient, whether additional testing or analysis is needed, whether a notified body route is triggered, and whether the DoC, instructions, labels, or must be updated.

  • Review after changes to antenna, enclosure, shielding, power supply, ports, cables, firmware, radio settings, accessories, installation instructions, intended use, market restrictions, or applicable standards.
  • Review when a supplier replaces the module, changes the module firmware, changes allowed installation conditions, or updates the module declaration or test report.
  • Review before private-labelling, importing, or modifying a module-based product in a way that may shift manufacturer responsibility or affect conformity.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu6 citations
Referenced sections
  • Binding RED source for radio-equipment definition, Article 3 essential requirements, Article 10 manufacturer duties, Article 17 conformity assessment, Article 21 technical documentation, Annex V technical-documentation contents, and Annex VI EU declaration contents.
  • Primary RED source for the definition of radio equipment and the Article 3 essential requirements that apply to radio equipment.
  • Article 3 sets essential requirements and Article 17 sets conformity assessment requirements for radio equipment.
Show 3 more
  • Article 21 and Annex V define RED technical-documentation contents, including product description, software or firmware affecting compliance, user information, standards, other specifications, DoC, certificates, and test results.
  • Article 10 grounds manufacturer duties for instructions, safety information, frequency band and power information, restriction information, EU declaration, and CE marking.
  • Primary source for manufacturer responsibility to ensure radio equipment is designed and manufactured in accordance with Article 3 and for technical documentation and declaration duties.
"radio equipment"
More quoted passages
"intentionally emits and/or receives radio waves"
"all intended operating conditions"
"CONTENTS OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION"
"instructions and safety information"
"designed and manufactured in accordance with the essential requirements"
ec.europa.eu6 citations
Referenced sections
  • Commission guidance used for RF module scope, module integration, final-product responsibility, use of component assessments, intended operating conditions, technical documentation, instructions, antennas, software, and DoC interpretation.
  • Commission guidance identifying RF modules and embedded RF modules as radio equipment when placed on the EU market before integration, and warning that integration can create further obligations.
  • Commission guidance explaining final-product responsibility, use of prior component assessments, and assessment across intended operating conditions and configurations.
Show 3 more
  • Commission guidance stating that prior component or part assessments used for the radio equipment assessment should be included in the technical documentation.
  • Commission guidance explaining instruction and DoC treatment for accessories, components, software, and antennas that affect conformity or are user-installed or user-changed.
  • Commission guidance used for changes that affect integration assumptions, instructions, intended use, and final-product responsibility.
"RF Modules (Radio Frequency Modules)"
More quoted passages
"responsible for the conformity of the whole product"
"assessments shall be included in its technical documentation"
"technical features of the antenna"
"reused assessment of the components or parts may not be sufficient"
Show all related guides (41)

When do RED cybersecurity requirements apply to connected radio equipment? | RED FAQ

RED FAQ explaining when Article 3(3)(d), (e), and (f) cybersecurity requirements apply to internet-connected, childcare, toy, wearable, and payment-capable radio equipment.

Which receivers and transmitters are covered by RED? | Directive 2014/53/EU FAQ

RED scope FAQ for products that intentionally emit or receive radio waves for radio communication or radiodetermination, including receiver-only products, transmitters, accessory-dependent products, and common exclusions.

Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Products Under the EU RED

FAQ for assessing Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, BLE and other short-range wireless products under the EU Radio Equipment Directive, including Article 3, CE, technical file, cybersecurity and notified-body triggers.

EU Radio Equipment Directive Timeline: RED, Cyber and USB-C Dates

Understand which RED dates changed market-access rules, including 2016 application, the 2017 transition cutoff, common-charger dates, and cybersecurity requirements from 1 August 2025.

EU RED Applicability Test for Radio Equipment

Decide whether Directive 2014/53/EU applies to a connected product, which RED requirements are triggered, and what evidence belongs in the technical file.

EU RED Common Charger Obligations: USB-C scope, dates, labels

Check RED common-charger device categories, application dates, USB-C and USB Power Delivery specifications, charger unbundling, consumer pictograms, labels, and release evidence.

EU RED compliance evidence guide

Build a Radio Equipment Directive compliance file with Article 3 requirement mapping, harmonised-standard checks, conformity assessment evidence, EU declarations, CE marking, and RED source links.

EU RED Cybersecurity Product Categories: 2022/30 scope

Classify products under RED Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30, including exclusions, EN 18031 evidence, and the 1 August 2025 to 10 December 2027 transition.

EU RED FAQ: Scope, CE and USB-C

Answers to common EU RED questions on radio equipment scope, Article 3 requirements, cybersecurity, USB-C common charger rules, CE marking, and technical-file evidence.

EU RED Radio Equipment Scope: products and exclusions

Decide whether a product is radio equipment under Directive 2014/53/EU, with RED scope tests, exclusions, examples, and evidence records.

EU RED Requirements Map: CE and Article 3

Map Radio Equipment Directive requirements for radio products: Article 3 safety, EMC, spectrum, selected Article 3(3) duties, common charger rules, conformity assessment, CE marking, EU declaration, and technical documentation.

EU RED Scope and Classification

Classify products under the EU Radio Equipment Directive with cited tests for radio equipment scope, exclusions, Article 3 requirement buckets, cybersecurity, common charging, and evidence records.

EU RED Scope Classification Workflow

Classify products under the EU Radio Equipment Directive with a cited workflow for RED scope, exclusions, Article 3 requirements, standards, CE evidence, cybersecurity, and common-charger triggers.

RED Article 10 labelling, instructions, and restrictions

Apply RED Article 10 to product identifiers, manufacturer contacts, instructions, declaration statements, radio-frequency information, charging labels, and use restrictions.

RED Article 3 requirement selection workflow

Select the right RED Article 3 branches for radio equipment: safety, EMC, spectrum, delegated Article 3(3) duties, cybersecurity, common charging, evidence, and conformity assessment.

RED Article 3 Requirements: Safety, EMC, Spectrum and Cyber

Map Radio Equipment Directive Article 3(1), 3(2), and 3(3) requirements to safety, EMC, spectrum, interoperability, emergency, software, and cyber evidence.

RED Compliance Checklist for Radio Equipment

Use this RED release checklist for product scope, Article 3 requirements, technical documentation, EU declarations, CE marking, cybersecurity, common charging, and notified-body decisions.

RED compliance deadlines calendar: 2016 to 2027

Calendar EU Radio Equipment Directive launch dates through 2027: RED applicability, common charger, cybersecurity, standards, CE marking, declarations and retention.

RED conformity assessment and CE marking

EU Radio Equipment Directive guide to Article 17 conformity modules, notified-body triggers, technical documentation, EU declarations, and CE marking.

RED Conformity Assessment Template

Template fields for documenting RED Article 3 requirements, Article 17 route selection, harmonised standards, notified-body evidence, technical documentation, EU declaration, CE marking, cybersecurity, and common-charger checks.

RED Cyber Compliance Workflow for Article 3(3)(d/e/f)

A cited RED cybersecurity workflow for internet-connected radio equipment, privacy and data safeguards, payment-fraud features, evidence packs, and CE release gates.

RED Cybersecurity Delegated Act Guide | Article 3(3)(d/e/f)

Guide to RED Article 3(3)(d), (e), and (f) scope, EN 18031 evidence, the 1 August 2025 application date, and repeal of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/30 from 11 December 2027.

RED Cybersecurity Requirements for Radio Equipment

EU RED cybersecurity requirements under Article 3(3)(d), (e), and (f): scope, affected radio equipment, application date, standards, notified bodies, and evidence.

RED EMC and LVD Safety Interplay for Radio Equipment

Explain how EU RED Article 3 applies LVD safety objectives and EMC requirements to radio equipment, with evidence, test-plan, and technical-file guidance.

RED Harmonised Standards and Test Plans: OJEU evidence guide

Build a Radio Equipment Directive standards matrix and test plan around OJEU-cited harmonised standards, Article 3 requirements, Article 17 route triggers, and Annex V technical-file evidence.

RED notified body route selection under Article 17

Decide when RED radio equipment can use internal production control and when Article 17 requires Annex III EU-type examination or Annex IV full quality assurance.

RED Notified Body Trigger Workflow: Article 17 evidence guide

Decide when the EU Radio Equipment Directive needs a notified body by mapping Article 3 requirements, OJEU-cited harmonised standards, Annex III EU-type examination, and Annex IV full quality assurance evidence.

RED penalties, fines, and enforcement actions

EU Radio Equipment Directive penalties guide covering Article 46, Member State penalty rules, recalls, withdrawals, formal non-compliance, and enforcement evidence.

RED software update impact for radio equipment

Assess when firmware, app, and software updates can affect EU Radio Equipment Directive conformity, technical documentation, DoC, standards, and notified-body evidence.

RED vs Cyber Resilience Act for radio equipment

Compare EU RED cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Act duties for connected radio equipment, including scope, dates, evidence, reporting, and conformity routes.

RED vs EMC Directive: which law applies to radio equipment?

Decide when EU radio equipment uses RED instead of the EMC Directive and how to place EMC tests, declarations, fixed installations, and technical evidence.

RED vs ETSI EN 303 645: what the IoT standard proves

Compare binding EU RED cybersecurity duties with ETSI EN 303 645 consumer IoT standard, current editions, EN 18031, evidence reuse, and CE conformity.

RED vs LVD: electrical safety for radio equipment

Decide when EU radio equipment uses RED safety requirements instead of the Low Voltage Directive, including voltage limits, chargers, evidence, and declarations.

RED vs Market Surveillance Regulation for radio equipment

Compare RED product-conformity duties with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 for responsible operators, online offers, customs controls, authority requests, and corrective action.

RED vs UK PSTI for connected radio products

Compare EU RED with the UK PSTI consumer connectable product regime, including scope, exclusions, passwords, updates, vulnerability reporting, evidence, and dates.