When can vendor affirmation be used under FIPS 140-3?
Vendor affirmation is available only for specific cases described in CMVP Implementation Guidance. The clearest HSS example is IG C.O for SP 800-208: HSS can be vendor-affirmed when the implementation performs the required cryptographic algorithm self-tests, the underlying LMS operations have the required CAVP certificates, and the CSTL verifies each supported HSS operation through source-code review.
Do not describe vendor affirmation as a general validation status. The FIPS 140-3 standard says cryptographic modules are validated through CMVP, with testing by accredited CST laboratories, while CAVP addresses approved security function and sensitive security parameter generation and establishment method testing.
- Confirm the exact IG section that allows the vendor affirmation claim, such as IG C.O for SP 800-208 HSS or IG D.H for SP 800-133 key generation.
- Keep CAVP certificate numbers for the underlying algorithms that the IG requires, including the LMS operations used by an HSS implementation.
- Make sure the Security Policy places the claim in the correct table or disclosure location required by the applicable IG.
Supports the specific IG C.O conditions for SP 800-208 HSS vendor affirmation, including CASTs, LMS CAVP certificates, CSTL source-code review, Security Policy placement, and transition when CAVP testing becomes available.
Supports the distinction between CMVP module validation, accredited CST laboratory testing, and the procurement role of validated modules.
Public NIST search page for checking algorithm-validation certificate evidence that an IG may require before a vendor-affirmed claim is usable.