FAQEU

EU MDR FAQ UDI-DI and Basic UDI-DI

The Basic UDI-DI groups related device models; a UDI-DI identifies a specific device model or packaging level.

This FAQ explains who assigns each identifier, where it appears, when it must change, and how to keep labels, technical documentation, and EUDAMED records aligned.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Questions
4

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
3

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

Under the EU MDR, the is the main key that groups devices with the same intended purpose, risk class, and essential design and manufacturing characteristics. A identifies a specific device model or packaging level and gives access to its UDI database information. The manufacturer assigns both under the rules of an EU-designated issuing entity. Keep the , technical documentation, declaration and certificate references, and EUDAMED data aligned. Assign a new UDI-DI whenever a change could cause device misidentification or ambiguity in traceability, including the changes expressly listed in MDR Annex VI.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

How should Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI be assigned under the EU MDR?

The manufacturer decides the grouping from its technical knowledge and the issuing entity's rules. Group only devices that share the same intended purpose, risk class, and essential design and manufacturing characteristics. The Basic UDI-DI is the main database and documentation key; it appears in the EU declaration of conformity and, where applicable, product certificates, technical documentation, the summary of safety and clinical performance (SSCP), and the periodic safety update report (PSUR). It is not placed on the device label.

Assign a to the device model and a separate UDI-DI to each higher packaging level, excluding shipping containers. The UDI-DI is specific to a manufacturer and device. It combines with the production identifier, or UDI-PI, to form the UDI conveyed by the . A may link to one or more UDI-DIs, but each device UDI-DI links to one Basic UDI-DI in EUDAMED.

  • Document why every device in the group has the same intended purpose, risk class, and essential design and manufacturing characteristics; do not use commercial family names as the grouping test.
  • Use UDI-DIs for the device and higher packaging levels; shipping containers are not higher levels of packaging for this purpose.
  • For devices needing notified-body product certificates, MDCG 2022-7 recommends aligning the grouping with the notified body so certificates and supporting regulatory documents reference the right group.
  • Assign the before applying to the notified body when MDR Article 29(3) applies, and assign or verify the required UDI/device data before placing the device on the market.

How should and be assigned under the EU MDR?

The manufacturer groups devices with the same intended purpose, risk class, and essential design and manufacturing characteristics under one . It then assigns a to each specific device model and each higher packaging level other than shipping containers. The UDI-DI combines with the applicable UDI-PI to form the UDI. Use an EU-designated issuing entity's rules, document the grouping rationale, and keep EUDAMED and regulatory records aligned.

Does the go on the label?

No. The is a database and regulatory-document key, not the identifier shown on the label. The conveys the device or packaging UDI through automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) and human-readable interpretation (HRI), subject to the MDR placement rules and exemptions.

Can one cover several device models?

Yes, if the models have the same intended purpose, risk class, and essential design and manufacturing characteristics. The manufacturer decides the grouping from its technical knowledge and the issuing entity's rules. For product certificates, MDCG 2022-7 recommends alignment with the notified body. A shared brand or commercial product family is not enough by itself.

Citations
MDCG 2022-7 - UDI system Q&A

Non-binding MDCG guidance on manufacturer-led Basic UDI-DI grouping, notified-body alignment, the relationship between Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI, and packaging identifiers.

Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices

Current consolidated MDR text for Article 27 UDI duties, Article 29 device registration, Annex IV declaration content, Annex VI definitions, packaging rules, and certificate references; EUR-Lex notes that the consolidated text itself has no legal effect.

Question 2

How do UDI carriers, labels, and EUDAMED records fit together?

The is the AIDC and HRI representation of the UDI. As a general rule, it is placed on the label or device itself and on higher packaging levels. Annex VI contains exceptions for space constraints, certain individually packaged class I and IIa single-use devices, retail point-of-sale packaging, direct marking, and systems or procedure packs. The UDI requirement does not replace the rest of the MDR labelling requirements.

Manufacturers must submit UDI/device information in EUDAMED for devices subject to the registration requirements. The UDI/Devices module has been mandatory since 28 May 2026. Before placing a device other than a custom-made device on the market, the manufacturer must enter or verify the applicable Annex VI device information and keep it updated. A record does not prove that the device conforms to the MDR.

  • Keep the label artwork, package hierarchy, and specification traceable to the assigned and UDI-PI.
  • Confirm that EUDAMED data matches the , , packaging hierarchy, manufacturer, EMDN code, and device characteristics used in regulatory records.
  • Do not treat the presence of a in the UDI database as proof of MDR conformity; it is an identifier record, not a conformity decision.
Citations
Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices

Current consolidated MDR text for Annex VI carrier formats and placement, exemptions, packaging, database maintenance, and the rule that registration is not proof of conformity; EUR-Lex notes that the consolidated text itself has no legal effect.

Question 3

When do changes trigger a new UDI-DI?

A new is required when a change could lead to device misidentification or ambiguity in traceability. MDR Annex VI makes a new UDI-DI mandatory for changes to the name or trade name, device version or model, single-use status, packaged-sterile status, need for sterilisation before use, quantity in a package, or critical warnings or contraindications such as latex or DEHP.

The list does not replace the general misidentification and traceability test. MDCG 2022-7 applies that test to package quantity and substance-based devices. Software has additional Annex VI rules: a modification that changes original performance, safety or intended use, or interpretation of data requires a new , while minor revisions generally require a new UDI-PI.

  • A package quantity change, such as moving from 5 to 10 devices in a package, requires a new for that package because it can create traceability ambiguity.
  • MDCG 2022-7 says a formulation or quantity change, or an additional medical-purpose claim, requires a new for the substance-based device examples it addresses.
  • If a person reprocesses a single-use device under MDR Article 17(2) and becomes its manufacturer, MDCG 2022-7 says the reprocessed device needs a new and UDI. A device reprocessed and used within a health institution under Article 17(3) does not require a new UDI under that guidance; Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1207 and national rules still apply.
Citations
MDCG 2022-7 - UDI system Q&A

Non-binding guidance applying UDI-DI change rules to package quantity, substance-based devices, and the two Article 17 reprocessing routes.

Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices

Current consolidated MDR text for the general UDI-DI change test, listed mandatory triggers, software-specific changes, and minor software revisions; EUR-Lex notes that the consolidated text itself has no legal effect.

Question 4

What records should be retained?

MDR Article 27(7) requires the manufacturer to keep an up-to-date list of all assigned UDIs in the technical documentation. The supporting record should also link each identifier to the product facts that justify it: grouping rationale, issuing entity rule, device and packaging level, label or carrier evidence, EUDAMED data, and the change assessment explaining why the identifier stayed the same or changed.

For reprocessing and relabelling situations, keep traceability back to the original device identifier where the guidance or MDR rule calls for it. MDCG 2022-7 says a reprocessor who becomes the manufacturer should keep the original product UDI in technical documentation and the QMS, and MDR Annex VI requires manufacturers that relabel or repackage devices with their own label to retain the original manufacturer's UDI.

  • Retain the grouping rationale, including intended purpose, risk class, and essential design or manufacturing characteristics.
  • Retain records for the device and packaging levels, plus the UDI-PI rules used for lot, serial, software, manufacturing, or expiry data on the label.
  • Retain controlled evidence of EUDAMED submissions, label artwork, scans or proofs, notified-body alignment where relevant, and change assessments for each new or unchanged decision.
  • Periodically verify the correctness of UDI database data for devices still available on the market. Update a database element that does not require a new within 30 days of the change.

How quickly must EUDAMED UDI data be updated?

MDR Annex VI requires the manufacturer to update the relevant UDI database record within 30 days when a data element changes but the change does not require a new . Data for a new UDI-DI must be available when the device is placed on the market. Manufacturers must also periodically verify the correctness of data for devices that remain available on the market.

Does every economic operator have to store every UDI it handles?

No. MDR Article 27(8) requires economic operators to store and keep UDIs for class III implantable devices they supplied or received, and for any additional devices or groups designated by an implementing measure. MDCG 2022-7 says that provision does not generally require storage of all other UDIs, although storing them may support traceability. The supply-chain traceability duties in MDR Article 25 and applicable national rules still apply.

Citations
MDCG 2022-7 - UDI system Q&A

Guidance on retaining the original product UDI for Article 17(2) reprocessing and on when economic operators must store supplied-device UDIs.

Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices

Current consolidated MDR text for the up-to-date UDI list in technical documentation, original-UDI retention after relabelling or repackaging, periodic data checks, and the 30-day update rule; EUR-Lex notes that the consolidated text itself has no legal effect.

Recommended next step

Review UDI-DI and Basic UDI-DI records

Check whether model grouping, device and package identifiers, label carriers, EUDAMED data, and change records remain consistent.

Primary sources

References and citations

health.ec.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Guidance on retaining the original product UDI for Article 17(2) reprocessing and on when economic operators must store supplied-device UDIs.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Current consolidated MDR text for the up-to-date UDI list in technical documentation, original-UDI retention after relabelling or repackaging, periodic data checks, and the 30-day update rule; EUR-Lex notes that the consolidated text itself has no legal effect.
Related guides

Explore more topics

Custom-made medical devices under the EU MDR | EU MDR FAQ
Concise EU MDR FAQ on custom-made device definition, mass-produced exclusions, Annex XIII statements, documentation, conformity assessment, PMS, vigilance, and records to retain.
EU MDR Annex II and III Technical Documentation
Build an MDR technical documentation index for Annex II device files and Annex III post-market surveillance evidence, including GSPR, risk, clinical, PMS, UDI, and EUDAMED records.
EU MDR Annex VIII Classification Guide
Classify EU MDR medical devices under Annex VIII using intended purpose, duration, invasiveness, active device and software rules, and conformity assessment impact.
EU MDR Annex XVI products without a medical purpose
EU MDR guide for Annex XVI products: listed groups, common specifications, binding reclassification rules, clinical evidence, notified-body route, transition conditions, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, and vigilance.
EU MDR Applicability Test
Test whether a product, accessory, software function, or Annex XVI product falls under the EU Medical Device Regulation, and record the evidence for the next classification step.
EU MDR change assessment workflow
Assess EU MDR device, design, software, intended purpose, QMS, clinical, PMS, UDI, classification, and notified-body impacts before releasing a medical device change.
EU MDR Checklist for Medical Device Compliance
Practical EU MDR checklist covering qualification, classification, conformity assessment, technical documentation, GSPR, clinical evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, vigilance, QMS, and legacy transition evidence.
EU MDR classification workflow
A concrete EU MDR classification workflow for intended purpose, device or accessory qualification, Annex VIII rule selection, Rule 11 software review, class outcome, and notified body impact.
EU MDR Clinical Evaluation Overview
EU MDR clinical evaluation overview covering Article 61, Annex XIV, clinical data sources, equivalence, PMCF, CER evidence, notified body review, GSPR, and benefit-risk support.
EU MDR Clinical Evaluation Report Template
A cited EU MDR clinical evaluation report template covering intended purpose, GSPR linkage, clinical data appraisal, equivalence limits, PMCF, conclusions, and reviewer signoff.
EU MDR clinical evidence guide
EU MDR guide to clinical evaluation, clinical investigations, equivalence, PMCF, GSPR support, technical documentation, and notified-body review.
EU MDR compliance obligations
EU MDR compliance guide for device qualification, classification, conformity assessment, QMS, technical documentation, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, vigilance, and legacy transition controls.
EU MDR conformity route workflow
EU MDR workflow for classifying a device, choosing the conformity assessment route, preparing technical and QMS evidence, and reaching certificate, DoC, UDI, EUDAMED, and CE outputs.
EU MDR deadlines and compliance calendar
EU MDR calendar for application, conditional legacy-device transition, UDI carrier dates, mandatory EUDAMED modules, and recurring compliance reviews.
EU MDR Device Classification Guide
Classify an EU MDR medical device by intended purpose, Annex VIII duration, invasiveness, active-device and software rules, then document the conformity route impact.
EU MDR EUDAMED and UDI registration
cited MDR guide to Basic UDI-DI, UDI-DI, EUDAMED device registration, actor roles, labels, technical documentation, and UDI data governance.
EU MDR FAQ: qualification, evidence, UDI, and transition
Concise EU MDR FAQ covering device qualification, software classification, accessories, custom-made devices, clinical evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, notified bodies, significant changes, and legacy transition.
EU MDR Legacy Device Transition
EU MDR legacy-device guide to Article 120 eligibility, class-based end dates, certificate validity, significant changes, surveillance, and evidence.
EU MDR notified body route selection
Choose an EU MDR conformity assessment route by device class, Article 52 option, notified body designation scope, QMS readiness, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and certificate evidence.
EU MDR penalties and enforcement risk
EU MDR guide to Article 113 national penalties, authority measures, recalls, certificate action, and the evidence needed for a country-specific assessment.
EU MDR PMS and Vigilance Guide
EU MDR guide to post-market surveillance, PMCF updates, PMS reports, PSURs, serious incident reporting, FSCA/FSN handling, trend reporting, and evidence records.
EU MDR PMS and vigilance records
Cited EU MDR guide to PMS plans, PMS reports, PSURs, PMCF updates, serious incident and FSCA reporting, trend reporting, and EUDAMED evidence handling.
EU MDR PMS Plan Template for Medical Devices
A cited EU MDR post-market surveillance plan template covering device scope, PMS data sources, PMCF linkage, vigilance, trend reporting, PMSR or PSUR outputs, roles, cadence, and evidence records.
EU MDR QMS and technical file evidence map
Map EU MDR Article 10 QMS duties to Annex II and Annex III technical documentation, PMS, vigilance, UDI records, and notified-body review evidence.
EU MDR QMS requirements under Article 10
EU MDR QMS guide for Article 10 manufacturer controls covering regulatory strategy, design, risk, clinical evaluation, PMS, vigilance, UDI, suppliers, CAPA, and conformity records.
EU MDR qualification and borderline products
EU MDR qualification guide for medical purpose claims, accessories, software, Annex XVI products, and borderline routes to classification and conformity assessment.
EU MDR qualification workflow
A concrete EU MDR workflow for deciding whether a product is a medical device, accessory, Annex XVI product, IVD interface, medicinal-product interface, or non-MDR product before classification and conformity assessment.
EU MDR requirements checklist
Concrete EU MDR requirements for medical-device scope, classification, GSPR, conformity assessment, technical documentation, QMS, clinical evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, vigilance, and economic-operator records.
EU MDR Rule 11 software classification
Classify MDR medical device software under Rule 11 using intended purpose, diagnosis or therapy decision impact, physiological monitoring, conformity route, clinical evidence, and software-change records.
EU MDR significant changes FAQ: legacy-device transition and notified-body review
FAQ on MDR significant changes for legacy devices, including intended-purpose, design, software, material, sterilisation, clinical, QMS, notified-body, and evidence impacts.
EU MDR SSCP: Devices and Requirements
Decide whether an EU medical device needs an SSCP, see worked class IIa, IIb, and III examples, and check the required content, evidence, publication, and update controls.
EU MDR transition timeline and end dates
EU MDR chronology for 2021 application, 2023 amendments, 2024 eligibility milestones, and conditional 2026, 2027, and 2028 transition endpoints.
EU MDR UDI and EUDAMED registration guide
EU MDR guide to Basic UDI-DI, UDI-DI, UDI carriers, EUDAMED actor and device registration, change impacts, and evidence governance.
EU MDR vigilance reporting workflow
Concrete EU MDR vigilance workflow for incident intake, serious incident assessment, FSCA and FSN handling, trend reporting, EUDAMED caveats, CAPA, PMS, clinical evaluation updates, and records.
MDR vs AI Act for medical-device software
Compare MDR and AI Act scope, high-risk classification, conformity assessment, evidence, monitoring, and timing for AI-enabled medical devices.
MDR vs EU Product Liability Directive
Compare MDR compliance evidence with EU product-liability claims, responsible parties, disclosure, presumptions, damage, and the December 2026 transition.
MDR vs GPSR: medical-device boundary checks
Compare MDR medical-device scope with general product-safety fallback questions for borderline, non-medical, and Annex XVI products.
MDR vs IVDR: medical devices and IVDs compared
Compare EU MDR and IVDR scope, classification, conformity routes, technical documentation, clinical or performance evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, and vigilance.
What should an EU MDR PMCF plan and report cover? | EU MDR FAQ
Under the EU MDR, PMCF is part of PMS and clinical evaluation. See what the plan, activities, report, updates, and retained evidence should cover.
What should manufacturers do when an EU MDR classification changes? | EU MDR FAQ
Concise EU MDR FAQ on classification changes, intended purpose, software, notified-body route impact, certificates, technical documentation, and retained evidence.
When can clinical equivalence be used under the EU MDR?
EU MDR FAQ on clinical equivalence, including technical, biological, and clinical characteristics, access to equivalent-device data, class III and implantable-device limits, clinical evaluation, PMCF, and retained evidence.
When do software or products make medical purpose claims under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ
EU MDR FAQ on medical purpose claims, intended purpose evidence, software qualification, Annex XVI contrasts, and records to keep.
When is a PSUR required under the EU MDR and what should it contain? | EU MDR FAQ
EU MDR FAQ on PSUR scope, content, update cadence, PMS and PMCF links, notified-body handling, EUDAMED submission, and evidence to retain.
When is an accessory regulated under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ
EU MDR FAQ on when an article is a medical device accessory, how intended purpose affects classification, and what evidence to keep.
When is software a medical device under the EU MDR?
EU MDR FAQ on medical device software qualification, Rule 11 and other classification rules, modules, evidence, software changes, UDI, and EUDAMED.
Which EUDAMED modules matter under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ
EU MDR FAQ mapping EUDAMED modules to actor registration, UDI/device data, certificates, clinical investigations, vigilance/PMS, market surveillance, and practical records.