CSRDValue chain estimatesESRS

CSRD value chain estimates under ESRS

Decide when estimated upstream or downstream value-chain information is acceptable in an ESRS sustainability statement.

Apply the ESRS boundary test, reasonable effort, indirect-source, BP-2, uncertainty, and evidence requirements.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

Under the 2023 ESRS Set 1, use a for required material upstream or downstream information only when it cannot be collected directly after reasonable efforts. Identify the value-chain segment, use reasonable and supportable information available without undue cost or effort, explain the basis and accuracy limits, and keep the result verifiable. Directive (EU) 2026/470 creates a separate request cap for a value-chain undertaking that did not exceed an average of 1,000 employees during the preceding financial year; Member States have until 19 March 2027 to transpose it. The related Article 29ca voluntary-standard delegated act adopted on 3 July 2026 was still under European Parliament and Council scrutiny on 24 July 2026.

Section 1

Use estimates only after the ESRS value-chain boundary test

Start with ESRS 1 paragraphs 63 to 65. The sustainability statement is extended beyond the reporting undertaking only for material impacts, risks, and opportunities connected through direct or indirect business relationships in the upstream or downstream value chain. ESRS 1 paragraph 64 is the guardrail: the undertaking is not asked to report on every supplier, distributor, customer, user, or end-of-life actor.

An estimate is appropriate only after that boundary test shows that value-chain information is needed and direct collection has not produced the necessary reliable information after reasonable efforts. If the matter is not material for the relevant value-chain part, do not invent a metric. If it is material, scope the estimate to that part of the chain and to the specific disclosure it supports.

The forthcoming value-chain request cap does not replace this ESRS estimation test. Directive (EU) 2026/470 requires national transposition by 19 March 2027 and limits specified sustainability-reporting requests to protected undertakings by reference to the Article 29ca voluntary standard. It does not prohibit voluntary sharing. Check applicable national law and the final delegated standard before deciding what may be requested; then apply ESRS 1 paragraph 69 to any required information that remains unavailable.

  • Define the IRO first: name the material impact, risk, or opportunity and the upstream or downstream relationship where it arises.
  • Define the reporting use: materiality assessment evidence, an ESRS metric, an entity-specific metric, or context for policies, actions, and targets.
  • Keep the estimate at the right level: geography, supplier tier, commodity, product use, customer group, waste stream, or other value-chain segment.
  • Do not use one enterprise-wide proxy where material differences between geographies, products, or activities would be obscured.
  • Stop if the estimate cannot meet ESRS qualitative characteristics, including relevance, faithful representation, comparability, verifiability, and understandability.
Section 2

What reasonable effort should leave behind

EFRAG IG 2 treats reasonable effort as fact-specific. It depends on the reporting burden of obtaining direct data, the expected quality loss from not obtaining it, the processes used to collect value-chain information, and the resources dedicated to those processes. That means a reporter needs evidence of the attempt, not a sentence saying the data was unavailable.

The record should be built at the metric or disclosure level. A Scope 3 category (other indirect value-chain greenhouse-gas emissions), a living-wage risk screen for facilities in high-risk countries, and a downstream use-phase energy estimate need different counterparties, indirect sources, assumptions, and accuracy explanations.

  • Request definition: the ESRS disclosure or entity-specific metric, requested datapoint, period, unit, value-chain segment, and expected use in the sustainability statement.
  • Collection evidence: supplier, customer, distributor, investee, or partner requests; response rates; non-response reasons; data-quality checks; and rejected inputs.
  • Proportionality rationale: why more direct collection was unavailable, unreliable, or beyond reasonable effort in this fact pattern.
  • Indirect-source rationale: why sector-average, country, product, spend, market, peer, sample, public-report, or database evidence is the most supportable available basis.
  • Quality conclusion: whether the estimate is suitable for trend reporting, target tracking, risk screening, narrative context, or only a directional statement.
Section 3

What BP-2 requires for estimated value-chain metrics

ESRS 2 BP-2, Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances, paragraph 10 applies when metrics include upstream or downstream value-chain data estimated using indirect sources such as sector-average data or other proxies. The disclosure has four parts: identify the affected metrics, describe the basis for preparation, describe the resulting level of accuracy, and, where applicable, describe planned actions to improve accuracy in the future.

Make the final number traceable to the estimate package. Do not bury an estimated input inside an aggregate total without explaining which metric used the estimate and what level of accuracy the evidence supports.

  • Metric identification: list each ESRS metric, entity-specific metric, or monetary amount affected by estimated value-chain inputs.
  • Basis for preparation: document boundary, population, indirect source, calculation method, conversion factor, period, and significant assumptions.
  • Resulting accuracy: state coverage, uncertainty, known bias, missing geographies or tiers, and whether the result is measured, modelled, extrapolated, or directional.
  • Improvement actions: describe planned supplier data collection, customer data collection, product-specific activity data, sampling, updated factors, or better controls where applicable.
  • Revision logic: when new information changes an estimate from a prior period, distinguish revised estimates from prior-period errors and explain comparability limits.
Section 4

Where an estimate needs a visible limitation

ESRS 1 section 7.2 says measurement uncertainty can arise when quantitative metrics and monetary amounts, including value-chain information, cannot be measured directly and can only be estimated. An estimate can still meet the qualitative characteristics of information when its assumptions, limitations, and uncertainty are accurately described and explained.

A visible limitation is needed when the source is broad, the value-chain segment is only partly covered, or the method could imply precision that the evidence does not support. EFRAG IG 2 also warns that quantifying indirect impacts does not always produce relevant information about the undertaking's impact; in some circumstances a different metric or narrative may be more faithful.

  • Sector averages: state the sector, geography, year, activity, and why the average is a reasonable proxy for the undertaking's value-chain segment.
  • Spend-based estimates: state the spend category, conversion factor, price-year or inflation treatment, and why spend is an acceptable activity proxy.
  • Sample extrapolations: state sample size, coverage, selection basis, excluded populations, and extrapolation method.
  • Country or risk databases: state why the country, region, commodity, worker group, or product-use context fits the IRO being assessed.
  • High uncertainty: explain whether the estimate can support target tracking or only screening, prioritisation, or contextual disclosure.
Section 5

Build a verifiable estimate package

ESRS Appendix B treats verifiability as the ability to corroborate the information itself or the inputs used to derive it. For value-chain estimates, that means the record should connect the ESRS requirement, materiality conclusion, direct-data effort, indirect source, calculation, limitation, BP-2 wording, and approval evidence.

Keep the package at the level of the affected metric or disclosure. A general policy saying proxies are allowed will not explain why a specific supplier-tier estimate, product-use estimate, living-wage screen, or Scope 3 input is reasonable and supportable at the reporting date.

  • Materiality link: IRO, affected stakeholder or environmental matter, value-chain segment, and ESRS disclosure or entity-specific metric.
  • Direct-data file: who was asked, what was requested, what was received, what failed data-quality checks, and why the remaining gap required estimation.
  • Indirect-source record: source title and URL, source date, coverage, geography, sector or product fit, known exclusions, and why it is reasonable for the estimate.
  • Calculation file: inputs, formulas, conversion factors, assumptions, sensitivity checks, preparer, reviewer, approval date, and version history.
  • Disclosure file: BP-2 metric list, basis for preparation, resulting accuracy, uncertainty wording, and planned actions to improve accuracy where applicable.
  • Reassessment record: date and owner for checking whether new primary data, a changed proxy, a changed value-chain segment, or a changed materiality conclusion requires recalculation, restatement, or different limitation wording.
Recommended next step

Turn value-chain estimates into reviewable ESRS evidence

This CSRD value-chain estimates guide helps document direct-data efforts, proxy choices, BP-2 disclosure wording, uncertainty, and improvement plans.

Primary sources

References and citations

xbrl.efrag.org6 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary ESRS source for value-chain scope, estimates after reasonable efforts, sector averages and proxies, BP-2 disclosure, estimation uncertainty, and verifiability.
  • ESRS 1 paragraphs 63 to 65 limit value-chain information to material upstream and downstream matters connected to the undertaking through business relationships.
  • ESRS 1 paragraph 69 requires estimation when required upstream or downstream value-chain information cannot be collected after reasonable efforts.
Show 3 more
  • ESRS 2 BP-2 paragraph 10 lists the disclosure items for metrics that include upstream or downstream value-chain data estimated from indirect sources.
  • ESRS 1 section 7.2 supports disclosure of significant uncertainty and the requirement to describe assumptions and estimates accurately.
  • ESRS 1 Appendix B supports keeping estimate inputs, methods, assumptions, and review evidence available so sustainability information is verifiable.
"Estimation using sector averages and proxies"
More quoted passages
"does not require information on each and every actor"
"all reasonable and supportable information"
"identify the metrics"
"measurement uncertainty may arise"
"inputs and methods of calculation"
efrag.org4 citations
Referenced sections
  • EFRAG page identifying the non-authoritative IG 2 Value Chain guidance used for practical reasonable-effort, indirect-source, and estimate-documentation examples.
  • Grounds the page's use of EFRAG IG 2 as the practical implementation source for value-chain reasonable effort, estimates, and indirect data examples.
  • EFRAG IG 2 provides practical examples of indirect value-chain estimates and cautions that quantitative indirect-impact estimates are not always the most relevant disclosure.
Show 1 more
  • EFRAG IG 2 supports transparent explanation of value-chain estimates, proxies, direct-data limitations, and future improvements.
"IG 2 Value Chain"
More quoted passages
"does not produce relevant information"
"transparent disclosure and explanation"
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • EU directive source for the value-chain cap, its limits, Article 29ca, and the 19 March 2027 national transposition deadline.
  • Creates the protected-undertaking request cap, limits it to specified sustainability-reporting requests, preserves voluntary sharing, and sets 19 March 2027 as the transposition deadline.
"Article 29ca"
xbrl.efrag.org2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Supports the digital-reporting point that BP-2 value-chain estimation explanations can be connected to affected metrics or fact values.
  • Explains how BP-2 value-chain estimation disclosures can be connected to affected digital facts through taxonomy dimensions or fact-to-fact relationships.
"fact-valueChainEstimation"
More quoted passages
"value chain estimated data"
finance.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official status source confirming that both delegated acts remain under scrutiny before application.
  • Official status notice that the revised ESRS and Article 29ca voluntary-standard delegated acts remain subject to European Parliament and Council scrutiny before application.
efrag.org
Referenced sections
  • Identifies IG 2 Value Chain Implementation Guidance as non-authoritative EFRAG guidance covering value-chain reporting, reporting boundary, operational control, and FAQs.
"Value Chain Implementation Guidance"
Show all related guides (40)

CSRD assurance and ESRS digital tagging evidence

Evidence checklist for CSRD assurance readiness, ESRS datapoint traceability, and digital tagging preparation under the ESRS XBRL and ESEF reporting framework.

CSRD assurance evidence pack workflow for ESRS reporting

A CSRD and ESRS workflow for building an assurance-ready evidence pack covering scope, double materiality, ESRS datapoints, controls, estimates, and digital tagging.

CSRD assurance-ready controls and evidence for ESRS reporting

Build CSRD and ESRS evidence around GOV-5 controls, double materiality, IROs, value-chain data, assurance files, and XBRL tagging checks.

CSRD deadlines and ESRS compliance calendar

A current-law CSRD and ESRS calendar covering the amended 2027 scope, national implementation, publication, assurance, and digital reporting milestones.

CSRD Double Materiality Interview Question Bank for ESRS

Interview prompts for ESRS double materiality work: context, affected stakeholders, value chain IROs, impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, and evidence.

CSRD double materiality method under ESRS

A practical method for ESRS double materiality assessment: impact materiality, financial materiality, value-chain coverage, thresholds, evidence, and documentation.

CSRD double materiality scoring: IRO assessment and ESRS data points

A practical scoring guide for CSRD and ESRS double materiality: impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, evidence, governance, and disclosure mapping.

CSRD Double Materiality Workflow for ESRS Assessment

A CSRD and ESRS workflow for running a double materiality assessment, from value-chain scoping and stakeholder inputs to IRO scoring, governance approval, and audit trail evidence.

CSRD penalties and fines: Member State enforcement, controls, and evidence

How CSRD penalties work through Member State law, which reporting and assurance failures may trigger enforcement, and what evidence teams should keep.

CSRD reporting waves and Omnibus status

Current CSRD status after Directive (EU) 2026/470: amended scope from FY 2027, Stop-the-Clock history, ESRS work, and remaining implementation steps.

CSRD scope and phasing by company type

Map CSRD reporting scope by company category, original Article 5 wave, listed SME opt-out, third-country group rules, and stop-the-clock caveats.

CSRD vs CSDDD: Reporting vs Due Diligence

Compare CSRD sustainability reporting with CSDDD human rights and environmental due diligence, including scope, evidence, assurance, penalties, and overlap.

CSRD vs EU Taxonomy Article 8

Compare CSRD and ESRS sustainability reporting with EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, including scope, evidence, tagging, and reuse limits.

CSRD vs GRI: ESRS Interoperability

Compare CSRD/ESRS reporting with GRI reporting: materiality, value-chain boundaries, additional disclosures, standards editions, and evidence reuse.

CSRD vs IFRS S1 and S2 Comparison

Compare CSRD and ESRS with IFRS S1 and S2 across scope, materiality, disclosures, value chain reporting, assurance, digital tagging, and interoperability.

CSRD vs SEC Climate Disclosure Rule

Compare CSRD/ESRS with the SEC's 2024 climate disclosure rules, including scope, materiality, emissions, filing, assurance, and the SEC's pending 2026 rescission proposal.

CSRD vs SFDR: ESRS and Financial Disclosures

Compare CSRD/ESRS corporate sustainability reporting with SFDR financial-market disclosures, including scope, materiality, PAI data, assurance, tagging, and reuse limits.

CSRD XBRL Tagging Checklist for ESRS and Article 8 Readiness

A CSRD digital-reporting readiness checklist for XHTML, Inline XBRL, ESRS and Article 8 taxonomy mapping, ESEF controls, and the current no-markup-until-rules status.

ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure under CSRD

How the 2023 ESRS Set 1 uses ESRS 1 for reporting requirements and ESRS 2 for general disclosures, with materiality rules and current revision status.

ESRS data point inventory workflow for CSRD reporting

Build an ESRS data point inventory that links disclosure requirements, materiality outcomes, evidence owners, XBRL tagging readiness, and assurance controls.

ESRS structure and data model for CSRD reporting

Map ESRS architecture, disclosure requirements, datapoints, materiality, XBRL taxonomy, Article 8 tagging, and report data ownership for CSRD reporting.

Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs for CSRD reporting

How to prepare EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under the current Disclosures Delegated Act, including 2026 simplifications, evidence, and digital-tagging status.

CSRD Article 40a third-country group reporting FAQ

FAQ on when CSRD Article 40a applies to third-country groups, which EU subsidiary or branch publishes the report, and what happens with assurance and missing information.

CSRD assurance evidence FAQ: what to keep for limited assurance

What CSRD and ESRS assurance evidence should support: management-report publication, the assurance report, national assurance procedures, and EU limited assurance milestones.

CSRD data point inventory FAQ for ESRS disclosure readiness

How to build an ESRS data point inventory for CSRD reporting: disclosure requirements, materiality filters, evidence ownership, value-chain data, XBRL readiness, and assurance support.

CSRD digital tagging and XBRL readiness FAQ

What CSRD teams should do now about XHTML, Inline XBRL, ESRS taxonomy materials, tagging controls, and limits before final digital taxonomy rules apply.

CSRD Omnibus status after Directive (EU) 2026/470

FAQ on the enacted CSRD Stop-the-Clock delay, Directive (EU) 2026/470 scope changes, and remaining national and ESRS implementation steps.

CSRD reporting waves FAQ: who reports first and what changed

FAQ on the original CSRD reporting waves, the amended 2027 scope, transitional relief, third-country reporting, and national transposition.

CSRD topical ESRS scoping: what must be reported?

FAQ on topical ESRS scoping under the current 2023 standards and the revised standards adopted in July 2026, including materiality, omitted topics, climate, and EU-law datapoints.

CSRD value chain estimates: current and revised ESRS

When current and revised ESRS permit value chain estimates, how the value-chain cap works, and what to disclose about methods, limits, and data-quality improvements.

FAQ: CSRD double materiality scoring - thresholds, weighting, and evidence

How to score CSRD double materiality under ESRS without invented thresholds: impact materiality, financial materiality, evidence, and documentation.

How do ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure CSRD reporting?

FAQ explaining how ESRS 1 general requirements and ESRS 2 general disclosures fit into CSRD reporting, materiality, and topical ESRS disclosures.

LSME and VSME under EU CSRD: what SMEs should know

Understand historical LSME reporting, amended CSRD scope, voluntary VSME modules, and the Article 29ca standard and value-chain cap.

Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under CSRD and ESRS

FAQ explaining how EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures relate to CSRD, ESRS, and the Article 8 XBRL taxonomy.