FAQCSRDEU

CSRD reporting waves who reports first and what changed

This FAQ separates the original CSRD application waves from the amended scope and transition rules now in force.

The practical check is entity-specific: identify the legal entity, listing status, group status, EU branch or subsidiary footprint, financial year, and national implementing law.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

are the original phased application dates for different categories of undertaking. They no longer give a complete current-scope answer. Directive (EU) 2025/794 postponed wave two and wave three, and Directive (EU) 2026/470 applies the amended main scope from financial years beginning in 2027 to undertakings and parent groups that exceed both EUR 450 million in net turnover and an average of 1,000 employees. Record the original wave as history, then document the current thresholds, transition rule, reporting year, and national implementation.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

5 of 5 questions
Question 1

What were the original CSRD reporting waves?

Directive (EU) 2022/2464 set phased application dates by financial year. The first wave covered large public-interest entities and public-interest parent undertakings of large groups that exceeded the 500-employee condition. The second wave covered other large undertakings and parent undertakings of large groups. The third wave covered listed SMEs that are not micro-undertakings, plus qualifying small and non-complex institutions and captive insurance or reinsurance undertakings.

The same directive also applied the third-country reporting provisions for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2028. That is a separate route, not the same analysis as a normal EU large undertaking or listed SME wave.

  • Financial years starting on or after 1 January 2024: large public-interest entities and public-interest large-group parents above the 500-employee condition.
  • Financial years starting on or after 1 January 2025: other large undertakings and other parent undertakings of large groups.
  • Financial years starting on or after 1 January 2026: listed SMEs that are not micro-undertakings, plus qualifying small and non-complex institutions and captive insurance or reinsurance undertakings.
  • Financial years starting on or after 1 January 2028: the CSRD third-country reporting route introduced through .
Question 2

Did the stop-the-clock measure erase the original waves?

The original wave rules remain useful history. Directive (EU) 2025/794 postponed the original wave-two and wave-three dates by two years. Directive (EU) 2026/470 then replaced the main scope from financial years beginning in 2027 with the EUR 450 million net-turnover and 1,000-employee tests. A current conclusion needs both steps and the applicable national law.

For financial years beginning in 2025 or 2026, Directive (EU) 2026/470 permits a Member State to exempt an undertaking or issuer that does not exceed either EUR 450 million net turnover or an average of 1,000 employees, on a consolidated basis where applicable, from specified amended requirements. The derogation applies only where the relevant Member State adopts it.

For a live entity assessment, keep the original CSRD wave, record whether the stop-the-clock measure and any national transition derogation affected it, test the entity against the amended scope, and verify the Member State implementation or issuer rules before changing a reporting plan. Directive (EU) 2026/470 requires Member States to transpose its CSRD amendments by 19 March 2027.

  • For wave one, check the separate quick-fix ESRS flexibility for financial years 2025 and 2026 and any national transition exemption. The Stop-the-Clock postponement concerns the original wave-two and wave-three dates.
  • For the original wave-two and wave-three companies, apply the postponement and then the amended 2027 thresholds. Confirm the national implementing law before assigning a publication deadline.
  • For a 2025 or 2026 financial year, retain the national provision that implements any transition derogation; the EU directive only authorises the Member State option.
  • A reporting-wave memo should record the original CSRD wave, any stop-the-clock reliance, the Member State or issuer regime checked, and the source date used for the conclusion.
Recommended next step

Check the CSRD wave before changing your reporting plan

Use the reporting-wave analysis to document entity classification, listed SME opt-out status, third-country exposure, stop-the-clock reliance, and local-law confirmation before changing CSRD reporting work.

Question 3

Does the former listed SME opt-out still determine current CSRD scope?

The belongs to the original CSRD transition rules. Under the earlier Article 19a(7), listed SMEs other than micro-undertakings could decline to report for financial years starting before 1 January 2028 if their management report briefly explained why. The Commission's 2024 FAQ describes that rule.

Directive (EU) 2026/470 deletes the listed-SME application category and Article 19a paragraphs 6 and 7. From financial years beginning in 2027, listed status alone does not bring an SME into the amended CSRD reporting scope. The main test is whether the undertaking, issuer, or group exceeds both EUR 450 million in net turnover and an average of 1,000 employees. Use the old opt-out only when analysing a financial year and national transition measure for which it still applied.

  • For financial years before 2027, confirm which national version of the listed SME transition rule applied.
  • For financial years beginning in 2027 or later, test both amended thresholds instead of relying on the former listed SME category.
  • Keep any historical opt-out explanation with the management report for the year in which it was used.
  • Check voluntary-reporting and value-chain requests separately; falling outside mandatory CSRD scope does not prevent voluntary reporting.
Question 4

How do CSRD reporting waves work for third-country undertakings?

There are two different third-country questions. First, a third-country issuer with transferable securities admitted to trading on an EU regulated market can fall under the issuer route. For financial years beginning in 2027, Directive (EU) 2026/470 applies that route only when the issuer undertaking, or its group on a consolidated basis, exceeds both EUR 450 million net turnover and an average of 1,000 employees. For earlier financial years, check the applicable national implementation and transition rules. Under the issuer route, sustainability information belongs in the management report within the annual financial report.

Second, covers certain third-country undertakings with a qualifying EU subsidiary or branch footprint. For financial years beginning in 2028, Directive (EU) 2026/470 requires the third-country undertaking to have generated more than EUR 450 million in EU net turnover in each of the last two consecutive financial years. The qualifying EU subsidiary must exceed EUR 200 million in net turnover in the preceding financial year. The same EUR 200 million threshold applies to a branch where the third-country undertaking has no qualifying EU subsidiary.

  • Check whether the third-country company is an EU-regulated-market issuer before using the branch or subsidiary route.
  • For , identify the EU subsidiary or branch that would publish and make the report accessible.
  • Check the EU turnover and branch turnover facts against audited or management-reporting records.
  • If a third-country undertaking withholds the required assurance opinion for an report, the EU subsidiary or branch must issue a statement indicating that fact.
Question 5

Why should teams confirm local law before relying on a CSRD wave answer?

CSRD is a directive. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 required Member States to bring national laws, regulations, and administrative provisions into force and communicate those measures to the Commission. Directive (EU) 2026/470 sets a 19 March 2027 deadline for transposing its CSRD amendments. An EU-level wave analysis is necessary but may not answer filing, assurance-provider, register, publication, or sanction questions under national law.

Local-law confirmation is especially important where an entity is near a size threshold, uses the , relies on a stop-the-clock delay, has securities admitted to trading on an EU regulated market, or publishes an third-country report through an EU subsidiary or branch.

  • Record the Member State law or issuer home Member State checked.
  • Confirm whether national law changes the practical publication channel, assurance-provider rules, or enforcement exposure.
  • Keep the CSRD source, the national-law source, the entity classification evidence, and the reporting-year conclusion together.
Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu5 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary legal source for the original CSRD reporting waves, Article 19a listed SME opt-out text, Article 40a third-country reporting scope, and Member State transposition duties.
  • Supports the original CSRD phased application years, the affected entity categories, the transposition obligation, and the third-country Article 40a application date.
  • Historical source for the former Article 19a(7) opt-out text before Directive (EU) 2026/470 deleted that paragraph.
Show 2 more
  • Historical source for the original Article 40a thresholds and publication mechanics; Directive (EU) 2026/470 supplies the amended EUR 450 million and EUR 200 million thresholds used above.
  • Supports the Member State transposition requirement and the need to check national implementing measures for practical application.
"for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2024"
More quoted passages
"may decide not to include"
"generated a net turnover of more than EUR 150 million"
"Member States shall bring into force"
eur-lex.europa.eu5 citations
Referenced sections
  • Current legal source for the amended 2027 main scope, transitional Member State derogation, 2028 third-country route, and transposition deadline.
  • Current legal source for the amended scope from financial years beginning in 2027, the transitional Member State derogation, and the 19 March 2027 transposition deadline.
  • Current legal source deleting the listed-SME application category and Article 19a paragraphs 6 and 7, and establishing the amended turnover and employee tests.
Show 2 more
  • Current legal source for the amended Article 40a EU turnover, subsidiary, and branch thresholds.
  • Current legal source for the transposition deadline applicable to the 2026 CSRD amendments.
"exceed a net turnover of EUR 450 000 000 and an average number of 1 000 employees"
More quoted passages
"for financial years starting between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2026"
"paragraphs 6 and 7 are deleted"
"for each of the last two consecutive financial years"
"by 19 March 2027"
finance.ec.europa.eu4 citations
Referenced sections
  • Commission FAQ used for listed SME opt-out, third-country issuer treatment, Article 40a assurance-opinion statement, and national-rule caveats.
  • Supports the listed SME opt-out, the exclusion of micro-undertakings, the pre-2028 financial-year condition, and the management-report explanation requirement.
  • Supports the distinction between third-country issuers under Articles 19a/29a and the assurance-opinion statement for Article 40a reports.
Show 1 more
  • Supports local-law checks for areas where the FAQ identifies Member State rules or national regimes as relevant to implementation.
"scope, application dates, and exemptions"
More quoted passages
"briefly state in its management report why"
"only if the third-country undertaking is an issuer"
"Member States may have adopted national rules"
finance.ec.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Commission overview used for the first-reporting-year context, stop-the-clock caveat, and quick-fix ESRS flexibility note.
  • Confirms that the first CSRD companies applied the new rules for the 2024 financial year and published reports in 2025.
  • Supports the stop-the-clock caveat for wave two and wave three companies and the separate quick-fix flexibility note for wave one companies.
"reports published in 2025"
More quoted passages
"for the first time in the 2024 financial year"
"wave two and wave three companies"
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Official EUR-Lex source identified by the Commission page for the stop-the-clock measure affecting wave two and wave three entry into application.
  • Official EUR-Lex source identified by the Commission page for the stop-the-clock directive affecting CSRD entry into application.
"stop-the-clock Directive"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports the separate postponement of Commission deadlines for sector-specific ESRS and certain third-country undertaking ESRS, which should not be confused with entity reporting waves.
"replaced by '30 June 2026'"
Show all related guides (40)

CSRD value chain estimates: current and revised ESRS

When current and revised ESRS permit value chain estimates, how the value-chain cap works, and what to disclose about methods, limits, and data-quality improvements.

FAQ: CSRD double materiality scoring - thresholds, weighting, and evidence

How to score CSRD double materiality under ESRS without invented thresholds: impact materiality, financial materiality, evidence, and documentation.

How do ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure CSRD reporting?

FAQ explaining how ESRS 1 general requirements and ESRS 2 general disclosures fit into CSRD reporting, materiality, and topical ESRS disclosures.

LSME and VSME under EU CSRD: what SMEs should know

Understand historical LSME reporting, amended CSRD scope, voluntary VSME modules, and the Article 29ca standard and value-chain cap.

Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under CSRD and ESRS

FAQ explaining how EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures relate to CSRD, ESRS, and the Article 8 XBRL taxonomy.

CSRD and ESRS Compliance Obligations

Practical CSRD and ESRS compliance guide covering scope checks, sustainability statements, double materiality, value-chain data, assurance, and digital-tagging status.

CSRD and ESRS FAQ: scope, materiality, assurance, tagging, and value chain

CSRD and ESRS FAQ hub covering company scope, reporting waves, ESRS structure, double materiality, assurance, digital tagging, Taxonomy Article 8, and value chain data.

CSRD and ESRS Reporting Checklist

A practical CSRD and ESRS checklist for confirming reporting scope, sustainability statement content, double materiality, value-chain evidence, assurance readiness, and digital tagging.

CSRD and ESRS requirements: scope, reporting, assurance, and evidence

Practical guide to CSRD and ESRS requirements: who reports, what the sustainability statement must cover, double materiality, value-chain data, assurance, publication, digital-tagging status, and controls.

CSRD and ESRS value-chain data, estimates, proxies, and evidence

How to handle ESRS value-chain information when supplier or customer data is incomplete: reasonable efforts, estimates, limitations, controls, and assurance evidence.

CSRD Applicability Test for EU and Non-EU Company Groups

Check whether CSRD and ESRS reporting may apply by testing undertaking size, listed status, group reporting, non-EU branches or subsidiaries, and phase-in evidence.

CSRD assurance and ESRS digital tagging evidence

Evidence checklist for CSRD assurance readiness, ESRS datapoint traceability, and digital tagging preparation under the ESRS XBRL and ESEF reporting framework.

CSRD assurance evidence pack workflow for ESRS reporting

A CSRD and ESRS workflow for building an assurance-ready evidence pack covering scope, double materiality, ESRS datapoints, controls, estimates, and digital tagging.

CSRD assurance-ready controls and evidence for ESRS reporting

Build CSRD and ESRS evidence around GOV-5 controls, double materiality, IROs, value-chain data, assurance files, and XBRL tagging checks.

CSRD deadlines and ESRS compliance calendar

A current-law CSRD and ESRS calendar covering the amended 2027 scope, national implementation, publication, assurance, and digital reporting milestones.

CSRD Double Materiality Interview Question Bank for ESRS

Interview prompts for ESRS double materiality work: context, affected stakeholders, value chain IROs, impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, and evidence.

CSRD double materiality method under ESRS

A practical method for ESRS double materiality assessment: impact materiality, financial materiality, value-chain coverage, thresholds, evidence, and documentation.

CSRD double materiality scoring: IRO assessment and ESRS data points

A practical scoring guide for CSRD and ESRS double materiality: impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, evidence, governance, and disclosure mapping.

CSRD Double Materiality Workflow for ESRS Assessment

A CSRD and ESRS workflow for running a double materiality assessment, from value-chain scoping and stakeholder inputs to IRO scoring, governance approval, and audit trail evidence.

CSRD penalties and fines: Member State enforcement, controls, and evidence

How CSRD penalties work through Member State law, which reporting and assurance failures may trigger enforcement, and what evidence teams should keep.

CSRD reporting waves and Omnibus status

Current CSRD status after Directive (EU) 2026/470: amended scope from FY 2027, Stop-the-Clock history, ESRS work, and remaining implementation steps.

CSRD scope and phasing by company type

Map CSRD reporting scope by company category, original Article 5 wave, listed SME opt-out, third-country group rules, and stop-the-clock caveats.

CSRD value chain data and estimation methodology under ESRS

How ESRS lets CSRD reporters use sector averages, proxies, and other estimates when direct value-chain data is not available after reasonable effort.

CSRD vs CSDDD: Reporting vs Due Diligence

Compare CSRD sustainability reporting with CSDDD human rights and environmental due diligence, including scope, evidence, assurance, penalties, and overlap.

CSRD vs EU Taxonomy Article 8

Compare CSRD and ESRS sustainability reporting with EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, including scope, evidence, tagging, and reuse limits.

CSRD vs GRI: ESRS Interoperability

Compare CSRD/ESRS reporting with GRI reporting: materiality, value-chain boundaries, additional disclosures, standards editions, and evidence reuse.

CSRD vs IFRS S1 and S2 Comparison

Compare CSRD and ESRS with IFRS S1 and S2 across scope, materiality, disclosures, value chain reporting, assurance, digital tagging, and interoperability.

CSRD vs SEC Climate Disclosure Rule

Compare CSRD/ESRS with the SEC's 2024 climate disclosure rules, including scope, materiality, emissions, filing, assurance, and the SEC's pending 2026 rescission proposal.

CSRD vs SFDR: ESRS and Financial Disclosures

Compare CSRD/ESRS corporate sustainability reporting with SFDR financial-market disclosures, including scope, materiality, PAI data, assurance, tagging, and reuse limits.

CSRD XBRL Tagging Checklist for ESRS and Article 8 Readiness

A CSRD digital-reporting readiness checklist for XHTML, Inline XBRL, ESRS and Article 8 taxonomy mapping, ESEF controls, and the current no-markup-until-rules status.

ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure under CSRD

How the 2023 ESRS Set 1 uses ESRS 1 for reporting requirements and ESRS 2 for general disclosures, with materiality rules and current revision status.

ESRS data point inventory workflow for CSRD reporting

Build an ESRS data point inventory that links disclosure requirements, materiality outcomes, evidence owners, XBRL tagging readiness, and assurance controls.

ESRS structure and data model for CSRD reporting

Map ESRS architecture, disclosure requirements, datapoints, materiality, XBRL taxonomy, Article 8 tagging, and report data ownership for CSRD reporting.

Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs for CSRD reporting

How to prepare EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under the current Disclosures Delegated Act, including 2026 simplifications, evidence, and digital-tagging status.