FAQCSRDEU

ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure for CSRD reporting

explains the reporting architecture and materiality rules. sets the general disclosures that companies use across material sustainability matters.

This page helps understand how cross-cutting ESRS, topical ESRS, materiality, policies, actions, metrics, and targets fit together. uses shorthand labels such as BP (basis for preparation), GOV (governance), SBM (strategy, business model and value chain), IRO (impact, risk and opportunity management), and MDR (minimum disclosure requirements).

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

is the cross-cutting standard that sets the concepts and general requirements for preparing an ESRS sustainability statement. is the cross-cutting standard containing general disclosures on preparation, governance, strategy, impacts, risks and opportunities, and metrics and targets. This page describes the 2023 ESRS adopted in Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. The Commission adopted revised ESRS on 3 July 2026, but they remain under Parliament and Council scrutiny, so preparers should confirm which version applies to their reporting year.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

What is the difference between ESRS 1 and ESRS 2?

In the 2023 ESRS, explains how to read and apply the standards. It covers the categories of standards, , value-chain reporting, time horizons, presentation of the sustainability statement, and concepts such as impacts, risks and opportunities.

In the 2023 ESRS, tells an undertaking what general information to provide, including governance, strategy, the process for identifying and assessing impacts, risks and opportunities, and minimum disclosure requirements for policies, actions, metrics, and targets.

  • Use to decide the reporting architecture, materiality approach, value-chain boundaries, disclosure structure, and whether entity-specific disclosures are needed.
  • Use to prepare the cross-cutting disclosures that sit across the sustainability statement, including basis for preparation (BP), governance (GOV), strategy, business model and value chain (SBM), impact, risk and opportunity management (IRO), and minimum disclosure requirements (MDR) disclosures.
  • Do not treat as a topic standard; it explains how the standards operate rather than listing climate, workforce, pollution, or business-conduct datapoints.
Question 2

How do cross-cutting and topical ESRS work together?

The 2023 ESRS text describes cross-cutting, topical and sector-specific categories. The adopted Set 1 contains cross-cutting and topical standards. Directive (EU) 2026/470 deleted the Commission empowerment to adopt sector-specific ESRS, so the historical category is not a separate current reporting checklist.

Topical ESRS cover environmental, social, and governance topics. They add topic-specific disclosure requirements and may also include requirements that are applied together with general disclosures. When a sustainability matter is material, the undertaking looks to the relevant topical ESRS and then applies the ESRS 2 minimum disclosure requirements for policies, actions, metrics, and targets where applicable.

  • Cross-cutting layer: supplies concepts and application rules; supplies general disclosures.
  • Topical layer: E1 to E5, S1 to S4, and G1 supply subject-specific disclosure requirements for material matters.
  • Entity-specific layer: if a material impact, risk, or opportunity is not covered, or is not covered with enough granularity, requires an .
Question 3

What does materiality change in the ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure?

Materiality is the starting point for ESRS reporting. ESRS uses : a sustainability matter is material if it meets the criteria for impact materiality, financial materiality, or both. The assessment covers impacts, risks, and opportunities in the undertaking's own operations and upstream and downstream value chain.

Under the 2023 ESRS, materiality does not make optional. paragraph 29 also requires the topical IRO-1 disclosures listed in ESRS 2 Appendix C irrespective of the materiality outcome, subject to applicable phase-ins. When a topical sustainability matter is material, the undertaking then applies the relevant topical disclosure requirements and the ESRS 2 minimum disclosure requirements connected to policies, actions, metrics, and targets.

  • IRO-1 explains the process used to identify and assess material impacts, risks, and opportunities.
  • SBM-3 explains the material impacts, risks, and opportunities resulting from the assessment and their interaction with strategy and business model.
  • IRO-2 identifies which ESRS disclosure requirements are covered by the sustainability statement.
  • For metrics, ESRS allows omission of information assessed as not material when the omission still meets the objective of the relevant disclosure requirement.
Recommended next step

Map ESRS 2 disclosures to material topics

Use the ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure to separate cross-cutting disclosures, topical requirements, materiality judgments, and evidence before drafting the CSRD sustainability statement.

Question 4

What should a company map before drafting ESRS disclosures?

A useful and map starts with architecture, not with a list of copied datapoints. The reporting team should know which cross-cutting disclosures are always in scope, which topical matters are material, which value-chain impacts, risks, and opportunities are included, and where entity-specific disclosures are needed.

The map should also separate policies, actions, metrics, and targets. contains minimum disclosure requirements for those categories, and topical standards can add topic-specific detail. This prevents teams from treating a target, a policy, and a metric as interchangeable evidence.

  • List all general disclosures required by the ESRS version applicable to the reporting year.
  • Record the materiality conclusion for each relevant sustainability matter, including impact and financial materiality considerations.
  • For each material matter, connect the topical ESRS requirements to MDR-P, MDR-A, MDR-M, and MDR-T - the minimum disclosure requirements for policies, actions, metrics, and targets - where they apply.
  • Flag any material impact, risk, or opportunity that needs because the standards do not cover it with enough granularity.
  • Keep evidence for the criteria, thresholds, judgments, and source references used in the materiality assessment and disclosure map.
  • Assign an owner and review date to each conclusion. Reassess the map when the reporting perimeter, business model, sectors, geographies, value chain, material impacts, risks or opportunities, or applicable ESRS version changes.
Primary sources

References and citations

xbrl.efrag.org5 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary ESRS source for ESRS 1 general requirements, ESRS 2 general disclosures, reporting areas, materiality, topical standards, and datapoints.
  • Supports the distinction between ESRS 1 as the general requirements standard and ESRS 2 as the general disclosures standard.
  • Supports the three ESRS categories and the relationship between cross-cutting, topical, sector-specific, and entity-specific disclosures.
Show 2 more
  • Supports the double materiality rule, the always-disclosed ESRS 2 layer, and the link between material matters and topical standards.
  • Supports the disclosure map: reporting areas, datapoints, minimum disclosure requirements, and entity-specific disclosure logic.
"ESRS 2 General disclosures"
More quoted passages
"ESRS 1 General requirements"
"cross-cutting standards"
"Double materiality"
"policies, actions, metrics and targets"
efrag.org3 citations
Referenced sections
  • EFRAG page for non-authoritative implementation guidance relating to the 2023 ESRS, including materiality assessment, value chain, and datapoint guidance.
  • Identifies EFRAG's non-authoritative implementation guidance, including IG 1 Materiality Assessment, as support for applying the ESRS materiality approach.
  • Supports use of EFRAG implementation guidance for materiality, value chain, and ESRS datapoint mapping.
"non-authoritative and support implementation"
More quoted passages
"IG 1 Materiality Assessment"
"Detailed ESRS Datapoints"
ec.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Commission Q&A explaining ESRS adoption, double materiality, mandatory ESRS 2 general disclosures, and materiality for other standards.
  • Explains that ESRS 1 sets general principles and ESRS 2 specifies essential information to be disclosed.
  • Supports the explanation that other standards and their datapoints are generally subject to materiality assessment, unlike ESRS 2.
"double materiality"
More quoted passages
"ESRS 2 is mandatory"
"subject to a materiality assessment"
finance.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Confirms that revised ESRS were adopted on 3 July 2026 but remain subject to Parliament and Council scrutiny.
  • Confirms adoption of revised ESRS on 3 July 2026 and the remaining Parliament and Council scrutiny period.
"The revised ESRS and the voluntary reporting standard will now be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council for scrutiny."
Show all related guides (40)

CSRD topical ESRS scoping: what must be reported?

FAQ on topical ESRS scoping under the current 2023 standards and the revised standards adopted in July 2026, including materiality, omitted topics, climate, and EU-law datapoints.

CSRD value chain estimates: current and revised ESRS

When current and revised ESRS permit value chain estimates, how the value-chain cap works, and what to disclose about methods, limits, and data-quality improvements.

FAQ: CSRD double materiality scoring - thresholds, weighting, and evidence

How to score CSRD double materiality under ESRS without invented thresholds: impact materiality, financial materiality, evidence, and documentation.

LSME and VSME under EU CSRD: what SMEs should know

Understand historical LSME reporting, amended CSRD scope, voluntary VSME modules, and the Article 29ca standard and value-chain cap.

Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under CSRD and ESRS

FAQ explaining how EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures relate to CSRD, ESRS, and the Article 8 XBRL taxonomy.

CSRD and ESRS Compliance Obligations

Practical CSRD and ESRS compliance guide covering scope checks, sustainability statements, double materiality, value-chain data, assurance, and digital-tagging status.

CSRD and ESRS FAQ: scope, materiality, assurance, tagging, and value chain

CSRD and ESRS FAQ hub covering company scope, reporting waves, ESRS structure, double materiality, assurance, digital tagging, Taxonomy Article 8, and value chain data.

CSRD and ESRS Reporting Checklist

A practical CSRD and ESRS checklist for confirming reporting scope, sustainability statement content, double materiality, value-chain evidence, assurance readiness, and digital tagging.

CSRD and ESRS requirements: scope, reporting, assurance, and evidence

Practical guide to CSRD and ESRS requirements: who reports, what the sustainability statement must cover, double materiality, value-chain data, assurance, publication, digital-tagging status, and controls.

CSRD and ESRS value-chain data, estimates, proxies, and evidence

How to handle ESRS value-chain information when supplier or customer data is incomplete: reasonable efforts, estimates, limitations, controls, and assurance evidence.

CSRD Applicability Test for EU and Non-EU Company Groups

Check whether CSRD and ESRS reporting may apply by testing undertaking size, listed status, group reporting, non-EU branches or subsidiaries, and phase-in evidence.

CSRD assurance and ESRS digital tagging evidence

Evidence checklist for CSRD assurance readiness, ESRS datapoint traceability, and digital tagging preparation under the ESRS XBRL and ESEF reporting framework.

CSRD assurance evidence pack workflow for ESRS reporting

A CSRD and ESRS workflow for building an assurance-ready evidence pack covering scope, double materiality, ESRS datapoints, controls, estimates, and digital tagging.

CSRD assurance-ready controls and evidence for ESRS reporting

Build CSRD and ESRS evidence around GOV-5 controls, double materiality, IROs, value-chain data, assurance files, and XBRL tagging checks.

CSRD deadlines and ESRS compliance calendar

A current-law CSRD and ESRS calendar covering the amended 2027 scope, national implementation, publication, assurance, and digital reporting milestones.

CSRD Double Materiality Interview Question Bank for ESRS

Interview prompts for ESRS double materiality work: context, affected stakeholders, value chain IROs, impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, and evidence.

CSRD double materiality method under ESRS

A practical method for ESRS double materiality assessment: impact materiality, financial materiality, value-chain coverage, thresholds, evidence, and documentation.

CSRD double materiality scoring: IRO assessment and ESRS data points

A practical scoring guide for CSRD and ESRS double materiality: impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, evidence, governance, and disclosure mapping.

CSRD Double Materiality Workflow for ESRS Assessment

A CSRD and ESRS workflow for running a double materiality assessment, from value-chain scoping and stakeholder inputs to IRO scoring, governance approval, and audit trail evidence.

CSRD penalties and fines: Member State enforcement, controls, and evidence

How CSRD penalties work through Member State law, which reporting and assurance failures may trigger enforcement, and what evidence teams should keep.

CSRD reporting waves and Omnibus status

Current CSRD status after Directive (EU) 2026/470: amended scope from FY 2027, Stop-the-Clock history, ESRS work, and remaining implementation steps.

CSRD scope and phasing by company type

Map CSRD reporting scope by company category, original Article 5 wave, listed SME opt-out, third-country group rules, and stop-the-clock caveats.

CSRD value chain data and estimation methodology under ESRS

How ESRS lets CSRD reporters use sector averages, proxies, and other estimates when direct value-chain data is not available after reasonable effort.

CSRD vs CSDDD: Reporting vs Due Diligence

Compare CSRD sustainability reporting with CSDDD human rights and environmental due diligence, including scope, evidence, assurance, penalties, and overlap.

CSRD vs EU Taxonomy Article 8

Compare CSRD and ESRS sustainability reporting with EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, including scope, evidence, tagging, and reuse limits.

CSRD vs GRI: ESRS Interoperability

Compare CSRD/ESRS reporting with GRI reporting: materiality, value-chain boundaries, additional disclosures, standards editions, and evidence reuse.

CSRD vs IFRS S1 and S2 Comparison

Compare CSRD and ESRS with IFRS S1 and S2 across scope, materiality, disclosures, value chain reporting, assurance, digital tagging, and interoperability.

CSRD vs SEC Climate Disclosure Rule

Compare CSRD/ESRS with the SEC's 2024 climate disclosure rules, including scope, materiality, emissions, filing, assurance, and the SEC's pending 2026 rescission proposal.

CSRD vs SFDR: ESRS and Financial Disclosures

Compare CSRD/ESRS corporate sustainability reporting with SFDR financial-market disclosures, including scope, materiality, PAI data, assurance, tagging, and reuse limits.

CSRD XBRL Tagging Checklist for ESRS and Article 8 Readiness

A CSRD digital-reporting readiness checklist for XHTML, Inline XBRL, ESRS and Article 8 taxonomy mapping, ESEF controls, and the current no-markup-until-rules status.

ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure under CSRD

How the 2023 ESRS Set 1 uses ESRS 1 for reporting requirements and ESRS 2 for general disclosures, with materiality rules and current revision status.

ESRS data point inventory workflow for CSRD reporting

Build an ESRS data point inventory that links disclosure requirements, materiality outcomes, evidence owners, XBRL tagging readiness, and assurance controls.

ESRS structure and data model for CSRD reporting

Map ESRS architecture, disclosure requirements, datapoints, materiality, XBRL taxonomy, Article 8 tagging, and report data ownership for CSRD reporting.

Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs for CSRD reporting

How to prepare EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under the current Disclosures Delegated Act, including 2026 simplifications, evidence, and digital-tagging status.