CSRDArticle 8 KPIsEU

CSRD Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures

Structure EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures inside the CSRD sustainability statement.

Connect Article 8 templates to ESRS reporting, digital-tagging readiness, assurance, and evidence controls.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
8

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

Undertakings required to report under Articles 19a or 29a of the Accounting Directive include Article 8 Taxonomy disclosures in the sustainability statement, although these disclosures are separate from the ESRS topical standards. A must satisfy the Taxonomy Regulation's four alignment conditions; appearing in a delegated-act activity list establishes eligibility only. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73, controls the KPI methods and templates. The management report must use the prescribed electronic format. Sustainability information, including Article 8 disclosures, does not have to be digitally marked up until the Commission adopts marking-up rules through Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815.

Section 1

How Article 8 fits inside CSRD and ESRS reporting

Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy Regulation requires undertakings that publish sustainability information under Articles 19a or 29a of the Accounting Directive to explain how and to what extent their activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 specifies the content, presentation, KPI methodology, and templates for those disclosures.

Use one reporting calendar and evidence model for ESRS and Article 8 reporting, while keeping their calculations separate. ESRS starts from material impacts, risks, and opportunities. Article 8 starts from Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned economic activities, the undertaking type, and the KPI templates in the Disclosures Delegated Act.

  • Place Article 8 disclosures in the CSRD sustainability statement governance and assurance workflow, even when the calculation logic comes from the Taxonomy Disclosures Delegated Act.
  • Keep the reporting undertaking and reporting period aligned with the financial statements and sustainability statement.
  • Separate ESRS double-materiality judgments from Taxonomy eligibility and alignment conclusions so reviewers can see which rule supports each disclosure.
  • Cross-reference ESRS climate or environmental narrative only where it explains the same activities, assumptions, CapEx plans, or transition actions used in the Article 8 KPIs.
Section 2

Which KPIs and templates should be controlled

For non-financial undertakings, the Article 8 KPI pack is built around turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure. Turnover compares Taxonomy-aligned net turnover with total net turnover. CapEx and OpEx compare the Taxonomy-aligned portion of the relevant expenditure base with the full denominator defined in the Disclosures Delegated Act.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73 replaced the non-financial undertaking templates and introduced optional financial-materiality relief. For each KPI, a non-financial undertaking may omit eligibility and alignment assessment for economic activities whose cumulative turnover, CapEx, or OpEx is below 10% of that KPI's denominator. The omitted amount stays in the denominator and is reported separately as non-material; all activities for which the relief is used count toward the cumulative threshold.

The template control should trace each assessed economic activity to its code, monetary amount, proportion, environmental objective, alignment conclusion, and enabling or transitional category. Keep the detailed substantial-contribution, DNSH, and minimum-safeguards evidence in the screening file even where the simplified published template does not display every test as a separate column.

  • For turnover, reconcile the net turnover denominator to the financial reporting source and keep the activity-level allocation used for the numerator.
  • For CapEx, document additions to tangible and intangible assets, acquisitions through business combinations, leases where included by the applicable accounting rules, qualifying CapEx plan treatment, management-body approval where relied on, and any restatement trigger.
  • For OpEx, keep the direct non-capitalised cost population defined by Annex I. If OpEx is not material to the business model, disclose the denominator value and explain why it is not material instead of reporting an OpEx eligibility or alignment percentage.
  • For financial undertakings, route the work to the correct amended template family: asset manager KPI, credit institution GAR and related KPIs, investment firm KPIs, insurance or reinsurance investment and underwriting KPIs, and the applicable qualitative disclosures.
  • Apply the 2026 templates and materiality relief to reporting from 1 January 2026. For a financial year starting during 2025, the regulation permits use of the rules that applied on 31 December 2025 instead.
Section 3

How to prepare the Article 8 data file

Treat the Article 8 disclosure as a data product before it becomes narrative in the sustainability statement. The control file should contain a row per economic activity and per KPI population, with a stable link to the accounting source, Taxonomy activity screening file, environmental objective, DNSH evidence, minimum safeguards assessment, calculation owner, and reviewer sign-off.

For group reporting, the record should preserve consolidation logic and avoid mixing entity-level eligibility screening with group-level KPI denominators. For financial undertakings, counterparty KPI inputs should be stored with source year, whether the data came from mandatory Article 8 reporting or another allowed basis, and the weighting method used in the relevant KPI.

  • Activity register: economic activity name, code, entity, business unit, revenue stream, asset or process, and Taxonomy objective assessed.
  • Screening evidence: substantial contribution result, DNSH result for each relevant objective, minimum safeguards result, source document, assessor, and review status.
  • KPI calculation: denominator source, numerator allocation, absolute amount, percentage, rounding rule, prior-period comparator, and restatement flag.
  • Narrative support: accounting policy, allocation basis, contextual explanation, exclusions, estimates, CapEx plan disclosures, and links to related ESRS narrative.
Section 4

What to do for XBRL and ESEF readiness

EFRAG's Article 8 XBRL Taxonomy is technical advice that transposes the Disclosures Delegated Act into machine-readable concepts. It does not change the legal content of Article 8 disclosures and is not, by itself, a filing rule. ESMA confirms that sustainability reporting does not have to be marked up until the Commission adopts marking-up rules through a delegated regulation. Directive (EU) 2026/470 instructs Member States to transpose the same express rule into Article 29d by 19 March 2027.

Digital readiness should focus on traceability without presenting a draft taxonomy as a current filing obligation. The published table, calculation file, and eventual tagged fact should point to the same activity, amount, unit, period, objective, and dimensional breakdown. EFRAG designed its Article 8 taxonomy as a closed taxonomy, but the authoritative taxonomy and tagging rules must be checked in the applicable version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 once adopted.

  • Maintain a provisional mapping from each disclosure table to the relevant EFRAG Article 8 taxonomy role, line item, dimensions, units, period, and default-member assumptions; label it as readiness work until binding marking-up rules apply.
  • Keep positive-number reporting, scaling, currency, percentages, and prior-period comparatives consistent between the human-readable XHTML and eventual tagged facts.
  • Test dimensional structures before filing: objective, eligibility or alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, enabling or transitional category, and reporting scope must remain internally consistent.
  • Record any corrected or revised figures separately so reviewers can distinguish original, corrected, and restated Article 8 facts.
Section 5

Evidence controls for assurance and review

Article 8 KPI evidence should be ready for the same assurance discipline as the sustainability statement. The reviewer needs to reperform the route from source data to eligibility, alignment, denominator, numerator, template cell, narrative explanation, and tagged fact without relying on undocumented management judgment.

Use one evidence index across finance, sustainability, legal, and reporting-system owners. Distinguish binding source requirements from EFRAG technical support, management estimates from source data, and ESRS narrative from Article 8 calculation outputs.

  • Control owner matrix for each KPI, template, activity screen, counterparty-data input, CapEx plan, and XBRL tagging step.
  • Evidence pack with source extracts, accounting reconciliations, activity-screening memos, DNSH evidence, safeguards assessment, approval trail, and change log.
  • Review gates before publication: denominator tie-out, numerator support, template completeness, prior-period comparator, qualitative disclosure completeness, and XBRL consistency check.
  • Exception log for unavailable counterparty information, estimates, voluntary inputs, omitted template fields, restatements, and open legal or technical interpretation questions.
  • Reassessment trigger: rescreen an activity after changes to the activity, technical screening criteria, minimum-safeguards evidence, CapEx plan, consolidation perimeter, accounting classification, or the delegated regulation and templates used for the reporting period.
Recommended next step

Build a controlled Article 8 KPI evidence file

This guide helps connect Taxonomy activity screening, KPI calculations, CSRD sustainability-statement controls, XBRL tagging readiness, and assurance evidence before publication.

Primary sources

References and citations

eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Binding amendment introducing simplified Article 8 templates, the 10% KPI-specific financial-materiality relief, separate reporting of non-material activities, OpEx relief, and the transition option for financial years starting in 2025.
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Requires Member States to transpose Article 29d wording that removes the sustainability-markup requirement until the relevant rules are adopted through Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815; the transposition deadline is 19 March 2027.
esma.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Current regulator status page confirming that sustainability reporting does not have to be marked up until marking-up rules are adopted by delegated regulation.
data.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Supports evidence controls around reporting boundaries, comparative information, materiality, and clear sustainability statement disclosures.
"disclose comparative information in respect of the previous period"
eur-lex.europa.eu
Referenced sections
  • Grounds Article 8(2), which identifies turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure as the non-financial undertaking KPI categories.
"proportion of their turnover derived from products or services associated with economic activities"
Related guides

Explore more topics

CSRD and ESRS Compliance Obligations
Practical CSRD and ESRS compliance guide covering scope checks, sustainability statements, double materiality, value-chain data, assurance, and digital-tagging status.
CSRD and ESRS FAQ: scope, materiality, assurance, tagging, and value chain
CSRD and ESRS FAQ hub covering company scope, reporting waves, ESRS structure, double materiality, assurance, digital tagging, Taxonomy Article 8, and value chain data.
CSRD and ESRS Reporting Checklist
A practical CSRD and ESRS checklist for confirming reporting scope, sustainability statement content, double materiality, value-chain evidence, assurance readiness, and digital tagging.
CSRD and ESRS requirements: scope, reporting, assurance, and evidence
Practical guide to CSRD and ESRS requirements: who reports, what the sustainability statement must cover, double materiality, value-chain data, assurance, publication, digital-tagging status, and controls.
CSRD and ESRS value-chain data, estimates, proxies, and evidence
How to handle ESRS value-chain information when supplier or customer data is incomplete: reasonable efforts, estimates, limitations, controls, and assurance evidence.
CSRD Applicability Test for EU and Non-EU Company Groups
Check whether CSRD and ESRS reporting may apply by testing undertaking size, listed status, group reporting, non-EU branches or subsidiaries, and phase-in evidence.
CSRD Article 40a third-country group reporting FAQ
FAQ on when CSRD Article 40a applies to third-country groups, which EU subsidiary or branch publishes the report, and what happens with assurance and missing information.
CSRD assurance and ESRS digital tagging evidence
Evidence checklist for CSRD assurance readiness, ESRS datapoint traceability, and digital tagging preparation under the ESRS XBRL and ESEF reporting framework.
CSRD assurance evidence FAQ: what to keep for limited assurance
What CSRD and ESRS assurance evidence should support: management-report publication, the assurance report, national assurance procedures, and EU limited assurance milestones.
CSRD assurance evidence pack workflow for ESRS reporting
A CSRD and ESRS workflow for building an assurance-ready evidence pack covering scope, double materiality, ESRS datapoints, controls, estimates, and digital tagging.
CSRD assurance-ready controls and evidence for ESRS reporting
Build CSRD and ESRS evidence around GOV-5 controls, double materiality, IROs, value-chain data, assurance files, and XBRL tagging checks.
CSRD data point inventory FAQ for ESRS disclosure readiness
How to build an ESRS data point inventory for CSRD reporting: disclosure requirements, materiality filters, evidence ownership, value-chain data, XBRL readiness, and assurance support.
CSRD deadlines and ESRS compliance calendar
A current-law CSRD and ESRS calendar covering the amended 2027 scope, national implementation, publication, assurance, and digital reporting milestones.
CSRD digital tagging and XBRL readiness FAQ
What CSRD teams should do now about XHTML, Inline XBRL, ESRS taxonomy materials, tagging controls, and limits before final digital taxonomy rules apply.
CSRD Double Materiality Interview Question Bank for ESRS
Interview prompts for ESRS double materiality work: context, affected stakeholders, value chain IROs, impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, and evidence.
CSRD double materiality method under ESRS
A practical method for ESRS double materiality assessment: impact materiality, financial materiality, value-chain coverage, thresholds, evidence, and documentation.
CSRD double materiality scoring: IRO assessment and ESRS data points
A practical scoring guide for CSRD and ESRS double materiality: impact materiality, financial materiality, thresholds, evidence, governance, and disclosure mapping.
CSRD Double Materiality Workflow for ESRS Assessment
A CSRD and ESRS workflow for running a double materiality assessment, from value-chain scoping and stakeholder inputs to IRO scoring, governance approval, and audit trail evidence.
CSRD Omnibus status after Directive (EU) 2026/470
FAQ on the enacted CSRD Stop-the-Clock delay, Directive (EU) 2026/470 scope changes, and remaining national and ESRS implementation steps.
CSRD penalties and fines: Member State enforcement, controls, and evidence
How CSRD penalties work through Member State law, which reporting and assurance failures may trigger enforcement, and what evidence teams should keep.
CSRD reporting waves and Omnibus status
Current CSRD status after Directive (EU) 2026/470: amended scope from FY 2027, Stop-the-Clock history, ESRS work, and remaining implementation steps.
CSRD reporting waves FAQ: who reports first and what changed
FAQ on the original CSRD reporting waves, the amended 2027 scope, transitional relief, third-country reporting, and national transposition.
CSRD scope and phasing by company type
Map CSRD reporting scope by company category, original Article 5 wave, listed SME opt-out, third-country group rules, and stop-the-clock caveats.
CSRD topical ESRS scoping: what must be reported?
FAQ on topical ESRS scoping under the current 2023 standards and the revised standards adopted in July 2026, including materiality, omitted topics, climate, and EU-law datapoints.
CSRD value chain data and estimation methodology under ESRS
How ESRS lets CSRD reporters use sector averages, proxies, and other estimates when direct value-chain data is not available after reasonable effort.
CSRD value chain estimates: current and revised ESRS
When current and revised ESRS permit value chain estimates, how the value-chain cap works, and what to disclose about methods, limits, and data-quality improvements.
CSRD vs CSDDD: Reporting vs Due Diligence
Compare CSRD sustainability reporting with CSDDD human rights and environmental due diligence, including scope, evidence, assurance, penalties, and overlap.
CSRD vs EU Taxonomy Article 8
Compare CSRD and ESRS sustainability reporting with EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, including scope, evidence, tagging, and reuse limits.
CSRD vs GRI: ESRS Interoperability
Compare CSRD/ESRS reporting with GRI-based reporting using official source ESRS interoperability, materiality, value-chain, and disclosure-reuse rules.
CSRD vs IFRS S1 and S2 Comparison
Compare CSRD and ESRS with IFRS S1 and S2 across scope, materiality, disclosures, value chain reporting, assurance, digital tagging, and interoperability.
CSRD vs SEC Climate Disclosure Rule
Compare CSRD/ESRS with the SEC's 2024 climate disclosure rules, including scope, materiality, emissions, filing, assurance, and the SEC's pending 2026 rescission proposal.
CSRD vs SFDR: ESRS and Financial Disclosures
Compare CSRD/ESRS corporate sustainability reporting with SFDR financial-market disclosures, including scope, materiality, PAI data, assurance, tagging, and reuse limits.
CSRD XBRL Tagging Checklist for ESRS and Article 8 Readiness
A CSRD digital-reporting readiness checklist for XHTML, Inline XBRL, ESRS and Article 8 taxonomy mapping, ESEF controls, and the current no-markup-until-rules status.
ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure under CSRD
How the 2023 ESRS Set 1 uses ESRS 1 for reporting requirements and ESRS 2 for general disclosures, with materiality rules and current revision status.
ESRS data point inventory workflow for CSRD reporting
Build an ESRS data point inventory that links disclosure requirements, materiality outcomes, evidence owners, XBRL tagging readiness, and assurance controls.
ESRS structure and data model for CSRD reporting
Map ESRS architecture, disclosure requirements, datapoints, materiality, XBRL taxonomy, Article 8 tagging, and report data ownership for CSRD reporting.
FAQ: CSRD double materiality scoring - thresholds, weighting, and evidence
How to score CSRD double materiality under ESRS without invented thresholds: impact materiality, financial materiality, evidence, and documentation.
How do ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 structure CSRD reporting?
FAQ explaining how ESRS 1 general requirements and ESRS 2 general disclosures fit into CSRD reporting, materiality, and topical ESRS disclosures.
LSME and VSME under EU CSRD: what SMEs should know
FAQ on LSME and VSME under the EU CSRD: listed SME reporting, the temporary opt-out, voluntary SME reporting, and value-chain requests.
Taxonomy Article 8 KPIs under CSRD and ESRS
FAQ explaining how EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures relate to CSRD, ESRS, and the Article 8 XBRL taxonomy.