- Supports the requirement to consider material impacts, risks, and opportunities connected with own operations and upstream and downstream value chains.
"upstream and downstream value chain"
Use this checklist to test whether a CSRD sustainability statement is scoped, structured, evidenced, assured, and prepared for digital reporting.
The checks are grounded in the Accounting Directive as amended by CSRD, the adopted ESRS, EFRAG implementation guidance, and ESRS XBRL taxonomy material.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
CSRD reporting is not just an annual narrative exercise. A useful checklist should confirm who reports, where the sustainability statement sits, which ESRS disclosures are mandatory or material, how value-chain information is evidenced, what assurance will test, and whether tagging requirements have been considered.
Start with the legal reporting entity before drafting disclosures. The CSRD amendments place sustainability reporting in the management report and require the statement to be clearly identifiable in a dedicated section.
For group reporting, align the sustainability statement with the reporting undertaking used for the financial statements. Where a subsidiary exemption is relied on, record the parent undertaking, registered office, report links, assurance link, and the exemption reference required by the Accounting Directive.
The disclosure inventory should separate always-required ESRS 2 general disclosures from topical disclosures that depend on the double materiality assessment. It should also identify EU-law datapoints and Taxonomy Regulation disclosures that need explicit handling.
Do not treat a topic as excluded just because no metric is currently available. The checklist should require a recorded materiality conclusion, the affected disclosure requirements, any omission rationale allowed by ESRS, and the owner responsible for evidence.
A CSRD checklist should make the materiality assessment auditable. Keep the method, stakeholder inputs, thresholds, evidence sources, and IRO register together so reviewers can trace why each sustainability matter was included, excluded, aggregated, or disaggregated.
Value-chain work should focus on material upstream and downstream impacts, risks, and opportunities rather than every supplier or customer. Where estimates, proxies, or sector averages are used, keep the basis and limitation visible in the evidence file.
Assurance readiness should be built before the report is drafted. The Accounting Directive requires an assurance opinion on sustainability reporting, and the auditor or permitted assurance provider must be able to test compliance with ESRS, the materiality process, digital markup, and Taxonomy Regulation reporting where applicable.
The checklist should therefore include control owners, source systems, review evidence, version control, and unresolved limitations for each material disclosure.
Use Sorena to connect ESRS disclosure requirements, source evidence, materiality conclusions, assurance requests, and tagging review items before the sustainability statement is published.
Digital reporting is part of CSRD implementation, not a formatting task at the end. The Accounting Directive links sustainability reporting to electronic reporting and markup, while EFRAG's ESRS Set 1 XBRL Taxonomy material explains the taxonomy developed for digital ESRS reporting.
Before publication, confirm that the report structure, labels, narrative disclosures, tables, units, periods, and cross-references can be tagged consistently with the applicable ESRS taxonomy and ESEF rules when those rules apply.
"upstream and downstream value chain"
"ESRS 2 ("General Disclosures") would remain mandatory"
"mark up sustainability reporting"
"non-authoritative and support implementation"
"ESRS Set 1 XBRL Taxonomy"
"large companies and listed companies"
"General Requirements for Sustainability Assurance Engagements"