Operate intake, acknowledgement, status updates, investigation, remediation, disclosure, and evidence while keeping the legal publication duty distinct from broader good-practice response targets.
PSTI mandates the public reporting information and promised timing information. It does not set one universal acknowledgement, status-update, remediation, or disclosure deadline.
Publish the reporting route before supply, then operate the process you promised. Schedule 1 requires the manufacturer to publish at least one point of contact and information about when a reporter can expect acknowledgement and status updates until resolution. The information must be in English, free, accessible, clear, transparent, and available without prior request and without asking for personal information. Broader triage, remediation, coordination, and disclosure steps are operational controls and ETSI guidance unless another legal duty is triggered.
1
Section 1
Receive and triage the report
Before release, publish a monitored point of contact and the expected acknowledgement and status-update timings. Test the route from outside the company and make sure it accepts enough information to identify the product and issue without forcing a reporter to buy, register, or request access.
When a report arrives, preserve the original submission, assign a case identifier, acknowledge it within the published timing, and tell the reporter how status updates will work. Continue status updates through resolution as promised. Do not promise a fixed remediation date unless the manufacturer can support it; Schedule 1 requires publication of the expected communication timings, not one government-set fix deadline.
Apply the public route to reports about all products identified by the policy, including reports about an older or out-of-support release. Support status can change the remediation decision, but it does not justify ignoring a report or missing the published acknowledgement and status-update process.
Log receipt time, reporting channel, reporter contact and confidentiality request, affected product and version, technical description, attachments, and possible exploitation.
Acknowledge receipt using the timescale published for the product and record the next status-update date.
Triage validity, severity, affected versions, support status, third-party dependencies, duplicate reports, and immediate containment needs.
Assign owners for investigation, remediation, update release, reporter communication, supplier coordination, customer messaging, and legal review.
Record every status update, decision, evidence item, remediation test, release, disclosure decision, and closure reason.
The case record should prove both sides of the control: what the manufacturer publicly promised and what happened for the individual report. Keep operational targets clearly labelled so they are not mistaken for statutory deadlines. Record calendar dates and time zones for acknowledgement and update promises; labels such as "promptly" or "regularly" are hard to test and defend.
Case intake: report ID, receipt time, reporter, product, version, vulnerability description, evidence, and confidentiality or coordination request.
Response control: acknowledgement due and sent, status-update schedule, investigation owner, supplier dependencies, risk decision, remediation plan, and verification result.
Outcome: affected releases, fix or mitigation, customer communication, coordinated disclosure decision, closure message, and lessons for product or process changes.
Compliance branch: suspected PSTI failure, actor awareness date, investigation record, stop-supply decision, manufacturer or representative contact, affected customers, OPSS notification analysis, and retained evidence.
Provision 5.2-1 supports the public policy; provisions 5.2-2 and 5.2-3 are recommendations for timely action and ongoing monitoring, not additional PSTI deadlines.
3
Section 3
Review the technical and compliance outcomes
A vulnerability report is not automatically a PSTI or an OPSS notification. A compliance failure concerns failure to meet a relevant security requirement or an applicable Chapter 2 duty, depending on the actor and provision. Assess that question separately from technical severity and coordinated disclosure, then apply the role-specific investigation, action, contact, notification, and record duties. Preserve the point at which each actor knew or ought to have known the relevant facts.
For a manufacturer, section 10 requires all reasonable steps to investigate when it is informed of a possible failure after UK availability and is aware, or ought to be aware, that the product is or will be a UK consumer connectable product. If the section 11 failure and awareness conditions hold, take all reasonable steps to prevent further availability and remedy the failure as soon as practicable. Notify OPSS, other known manufacturers and the importers or distributors supplied as soon as possible, subject to the exception for a relevant person whose statutory contact revealed the failure. Customer notification depends on the further specified conditions. Include the failure, known risks, remedial steps and whether they succeeded; tell notified manufacturers, importers and distributors whether OPSS was notified. Importers and distributors must apply their own sections rather than this manufacturer recipient list.
Close the case only after recording the technical outcome and the communication outcome. A duplicate, invalid, accepted-risk, fixed, mitigated, or unsupported report needs a reason, approver, reporter message, next review trigger, and any separate compliance-failure decision.
Escalate active exploitation, safety impact, systemic exposure, failed update delivery, missing public contact information, missed published communications, or evidence of a wider product failure.
Keep the reporter relationship and public disclosure decision separate from the statutory OPSS notification analysis.
Review the public policy after contact changes, product launches, acquisitions, supplier changes, missed service targets, or recurring report-handling failures.
Monitor the contact route continuously; an abandoned mailbox or broken form can defeat the published control even when the policy page remains online.
Vulnerability-disclosure policy and response recommendations in provisions 5.2-1 to 5.2-3.
Provision 5.2-1 supports the public policy; provisions 5.2-2 and 5.2-3 are recommendations for timely action and ongoing monitoring, not additional PSTI deadlines.