What counts as a Serious Risk under EU market surveillance rules?
A serious-risk decision is not just a finding that a product is non-compliant. It requires an appropriate risk assessment that looks at the nature of the hazard and the likelihood that the hazard will occur under normal and foreseeable use.
Where the product presents a serious risk, market surveillance authorities must ensure withdrawal or recall when no other effective measure can eliminate the risk, or prohibit the product from being made available on the market. Under the broader MSR measures article, authorities can also require proportionate corrective action such as bringing the product into compliance, preventing further availability, warnings, public alerts, withdrawal, recall, destruction, or restrictions.
- Frame the assessment around the product, hazard, affected end users, normal and foreseeable use, probability, severity, and available technical or incident evidence.
- Separate serious risk from lower-risk non-compliance: the trigger is the need for rapid intervention, not the mere existence of safer alternatives or a higher possible safety level.
- Keep the authority-measure record precise: withdrawal prevents further supply-chain availability; recall seeks return from end users; prohibition or restriction blocks market availability.
Articles 3, 16, and 19 support the serious-risk definition, risk-assessment basis, and withdrawal, recall, prohibition, restriction, and corrective-action measures.