Article 26 lists the main reasons designated border authorities must suspend release: missing required documentation, doubts about documentation authenticity, accuracy, or completeness, incorrect marking or labelling, false or misleading CE or other required marking, missing Article 4 responsible-operator details, or other cause to believe the product is non-compliant or presents a serious risk.
After a suspension, the process moves to market surveillance review. If all other customs requirements are met, Article 27 allows release when market surveillance approves it or when, within four working days of suspension, market surveillance has not asked the designated border authority to maintain the suspension. The four-working-day rule governs the authorities' suspension process; it is not a general operator response deadline. Release is not proof of conformity with Union law.
Article 28 separates two refusal routes. If market surveillance concludes the product presents a serious risk, it prohibits placing on the market and requires customs not to release it. If it concludes the product may not be placed on the market because it is non-compliant, it also requires non-release and a non-conformity notice in the customs data-processing system and relevant documents. If the declarant later uses another customs procedure and market surveillance does not object, the Article 28 notice follows the goods in the documents for that procedure.