- Article 34 specifies the information and communication system entries for authority measures, testing reports, corrective action, injury reports, objections, and follow-up.
"corrective action taken by economic operators"
Start this workflow after a market-surveillance finding, complaint, test result, customs hold, authority request, or independent review indicates non-compliance or product risk under Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
It separates operator voluntary measures from ordered restrictions, withdrawal, recall, serious-risk notification, ICSMS records, Safety Gate escalation, and evidence retention.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
Open a case when a test, complaint, inspection, customs hold, authority request, or operator review identifies non-compliance or product risk under Union harmonisation legislation. Classify the affected product population and risk first, choose a proportionate measure, name the economic operator and authority owners, and preserve the decision, implementation evidence, customer or distributor communications, and verification result. If the authority sets a period, that case-specific period controls; serious risk requires rapid authority intervention and immediate notification paths.
Start the escalation when a test, inspection, complaint, customs suspension, authority request, online listing review, or operator assessment shows a possible failure against Union harmonisation legislation or a product risk. Record the product identity, applicable legislation, model or batch, market status, supply-chain operator, and whether the product has already reached end users.
Risk is the combination of the probability that a hazard causes harm and the severity of that harm. A product presents a serious risk only when an appropriate assessment, including normal and reasonably foreseeable use, shows that rapid authority intervention is required; the effects need not be immediate. Record the hazard, exposed users, use conditions, probability, severity, affected population, evidence limits, and assessor before using the serious-risk branch.
If the operator does not take adequate , or if non-compliance or risk persists, Article 16 requires authority measures. Document the exact measure, grounds, product scope, territories affected, communication to the operator, and any public alert. Article 18 also requires the measure or decision to state its grounds and available remedies; the operator normally receives at least 10 working days to be heard. When health, safety, or another protected public interest makes a prior hearing impossible, the authority may act first but must hear the operator as soon as possible afterward and review the measure promptly.
Once is selected, the case file should show how information moved beyond the first team or first authority. Market surveillance authorities enter MSR enforcement information in ICSMS and make the rapid-alert notifications required by Article 20. Safety Gate is the current public-facing rapid alert system for dangerous non-food products. Economic operators provide the underlying facts and retain authority references; they do not create the authority record themselves.
Close the operator case only after the record identifies the affected products and territories, proves the measure was carried out, verifies that the non-compliance ended or the risk was eliminated or mitigated, reconciles remaining stock and returned units, and records the authority's closure or the owner and date for continuing monitoring.
Map a non-compliance or risk finding to operator measures, authority escalation, serious-risk notification, ICSMS or Safety Gate records, and the evidence needed to close the case.
"corrective action taken by economic operators"
"measures taken by the economic operator or ordered by the authority"
"information on measures taken by surveillance authorities"