- Official Commission source for greenwashing statistics, scope intent, and emphasis on substantiation and ex ante verification.
References and citations
- Policy briefing summarizing the proposal and key risk areas for environmental claims.
A pre-publication checklist for claims, labels, and sustainability messaging.
Outcome: reduce enforcement risk, improve consumer clarity, and standardize approvals.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
Greenwashing failures are usually predictable: vague language, undefined boundaries, hidden trade-offs, and offset-heavy climate claims presented as absolute outcomes. Use this checklist as a gate in your marketing workflow-if any red flag hits, the claim should be revised, escalated, or blocked until evidence and disclosures are fixed.
If a consumer can't tell what the claim means, you can't substantiate it. Define the claim as a structured object: text -> type -> boundary -> evidence.
Ban undefined words in high-reach campaigns unless they are immediately quantified and scoped.
Most disputes are boundary disputes. If you don't state the boundary, reviewers assume you're implying more than you can prove.
Trade-offs must be handled explicitly: improvement in one impact category doesn't automatically mean overall better.
Comparative claims need a baseline and a like-for-like methodology. Without it, comparisons are easy targets.
Keep the baseline artifacts: prior model definitions, datasets, and change rationale.
Offset-based claims are frequently challenged because they conflate reductions and compensation. Treat them as high-risk claims requiring extra disclosure and stronger evidence.
If the claim relies on offsets/credits, separate what was reduced vs what was offset and retain accounting evidence.
Badges and seals create implied claims. They must be governed like claims: transparent criteria, controls, and enforcement rules.
If you reference third-party labels, keep scheme rules and proof of eligibility current.
A claim that can't be exported as evidence is not ready. Build an evidence pack and approval log for each high-impact claim.
Define acceptance criteria: what minimum artifacts must exist before publication.
ESG Compliance can take EU Green Claims Greenwashing Risk Checklist from turning this checklist into an operational workflow to a reusable workflow inside Sorena. Teams working on EU Green Claims can keep owners, evidence, and next steps aligned without copying this guide into separate documents.
Start from EU Green Claims Greenwashing Risk Checklist and manage cross team sustainability work, reporting, and evidence from one workflow.
Review your current process, evidence gaps, and next steps for EU Green Claims Greenwashing Risk Checklist.