Confirm whether personal data was affected, record when the controller learned that fact, and assess whether the incident may cause relevant risk or damage.
When the reporting threshold is met, the controller must notify the ANPD and affected data subjects within three business days, unless sector-specific law sets another period.
Use this workflow to handle a Brazil LGPD from the first alert through risk assessment, ANPD and data-subject notices, mitigation, supplementation, and final records.
1
Section 1
How should a Brazil LGPD incident workflow run?
Open the privacy incident workflow when an event may have affected the confidentiality, integrity, availability, or authenticity of personal data. A vulnerability with no confirmed adverse event is not itself an incident, and an event involving only effectively anonymized data does not require an LGPD incident notice. Preserve logs and evidence while security contains the event.
The notification test has three cumulative parts: the incident is confirmed, it involves personal data subject to the LGPD, and it may cause relevant risk or damage to data subjects. Assess the processing context, categories and number of people, nature and amount of data, possible material, moral, or reputational harm, effective protection such as encryption, mitigation already completed, large-scale effects, sensitive data, and vulnerable groups.
Treat compromise of authentication credentials, financial or payment data, protected secrets, sensitive data, or data about children and other vulnerable people as a strong risk indicator, especially at scale or where fraud, identity theft, discrimination, physical harm, or denial of a service is plausible. The category alone does not replace the case-specific threshold assessment; record how exposure, protection, duration, recoverability, and completed mitigation change the likely harm.
The owns the reportability decision and notifications. An must inform the controller without unjustified delay and supply the information needed for the assessment and notices. Contractual escalation periods should be short enough for the controller to meet the legal clock.
Record occurrence, detection, notice, and -knowledge times separately; do not reconstruct the clock after the decision.
Contain the event without destroying evidence, identify affected systems and data flows, and preserve the reasoning behind every scope estimate.
Issue a documented no-notify decision when the cumulative threshold is not met, with a named approver and facts that would reopen the assessment.
If the threshold is met, prepare ANPD and data-subject notices in parallel with containment and remediation.
Notify the ANPD and affected data subjects within three business days from the 's knowledge that the incident affected personal data, unless specific legislation sets another period. Resolution 2/2022 gives qualifying small processing agents double time under the incident regulation. A team should confirm that status before relying on the extension.
If complete information is unavailable, submit a justified preliminary ANPD communication and supplement it within 20 business days from that communication. A preliminary filing does not complete the Article 48 duty. Data-subject notices should be direct, individual, in simple language, and sent through a customary channel where possible; indirect public notice is exceptional and must be justified.
ANPD filing: and identities, incident description, affected data and people, occurrence and knowledge dates, risks, security measures, mitigation, notices, delay reason, and contact details.
Data-subject notice: affected data categories, relevant protection measures, likely impacts, delay reason if late, mitigation already taken or planned, knowledge date, and a contact route including the encarregado when applicable.
Supplement tracker: unknown fact, owner, investigation step, expected date, 20-business-day due date, same-process filing reference, and final submission proof.
Parallel duties: record any sector regulator, contractual, law-enforcement, insurer, or cross-border notification separately; an ANPD filing does not replace another applicable duty.
Resolution 15/2024 requires the to keep a record of security incidents involving personal data for at least five years, including incidents that were not communicated. The record should let a reviewer reproduce the threshold decision, clock calculation, notices, mitigation, and follow-up without relying on memory.
Close the incident only after containment and recovery are verified, required communications and supplements are complete, corrective actions have owners and dates, and the records whether the RIPD, processing inventory, contracts, security measures, retention rules, or data-subject guidance must change.
Record why encryption, anonymization, containment, or another control did or did not reduce relevant risk; naming a control is not enough.
For a non-reportable event, retain the missing threshold element, supporting facts, approver, and reopening trigger. For a reportable event, retain the three-business-day calculation from knowledge and explain any delay.
Test the escalation path and notice templates after material system, vendor, or contact-channel changes.
Reopen the assessment if later forensics expand the people, data, duration, or harm involved.