What should teams do about Legitimate Interest Balancing under the Brazil LGPD?
Begin with an eligibility gate. Do not use this basis for sensitive personal data under Article 11. Identify whether the interest belongs to the controller or a third party, confirm that it is lawful, concrete, and linked to a specific purpose, and check whether another basis is more appropriate. A general aim such as improving business, security, or user experience is not specific enough without the actual operation and benefit.
ANPD's non-binding guide then uses three phases. Purpose asks whether the interest is legitimate and the purpose specific. Necessity asks whether the processing can achieve the purpose, whether every data item is strictly necessary, and whether a less intrusive effective alternative exists. Balancing and compare benefits with the nature of the data, source, relationship, context, , affected people, likely effects, and the ability to prevent or reduce harm.
Examples remain fact-specific. Limited first-party audience measurement using aggregate results, no cross-service combination, no profiles, short retention, and clear opt-out may be easier to justify than third-party behavioral advertising. Fraud detection may support a concrete interest, but broad indefinite monitoring of every customer or worker still requires proof of necessity and proportionate controls.
Children and adolescents require special caution because Article 14 requires their best interests. Vulnerability, employment or platform power imbalances, systematic observation, profiling, unexpected secondary use, third-party data, denial of a service, or significant effects can shift the balance. Public authorities should not use legitimate interest merely to avoid the public-sector bases and duties that fit their statutory activity.
- Purpose gate: identify the interest holder, concrete benefit, specific purpose, legality, data category, affected people, and why Article 7(IX) is appropriate.
- Necessity gate: show the processing contributes to the purpose, remove unnecessary data and recipients, compare less intrusive means, and set the shortest justified retention.
- Balance: document collection source, relationship, notice, customary context, vulnerable groups, , benefits, probabilities, severity, and effects on rights and freedoms.
- Controls and outcome: assign , explain the processing clearly, operate rights and objection routes, record the approver and conclusion, and stop or choose another basis if the balance fails.
- Reassess after a new purpose, data source, profiling logic, recipient, population, technology, retention period, complaint pattern, incident, or evidence that a safeguard does not work.
Articles 7(IX) and 10 set the legal basis, rights-and-freedoms limit, necessity rule, transparency duty, and possible impact-report request.
ANPD guidance explains the purpose, necessity, and balancing tests and the safeguards expected when legitimate interest is used.