Artifact GuideBrazilSanctions Methodology

Brazil LGPD Sanctions Methodology

ANPD Resolution 4/2023 sets the method for applying LGPD administrative sanctions and calculating the base amount of fines.

Keep evidence of the conduct, duration, affected people, harm, cooperation, recurrence, governance, corrective measures, and Brazilian revenue inputs.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 25, 2026
Questions
3

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
3

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 25, 2026
Overview

ANPD uses under Resolution 4/2023 to classify an established LGPD infringement, select a proportionate administrative sanction, and calculate a fine when one is imposed. Preserve the facts and revenue evidence that affect classification, sanction choice, aggravating and mitigating factors, and statutory limits; distinguish this process from civil liability and action by other regulators.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

3 of 3 questions
Question 1

How should teams prepare for ANPD sanctions decisions under the Brazil LGPD?

The binding framework is LGPD Articles 52 and 53, ANPD's inspection and administrative-proceeding rules, and Resolution 4/2023. Sanctions follow an administrative proceeding with due process; an investigation, finding, or maximum statutory number is not itself a final sanction.

ANPD first performs an . A medium infringement significantly affects fundamental interests and rights by impeding or limiting rights or access to services or by causing material or moral damage. A serious infringement meets that threshold plus at least one listed factor, including large scale, intent, risk to life or physical integrity, sensitive data or data on children, adolescents, or older people, absence of a legal basis, unlawful or discriminatory effects, systematic unlawful practice, or inspection obstruction. Other infringements are light.

Article 52 sanctions include a warning with a corrective deadline; simple or daily fine; public disclosure after confirmation and investigation; blocking or deletion of affected personal data; partial suspension of the database or processing activity; and partial or total prohibition of personal-data processing. Resolution 4 links the selection to gravity, nature and circumstances, data-subject rights, proportionality, recurrence, cooperation, governance, remediation, harm, advantage, good faith, and economic condition.

For a simple fine, calculate the using the classification and the Resolution's applicable revenue method, then apply its aggravating and mitigating factors and the minimum and maximum limits. The LGPD ceiling for a private legal person is two percent of prior-year revenue in Brazil, excluding taxes, limited to R$50 million per infringement; it is a ceiling, not the starting point.

Build the record as soon as an ANPD inquiry or inspection begins. Preserve the alleged conduct and legal duties, chronology, processing and affected people, scale and harm, advantage sought or obtained, intent and good faith, recurrence, cooperation, governance, remediation, economic condition, and verified Brazilian revenue inputs.

  • Case scope: identify each alleged infringement, legal provision, conduct, responsible processing agent, duration, affected operation, procedural deadline, and disputed fact.
  • Classification: map the evidence to the light, medium, or serious criteria without assuming that data sensitivity or scale alone decides every case.
  • Sanction selection: compare warning, monetary and restrictive measures against the established facts, prior measures, effects on people, proportionality, and need to correct the processing.
  • Fine calculation: retain source financial statements, taxes excluded, Brazilian entity or group perimeter, prior-year period, classification parameters, adjustments, and cap check.
  • Response: assign counsel and evidence owners, preserve due-process objections, cooperate accurately, stop continuing violations, remediate harm, and prove each completed corrective action.
Citations
Question 2

What evidence should teams keep for Sanctions Methodology under the Brazil LGPD?

Keep a traceable case file that separates facts established in the proceeding from estimates, legal positions, and disputed points. Connect every classification criterion, adjustment, corrective action, and financial input to dated evidence and the version submitted to ANPD.

  • Proceeding: notices, service dates, access records, submissions, exhibits, hearing or inspection material, decisions, appeals, payment or compliance dates, and responsible counsel.
  • Conduct: data flows, roles, purposes and bases, records, notices, contracts, controls, logs, people and data, duration, scale, intent, benefits, incidents, complaints, and effects.
  • Adjustment factors: prior final cases, cooperation chronology, good-faith evidence, governance program, policies and training, risk reviews, audit results, voluntary cessation, remediation, and measures preventing recurrence.
  • Financial record: legal entity and economic-group perimeter, Brazilian gross revenue for the relevant prior year, excluded taxes, source statements, calculation workbook, assumptions, and independent verification.
  • Corrective record: each obligation, owner, deadline, implementation proof, effectiveness test, communication to affected people, and ANPD acceptance or follow-up.
Citations
Question 3

Which mistakes create risk when handling Sanctions Methodology under the Brazil LGPD?

The headline simple fine is not automatic. ANPD must apply the administrative framework to the proven facts, and non-monetary sanctions may be more consequential to operations. Civil damages, consumer remedies, criminal questions, contractual consequences, and sector-regulator action remain legally distinct and may proceed separately.

  • Do not present the maximum simple fine as the automatic, likely, or exclusive outcome of an infringement.
  • Do not skip classification or treat a serious factor as proof without first satisfying the medium-infringement threshold.
  • Do not calculate from unverified global revenue when the applicable rule uses the defined Brazilian revenue base, excluding taxes, subject to the statutory cap and Resolution methodology.
  • Do not claim cooperation, cessation, governance, or remediation without dated proof that meets the applicable adjustment conditions.
  • Do not confuse a preventive or inspection action with a final sanction, or ANPD administrative sanctions with civil and sector-specific liability.
Citations
Primary sources

References and citations

planalto.gov.br
Referenced sections
  • Official LGPD text used to connect sanctions methodology to the Article 52 administrative-sanctions framework and related ANPD authority.
"O tratamento de dados pessoais somente poderá ser realizado nas seguintes hipóteses"
gov.br
Referenced sections
  • ANPD inspection regulation used to connect cited decisions to preventive, monitoring, and enforcement review records.
"atuação baseada, preferencialmente, na construção conjunta e dialogada de soluções"
in.gov.br
Referenced sections
  • ANPD dosimetry regulation used to support sanctions-methodology decisions, fine calculation evidence, and enforcement-risk review.
"metodologias que orientarão o cálculo do valor-base das sanções de multa"
Related guides

Explore more topics

Brazil LGPD ANPD Enforcement and Fines Guide
How ANPD investigates LGPD infringements, classifies severity, selects sanctions, calculates fines, and weighs aggravating and mitigating evidence.
Brazil LGPD Applicability Test Guide
Apply LGPD Articles 3 and 4 to a processing activity, including foreign organisations, Brazil collection, targeting, exclusions, and the evidence to retain.
Brazil LGPD Breach Notification Guide
Apply Brazil's LGPD incident notification test, three-business-day clock, notice content, phased filing, affected-person communication, and five-year records.
Brazil LGPD Checklist
An evidence-based Brazil LGPD checklist for scope, roles, legal bases, notices, rights, vendors, security incidents, transfers, retention, and governance.
Brazil LGPD Compliance Guide
Build an LGPD compliance program from processing records, legal bases, transparency, rights, security, vendors, transfers, incidents, and accountable evidence.
Brazil LGPD Controller Operator and DPO Roles Guide
Classify LGPD controller, operator, sub-operator, and encarregado roles from actual decisions, instructions, processing facts, and Resolution 18 duties.
Brazil LGPD Data Subject Rights Guide
Brazil LGPD rights guide covering confirmation, access, correction, restriction, deletion, portability, consent, sharing, objection, and automated decisions.
Brazil LGPD Deadlines and Compliance Calendar Guide
Track Brazil LGPD commencement dates, data-access responses, incident notices, international-transfer clauses, and ANPD fine-payment deadlines.
Brazil LGPD DSAR Response Template Guide
Build an LGPD data-subject response that identifies the right, applies the correct timing, records the decision, protects third parties, and proves delivery.
Brazil LGPD DSAR Workflow Guide
Run an LGPD data-subject request from intake and identity checks through rights analysis, response timing, evidence, exceptions, and escalation.
Brazil LGPD Incident Reporting to ANPD Guide
Decide whether an LGPD incident is reportable, calculate the ANPD deadline, prepare complete or staged notices, and keep the required five-year record.
Brazil LGPD Incident Workflow Guide
Run an LGPD personal-data incident from confirmation and risk assessment through three-business-day notices, supplementation, mitigation, and records.
Brazil LGPD International Transfer Mechanisms Guide
Compare LGPD international-transfer mechanisms: adequacy, ANPD standard clauses, approved specific clauses, global corporate rules, consent, and other Article 33 routes.
Brazil LGPD International Transfers Guide
Brazil LGPD international-transfer guide for identifying transfers, selecting Article 33 mechanisms, applying ANPD clauses, EU adequacy, and transparency.
Brazil LGPD Lawful Bases Guide
Compare LGPD Article 7 bases for ordinary personal data and Article 11 bases for sensitive data, with consent, necessity, evidence, and edge cases.
Brazil LGPD Legal Bases and Legitimate Interest Balancing Guide
Apply LGPD legitimate interest through purpose, necessity, balancing, reasonable expectations, safeguards, children, sensitive-data limits, and records.
Brazil LGPD Penalties and Fines Guide
Understand every ANPD administrative sanction under LGPD Article 52, the fine ceilings, non-monetary penalties, and public-body limits.
Brazil LGPD Privacy Law FAQ
Answers to common Brazil LGPD questions about scope, roles, legal bases, rights, incidents, transfers, impact reports, small agents, and enforcement.
Brazil LGPD Requirements Guide
Reference guide to Brazil LGPD scope, principles, legal bases, transparency, rights, roles, security, incidents, transfers, records, and ANPD oversight.
Brazil LGPD RIPD and DPIA Evidence Guide
Build an LGPD RIPD evidence file that proves the processing scope, high-risk screen, necessity, safeguards, residual risk, approval, and later review.
Brazil LGPD RIPD Workflow Guide
Decide when to prepare an LGPD RIPD, apply the ANPD high-risk screen, document required evidence and mitigation, approve residual risk, and review changes.
Brazil LGPD Small Processing Agents Guide
Check whether an organization qualifies for Brazil's small-processing-agent regime, which flexibilities apply, and which LGPD duties remain unchanged.
Brazil LGPD Templates Guide
Choose and maintain LGPD templates for processing records, data-subject requests, incidents, RIPDs, transfers, and controller-operator role evidence.
Brazil LGPD Transfer Workflow Guide
Classify an LGPD international transfer, confirm the processing legal basis and transfer mechanism, document onward transfers, and approve the evidence before launch.
LGPD vs CCPA: Key Differences for Privacy Teams
Compare Brazil's LGPD and California's CCPA by scope, legal bases, consumer rights, sale and sharing rules, deadlines, transfers, and enforcement.
LGPD vs GDPR: Key Differences for Privacy Teams
Compare Brazil's LGPD and the EU GDPR by scope, legal bases, roles, rights deadlines, impact assessments, incidents, transfers, and enforcement.
What should teams do about Children's Data under the Brazil LGPD?
Apply LGPD Article 14 to children's and adolescents' data: age categories, best interests, legal bases, parental consent, limited collection, notices, and evidence.
What should teams do about Controller Operator and DPO Roles under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for Controller Operator and DPO Roles, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about Cookies under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for Cookies, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about Incident Reporting To ANPD under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for Incident Reporting To ANPD, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about International Transfer Mechanisms under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for International Transfer Mechanisms, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about Legal Bases under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for Legal Bases, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about Legitimate Interest Balancing under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for Legitimate Interest Balancing, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about RIPD and DPIA under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for RIPD and DPIA, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.
What should teams do about Small Processing Agents under the Brazil LGPD?
Brazil LGPD guidance for Small Processing Agents, with practical decisions, evidence, edge cases, and external source citations.