How should teams prepare for ANPD sanctions decisions under the Brazil LGPD?
The binding framework is LGPD Articles 52 and 53, ANPD's inspection and administrative-proceeding rules, and Resolution 4/2023. Sanctions follow an administrative proceeding with due process; an investigation, finding, or maximum statutory number is not itself a final sanction.
ANPD first performs an . A medium infringement significantly affects fundamental interests and rights by impeding or limiting rights or access to services or by causing material or moral damage. A serious infringement meets that threshold plus at least one listed factor, including large scale, intent, risk to life or physical integrity, sensitive data or data on children, adolescents, or older people, absence of a legal basis, unlawful or discriminatory effects, systematic unlawful practice, or inspection obstruction. Other infringements are light.
Article 52 sanctions include a warning with a corrective deadline; simple or daily fine; public disclosure after confirmation and investigation; blocking or deletion of affected personal data; partial suspension of the database or processing activity; and partial or total prohibition of personal-data processing. Resolution 4 links the selection to gravity, nature and circumstances, data-subject rights, proportionality, recurrence, cooperation, governance, remediation, harm, advantage, good faith, and economic condition.
For a simple fine, calculate the using the classification and the Resolution's applicable revenue method, then apply its aggravating and mitigating factors and the minimum and maximum limits. The LGPD ceiling for a private legal person is two percent of prior-year revenue in Brazil, excluding taxes, limited to R$50 million per infringement; it is a ceiling, not the starting point.
Build the record as soon as an ANPD inquiry or inspection begins. Preserve the alleged conduct and legal duties, chronology, processing and affected people, scale and harm, advantage sought or obtained, intent and good faith, recurrence, cooperation, governance, remediation, economic condition, and verified Brazilian revenue inputs.
- Case scope: identify each alleged infringement, legal provision, conduct, responsible processing agent, duration, affected operation, procedural deadline, and disputed fact.
- Classification: map the evidence to the light, medium, or serious criteria without assuming that data sensitivity or scale alone decides every case.
- Sanction selection: compare warning, monetary and restrictive measures against the established facts, prior measures, effects on people, proportionality, and need to correct the processing.
- Fine calculation: retain source financial statements, taxes excluded, Brazilian entity or group perimeter, prior-year period, classification parameters, adjustments, and cap check.
- Response: assign counsel and evidence owners, preserve due-process objections, cooperate accurately, stop continuing violations, remediate harm, and prove each completed corrective action.
Official LGPD text used to connect sanctions methodology to the Article 52 administrative-sanctions framework and related ANPD authority.
ANPD dosimetry regulation used to support sanctions-methodology decisions, fine calculation evidence, and enforcement-risk review.