ChecklistEU

EU ePrivacy Directive direct-marketing consent checklist

Check each campaign against Article 13 before sending automated calls, fax, email, SMS, stored messages, or similar electronic direct-marketing communications.

Use the checklist to record channel scope, sender identity, consent proof, existing-customer soft opt-in logic, opt-out handling, suppression records, and Member State caveats.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

Article 13 is the EU starting point, but the send decision is channel-, recipient-, sender-, and country-specific. Prior consent is the baseline for automated calling systems without human intervention, fax, and used for direct marketing. The Article 13(2) soft opt-in is limited to electronic contact details obtained from customers in the context of a sale, used by the same natural or legal person for its own similar products or services, with a clear, free, easy objection opportunity at collection and in every message. National law controls other channels and the protection of legal persons.

Section 1

1. Classify the channel and message scope

Start by deciding whether the campaign uses automated calling systems without human intervention, fax, , or another unsolicited direct-marketing channel. The Directive defines electronic mail broadly enough to cover text, voice, sound, or image messages sent over a public communications network and stored until collection.

Record the product, service, audience, country coverage, sender entity, sending platform, and whether the journey also stores or accesses information on the recipient's device, such as tracking pixels, link identifiers, cookies, or app identifiers.

  • Channel: automated call, fax, email, SMS, in-app stored message, or another national-law direct-marketing channel.
  • Purpose: direct marketing only, service notice only, or mixed service-and-marketing content.
  • Recipient type: subscriber, user, existing customer, prospect, business contact, or unclear.
  • Technical access: whether the message or landing journey stores or accesses terminal-equipment information.
  • Country caveat: do not assume one EU-wide rule for channels outside Article 13(1) and 13(2); Member State law determines the consent-or-opt-out choice for other cases.
Section 2

2. Choose the lawful send route before launch

For automated calling systems without human intervention, fax, and used for direct marketing, the default Article 13 route is prior consent. Do not treat a generic privacy-policy acknowledgement, passive account creation, or pre-ticked preference as enough consent evidence.

For sent to existing customers, Article 13(2) supports a narrower route when the same sender collected the contact details in the context of a sale, markets its own similar products or services, and gave a clear, distinct, free, easy chance to object both when details were collected and in each later message.

  • Prior consent route: keep the consent text, channel, purpose, sender identity, timestamp, source form or preference center, country, and version shown to the recipient.
  • Existing-customer soft opt-in route: document how the electronic contact details were obtained from the customer in the context of a sale, confirm that the same natural or legal person collected and uses them, and show that the campaign covers that sender's own similar products or services. Check national law before deciding whether an uncompleted transaction or another borderline collection journey qualifies.
  • No route: suppress the recipient when consent proof is missing, the soft opt-in facts are incomplete, the products are not similar, the sender changed, or the contact previously objected.
  • GDPR consent quality: consent used for ePrivacy must remain freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous, and demonstrable.
Section 3

3. Make opt-out and sender identity non-negotiable

Every electronic-mail marketing message relying on the existing-customer route needs a free and easy objection path in the message. The same opt-out control should also be checked for consent-based campaigns because withdrawal must be easy and the sender needs reliable suppression evidence.

Article 13 separately prohibits direct-marketing that disguises or conceals the sender identity, lacks a valid address for stop requests, or sends recipients to websites that contravene the e-commerce information rule referenced in the Directive.

  • Sender identity: show the legal or trading sender on whose behalf the communication is made; do not hide behind the platform, agency, or group brand.
  • Stop address: include a valid address or working unsubscribe mechanism that receives requests to stop communications.
  • Opt-out cost: make refusal free of charge apart from ordinary transmission costs and easy enough for the recipient to use without account login friction.
  • Per-message check: include the opt-out opportunity on each message when the customer has not already refused.
  • Suppression action: move opt-outs, withdrawals, bounces that indicate stop requests, and manual complaints into the suppression process before the next send.
Section 4

4. Keep proof, suppression, and national-law notes

Close the checklist only when the campaign record proves the selected route for each recipient segment. The record should let a reviewer see why a send happened, why a recipient was suppressed, and which jurisdiction-specific caveat still needs local validation.

The ePrivacy Directive particularises and complements the GDPR, and Member States implement and enforce national ePrivacy rules through national law. Avoid adding country-specific rules, penalties, authority names, or limitation periods unless those facts are separately supported by an official source for the country.

  • Consent proof fields: consent statement, purpose, channel, sender, capture method, timestamp, source URL or form, locale, policy version, and withdrawal path shown.
  • Soft opt-in proof fields: sale-context record, collecting and sending natural or legal person, collection notice, initial refusal option, product-similarity rationale, and per-message objection mechanism.
  • Suppression fields: recipient identifier, reason, date received, source system, campaign affected, operator if manual, and downstream systems updated.
  • Review triggers: new sender entity, new product category, new country, new channel, new tracking technology, changed unsubscribe flow, list import, or acquisition of another customer base.
  • Country review: link the applicable national marketing rule and official authority guidance to each destination country, channel, and recipient type; hold the send decision where the governing rule is unresolved.
Primary sources

References and citations

edpb.europa.eu4 citations
Referenced sections
  • Consent-quality source for freely given, specific, informed, unambiguous, demonstrable, and withdrawable consent in ePrivacy contexts.
  • EDPB consent guidance supports the consent-quality and proof checks where Article 13 relies on consent.
  • This source helps test whether withdrawal from consent-based marketing is available and operational.
Show 1 more
  • EDPB consent guidance supports keeping records that demonstrate valid consent and operational withdrawal.
"free, specific, informed and unambiguous"
More quoted passages
"demonstrating valid consent"
"withdraw their consent easily"
"demonstrate that consent was obtained"
eur-lex.europa.eu3 citations
Referenced sections
  • Amendment source for the revised Article 13 text used to check users, prior consent, per-message objection, and identity prohibitions.
  • The 2009 amendment text confirms the updated Article 13 wording on users, prior consent, existing-customer email marketing, and opt-out opportunities.
  • The amendment text adds the prohibition on messages that encourage visits to websites contravening the referenced e-commerce information rule.
"Article 13 shall be replaced"
More quoted passages
"valid address"
eur-lex.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary source for direct-marketing consent, existing-customer electronic-mail soft opt-in, opt-out, sender identity, valid-address, and national-law caveats.
  • Articles 2(h) and 13 supply the definition of electronic mail and the channel-specific direct-marketing rule, including prior consent for automated calling systems, fax, and electronic mail.
"Unsolicited communications"
More quoted passages
"for the purposes of direct marketing"
edpb.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Technical-scope source for marketing pixels, identifiers, cookies, SDKs, and other terminal-equipment access tied to campaigns.
  • This source supports review when the marketing message or landing page includes pixels, cookies, local storage, SDKs, or other terminal-equipment access.
"storage of information"
More quoted passages
"technical scope of Art. 5(3)"
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Commission source for the broader ePrivacy framework and its relationship to modern electronic-communications privacy reform.
  • Commission material supports treating ePrivacy as the EU privacy framework for electronic communications alongside GDPR modernization work.
"online privacy"
More quoted passages
"future proof legal framework"
Show all related guides (32)

EU ePrivacy Confidentiality of Communications: Article 5 controls

Article 5 confidentiality guide for EU ePrivacy communications, traffic data, metadata, terminal-equipment access, consent limits, and GDPR interplay.

EU ePrivacy consent-log evidence workflow for cookies and trackers

Build evidence that links each cookie or tracker decision to the banner shown, the user's signal, the live technical behavior, withdrawal, and later changes.

EU ePrivacy cookie banner UX test cases

Source-backed cookie banner UX tests for Article 5(3) ePrivacy consent: reject all, pre-ticked boxes, withdrawal, cookie walls, analytics toggles, and consent evidence.

EU ePrivacy Cookie Scope Classifier Workflow

Decide whether cookies, pixels, SDKs, local storage, identifiers, and analytics fall within Article 5(3), then document consent, an exemption, or escalation.

EU ePrivacy Directive compliance calendar for cookies, consent, and marketing

Source-backed ePrivacy calendar covering Directive milestones, Article 5(3) cookie reviews, consent evidence, direct marketing checks, and national-law follow-up.

EU ePrivacy Directive Compliance Checklist

A concrete ePrivacy checklist for terminal equipment access, cookie consent, exemptions, banner UX, direct marketing, confidentiality, GDPR interplay, and evidence records.

EU ePrivacy Directive Compliance Guide for Cookies, Marketing, and Communications

Practical ePrivacy Directive compliance checks for terminal equipment, communications confidentiality, cookie consent, exemptions, direct marketing, evidence, and national-law caveats.

EU ePrivacy Directive Cookies and Consent: Article 5(3), exemptions, and banner evidence

Cookie consent guide for the EU ePrivacy Directive: Article 5(3) scope, strictly necessary and transmission exemptions, consent UX, withdrawal, logs, analytics caveats, and GDPR interplay.

EU ePrivacy Directive direct marketing rules for electronic mail

Source-backed guide to Article 13 ePrivacy Directive rules for electronic mail marketing, prior consent, customer soft opt-in, opt-out handling, sender identity, and Member State caveats.

EU ePrivacy Directive Enforcement and Fines

Source-backed guide to ePrivacy Directive enforcement, national penalties, competent authorities, GDPR interplay, cookie-banner risk, and evidence limits.

EU ePrivacy Directive FAQ: cookies, consent, marketing, GDPR interplay

Answers to recurring EU ePrivacy Directive questions on Article 5(3), terminal-equipment access, cookie consent, exemptions, analytics, direct marketing, GDPR interplay, national enforcement, and evidence.

EU ePrivacy Directive Member State Cookie Rules

How to evidence EU ePrivacy cookie compliance when Article 5(3) is implemented through Member State law and national authority practice.

EU ePrivacy Directive Metadata and Location Data Guide

Source-backed guide to EU ePrivacy Directive rules for traffic data, location data, anonymisation, consent, value-added services, Article 5(3) overlap, and national-law limits.

EU ePrivacy Directive penalties and fines: national enforcement caveats

Source-backed guide to ePrivacy Directive penalty exposure, national transposition caveats, cookie enforcement evidence, consent defects, and GDPR overlap limits.

EU ePrivacy Directive Requirements: cookies, communications and marketing

Source-backed map of EU ePrivacy Directive requirements for communications confidentiality, terminal-equipment access, consent, traffic and location data, and direct marketing.

EU ePrivacy Directive vs GDPR: cookies, communications, marketing, and evidence

Compare the EU ePrivacy Directive and GDPR by trigger, consent standard, lex specialis overlap, enforcement caveats, and evidence outputs for cookies, device access, communications, and marketing.

EU ePrivacy Directive vs UK PECR: cookies and direct marketing

Compare the EU ePrivacy Directive with current UK PECR rules for device storage and access, statutory exceptions, consent, electronic-mail marketing, soft opt-ins, and enforcement.

EU ePrivacy soft opt-in marketing checklist

Source-backed checklist for using the EU ePrivacy Directive soft opt-in exception for customer email marketing, opt-outs, sender identity, suppression records, and national-law caveats.

EU ePrivacy soft opt-in marketing review workflow

Decide whether an electronic-mail marketing audience meets every Article 13 soft opt-in condition, or must be suppressed or supported by valid prior consent.

EU ePrivacy Strictly Necessary Cookie Exemptions

Source-backed guide to the Article 5(3) ePrivacy exemptions for transmission cookies, requested-service cookies, analytics caveats, evidence, and national-law checks.

Are cookie walls allowed under the EU ePrivacy Directive?

FAQ answer on cookie walls under the EU ePrivacy Directive, covering freely given consent, refusal and withdrawal paths, banner evidence, and national-law caveats.

Do Analytics Cookies Require Consent under the EU ePrivacy Directive?

FAQ answer on analytics cookies under Article 5(3) ePrivacy, limited analytics exemptions, configuration evidence, consent logs, and national-law caveats.

EU ePrivacy soft opt-in FAQ for email marketing

When Article 13(2) soft opt-in can support EU customer email marketing, including existing-customer, similar-offer, opt-out, sender-identity, suppression-list, and national-law checks.

Is a reject-all button required for EU ePrivacy cookie consent?

Standalone FAQ answer on EU ePrivacy reject-all and refuse options for cookie banners, including equal prominence, deceptive UX, consent evidence, withdrawal, and national-law caveats.

Strictly Necessary Cookies under the EU ePrivacy Directive

FAQ answer on when EU ePrivacy Article 5(3) allows cookies without consent, with cited examples, analytics caveats, evidence records, and national-law cautions.

What should CMP consent logs retain under the EU ePrivacy Directive?

FAQ answer on CMP consent logs for EU ePrivacy cookie consent: retained fields, consent validity signals, banner versioning, refusal and withdrawal events, proof limits, and national-law caveats.