| Scope and covered activity | ISO/IEC 27035 structures information security incident management from preparation and detection through response and lessons learned. | NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 is incident response guidance focused on cybersecurity incident preparation, coordination, analysis, and improvement. | Choose ISO/IEC 27035 when the question is how to build and run an information security incident management process. Choose NIST SP 800-61 when the question is how to apply cybersecurity incident response recommendations inside a CSF 2.0 risk-management program. |
|---|
| Who must act | ISO/IEC 27035 ownership should sit with incident management leadership, the Incident Management Team, Incident Response Team, security operations, risk owners, and managers who can approve lessons learned. | NIST SP 800-61 ownership should map to incident response leadership, incident handlers, technology professionals, legal, public affairs, asset owners, and contracted response providers where they support the response. | Assign the people who actually operate the process. Use ISO/IEC 27035 to define management-system ownership and NIST SP 800-61 to document operational response participants and third parties. |
|---|
| Trigger or threshold | ISO/IEC 27035 work is triggered by scope definition, implementation, certification readiness, customer assurance, control gaps, incidents, supplier changes, or management review. | NIST SP 800-61 work is triggered by its own legal, assurance, framework, contract, customer, or risk-management event. | Use the trigger to route intake: standards implementation, regulatory response, assurance report, framework mapping, customer request, or operational remediation. |
|---|
| Core obligations | ISO/IEC 27035 requires practical governance: scope, roles, risk or impact decisions, evidence, operating cadence, monitoring, review, and improvement. | NIST SP 800-61 organizes incident response as cybersecurity risk management guidance within the CSF 2.0 community profile, including preparation, detection, response, recovery, and lessons learned. | Use ISO/IEC 27035 for the management-system backbone: policy, roles, process, records, and review. Use NIST SP 800-61 for incident-response recommendations that fit a CSF 2.0 based risk-management model. |
|---|
| Evidence and records | ISO/IEC 27035 evidence should show the process operating: owners, decisions, registers, control records, test results, review minutes, audit samples, or corrective actions. | NIST SP 800-61 evidence should match its own proof model, such as incident logs, triage notes, notifications, response tickets, recovery records, retained logs, and lessons-learned outputs. | Build an evidence matrix with one row per claim and columns for source, owner, artifact, date, review trigger, and reuse permission. Keep incident records separate when the source, owner, or review rule differs. |
|---|
| Timing and cadence | ISO/IEC 27035 timing follows implementation, audit, certification, review, supplier, incident, or change cycles rather than a single universal deadline. | NIST SP 800-61 timing follows the legal effective date, assurance period, framework version, contract milestone, or publication lifecycle that applies to that side. | Track dates separately so an ISO review cycle does not get mistaken for a statutory deadline or assurance reporting period. |
|---|
| Enforcement or assurance route | ISO/IEC 27035 is usually tested through certification audits, internal audits, customer assurance, management review, or governance review, depending on how the organization adopts it. | NIST SP 800-61 may be enforced, audited, attested, assessed, or used voluntarily depending on whether it is law, assurance criteria, a framework, or guidance. | Separate audit readiness from legal compliance and from voluntary framework maturity so executives see the actual consequence of gaps. |
|---|
| Overlap and reuse | ISO/IEC 27035 can supply reusable management-system evidence, control operation records, risk decisions, and review outputs. | NIST SP 800-61 can reuse some of that evidence when the control, process, risk, or duty is genuinely the same. | Reuse evidence only after checking scope, actor, date, data type, service, supplier, and acceptance criteria; otherwise keep separate records. |
|---|
| Practical decision rule | Use ISO/IEC 27035 when the main work is building, operating, reviewing, or proving a management-system or standards-based control process. | Use NIST SP 800-61 when the main work is satisfying that side's law, assurance route, framework outcome, risk method, or external reporting expectation. | If both apply, keep the primary obligation visible and use the other side as supporting structure, not as a substitute source. |
|---|