Practical toolGlobalISO/IEC 27035

ISO/IEC 27035 Evidence Log Template

Use an ISO/IEC 27035-aligned incident log to preserve facts, decisions, actions, communications, evidence references, and chain-of-custody information.

ISO/IEC 27035 is voluntary guidance, not a law or standalone certification scheme. Adapt it to the incident and apply separate legal, regulatory, contractual, and ISO/IEC 27001 requirements where relevant.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Sections
5

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
4

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

Use the as the chronological record from detection through resolution. Keep raw security telemetry, forensic reports, and evidence items in their approved repositories and link them by stable identifier. Each log entry should say who observed, decided, did, approved, or communicated what and when.

Section 1

What should the ISO/IEC 27035 evidence log capture?

Give the incident a stable identifier and identify the log owner, access classification, time zone, and system of record. Capture the original event report, detection and reporting times, validation, incident decision, category, severity, affected assets and services, coordinator, assigned responders, hypotheses, decisions, actions, results, communications, evidence references, recovery checks, conclusion, and follow-up owners.

Use one append-only chronology. Each entry should contain an entry identifier, timestamp and time source, author or system, entry type, factual description, confidence or uncertainty where relevant, related asset or service, decision or action owner, approval, result, and links to supporting records. Preserve original timestamps and separate observed facts from assumptions and later corrections.

The event report should capture when, what, how, and, if known, why the event occurred; the reporter; initial affected components; business impact; and any identified vulnerability. If the event becomes an incident, add the incident category, affected information, hardware, software, communications, documentation, or processes; recovery cost where the organization tracks it; actions taken, planned, and outstanding; internal and external notifications; resolution; and conclusion. Mark unknown fields as unknown rather than guessing.

  • Entry types: report, observation, hypothesis, assessment, decision, approval, action, result, handoff, communication, evidence reference, recovery check, correction, and closure.
  • Decision entry: current facts and uncertainty, options considered where material, selected action, authority, approver, expected effect, evidence or operational risk, and next checkpoint.
  • Correction entry: identify the earlier entry, retain its original text, state the correction and reason, name the author, and add the correction time.
Recommended next step

Control the incident chronology and evidence references

Keep an append-only incident chronology, reference protected evidence by stable identifier, control access and custody, and close with traceable follow-up and retention decisions.

Section 2

How should potential digital evidence be referenced?

Create a separate evidence item record for material collected files, exports, images, devices, memory captures, logs, malware samples, or other potential digital evidence. The incident log should reference the evidence identifier and relevant action, not duplicate the evidence or expose sensitive content to every log reader.

For each item, record what it is, its source and owner, who identified or collected it, collection or acquisition method, date and time, tool and version where relevant, integrity information, storage location, access restriction, transfers, analysis copies, and disposition. Apply the organization's investigation and evidence procedures; ISO/IEC 27037 gives more detailed guidance for identifying, collecting, acquiring, and preserving potential digital evidence.

  • Before changing a compromised system, record the proposed action and collect necessary volatile or other information when feasible, safe, authorized, and required by the investigation plan.
  • For every transfer, record the sender, recipient, time, purpose, method, item condition, and acknowledgment so custody can be reconstructed.
  • A hash or other integrity value can support later comparison, but it does not by itself establish lawful collection, complete custody, relevance, authenticity, or admissibility.
Section 3

Who maintains the log and how should access work?

The incident coordinator is accountable for a complete management record, but responders, monitoring teams, service owners, communications staff, suppliers, and specialists should enter or supply records for their own work. Identify an evidence custodian when potential evidence needs controlled handling. Define alternates so logging continues across shifts and absences.

Restrict access by role and incident sensitivity. Protect personal data, credentials, vulnerabilities, legal advice, investigation material, supplier information, and other sensitive content. Give responders enough access to act, while using references or separated restricted records when broad disclosure would create risk.

  • At shift handoff, confirm current severity and scope, open hypotheses, completed and pending actions, evidence status, communications, deadlines, risks, authorities, and next checkpoint.
  • Record access and material exports when required by the organization's policy or investigation procedure.
  • Keep the authoritative log centrally managed; if offline notes are necessary, import them with their original authors and times and retain the reconciliation record.
Section 4

What mistakes weaken the record?

A weak log mixes facts, assumptions, actions, and later conclusions in one rewritten narrative. That prevents a reviewer from seeing what responders knew at a decision point. Preserve the chronology, identify the source of each material fact, append corrections, and record why the team changed course.

Another failure is treating the log as the evidence repository. Pasting credentials, personal data, malware, or large raw exports into the chronology can increase access and integrity risks. Store protected material in the approved location and reference it by stable identifier.

  • Do not use vague entries such as 'issue fixed'; identify the actor, action, target, time, result, validation, and evidence.
  • Do not let chat messages or meeting calls become the only record of decisions; add an attributed log entry and link the source where retained.
  • Do not silently normalize conflicting timestamps; retain each source, time zone, precision, offset, and reconciliation.
  • Do not claim chain of custody when transfers, access, integrity, or disposition cannot be reconstructed; state the gap and escalate it.
Section 5

How should the log close, retain records, and support lessons learned?

At conclusion, record the closure authority, recovery acceptance, final severity and scope, required reports and their status, evidence disposition, continuing monitoring, unresolved risk, corrective-action owners, and final-report location. Lock or otherwise protect the completed chronology according to the organization's record-control procedure while allowing traceable supplements.

Set retention and disposition from applicable law, regulation, contracts, litigation or investigation holds, privacy requirements, and organizational policy. ISO/IEC 27035 does not prescribe one universal retention period. Restrict lessons-learned extracts to the information needed for improvement, awareness, metrics, or management review.

  • Review whether the log captured detection, assessment, authority, response, reporting, recovery, handoffs, and evidence handling without unexplained gaps.
  • Track accepted improvements to owners, due dates, and verification; update the template when repeated gaps show that a field or workflow is unclear.
  • Test the template in exercises, including offline operation, shift change, supplier input, restricted evidence, timestamp conflict, and later correction.
Primary sources

References and citations

iso.org
Referenced sections
  • Part 1 calls for consistent documentation throughout incident handling and date-and-time records for actions and decisions.
iso.org
Referenced sections
  • Part 2 covers identifying and making improvements and evaluating the incident response team during lessons learned.
iso.org
Referenced sections
  • Part 3 covers conclusion, reporting, evidence preservation, and the ICT response records that support later review.
iso.org
Referenced sections
  • Official ISO page for guidance on identification, collection, acquisition, and preservation of potential digital evidence; ISO currently lists the edition as published and at the close-of-review stage.
Related guides

Explore more topics

ISO/IEC 27035 Compliance Guide
Understand what the ISO/IEC 27035 series covers, how its three published parts fit together, and how to adopt the guidance without mistaking it for a law or certification scheme.
ISO/IEC 27035 CSIRT Roles FAQ
Assign ISO/IEC 27035 incident coordinator, IMT, IRT or CSIRT, point-of-contact, evidence, communications, and business decision roles.
ISO/IEC 27035 Escalation FAQ
Define ISO/IEC 27035 escalation and elevation triggers, authorities, handoff evidence, and reassessment rules before incidents occur.
ISO/IEC 27035 Event vs Incident FAQ
Distinguish an information security event from an incident under ISO/IEC 27035 and record the assessment without discarding useful event evidence.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Lifecycle Guide
Follow the ISO/IEC 27035 five-phase incident-management process and understand how the detailed ICT response loop fits inside it.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Lifecycle Workflow
Turn the ISO/IEC 27035 lifecycle into an operational workflow with explicit decisions, handoffs, owners, evidence, and reopening triggers.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Management FAQ
Plain-language ISO/IEC 27035 answers on events, incidents, roles, severity, escalation, evidence, notification, retention, review, and lessons learned.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Response Playbook
Build ISO/IEC 27035-aligned playbooks that guide detection, triage, analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, reporting, and evidence preservation.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Severity and Escalation Matrix
Design an ISO/IEC 27035-aligned severity and escalation matrix using impact, priority, damage, urgency, recoverability, and reporting triggers.
ISO/IEC 27035 Incident Timer Workflow
Create an incident clock that tracks operational checkpoints and separate legal or contractual deadlines without inventing ISO/IEC 27035 time limits.
ISO/IEC 27035 Lessons Learned FAQ
Apply ISO/IEC 27035 lessons learned to plans, controls, risk decisions, training, relationships, metrics, and future response capability.
ISO/IEC 27035 Notification Evidence FAQ
Preserve evidence for internal and external incident notifications without attributing legal deadlines or reporting duties to ISO/IEC 27035.
ISO/IEC 27035 Notification Threshold Mapping Guide
Map ISO/IEC 27035 incident reporting routes to separate legal, contractual, customer, supplier, insurer, and internal notification thresholds.
ISO/IEC 27035 Post Incident Review FAQ
Run an ISO/IEC 27035 post-incident review after stabilization and recovery, then assign measurable improvements without losing accountability.
ISO/IEC 27035 Retained Logs FAQ
Retain ISO/IEC 27035 incident logs and digital evidence according to purpose, investigation needs, law, contracts, privacy, and organizational policy.
ISO/IEC 27035 Severity Classification FAQ
Classify incident severity under ISO/IEC 27035 using organization-specific criteria and reassess it as facts, impact, and recoverability change.
ISO/IEC 27035 vs ISO 22301 Comparison
Compare ISO/IEC 27035 incident-management guidance with ISO 22301 business continuity management-system requirements and certification scope.
ISO/IEC 27035 vs NIS2 Comparison
Compare voluntary ISO/IEC 27035 incident-management guidance with binding NIS2 duties for in-scope EU entities and national implementation.
ISO/IEC 27035 vs NIST SP 800-61 Comparison
Compare ISO/IEC 27035 with the current NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 while preserving this legacy route for visitors using the older publication name.
ISO/IEC 27035 vs NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 Comparison
Compare the ISO/IEC 27035 series with NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 incident-response guidance and show how organizations can use both.