Search every question across sub-FAQs

Directive 2011/65/EU defines cables as cables rated below 250 V that connect EEE to an electrical outlet or connect two or more EEE to each other. That definition should not be stretched to every product called a cable. Commission RoHS FAQ guidance separately treats cables used to transfer electrical currents or electromagnetic fields as EEE unless they specifically belong to EEE or a combination of EEE outside RoHS scope.

This means a cable scope decision should start with the cable's function and market placement. A power cord, HDMI cable, network cable, cable reel, or cable supplied with equipment may have different evidence and conformity-documentation consequences even when the same restricted-substance limits apply at material level.

The Commission FAQ draws a clear distinction between internal wires, permanently attached cables, external cables supplied with EEE, and external cables sold separately. Internal wiring in in-scope EEE must meet the RoHS material restrictions like the rest of the equipment, but it is not treated as a separately CE-marked cable product.

External cables that are sold together with, marketed for, or shipped for use with an EEE follow the technical requirements of that EEE. Separately placed external cables are treated differently because the cable itself is the product being placed on the market.

Cable evidence should prove both the scope decision and the substance-compliance decision. For scope, keep the rated voltage, connection function, whether the cable transfers electrical current or electromagnetic fields, whether it is optical, whether it is internal or external, and whether it is supplied with or separately placed on the market from the host EEE.

For substance compliance, keep material-level evidence because RoHS maximum concentration values apply by homogeneous material. A cable record should therefore separate insulation, jacket, copper conductor, solder, plating, connectors, flame-retardant polymers, and any other separable material or component that affects the restricted-substance assessment.

A useful cable record states how the cable is placed on the market. A generic supplier RoHS statement does not answer whether the cable is internal, attached, supplied with the EEE, sold separately, optical, tied to excluded equipment, or covered by the host product's DoC.

The other common gap is testing at the wrong level. RoHS limits are assessed at homogeneous-material level, so a whole-cable statement should still be traceable to material declarations, supplier evidence, exemptions, or risk-based tests for the separable materials that make up the cable.

Yes, when the component is used in finished EEE or as a spare part for in-scope EEE, unless a specific Article 4, Annex II, Annex III, or Annex IV provision applies. Directive 2011/65/EU requires EEE placed on the Union market, including cables and spare parts for repair, reuse, updating, or capacity upgrades, not to contain the restricted substances above the Annex II maximum concentration values in homogeneous materials.

The practical consequence is component-level evidence rather than a separate RoHS label on every part. The Commission RoHS FAQ explains that finished EEE can meet RoHS substance requirements only if its components and parts meet the substance restrictions, including non-electronic parts such as fasteners or plastic enclosures. The finished-EEE manufacturer must decide whether the supplier evidence is specific, current, and adequate for the product's technical documentation.

RoHS CE marking is tied to finished EEE. Directive 2011/65/EU requires the CE marking to be affixed visibly, legibly, and indelibly to the finished EEE or, where that is not possible, to the packaging and accompanying documents.

The Commission FAQ states that components used in finished EEE or for repair or upgrade of in-scope EEE must meet Article 4 substance restrictions but do not need RoHS CE marking. That substance rule is subject to the dated spare-part provisions in Article 4(4), Article 4(5), and Annex II, as well as applicable Annex III or Annex IV exemptions. Spare parts that are not finished EEE also do not need a RoHS declaration of conformity or CE mark. If an item independently meets the EEE definition and is placed on the market as a finished product for the end user, assess that item as EEE even if the supply chain calls it a component.

Start with the restricted substances and the material breakdown. Annex II sets maximum concentration values by weight in homogeneous materials: lead, mercury, hexavalent chromium, PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, and DIBP at 0.1%, and cadmium at 0.01%. The Commission FAQ gives practical examples of homogeneous materials such as a plastic cover, copper wire inside a cable, and the solder part of a solder joint.

Then decide whether supplier evidence is enough or whether risk-based testing is needed. EN IEC 63000:2018 is the harmonised standard listed for technical documentation assessing electrical and electronic products with respect to restricted substances; the IEC 62321 series provides test and sample-preparation methods often used when declarations need analytical support.

A component that depends on an exemption should not be treated as permanently compliant. Directive 2011/65/EU allows materials and components of EEE to be included in Annex III or IV for specific applications only when the Article 5 conditions are met, and exemption validity periods are limited and renewable.

The Commission implementation page confirms that exemption renewals must be submitted no later than 18 months before expiry and that existing exemptions with renewal requests remain valid until the Commission decides. Component records should therefore track the specific exemption text, application, EEE category, renewal status, and any planned substitute material or design.

Supplier declarations are useful when they identify the exact part, material, supplier, revision, restricted-substance scope, and date. They should support the manufacturer technical documentation required by RoHS, not replace the manufacturer decision.

A declaration is strongest when it can be tied to a BOM line, homogeneous-material assessment, IEC 62474-style material declaration, exemption claim if any, and the EU declaration of conformity. It is weak when it is only a broad marketing statement, an expired certificate, or a generic "RoHS compliant" label with no product identity.

Add testing when declarations do not give enough confidence for the risk. Common triggers include missing supplier data, unverified high-risk materials, a new or changed supplier, a design or material change, inconsistent documents, an exemption boundary, or a request from a customer, importer, or market-surveillance authority.

RoHS limits are assessed at homogeneous-material level. Lab work should start with sample selection and preparation, then use the IEC 62321 method that matches the substance and material. IEC 62321-3-1:2026 uses XRF to screen for lead, mercury, cadmium, total chromium, total bromine, and other elemental indicators in uniform materials. Total chromium does not identify hexavalent chromium, and total bromine does not identify PBB or PBDE, so a screening result can require a substance-specific follow-up method.

The record should let a reviewer reproduce the decision without interviewing the project team. It should state the EEE, BOM or material population, supplier evidence reviewed, RoHS restricted substances and homogeneous-material limits considered, exemption assumptions, test method if used, owner, date, and review trigger.

Avoid a binary "declarations or tests" policy. Most RoHS files use both: declarations for broad supply-chain coverage and targeted tests for higher-risk materials, weak evidence, or unresolved questions.

The most common mistake is treating a certificate as a conclusion without checking what it actually covers. A supplier document may cover a part number, a material family, a manufacturing site, or only some substances. A lab report may cover one tested sample, not every future lot or supplier change.

Another mistake is testing the wrong layer. RoHS maximum concentration values apply by weight in homogeneous materials, so the sampling plan matters as much as the analytical method. Screening also has chemical-form limits: an elemental XRF result is not automatically a result for hexavalent chromium, PBB, or PBDE.

Start from the restriction, then document the exception. Annex II lists lead and mercury at 0.1% by weight in homogeneous materials and cadmium at 0.01%. Article 4 says those limits do not apply to applications listed in Annex III or Annex IV, so an exemption record must prove that the product's use matches a specific listed application.

Avoid documenting exemptions as broad product permissions. The Commission RoHS FAQ explains that exemptions are granted for specific substances used in specific applications, not for a company or for a whole piece of EEE. A useful record therefore identifies the substance, material, component, product category, and Annex wording that supports the exception.

Do not make an unsourced current-status table for lead, mercury, or cadmium exemptions. Annex entries are technical and time-limited, and many include category-specific expiry dates, scope limits, spare-parts wording, amount limits, or renewal effects. Check the current consolidated Directive because amendments that applied from 1 July 2026 changed several Annex III lead entries. Keep the official source URL and the date checked with the exemption record.

The documentation fields differ because the Annex entries differ. Mercury lamp exemptions often use per-lamp or per-burner milligram limits and specific lamp technologies. Lead entries include alloys, solders, glasses, ceramics, coatings, bearings, and application-specific electronic components. Cadmium entries include electrical contacts, optical or filter glass uses, printing inks, thick film pastes, quantum dots, and specialized measurement or monitoring uses.

Use those examples as a cue for record structure, not as a substitute for checking the exact entry. The record should distinguish an entry that is currently applicable, an existing entry kept valid by a submitted renewal request, and a new exemption request that has not yet been granted. Only the first two can support continued reliance.

A supplier statement that says only 'mercury exempt for fluorescent lamp' cannot support release. Annex III contains technology-specific lamp entries, amount limits and dates rather than one lighting exemption. The reviewer must open the official consolidated Annex applicable to the planned release date, identify the exact entry and sub-entry, and match the marketed lamp to every condition in that wording.

For a replacement lamp, record whether it is single-capped or double-capped, its phosphor or other stated technology, rated power and lifetime conditions, the mercury amount per lamp or burner, the EEE category and the entry's expiry or renewal status. Then check whether the lamp is sold as finished EEE, supplied with new EEE, or supplied as a spare part for older equipment. Those facts can change the applicable product and date analysis even when the lamp has the same base and shape.