- The guide explains practical technical-documentation contents and says evidence of compliance includes a dated list of harmonised standards and results obtained from applying them.
"a dated list of the European harmonised standards"
This workflow is relevant when an apparatus EMC assessment depends on which harmonised standards, amendments, corrigenda, or alternative technical specifications support the EU Declaration of Conformity.
The output should show OJEU status, essential-requirement coverage, transition or withdrawal risk, deviations, test evidence, and technical documentation links.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
Under Directive 2014/30/EU, OJEU-cited EMC harmonised standards can give a presumption of conformity only for the essential requirements covered by those standards or parts of standards. Start with the apparatus and electromagnetic environment, then record why each selected standard applies, whether it is still cited for the intended placing-on-the-market decision, and what evidence fills any uncovered or deviated requirement.
Start with the apparatus model, intended use, configurations, ports, power supply, accessories, installation environment, and EU acts that may be more specific than the EMC Directive for the same requirement. The EMC Directive requires the EMC assessment to consider relevant phenomena and normal intended operating conditions, including representative configurations identified by the manufacturer.
Record whether the product is being assessed as apparatus or as part of a fixed installation. This workflow is for apparatus standard selection; fixed installations rely on documented good engineering practices rather than the same CE-marked apparatus route.
When harmonised standards are used, select them in the order described by the Commission EMC guide: product-specific standards first, then product-family standards, then generic standards. Generic standards can be useful when no product-specific or product-family standard covers the apparatus, but they do not by themselves explain all product-specific operating and loading conditions.
For each candidate, record what it covers: emissions, immunity, conducted disturbance, radiated disturbance, transient phenomena, ports, operating modes, loading, and environment. Do not assume a single standard covers the whole Annex I essential-requirement case.
For each selected standard, check the OJEU reference under the EMC Directive, including amendments and corrigenda that form part of the cited reference, and note any withdrawal date for a superseded reference. The Commission states that the 13 July 2018 communication and the later implementing decisions must be read together because later decisions can add, modify, or withdraw references.
Use the Commission summary list to find candidate references, then verify the controlling OJEU publication before the release decision. The Commission labels the summary as informational, warns that it may contain errors or be incomplete at a given time, and states that the summary itself has no legal effect. Use transition or withdrawal dates only when the OJEU publication supports them.
The mapping should connect each selected standard to the EMC Directive Annex I requirement it covers. The Commission guide explains that each harmonised standard identifies the corresponding essential requirements in an annex, commonly called Annex ZZ. Use that mapping rather than treating a test pass as blanket conformity for the product.
If the chosen standards do not cover a phenomenon, operating mode, configuration, frequency range, installation environment, or intended use, add a residual-risk row. The row should explain the additional assessment, other technical specification, design control, calculation, comparison, or test evidence used to demonstrate the essential requirement.
Where a manufacturer deviates from the method in a harmonised standard, skips a test, uses comparison with similar apparatus, or relies on design precautions, the technical documentation should explain the deviation and how the essential requirements are still met. The Commission guide treats deviations as a manufacturer responsibility and warns that they carry risk.
A deviation record should be reviewed before the Declaration of Conformity is signed, because the declaration takes responsibility for the apparatus and should not imply full harmonised-standard coverage where the evidence is actually partial or based on another method.
The release output should be a technical-file pack, not a detached standards spreadsheet. The EMC Directive and Commission guide require technical documentation that makes conformity assessable, including product identification, design information, applied harmonised standards, alternative solutions where standards are not applied, examination results, and test reports.
The Declaration of Conformity should use dated references for the harmonised standards or other technical specifications in relation to which conformity is declared. Keep the DoC aligned with the technical documentation: if a standard is applied only in part, the record should not present it as full coverage.
Use the standards register, OJEU check, essential-requirement matrix, deviation log, and test reports together before signing or updating the EU Declaration of Conformity.
Ask cited EMC Directive questions about scope, standards, conformity assessment, and documentation.
Review product scope, OJEU status, standards coverage, deviations, test evidence, and technical-file outputs.
"a dated list of the European harmonised standards"
"defer the withdrawal"
"for 10 years after the apparatus"
"They need to be read together"