| Scope boundary | Is the product equipment, apparatus, or a fixed installation whose electromagnetic emissions or immunity must be assessed under Directive 2014/30/EU? | Is the product machinery or a machinery-related product that needs machinery safety conformity work for hazards and safety functions? | Start with both questions for electrically controlled machinery. A yes on the machinery side does not automatically answer the EMC side, and a passed EMC assessment does not close the machinery safety file. |
|---|
| Covered actors | EMC covers electromagnetic disturbance generated by equipment and immunity to disturbance expected in intended use. | Machinery safety work covers safety hazards and safety functions. If electromagnetic disturbance can create a hazardous machine condition, EMC evidence should feed that safety case. | Label each test or analysis by the claim it supports: EMC conformity, machinery safety, or both. Do not let one test report silently stand in for the other evidence set. |
|---|
| Trigger | EMC evidence normally starts with relevant electromagnetic phenomena, intended operating environments, representative configurations, harmonised standards, and any technical justification where standards are not used or are only partly used. | Machinery evidence should start with the machine boundary, intended use, foreseeable safety risks, safety functions, instructions, and the machinery standards or specifications used for those safety requirements. | Run the analyses together only where useful for engineering, but record the outputs separately so a reviewer can see which law each method satisfies. |
|---|
| Core obligations | The EMC technical file should show the apparatus description, design and operation information, requirements applied, standards used in full or part, other technical specifications, risk analysis, and evidence that emissions and immunity requirements are met. | The machinery file should show the machinery safety evidence and may cross-reference EMC reports only where they support a machinery safety claim, such as a control function's immunity to disturbance. | Use a shared index if helpful, but tag every document to EMC, machinery, or both. A shared folder is not the same as a shared legal basis. |
|---|
| Evidence record | For EMC apparatus, the manufacturer draws up the EU declaration of conformity, keeps it with the technical documentation, and affixes CE marking when applicable EMC requirements are satisfied. | For machinery, CE marking and declaration claims must reflect the machinery conformity route as well as any other applicable Union acts. | One EU declaration can cover multiple Union acts, but it must identify the acts concerned. Do not list the EMC Directive unless the EMC conformity case is complete. |
|---|
| Standards coverage | EMC standards support disturbance and immunity claims only for the essential requirements and phenomena they cover. | Machinery standards support machinery safety claims. They do not automatically prove EMC unless they also cover the relevant EMC requirement through the appropriate EMC basis. | Check the standards annexes and OJEU references before reusing a standards list across both columns. |
|---|
| Fixed installations and installed machinery | A fixed installation is assembled and intended for permanent use at a predefined location. It has EMC essential requirements, but fixed installations are not subject to CE marking or an EU declaration under the EMC Directive. | Installed machinery may still need machinery safety documentation for the machine or installation context. The EMC fixed-installation treatment should not be mistaken for a machinery CE marking answer. | For plant, production lines, and large installed systems, separate the EMC status of the fixed installation from the CE status of any apparatus or machinery placed on the market. |
|---|
| Overlap and reuse | Is the product equipment, apparatus, or a fixed installation whose electromagnetic emissions or immunity must be assessed under Directive 2014/30/EU? | Is the product machinery or a machinery-related product that needs machinery safety conformity work for hazards and safety functions? | Start with both questions for electrically controlled machinery. A yes on the machinery side does not automatically answer the EMC side, and a passed EMC assessment does not close the machinery safety file. |
|---|
| Practical decision rule | Is the product equipment, apparatus, or a fixed installation whose electromagnetic emissions or immunity must be assessed under Directive 2014/30/EU? | Is the product machinery or a machinery-related product that needs machinery safety conformity work for hazards and safety functions? | Start with both questions for electrically controlled machinery. A yes on the machinery side does not automatically answer the EMC side, and a passed EMC assessment does not close the machinery safety file. |
|---|